Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Conundrum wrote:

Next year in 7th grade it will all make sense to you.

6th grade Sam wrote:

You really don't get much of what is going on around you, do you?

0/10

Grow up, child.

You sound like you are trying to be everyone's mommy here.

Hate to break it to you but you're really not. And your attempts make you look terribly pathetic.

Maybe you could try to post something of substance and leave the mommy stuff for your family (if you even have one).

I would be massively surprised if trump won a re-do today. He lost a lot of support among independents - his approval rating in that group has fallen rom around 48 to around 40 since the inauguration. Not sure what it was on election day. That alone would throw the election to HRC. Plus look at the massive increase in Dem activity and success - in the special elections the Dems have been punching way, way over their weight. I'm sure the same thing would happen in a redone presidential election and the 70,000 vote lead that gave trump the win would evaporate.

actual approval rate change among indies since the inaug: 42 down to 35. Doesnt' change my argument.

So the Trumpettes would be more likely to support impeachment than staying home from voting next time? No way.

Impeachment just isn't going to happen. A Trump loss in 2020 may.

I don't want to pick on this poster but I mentioned how emotions can reduce the ability of using reason to mitigate the effects of cognitive dissonance reduction.This poster put much emotion and anger into his post. It would be extremely difficult for him to accept information that was contrary to his view. His emotions will trump (no pun intended) reason and he will never accept any information that he is wrong.Read through his post and you will know that I am right.

I don't know the poll numbers on independents in PA, WI, OH, etc. but yeah I could see them not voting for Trump again. The question is, would they rather vote for Hillary or Trump? You are right that an increase in Dem turnout in those states could wipe out Trump's lead though. But, my focus here is less on approval rating. It doesn't really matter if a voter approves of Trump or not. It's a matter of whether they would rather have Hillary, aka the alternative, in office. For all we know Hillary's 'approval' rating among voters could be lower than Trump's.

I see your point. I think it depends on how many Trump voters are "Trumpettes" and how many are just "Republicans". Neither will vote for a democrat in 2020, but Republicans might prefer having Pence in office over Trump. That would alienate the Trumpettes who don't support the Republican party as a whole, of course. I agree though that impeachment is very unlikely (barring a substantial, unambiguous discovery of treason or whatever).

Conundrum wrote:

However we all are affected by selective perception, the need to reduce dissonance and by the need to score points against those who differ. We would be deceiving ourselves if we thought we were immune to these effects.

All true. It seems like the opportunity has been taken to amplify those differences and use them to divide, regardless of the administration in power.

liberals have no room to talk about others using "emotion"

liberals have been operating on "emotion" since day one. where are the results they claim or predicted? why do they continue to trust their media friends, blow things out of proportion, and then hide and excuse when - once again - a news story goes nowhere, or deeper analysis reveals no substance, or further inquiry highlights mere partisan efforts? Why can't liberals 'rationally' accept that President Trump is going nowhere. screams of "impeach" and "russia" epitomize emotion without reason. And every liberal jokester on this board has been doing it since day one. just like they've been sniveling over polls that were fraudulent, and projections that had no real-world bearings. From "hitler" comparisons to "putin's remote controlled puppet" accusations, liberals everywhere have taken selective emotional outrage to new levels. This Conundrum clown talking like the moral arbiter with his pseudo-intellectual snobbery doesn't make him any different than his cuck friends. just another pretentious liberal who has been wrong more times than his cucked brain can decipher. you wanna talk about cognitive dissonance?? take a look in the mirror. you're a joke

It is the main motivation because during Obama's presidency the only thing the GOP did was drum up hate and call Obama a fraud, unamerican, liar and incompetent, in addition to making the media appear to be fake and all Democrats appear to be entitled snobs. Therefore, the base wanted blood and they wanted it fast. Then comes Trump promising to deliver... so now the only thing to hang on to is the fact that Trump is president which symbolically is 'sticking to the man.' They've been had!

Conundrum wrote:

Bruhs, only GOP polls matter wrote:

^This. +10000. Bruhs, I know that everything going on with the Trump administration seems absolutely crazy and really, really bad for the ENTIRE country but it doesn't matter because at least half of the country would disagree with that assessment....and there in lies the problem. If any of you still trust polls, look at Trump's approval rating with GOP voters...it's still 80+%!!!! Until that changes and gets to around 50-60%, absolutely nothing will come of any of this noise.

I agree but why is that one of the main motivations of Trump supporters?

Why don't you post a coherent argument to invite dialogue instead of rambling? It seems to me you are more brainwashed by the liberal media than liberals would be. You are pulling snippets from left-leaning media, putting your own spin on them, and projecting that to be the belief of half the country. Ever ask yourself why you do that?

TroLLminator wrote:

Why don't you post a coherent argument to invite dialogue instead of rambling? It seems to me you are more brainwashed by the liberal media than liberals would be. You are pulling snippets from left-leaning media, putting your own spin on them, and projecting that to be the belief of half the country. Ever ask yourself why you do that?]

you didn't bother to read what I said, which is fine. So you call it rambling. Just like you call fact-based arguments that trigger you, 'racist' or 'bigoted' or 'alt-right' or 'drumpf' or 'trumpette' or 'inflammatory' or whatever other meaningless words the left has overplayed to shut the door on "dialogue." You guys don't want dialogue, so just shut the hell up about that. There's a reason you jokes keep losing and crying about it. You don't want dialogue. And the media - the propaganda arm of the Dem party - has irreparably hurt itself. Brainwashed? No, the only brainwashed fools I see are the ones on this board who for over a year have been sniveling about polls and prognostications that repeatedly are false. Let me say it again. You're a joke. Your cucked friends on this board are jokes. You guys keep losing. You're losers. I know that triggers you, but most of the country is sick of your indignant double standards. Stop It

yeah going nowhere.

1. We never met with Russians

-journalists find meetings with Russia -

2. Ok, we meet with Russians but those meetings don't count

-journalists find meetings that do count

3. Ok, fine. but we didn't collude

-journalists find meetings that show collusion

4. Ok, but everyone does it-

-journalists find many GOP and Dem politicians who went to FBI instead of collude and zero who did collude other than trump

5. Ok, but Trump Sr didn't know about the collusion

-Journalists find tweets that suggest TRump sr did know about the collusion.

And so on. We have every reason to expect the other two parts of collusion happened

-Kushner worked with Russian trolls to target vulnerable purple areas

-Trump campaign took cash from Russia.

Since the Trumpers have lied about everything else so far, we have to completely disregard everything they say and hope the journalists and law enforcement officers do their jobs.

eric a blair wrote:

yeah going nowhere.

1. We never met with Russians

-journalists find meetings with Russia -

2. Ok, we meet with Russians but those meetings don't count

-journalists find meetings that do count

3. Ok, fine. but we didn't collude

-journalists find meetings that show collusion

4. Ok, but everyone does it-

-journalists find many GOP and Dem politicians who went to FBI instead of collude and zero who did collude other than trump

5. Ok, but Trump Sr didn't know about the collusion

-Journalists find tweets that suggest TRump sr did know about the collusion.

And so on. We have every reason to expect the other two parts of collusion happened

-Kushner worked with Russian trolls to target vulnerable purple areas

-Trump campaign took cash from Russia.

Since the Trumpers have lied about everything else so far, we have to completely disregard everything they say and hope the journalists and law enforcement officers do their jobs.

I stopped reading once you got to the point "oh yea but zero Dems do blah blah blah" - nobody rational believes that. You do. You're not rational. You're a cuck. This is why your party is crumbling. Don't believe me? Good, please continue to not believe me so that the truth shocks you even more, time and time and time again. "Collusion"? What the hell is "collusion" in your myopic world? Meeting with Russians isn't a crime. Do you really want me to dredge up all the Russian-Dem cases of "collusion," all the cases of Clinton-DNC "collusion"?? Should I expose you for the partisan cuck you are? Just go away. You and FagPole can go away, save face, come back in a year when the russia story is clinging to threads and the Dem party is totally dead and act like you all knew what was happening.

So you think its the liberals who are all emotional and attacking? We need to turn down the emotion and use a bit more reasoning. That's your INTENDED message from your post. I won't say anything more.

eric a blair wrote:

yeah going nowhere.

1. We never met with Russians

-journalists find meetings with Russia -

2. Ok, we meet with Russians but those meetings don't count

-journalists find meetings that do count

3. Ok, fine. but we didn't collude

-journalists find meetings that show collusion

4. Ok, but everyone does it-

-journalists find many GOP and Dem politicians who went to FBI instead of collude and zero who did collude other than trump

5. Ok, but Trump Sr didn't know about the collusion

-Journalists find tweets that suggest TRump sr did know about the collusion.

And so on. We have every reason to expect the other two parts of collusion happened

-Kushner worked with Russian trolls to target vulnerable purple areas

-Trump campaign took cash from Russia.

Since the Trumpers have lied about everything else so far, we have to completely disregard everything they say and hope the journalists and law enforcement officers do their jobs.

It's NOT lying. It's modern presidential communicating.

Conundrum wrote:

So you think its the liberals who are all emotional and attacking? We need to turn down the emotion and use a bit more reasoning.

That's your INTENDED message from your post.

I won't say anything more.

Yes, your fellow libturds scream "resist" and "impeach 45" and wear vagina hats. bro, your party is in shambles, most ppl are tired of it and want to hear news coverage spend time talking about health care and ISIS and north korea, not 90%+ of air-time on Russia this and that. We want to work with Russia to take down ISIS. Libs are emotional trainwrecks and don't even know it.

kekistani wrote:

Yes, your fellow libturds scream "resist" and "impeach 45" and wear vagina hats. bro, your party is in shambles, most ppl are tired of it and want to hear news coverage spend time talking about health care ...

OK. Talk about healthcare.

The Democrats passed a plan that covered millions more than before.

Trump and the Republicans promised to replace it with something better.

How's that going?