Dogging traitors isn’t a job, it’s fun, baby.
Dogging traitors isn’t a job, it’s fun, baby.
Third Party wrote:
Dunna bout that wrote:
In short, the Russians may indeed like and promote Gabbard. But there the similarity with Trump ends.
Russians, Ghost, Rigged and Sally. Go pound on them for promoting Gabbard as a third party.
Tulsi is a radical leftist. Everyone in the Dem party is a radical leftist. There are NO exceptions. That’s why it’s nice to see Tulsi & Cankles fighting.
Clown fight.
KAG2020
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
Third Party wrote:
Russians, Ghost, Rigged and Sally. Go pound on them for promoting Gabbard as a third party.
Yes the Russians are coming!
True. Your every posted link is to Russian backed pro-Trump propaganda.
Why Conservative Media and the Far Right Love Tulsi Gabbard
Republicans and Russians Want Tulsi Gabbard
When will Tulsi Gabbard become a Republican?
https://www.uspresidentialelectionnews.com/2019/05/republicans-and-russians-want-tulsi-gabbard/
Congrats to whoever is doing the opposition research on Ghost, because he’s right out in the open now as putin’s new fave...
Rigged has cracked the case of a House ethics violation!
So when we finish the impeachment for treason, dumb@ss, we’ll tackle your little problem...
Third Party wrote:
Why Conservative Media and the Far Right Love Tulsi Gabbard
Republicans and Russians Want Tulsi Gabbard
When will Tulsi Gabbard become a Republican?
https://www.thedailybeast.com/why-conservative-media-and-the-far-right-love-tulsi-gabbard-for-presidenthttps://www.uspresidentialelectionnews.com/2019/05/republicans-and-russians-want-tulsi-gabbard/https://spectator.us/tulsi-gabbard-become-republican/
What am I missing? She is currently polling at 1%. Shouldn't we wait until she gets to 2% before we start giving a crap about what she thinks about anything?
Third Party wrote:
Why Conservative Media and the Far Right Love Tulsi Gabbard
Republicans and Russians Want Tulsi Gabbard
When will Tulsi Gabbard become a Republican?
https://www.thedailybeast.com/why-conservative-media-and-the-far-right-love-tulsi-gabbard-for-presidenthttps://www.uspresidentialelectionnews.com/2019/05/republicans-and-russians-want-tulsi-gabbard/https://spectator.us/tulsi-gabbard-become-republican/
Again, Tulsi is a radical leftist. Medicare for all is one of her positions- that doesn't fly with the GOP and especially not in Trump country. If any Dem were to become a Republican, the closest to doing that is Joe Manchin- and that is most likely not happening either.
KAG2020
Ciro wrote:
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
Opinions on staying in Syria.
Now that is nonsense.
You prefer them in Saudi Arabia?
https://www.politico.com/news/2019/10/11/pentagon-troops-saudi-arabia-044502
We will always have troops deployed somewhere.
Trump is simply trying to abide by his campaign promises AND further American isolationism.
He wants ZERO troops overseas and fails to see the benefit of having troops deployed. It's a common man ideology. He doesn't really have any grown ups left in his administration to set him right.
Alan
True. wrote:
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
Yes the Russians are coming!
True. Your every posted link is to Russian backed pro-Trump propaganda.
You’re a phony patriot.
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/impeachment-becomes-psychodrama-pressSDSU Aztec wrote:
What am I missing? She is currently polling at 1%. Shouldn't we wait until she gets to 2% before we start giving a crap about what she thinks about anything?
You are missing the obvious: NO THIRD-PARTY candidate for 2020. That is why Trumpers love Gabbard; to split the Democratic vote. And a few percent is all Trump supporters think they need to pick up the swing states; a la Jill Stein and Bernie Sanders in 2016—without those two your president is Hillary Clinton.
Third Party wrote:
SDSU Aztec wrote:
What am I missing? She is currently polling at 1%. Shouldn't we wait until she gets to 2% before we start giving a crap about what she thinks about anything?
You are missing the obvious: NO THIRD-PARTY candidate for 2020. That is why Trumpers love Gabbard; to split the Democratic vote. And a few percent is all Trump supporters think they need to pick up the swing states; a la Jill Stein and Bernie Sanders in 2016—without those two your president is Hillary Clinton.
I would expect that the most important thing for any Democrat voter is for Trump to lose in 2020. A vote for an Independent is effectively a vote for Trump.
Check out vladimir’s love slave telling us about patriotism...
SDSU Aztec wrote:
Third Party wrote:
You are missing the obvious: NO THIRD-PARTY candidate for 2020. That is why Trumpers love Gabbard; to split the Democratic vote. And a few percent is all Trump supporters think they need to pick up the swing states; a la Jill Stein and Bernie Sanders in 2016—without those two your president is Hillary Clinton.
I would expect that the most important thing for any Democrat voter is for Trump to lose in 2020. A vote for an Independent is effectively a vote for Trump.
And now you see why Russia, Republicans, and Right-wingers are pushing so hard for Gabbard.
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
Many Americans realize these wars have flushed away Trillions of dollars in national wealth for what? The death of millions while this country is massively indebted, and worse off. Foolish as well as unaffordable.
False Patriotism.
While most will not disagree with what you said there, it is clear that the way in which Trump took troops out of Syria was wrong.
1) He didn't consult anyone.
2) HUGE bi-partisan condemnation of what he did including from respected former military people.
3) Lots of lives lost almost immediately based on this decision of his.
4) Russia and Turkey and Syria were all helped by this.
There just is no win here at all for the US.
As Pelosi related, Trump said his plan was to keep Americans safe. She correctly told him that was a goal, not a plan, and then he did not have an answer for what the plan was.
He's an idiot. He's a narcissist who doesn't believe anyone but him has the right answers. He's dangerous. He's a criminal.
You are wrong to support and defend him.
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Ciro wrote:
Nice of you to come in today to admit you jumped the gun yet again ?
Expand your reading beyond alt right fan boy websites and you’ll stop embarrassing yourself.
It is a violation of House Ethics Rules.
She was a campaign staffer, not a House employee. Those rules likely do not apply.
Slow your roll wrote:
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
It is a violation of House Ethics Rules.
She was a campaign staffer, not a House employee. Those rules likely do not apply.
When did people start using "throuple"? Yikes. "Menage a trois" is a much cooler description.
Clearly the neo-nazi media can’t find one gal, much less two...
Incels trying to describe a love triangle, oh the irony...
SDSU Aztec wrote:
When did people start using "throuple"? Yikes. "Menage a trois" is a much cooler description.
Only in this decade. Millennials made it up because they can't say menage a trois. But the spelling is not fixed. Thruple and thrupple are other spellings. The millennials haven't figured it out yet. The word is supposed to be a take on three people except said as three triple people, which grammatical nonsense.
Flagpole, you forgot to include your caveats and the other stuff you include in ALL of your posts. I forgot already what you used to say! Please include in ALL of your posts.