haaaaa wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
"Shut up, Troll" is not an insightful post. YOU can do better!
dude if you start by saying mueller found nothing then you deserve to be called a troll and ordered to shut up.
You are going to be "ordering" me to shut up? That is what they do in Russia! Really, you are suggesting I should be ordered to shut up? Wow.
Fat hurts wrote:
tRumpanzee wrote:
The Trump Organization says the real problems scaring visitors away [from Doral] are the Zika virus and hurricanes.
Both made worse by Global Warming.
"Global warming" is a hoax invented by China to hurt the US economy. I thought everyone knew that by now.
When putin threatened you with a blunt object I bet you said, “You are not the sharpest of the bunch.”
haaaaa wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
"Shut up, Troll" is not an insightful post. YOU can do better!
dude if you start by saying mueller found nothing then you deserve to be called a troll and ordered to shut up.
I know that you have never heard of Voltaire or Evelyn Beatrice Hall, and there is some disagreement over who said this first, but instead of "ordering" me to shut up you might want to ponder this ... :“I wholly disagree with what you say and will contend to the death for your right to say it
Sally Vix wrote:
haaaaa wrote:
dude if you start by saying mueller found nothing then you deserve to be called a troll and ordered to shut up.
You are going to be "ordering" me to shut up? That is what they do in Russia! Really, you are suggesting I should be ordered to shut up? Wow.
Shut up, Troll.
jesseriley wrote:
When putin threatened you with a blunt object I bet you said, “You are not the sharpest of the bunch.”
Got a chuckle out of me.
Hitler’s last words: “I will fight to the death...”
Sally Vix wrote:
Fat hurts wrote:
Are you ready to remove your tin foil hat and admit that there is no global scientific conspiracy? If so, then we can discuss this.
I don't think there is a global scientific conspiracy per se. I DO think that their is a narrative among Global Warming advocates (not sure that is right word) and you are expected to "toe the line", i.e., one on the left who challenges the Global Warming narrative (Global warming and the ever-increasing CO2 levels are human-caused and will lead to the destruction of the Earth) will be ostracized and never gain acceptance back into that crowd. No grants, no university jobs, no nothing. If you question the Global Warming narrative, you are black-balled just as Colin Kapernick has been black-balled. Serious question for you ... Do you really think a university professor of science at a university like UC-Berkley could question the Global Warming narrative and still maintain his or her job?
Yes, of course you can maintain your job. Witness Dr. Judith Curry of Georgia Tech. She was very critical of the science around climate change and continued to hold a prestigious chair for 10 years until she retired to do consulting for energy companies.
The scientific community has a proud tradition of scientists who question conventional wisdom. As long as they make good arguments and can prove their theories then they are highly lauded.
If you think that the scientific consensus on Climate is wrong then you either believe:
1) You know more than the scientific community
2) The scientific community is engaged in a global scientific conspiracy.
Either belief makes you a loon. And I won't discuss science with a crazy person.
Sally Vix wrote:
Smorbun wrote:
You are such a loser. Collusion was clear, just not enough evidence to prosecute. 11 instances of Obstruction of Justice which he will still have to deal with down the line. There is a greater chance of Trump spending time in jail for those Obstruction of Justice claims in the Mueller Report than there is of you ever, and I mean ever, saying something remotely correct or intelligent.
You are not the sharpest of the bunch. Robert Mueller never even used "collusion." He termed it "conspiracy." So go back and read the Mueller report and get back to me when you can!
Sally, you're an idiot. You have already stated you never read the Mueller Report, and that much is clear as the word "collusion" appears 23 times in Mueller's Report, including this section, "Potential Coordination: Conspiracy and Collusion". So, he talked about "collusion" plenty. The crime to be prosecuted for collusion would have been "Conspiracy", but as I said, he decided there was not enough evidence to support prosecution.
Stop trying to pretend you know anything. You are an uneducated idiot.
jesseriley wrote:
Hitler’s last words: “I will fight to the death...”
Flagpole - Last words are for Fools who haven't said enough. (Karl Marx)
Fat hurts wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
I don't think there is a global scientific conspiracy per se. I DO think that their is a narrative among Global Warming advocates (not sure that is right word) and you are expected to "toe the line", i.e., one on the left who challenges the Global Warming narrative (Global warming and the ever-increasing CO2 levels are human-caused and will lead to the destruction of the Earth) will be ostracized and never gain acceptance back into that crowd. No grants, no university jobs, no nothing. If you question the Global Warming narrative, you are black-balled just as Colin Kapernick has been black-balled. Serious question for you ... Do you really think a university professor of science at a university like UC-Berkley could question the Global Warming narrative and still maintain his or her job?
Yes, of course you can maintain your job. Witness Dr. Judith Curry of Georgia Tech. She was very critical of the science around climate change and continued to hold a prestigious chair for 10 years until she retired to do consulting for energy companies.
The scientific community has a proud tradition of scientists who question conventional wisdom. As long as they make good arguments and can prove their theories then they are highly lauded.
If you think that the scientific consensus on Climate is wrong then you either believe:
1) You know more than the scientific community
2) The scientific community is engaged in a global scientific conspiracy.
Either belief makes you a loon. And I won't discuss science with a crazy person.
Hardly a loon. Have you read all the IPCC reports? I have.
Sally Vix wrote:
That is great! Nice work. You did a Yeoman's job. A stellar job! But please explain how President Trump should be impeached because of all those jokers doing bad. Nothing was found ON HIM.
Cohen would not be in jail without his illegal activity being directed by Trump.
They found stuff on Trump, he just remains un-indicted.
Now to the "collusion".
They found that Russia did stiff for Trump but no transcripts of discussions between the.
Post-Mueller we have a transcript of Trump's attempted collusion with Ukraine.
Trump in Texas to open a Louis Vuitton store, believe it or not.
Putin bought him some very nice accessories for St. Basil’s Day.
Smorbun wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
You are not the sharpest of the bunch. Robert Mueller never even used "collusion." He termed it "conspiracy." So go back and read the Mueller report and get back to me when you can!
Sally, you're an idiot. You have already stated you never read the Mueller Report, and that much is clear as the word "collusion" appears 23 times in Mueller's Report, including this section, "Potential Coordination: Conspiracy and Collusion". So, he talked about "collusion" plenty. The crime to be prosecuted for collusion would have been "Conspiracy", but as I said, he decided there was not enough evidence to support prosecution.
Stop trying to pretend you know anything. You are an uneducated idiot.
Dude or dudette - you might be swell person and I love swell people but I don't do insults. So, please quit responding someone else. Again, you are likely a swell person, but go bother someone else.
Fat Hurts - one question for you. And you can ignore me forever or at least the Earth is destroyed by Global Warming.
Will the Earth just continue to get hotter and hotter because of Global Warming until we all perish or is there a chance that the warming will cease and the Earth will be cooling again? Answer that please. If you can't answer that you are not serious.
Sally Vix wrote:
haaaaa wrote:
dude if you start by saying mueller found nothing then you deserve to be called a troll and ordered to shut up.
I know that you have never heard of Voltaire or Evelyn Beatrice Hall, and there is some disagreement over who said this first, but instead of "ordering" me to shut up you might want to ponder this ... :“I wholly disagree with what you say and will contend to the death for your right to say it
Quoting people is pretentious, but most pretentious people at least get the quote right.
"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."
You would be best served by just shutting up.
I miss your friend, Ghost of Ignoramus...
Smorbun wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
I know that you have never heard of Voltaire or Evelyn Beatrice Hall, and there is some disagreement over who said this first, but instead of "ordering" me to shut up you might want to ponder this ... :“I wholly disagree with what you say and will contend to the death for your right to say it
Quoting people is pretentious, but most pretentious people at least get the quote right.
"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."
You would be best served by just shutting up.
Again, please quit responding to me. Go respond to one of your fellow Libs. I DO NOT do insults. Thanks in advance and I am an experts on quotes. So just go away but you are a swell person. I am sure your family loves you.
Sally Vix wrote:
Smorbun wrote:
Sally, you're an idiot. You have already stated you never read the Mueller Report, and that much is clear as the word "collusion" appears 23 times in Mueller's Report, including this section, "Potential Coordination: Conspiracy and Collusion". So, he talked about "collusion" plenty. The crime to be prosecuted for collusion would have been "Conspiracy", but as I said, he decided there was not enough evidence to support prosecution.
Stop trying to pretend you know anything. You are an uneducated idiot.
Dude or dudette - you might be swell person and I love swell people but I don't do insults. So, please quit responding someone else. Again, you are likely a swell person, but go bother someone else.
It has already been established that you insult people plenty. Why do you continue to lie about this? Your lies and insults are part of the reason you deserve this tone from me. Your continued idiocy though is the main reason. Stop being an idiot.
Spanks is just going for broke now. The horse is out of the stable, boat on full throttle, going out to find the green light somewhere.
https://twitter.com/WalshFreedom/status/1184900876042936321?s=20