Sally Vvv wrote:
I only post as Sally here. My 2 other names I don't use pretty much anymore.
You were outed, and admitted to, posting under other names on this thread. This is called lying.
Sally Vvv wrote:
I only post as Sally here. My 2 other names I don't use pretty much anymore.
You were outed, and admitted to, posting under other names on this thread. This is called lying.
liar sally wrote:
quote]Sally Vvv wrote:
I only post as Sally here. My 2 other names I don't use pretty much anymore.
You were outed, and admitted to, posting under other names on this thread. This is called lying.[/quote]
In fairness, look at that post again: "pretty much" and "anymore."
SV admitted using other names *earlier* in the thread; but that is not *anymore*.
That said, SV has been repeatedly outed as a troll, so why are you feeding it with *any* responsive posts? (This one is responding to "liar sally," by the way, and not SV.) Don't feed the troll!
liar sally wrote:
Sally Vvv wrote:
I only post as Sally here. My 2 other names I don't use pretty much anymore.
You were outed, and admitted to, posting under other names on this thread. This is called lying.
I have 3 names - Sally, Fatty R. Belt Buckle and Polly P. The latter two I don't really use any more but I occasionally (rarely) post as Fatty on other threads.
Sally Vix wrote:
I have 3 names - Sally, Fatty R. Belt Buckle and Polly P. The latter two I don't really use any more but I occasionally (rarely) post as Fatty on other threads.
^ Liar
Not sure why you were so hard on that poster. Your definition of "monotonic" is one for mathematics but there are other definitions, e.g., the relationship between variables, that is different.
Liar Sally wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
I have 3 names - Sally, Fatty R. Belt Buckle and Polly P. The latter two I don't really use any more but I occasionally (rarely) post as Fatty on other threads.
^ Liar
It looks like someone has deleted the post that caught you making post under names other that the three you claim to use. Unfortunately, the mod helping you out, missed one.
https://www.letsrun.com/forum/flat_read.php?board=1&id=9338118&thread=8017990#9338118Sally Vix wrote:
LIAR SALLY wrote:
Looks like you got caught trolling this forum under a new name. You claim you only use Sally Polly Fatty. That is of course a LIE.
I said up until last week I used Fatty, Polly and Sally. I only began using the new one [posting name] this week.
I just thought of something. Mayor Pete seems to be gathering up momentum. I had never thought about this before. If he was to win the nomination and then win the election, we would possibly have our first First gentleman (which I am fine with). It would be initially peculiar but we would eventually get comfortable with it.
What I worry about is certain countries which would be aghast at the site of the president and the first gentleman disembarking Air Force One - countries such as India, Iran, Turkey, China, Afghanistan and some others. Nigeria, for instance, has laws that state gays should be stoned to death. You think the President Mayor Pete and his First gentleman are going to want to make a stop in Iran or Afghanistan, or even Singapore?
This america Sally - if you haven't noticed nobody cares what others think
Of interest -- on Christian Broadcasting Network this morning (Oct 16th). Trump has lost Lindsey Graham. And is losing the support of Evangelical leader Pat Robertson.
Graham: It was the Kurds who worked with the America military to destroy ISIS. If we abandon the Kurds, it will be dishonorable, it will be a disaster.. I am looking to President Trump to change this. I will do anything I can to help him, but I will also become President Trump’s worst nightmare. I will not sit along the sidelines and watch our good ally, the Kurds, be slaughtered by Turkey and watch Iran move in to Syria and become another nightmare for Israel.
Robertson: I have suggested that there be a ... declaration that there be a homeland for the Kurds. Let's give them a country.
Sally Vix wrote:
If he was to win the nomination and then win the election, we would possibly have our first First gentleman (which I am fine with). It would be initially peculiar but we would eventually get comfortable with it.
Oh, you're fine with it are you? We would "eventually" get comfortable with it, would we? How forward thinking of you. People who aren't homophobic have nothing to get comfortable with. So, you're stupid, racist, and homophobic too. Your wife sure picked a winner. Go work on yourself.
Interestingly, the Rs will put up with an openly racist and fraudulent and felonious president. but screw over the kurds and you are in a world of hurt.
what is that mentality exactly?
Anyway, the House had a thoroughly bipartisan vote to condemn trump on the Kurds. And Rs in the House yelled at WH leadership for an hour or two today.
Clearly the Kurds are more cared about by Rs than Democratic Party voters.
I mean great, Rs. Way to go. But come on. Look homeward. See the Americans Trump is hurting on purpose.
https://twitter.com/HouseDailyPress/status/1184541164776677376?s=20
Scratch a trumper and you get crimes. All the crimes.
Rudy, Rudy, Rudy. From federal prosecutor to subject of federal investigations and counter-intelligence concerns.
(CNN)For months, investigators looking into Rudy Giuliani's business dealings in Ukraine have dug into everything from possible financial entanglements with alleged corrupt Ukrainian figures to counterintelligence concerns raised by some of those business ties, according to people briefed on the matter.
The counterintelligence part of the investigation indicates that FBI and criminal prosecutors in Manhattan are looking at a broader set of issues related to Giuliani, President Donald Trump's personal attorney, than has been previously reported.
Victory Blvd. wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
If he was to win the nomination and then win the election, we would possibly have our first First gentleman (which I am fine with). It would be initially peculiar but we would eventually get comfortable with it.
Oh, you're fine with it are you? We would "eventually" get comfortable with it, would we? How forward thinking of you. People who aren't homophobic have nothing to get comfortable with. So, you're stupid, racist, and homophobic too. Your wife sure picked a winner. Go work on yourself.
Oh, so President Mayor Pete and the first First Gentleman are over having a great time with the Chancellor of Austria and his wife in the great ballroom and the music comes on and President Pete and the first First Gentleman lock hands and go out on the dance floor and President Pete is twirling around the First Gentleman like Christopher Plummer did with Julie Andrews did in the Sound Of Music and you be totally comfortable with that?
Sally Vix wrote:
Victory Blvd. wrote:
Oh, you're fine with it are you? We would "eventually" get comfortable with it, would we? How forward thinking of you. People who aren't homophobic have nothing to get comfortable with. So, you're stupid, racist, and homophobic too. Your wife sure picked a winner. Go work on yourself.
Oh, so President Mayor Pete and the first First Gentleman are over having a great time with the Chancellor of Austria and his wife in the great ballroom and the music comes on and President Pete and the first First Gentleman lock hands and go out on the dance floor and President Pete is twirling around the First Gentleman like Christopher Plummer did with Julie Andrews did in the Sound Of Music and you be totally comfortable with that?
What a weird question. Why in the world would anyone care?
WTF^n wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
Oh, so President Mayor Pete and the first First Gentleman are over having a great time with the Chancellor of Austria and his wife in the great ballroom and the music comes on and President Pete and the first First Gentleman lock hands and go out on the dance floor and President Pete is twirling around the First Gentleman like Christopher Plummer did with Julie Andrews did in the Sound Of Music and you be totally comfortable with that?
What a weird question. Why in the world would anyone care?
oh come on. A lot of people would care and you know it. You think Pete would say 'eh no one cares that I'm openly gay'?
Of course not - he knows people care.
agip wrote:
WTF^n wrote:
What a weird question. Why in the world would anyone care?
oh come on. A lot of people would care and you know it. You think Pete would say 'eh no one cares that I'm openly gay'?
Of course not - he knows people care.
Mayor Pete and companion show up in Riyadh ( where homosexuality is punishable by death) what happens if they execute our president and First Gentleman?
Sally Vix wrote:
agip wrote:
oh come on. A lot of people would care and you know it. You think Pete would say 'eh no one cares that I'm openly gay'?
Of course not - he knows people care.
Mayor Pete and companion show up in Riyadh ( where homosexuality is punishable by death) what happens if they execute our president and First Gentleman?
Even in UAE, our ally, the president and first gentleman would be executed.
just...just...just imagine how Fox News would report it if US jets bombed abandoned US training posts in Syria. Under Obama's watch I mean. How would fox report this if Obama were C in Chief?
https://twitter.com/dave_brown24/status/1184554658712477697?s=20
Trump and his catch and bury National Enquirer team. Killed the story of Trump raping a 13 year old; Katie Johnson who tried to go public but who was threatened by Trump's goon squad and when back into hiding.
https://www.newsweek.com/trump-teen-rape-allegation-national-enquirer-ronan-farrow-jane-doe-1465652
not surprised at all wrote:
Trump and his catch and bury National Enquirer team. Killed the story of Trump raping a 13 year old; Katie Johnson who tried to go public but who was threatened by Trump's goon squad and when back into hiding.
https://www.newsweek.com/trump-teen-rape-allegation-national-enquirer-ronan-farrow-jane-doe-1465652
Quit with the lies.
Social media erupted with claims that the woman had been paid off by Trump or was so terrified by threats to her life from Trump supporters that she was forced to withdraw her claims.
But DailyMail.com has learned that the real reason the suit was dropped is because the claims were simply NOT true.
The woman first sued Trump and Jeffrey Epstein under the name Katie Johnson - a name we know not to be her real identity - on April 26 in California federal court and filed an amended complaint in New York federal court in October, claiming she was subject to rape, criminal sexual acts, assault, battery and false imprisonment.
The court papers offered no corroborative evidence that her claims were true.
News that the allegations were dropped dismayed Hillary supporters who had hoped the claims would be the knock out blow for Trump's election campaign - already rocked in recent weeks by a string of sex assault claims.
Thousands of loyal Hillary followers had opened a discussion about the rape claims on Twitter and other social media networks hoping to damage Trump's push for the White House.
The Huffington Post jumped on the bandwagon of anti-Trump sentiment after she made her claims, asking: 'Donald Trump Is Accused Of Raping A 13-Year-Old. Why Haven't The Media Covered It?'
RIP: D3 All-American Frank Csorba - who ran 13:56 in March - dead
RENATO can you talk about the preparation of Emile Cairess 2:06
Running for Bowerman Track Club used to be cool now its embarrassing
Rest in Peace Adrian Lehmann - 2:11 Swiss marathoner. Dies of heart attack.
Hats off to my dad. He just ran a 1:42 Half Marathon and turns 75 in 2 months!
Great interview with Steve Cram - says Jakob has no chance of WRs this year