Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Agree, and Moscow Mitch is up for re-election, not to mention he won’t be leading any Senate that dems control. He needs this to be wrapped up; no candidate can survive daily headline updates on their crimes, and McConMan is rather closely associated with the Traitor-in-Chief.

This is where he & his equally corrupt dominatrix Elaine Chao (Trans. Sec.) face the music.

agip wrote:

WTF^n wrote:

Good DOG! WTF is wrong with you, agip, Trollminator, Flagpole, Conundrum . . . ?!?

You STILL don't get that Sally is pure, 100%, unadulterated troll? Seriously? Are you folks f'ing retarded? He couldn't make it more clear if he started and ended each of his posts with "Just Trolling Here".

$10 says Sally wrote this post.

Or not. I consider Sally an educational cause. A little pro bono work.

You just lost $10.

Sally is pure, 100%, unadulterated troll. It is astonishing to me that this isn't obvious to you by now. Go back and read the steps of Sally's trolling a few pages back. Sally to a T.

Sally Vix wrote:

When Flagpole is the beacon of honesty and truthfulness for Libs you have some major problems.

Watch it there, brother. I will ban you again or turn on you in the drop of a hat if you keep that crap up.

I do not lie, EVER, and you can not show otherwise.

You went off the deep end with regard to Schiff after I offered you an olive branch. Had you done that BEFORE I did that, you would still be banned by me.

Stay cordial, brother.

Sally Vix wrote:

agip wrote:

Schiff told us he was changing Trump's words to get to their real meaning...and then he did just that.

Explain how that's a lie.

Seriously, Agip? This is like bottom-of-the-barrel for you. How does Adam Schiff know how to "interpret" their real meaning. And he never suggested that he was "interpreting" the transcript He never said that! He read the made-up lies like it was the real transcript. IT WASN'T! He lied.

No...that's not a lie. It is an interpretation of the transcript that you don't agree with. NOT a lie.

This is all moot now though as Trump just called for Ukraine and China to investigate the Bidens. Insane.

agip wrote:

Capt. Kangaroo wrote:

STILL NO, the argument is that it is entirely possible that Joe Biden took advantage of WH foreign policy toward Ukraine to protect his son. The aid was already awarded and Biden interjected himself into that process. Why? It's a fair question and your argument is that it should not be investigated. Which leads to the conclusion that you are looking to hide something.

ok so you think there is a solid chance that the EU and the US stuck together on askign for a tougher prosecutor in order to somehow help Hunter biden. With no leaks of this multinational conspiracy.

That's beyond wackadoodle.

I have suggested no such thing. That's all spin and a blatant mischaracterization.

Capt. Kangaroo wrote:

agip wrote:

ok fine fair enough.

just change what I wrote to

your argument seems to be that it's legit possible and well- worth investigating that the entire WH foreign policy toward Ukraine AND the entire European Union foreign policy policy toward Ukraine was...was...wait for it...oh keep waiting, it's well worth it....meant to protect...keep waiting...HUNTER BIDEN.

STILL NO, the argument is that it is entirely possible that Joe Biden took advantage of WH foreign policy toward Ukraine to protect his son. The aid was already awarded and Biden interjected himself into that process. Why? It's a fair question and your argument is that it should not be investigated. Which leads to the conclusion that you are looking to hide something.

No...it's not a fair question...only fair for people who don't understand anything to ask. Biden was acting in an official capacity for the US. The whole western world was trying to get that inactive prosecutor to resign. Hunter Biden was not under an investigation. Joe Biden was arguing for a prosecutor who was doing nothing to be replaced by someone who MIGHT do something, therefore potentially putting the company his son worked for into MORE peril. There is no evidence that either Biden did anything illegal.

Did Hunter Biden have a cushy job that it appears he wasn't qualified for? Yep. Is that illegal? Nope. Is that the result of privilege? Yep. Are there other examples of this? Um...Ivanka Trump, Jared Kushner.

If I were a Catholic priest, you would be sentenced to pay penance.

Capt. Kangaroo wrote:

agip wrote:

ok so you think there is a solid chance that the EU and the US stuck together on askign for a tougher prosecutor in order to somehow help Hunter biden. With no leaks of this multinational conspiracy.

That's beyond wackadoodle.

I have suggested no such thing. That's all spin and a blatant mischaracterization.

ok well I'll withdraw my claims then. I must have misunderstood the context of your post.

Today in Trumpology:

1) Trump again asked a hostile foreign power (China in this case) to interfere in domestic politics. Out in the open this time. Add another article of impeachment I guess.

2) The lead US diplomat in Ukraine wrote a text (before the whistleblower complaint) to other diplomats at the time saying basically 'It's crazy to do what Trump is doing - holding back aid unless Ukraine interferes in US politics. '

3) several Republican senators worked with Biden and the Europeans to get a tougher prosecutor installed in Ukraine. Rs think the Republican senators were also working to help Hunter Biden? Is that your story?

4) Volker warned Stupidliani that Biden info was bogus. No wonder Pompous didn’t want him testifying & he resigned.

Meanwhile, Trump wins again.

https://nypost.com/2019/10/03/trumps-approval-rating-hits-high-for-2019-in-wake-of-impeachment-talk/

Oops! New whistleblower complaint about tax returns...

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Meanwhile, Trump wins again.

https://nypost.com/2019/10/03/trumps-approval-rating-hits-high-for-2019-in-wake-of-impeachment-talk/

You conveniently ignored these gems from the same article:

"A new survey by Gallup found that just 40 percent of Americans approve of his job performance and only 34 percent approve of his personality.

And a separate survey by Monmouth released Tuesday found just 39 percent of registered voters think Trump deserves re-election."

Just like that “secret strength” trump claimed in 2016 (which was true, but he forgot to mention it came from Russia).

You are ignoring the fact that the prosecutor in question is on the record as saying he was fired because he refused to stop the investigation into Biden Jr.'s firm. So, your whole argument is crap.

And please, keep your ego in check.

I'm done with you all.

Fat hurts wrote:

agip wrote:

actually we will miss him - he's the only right winger who posts regularly. Rigged just pops in to troll hard once in a while. Without Salster it's just a bunch of Democrats in an echo chamber.

I wouldn't mind if Sally and Rigged just went away.

I'd prefer to only have posters who make coherent arguments and interesting points.

It doesn't matter if they are liberal or conservative. But they need to be thoughtful and incisive. Sally and Rigged don't come close.

I agree with much of your post but disagree 100% about Sally and Rigged and throw in Iggy too. They represent how different types of Trump defenders think and react to the news. I want them postings. Take rigged for example. I have no doubt many Trump supporters post the same pictures he does and have the same perceptions that he does. I want to know how for instance people who think like Rigged react to Trump's behavior. These posts are a window to how they really think. Its a significant segment of our population so we should know about them. Even hateful posts, show us first hand how they think and feel.

In my opinion./

Go ahead & rely on the testimony of a corrupt official. And please vote for trump - even if he’s in prison.

That's a good point.

Do you think their posts reflect their honest opinions?

House Minority Leader demands suspension of impeachment, apparently unable to count...

Fortunately, he’ll have far fewer GOP to count next Congress...

Flagpole wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

When Flagpole is the beacon of honesty and truthfulness for Libs you have some major problems.

Watch it there, brother. I will ban you again or turn on you in the drop of a hat if you keep that crap up.

I do not lie, EVER, and you can not show otherwise.

You went off the deep end with regard to Schiff after I offered you an olive branch. Had you done that BEFORE I did that, you would still be banned by me.

Stay cordial, brother.

wait what? flaggy is a mod?

I mean sally, rigged, et al. are horrific and idiotic, but flaggy as a mod?

may god help us all