jesseriley wrote:
Are those impeachment votes?
Endorsement votes!
jesseriley wrote:
Are those impeachment votes?
Endorsement votes!
Sally Vix wrote:
The House is engaged in an impeachment hearing/inquiry/proceeding and the effing House Intel Chief and one of the 2 heads of the Impeaching proceeding is engaged in fraud????!!! He needs to be impeached. Not Trump. Is this Clown show 101? Schiff committed an impeachable offense. Perjury, fraud and many others.
Can you please quote the laws that Shiff broke?
Can you please show the part of the Constitution that talks about impeaching legislators?
read the constitution wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
The House is engaged in an impeachment hearing/inquiry/proceeding and the effing House Intel Chief and one of the 2 heads of the Impeaching proceeding is engaged in fraud????!!! He needs to be impeached. Not Trump. Is this Clown show 101? Schiff committed an impeachable offense. Perjury, fraud and many others.
Can you please quote the laws that Shiff broke?
Can you please show the part of the Constitution that talks about impeaching legislators?
I know more about impeaching judges. But I think the same laws apply to House members. I have to say ... you LIbs are pathetic ... really pathetic ... You come on here and whine and cry about how Trump is such a terrible person but you have no balls or cajones to condemn Schiff. Just pathetic.
I will actually have no use for ANY of you if you did not condemn Schiff. You might be considered frauds. Agip is serious and so too Fat Hurts and othes. Flagpole especially. But for the others - if you can't condemn Schiff - you have no credibility. NONE. You are political frauds.
Sally Vix wrote:
I know more about impeaching judges. But I think the same laws apply to House members. I have to say ... you LIbs are pathetic ... really pathetic ... You come on here and whine and cry about how Trump is such a terrible person but you have no balls or cajones to condemn Schiff. Just pathetic.
So, you can't quote a single law the Schiff broke.
You have ignored the fact that the constitution gives legislators immunity for any speech or debate in the House.
You do not understand that the constitution creates a framework for impeach executive branch and judicial branch officers but does not apply impeachment to legislators.
And you are calling other people pathetic?
Go actually read that constitution, loser.
Sally Vix wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
I am breaking my ban with you for this post because I feel you need a win, and protecting the feelings of others is more important than maintaining a ban.
On this point, you are CORRECT (well, correct that Schiff shouldn't have done it...not a crime, serious or otherwise)! Schiff DID say things that weren't correct, were misleading, and he did put his own personal spin on the readout of the call. He shouldn't have done that, and Trump has a right to be upset by it. It was foolish of Schiff to do that, because the readout as it is is damning enough. The cover up is damning enough. The very dangerous and likely criminal speech Trump has engaged in since is damning enough.
Now, even though you got this right, just to be clear, what Schiff did doesn't absolve Trump in any way for his crime. What Trump did there on that call with Ukraine is very serious and criminal and impeachable. He WILL be impeached for it too...but enough of my correctness...this post was to congratulate you for a correct view (mostly correct) on something.
I hope you keep it up. I'm rooting for you.
Ban back on until I see consistent reasonableness from you.
Thanks, Flagpole. I appreciate that. But what should be more concerning to you is that NO ONE besides YOU (that I know of ) condemned Adam Schiff's lies when he read that phony transcript. NOT ONE OTHER PERSON HERE CONDEMNED THE HOUSE INTEL HEAD making up lies about the transcript of the phone call. The House is seriously considering the impeachment of the President of the UNited STates and the House Intel Head is making up lies as he reads to the members of Congress. That should be impeachable right there! YET, besides Flagpole, from what I believe NO ONE ELSE HERE CONDEMNED HIM FOR IT. Agip - did you? Fat Hurts - did you? KBitz - did you ? Jesse - did you? Aztec - did you? Everyone else - DID YOU CONDEMN his lies? Or are you only out for the good of the party? Do you care about truth and justice or you just care about forwarding the agenda of your sad party?
I watched the hearing as it happened.
It was clear to me that Schiff was giving his interpretation of the call and not quoting it verbatim. There is nothing wrong with that.
He started out saying, "Shorn of its rambling character and in not so many words, this is the essence of what the President communicates..."
Then he gave his interpretation of that essence.
So he told us he was communicating the essence of the transcript and not the transcript itself. If you read the transcript beforehand this was quite obvious.
I can see how some might have misunderstood what Shiff was saying but that's not really Shiff's fault.
read the constitution wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
I know more about impeaching judges. But I think the same laws apply to House members. I have to say ... you LIbs are pathetic ... really pathetic ... You come on here and whine and cry about how Trump is such a terrible person but you have no balls or cajones to condemn Schiff. Just pathetic.
So, you can't quote a single law the Schiff broke.
You have ignored the fact that the constitution gives legislators immunity for any speech or debate in the House.
You do not understand that the constitution creates a framework for impeach executive branch and judicial branch officers but does not apply impeachment to legislators.
And you are calling other people pathetic?
Go actually read that constitution, loser.
I will apologize for calling people Losers Everyone here is a good person.
Fat hurts wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
Thanks, Flagpole. I appreciate that. But what should be more concerning to you is that NO ONE besides YOU (that I know of ) condemned Adam Schiff's lies when he read that phony transcript. NOT ONE OTHER PERSON HERE CONDEMNED THE HOUSE INTEL HEAD making up lies about the transcript of the phone call. The House is seriously considering the impeachment of the President of the UNited STates and the House Intel Head is making up lies as he reads to the members of Congress. That should be impeachable right there! YET, besides Flagpole, from what I believe NO ONE ELSE HERE CONDEMNED HIM FOR IT. Agip - did you? Fat Hurts - did you? KBitz - did you ? Jesse - did you? Aztec - did you? Everyone else - DID YOU CONDEMN his lies? Or are you only out for the good of the party? Do you care about truth and justice or you just care about forwarding the agenda of your sad party?
I watched the hearing as it happened.
It was clear to me that Schiff was giving his interpretation of the call and not quoting it verbatim. There is nothing wrong with that.
He started out saying, "Shorn of its rambling character and in not so many words, this is the essence of what the President communicates..."
Then he gave his interpretation of that essence.
So he told us he was communicating the essence of the transcript and not the transcript itself. If you read the transcript beforehand this was quite obvious.
I can see how some might have misunderstood what Shiff was saying but that's not really Shiff's fault.
FAt Hurt s-- he had the effing transcript in front of him. He chose to make up LIES! He has the effing transcript!
Sally Vix wrote:
Fat hurts wrote:
I watched the hearing as it happened.
It was clear to me that Schiff was giving his interpretation of the call and not quoting it verbatim. There is nothing wrong with that.
He started out saying, "Shorn of its rambling character and in not so many words, this is the essence of what the President communicates..."
Then he gave his interpretation of that essence.
So he told us he was communicating the essence of the transcript and not the transcript itself. If you read the transcript beforehand this was quite obvious.
I can see how some might have misunderstood what Shiff was saying but that's not really Shiff's fault.
FAt Hurt s-- he had the effing transcript in front of him. He chose to make up LIES! He has the effing transcript!
His purpose was not to enter the transcript into the record. That was already done.
Schiff gave his interpretation of the transcript. He told us that's what he was doing. There is nothing wrong with that and he did not lie.
Fat hurts wrote:
I can see how some might have misunderstood what Shiff was saying but that's not really Shiff's fault.
Schiff should have been more careful, not because he did anything egregious, but because of the predictable overblown and tactical outrage from the right.
Trolls are playing a different game.
A mind is a terrible thing to waste, and the Constitution is wasted on trumpettes: it only holds them back.
Th e Donald wrote:
Scorebored wrote:
Adam Schiff: 1
Donald Trump: 12,000+
Winning!
Don't forget that scam Russian phone call that Pencil neck was suckered with trying to dig up dirt on Trump.
Fat hurts wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
FAt Hurt s-- he had the effing transcript in front of him. He chose to make up LIES! He has the effing transcript!
His purpose was not to enter the transcript into the record. That was already done.
Schiff gave his interpretation of the transcript. He told us that's what he was doing. There is nothing wrong with that and he did not lie.
He had the EFFINg verbatim transcript. Why give us his "interpretation?" Are you really suggesting this? Come on dude! You have a STEM degree and really going this route?
Monkeys typing wrote:
Fat hurts wrote:
I can see how some might have misunderstood what Shiff was saying but that's not really Shiff's fault.
Schiff should have been more careful, not because he did anything egregious, but because of the predictable overblown and tactical outrage from the right.
Trolls are playing a different game.
Yea, but you never know what these clowns will latch on to. If it wasn't this it would have been something else. Schiff can't do his job if he's always worried about how his words will play on Breitebart.
Fat hurts wrote:
Monkeys typing wrote:
Schiff should have been more careful, not because he did anything egregious, but because of the predictable overblown and tactical outrage from the right.
Trolls are playing a different game.
Yea, but you never know what these clowns will latch on to. If it wasn't this it would have been something else. Schiff can't do his job if he's always worried about how his words will play on Breitebart.
Don't call us clowns when you refuse to condemn Adam Schiff even though I condemn Trump. You are not a serious player here.
Fat Hurts - Not serious -
Sally Vix wrote:
Fat hurts wrote:
His purpose was not to enter the transcript into the record. That was already done.
Schiff gave his interpretation of the transcript. He told us that's what he was doing. There is nothing wrong with that and he did not lie.
He had the EFFINg verbatim transcript. Why give us his "interpretation?" Are you really suggesting this? Come on dude! You have a STEM degree and really going this route?
I'm not suggesting anything. That's what Schiff told us in his statement. That is what happened.
Schiff is free to give his interpretation if he wants. He didn't try to mislead anyone. He didn't lie. He certainly didn't break any laws.
So just deal with it if you can.
Fat hurts wrote:
Monkeys typing wrote:
Schiff should have been more careful, not because he did anything egregious, but because of the predictable overblown and tactical outrage from the right.
Trolls are playing a different game.
Yea, but you never know what these clowns will latch on to. If it wasn't this it would have been something else. Schiff can't do his job if he's always worried about how his words will play on Breitebart.
I have to say Fat Hurts - you are a fraud - if you can't condemn Schiff.
Now the Inspector General at State (overseeing Pompeo’s work) has briefed the House on retaliation against perceived whistleblowers. Calling all clowns, stop digging yourself deeper...
Sally Vix wrote:
Don't call us clowns . . .
Deer Sally Trumper. You are a CLOWN!!!
Sally Vix wrote:
Don't call us clowns when you refuse to condemn Adam Schiff even though I condemn Trump. You are not a serious player here.
Fat Hurts - Not serious -
Sally = 100%, pure, unadulterated troll.
Sorry Sally, but you've really overplayed your hand the last couple of days. There is no longer any way that any serious poster could confuse you with anything other than a troll.
Jakob Ingebrigtsen has a 1989 Ferrari 348 GTB and he's just put in paperwork to upgrade it
Strava thinks the London Marathon times improved 12 minutes last year thanks to supershoes
Is there a rule against attaching a helium balloon to yourself while running a road race?
NAU women have no excuse - they should win it all at 2024 NCAA XC
Mark Coogan says that if you could only do 3 workouts as a 1500m runner you should do these
Move over Mark Coogan, Rojo and John Kellogg share their 3 favorite mile workouts
How rare is it to run a sub 5 minute mile AND bench press 225?