Sally Vix wrote:
Serious question for the Dems/Libs here ... has anyone called out Adam Schiff here for making up false stuff when he had the actual transcript before him? Seriously, this is a very serious crime but I can't recall ANY of you condemned him for it. You will only pillorize Trump whom you hate but give a free ride to the Senate Intel head who did something very, very egregious. Do any of you really care about the truth or being honest. Or is it all about your party getting the "upper-hand?" If the latter you need to take back everything bad you said about me and hang your heads in a collective LOW. Shame on you!
I am breaking my ban with you for this post because I feel you need a win, and protecting the feelings of others is more important than maintaining a ban.
On this point, you are CORRECT (well, correct that Schiff shouldn't have done it...not a crime, serious or otherwise)! Schiff DID say things that weren't correct, were misleading, and he did put his own personal spin on the readout of the call. He shouldn't have done that, and Trump has a right to be upset by it. It was foolish of Schiff to do that, because the readout as it is is damning enough. The cover up is damning enough. The very dangerous and likely criminal speech Trump has engaged in since is damning enough.
Now, even though you got this right, just to be clear, what Schiff did doesn't absolve Trump in any way for his crime. What Trump did there on that call with Ukraine is very serious and criminal and impeachable. He WILL be impeached for it too...but enough of my correctness...this post was to congratulate you for a correct view (mostly correct) on something.
I hope you keep it up. I'm rooting for you.
Ban back on until I see consistent reasonableness from you.