Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Smorbun wrote:

P wrote:

This has been addressed multiple times on this thread already. It is not anyone else' fault that you ignored or failed to comprehend previous posts on this topic.

This is right. To compare in any way Trump's criminality to this false accusation of misdeeds by Biden is ignorant at best. This question has been asked and appropriately answered. Sally is a nimrod.

Please answer who in the US government investigated this matter. I really want to know which branch of the government investigated and absolved the Bidens of no wrongdoing. It it is legitimate you should have no problem listing it with like 4 seconds of time. Thanks!

Sally Vix wrote:

Calyope wrote:

Rigged, looks like you've been challenged to show some shred of dignity. Care to answer the call? Can you admit to getting that wrong without mentioning anyone else? You are still a wanker. The only question is if you can be a smaller wanker. You've been challenged, mate.

Why would Rigged ever respond to you? Every one of your posts calls him an idiot racist wanker. You are not a serious poster here. You are a big time nut job. Why should he ever respond to one of your nonsense posts when you offer nothing of substance? Seriously, show me JUST ONE of your posts where you make a cogent response with some thought and seriousness. I have yet to see one yet. Everything is "idiot racist wanker." Are you 5 years old? 6?

You continue to prove how stupid you are, mate. This is the second time now that you have accused me of calling either you or him an idiot racist wanker in "every one" of my posts, right after a post in which I did not call him or you that.

Rigged should answer because he posted something that was fake without investigating it first, and he has been called out. Put the tinny down and answer the call, Rigged! He's a sheep for the conservatives, and he has no credibility whatsoever. You also do not as you continue to say the same crap again and again ever after you have been proven wrong about the crap. You, sir or madam, are indeed an idiot racist wanker. For you the biggest part of that is idiot. For Rigged it's wanker, but all three titles are stuck on you both. Wanker.

Sally Vix wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

Joe and Hunter should be investigated as soon as there is evidence of wrongdoing.

There is audio of Joe Biden laughing at how he got the Ukranian prosecutor FIRED because he threatened to withhold aid to Ukraine. Seriously, that is not evidence of wrongdoing? Come on!

Yes, it is not evidence of wrongdoing. Again, you are ignorant of the facts in this case. Your stupidity is of a very high level.

Calyope wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

There is audio of Joe Biden laughing at how he got the Ukranian prosecutor FIRED because he threatened to withhold aid to Ukraine. Seriously, that is not evidence of wrongdoing? Come on!

Yes, it is not evidence of wrongdoing. Again, you are ignorant of the facts in this case. Your stupidity is of a very high level.

Not one cogent response. NOT ONE! You hold the LetsRun record. Congrats!

what do you think, boys?

Is Sally unaware that biden and the Europeans wanted a tougher, not a weaker, prosecutor?

Or is Sally just another common variety trumpist liar?

Sally Vix wrote:

I am asking this in earnest. Did the US investigate this potential wrongdoing by Biden and son or was it some rogue Ukranian prosecutor who absolved the Bidens of any wrongdoing. Again, did the US government clear him or did some hack prosecutor who maybe had his palms greased who cleared the duo?

Here's a suggestion. Why don't you find out the truth about things on your own before you spout your embarrassingly stupid comments here? Sometimes when a bunch of people are calling you stupid, it's because you are. People know that about you because of what you post. Quit posting stuff that shows how stupid you are, and those calling you that will likely stop.

Sally Vix wrote:

Smorbun wrote:

This is right. To compare in any way Trump's criminality to this false accusation of misdeeds by Biden is ignorant at best. This question has been asked and appropriately answered. Sally is a nimrod.

Please answer who in the US government investigated this matter. I really want to know which branch of the government investigated and absolved the Bidens of no wrongdoing. It it is legitimate you should have no problem listing it with like 4 seconds of time. Thanks!

I really want to know which branch of government investigated and absolved Sally Vix of beating his wife. If it is legitimate you should have no problem listing it with like 4 seconds of time. Thanks!

agip wrote:

what do you think, boys?

Is Sally unaware that biden and the Europeans wanted a tougher, not a weaker, prosecutor?

Or is Sally just another common variety trumpist liar?

Sally is unaware because he doesn't want to be aware and probably isn't capable of being aware. The US Government doesn't just go investigate everyone for no reason! As far as I know, the US Government hasn't investigated Sally. Does that mean Sally might have done something illegal that we just don't know about? Should I say what Sally said and say he's not legitimate until the US Government investigates him? Sally is an idiot racist wanker, the likes of which I have never seen before. Earth-shattering stupidity. Bogan wanker.

Fat hurts wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

Please answer who in the US government investigated this matter. I really want to know which branch of the government investigated and absolved the Bidens of no wrongdoing. It it is legitimate you should have no problem listing it with like 4 seconds of time. Thanks!

I really want to know which branch of government investigated and absolved Sally Vix of beating his wife. If it is legitimate you should have no problem listing it with like 4 seconds of time. Thanks!

Good on you, mate! We just basically said the same thing. Sally probably won't even understand it.

You say Trump has been investigated for 3 years.

Republican Rod Rosenstien appointed Republican Robert Mueller in May of 2017 to investigate Russian interference of the 2016 election and anything related to it.

That concluded in April 2019.

That’s 2 years, not 3.

Trump refused to be interviewed for the investigation.

There were accusations that Trump cooperated with Russia to help them spread fake news.

No recordings or transcripts were found so they could not conclude a conspiracy.

So the very day after Mueller testifies before Congress, Trump asks a foreign leader to investigate his political rival while simultaneously withholding pledged support to that country.

He will be impeached for that.

You can change the subject all you want but we’re talking about the Trump presidency here.

Sally Vix wrote:

Oh, sure wrote:

Yes, Sally, and you have already been informed--on this thread, and more than once--about the circumstances of the firing of the corrupt, non-prosecuting prosecutor.

So this is either more trollage from you, or you're deliberately attempting to leave a false impression in the minds of those who haven't already received the information that you've gotten.

By the way, a deliberate attempt to leave a knowingly false impression with someone is what we mean by a LIE.

I am asking this in earnest. Did the US investigate this potential wrongdoing by Biden and son or was it some rogue Ukranian prosecutor who absolved the Bidens of any wrongdoing. Again, did the US government clear him or did some hack prosecutor who maybe had his palms greased who cleared the duo?

Sally why do you care about Biden so much? If it turns out Biden did something illegal will that reduce trump’s illegality in your eyes? What does one have to do with the other?

Biden acted with the full and open support of the POTUS and in line with Congress action on Ukraine. He wasn’t hiding anything. Was it appropriate for his son to be serving on the board of a state owned energy company? Without the facts I’d say probably not. Illegal? So far no one has found reason to investigate him. So why do you think they should? You see some equivalence here?

Sally Vix wrote:

Smorbun wrote:

This is right. To compare in any way Trump's criminality to this false accusation of misdeeds by Biden is ignorant at best. This question has been asked and appropriately answered. Sally is a nimrod.

Please answer who in the US government investigated this matter. I really want to know which branch of the government investigated and absolved the Bidens of no wrongdoing. It it is legitimate you should have no problem listing it with like 4 seconds of time. Thanks!

I don’t know Sally why hasn’t trump made Barr look into it just like he was going to look into Hillary’s crimes? Hint hint

agip wrote:

what do you think, boys?

Is Sally unaware that biden and the Europeans wanted a tougher, not a weaker, prosecutor?

Or is Sally just another common variety trumpist liar?

I think he’s on agent orange...

Sally Vix wrote:

Smorbun wrote:

This is right. To compare in any way Trump's criminality to this false accusation of misdeeds by Biden is ignorant at best. This question has been asked and appropriately answered. Sally is a nimrod.

Please answer who in the US government investigated this matter. I really want to know which branch of the government investigated and absolved the Bidens of no wrongdoing. It it is legitimate you should have no problem listing it with like 4 seconds of time. Thanks!

Sally, here is the issue. Trump asked a leader of a foreign country to investigate a political rival. In other words, Trump used the power if the presidency in an attempt to benifit himself. This is 100% verified by documentation provided by the White House. His use of the words "reciprocal" and "though" imply that the investigation was considered to be a requirement of receiving aid.

Trump did a bad thing. Do you deny that?

Smorbun wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

I am asking this in earnest. Did the US investigate this potential wrongdoing by Biden and son or was it some rogue Ukranian prosecutor who absolved the Bidens of any wrongdoing. Again, did the US government clear him or did some hack prosecutor who maybe had his palms greased who cleared the duo?

Here's a suggestion. Why don't you find out the truth about things on your own before you spout your embarrassingly stupid comments here? Sometimes when a bunch of people are calling you stupid, it's because you are. People know that about you because of what you post. Quit posting stuff that shows how stupid you are, and those calling you that will likely stop.

Here's a suggestion: Learn to use "Here's a suggestion." You are offering up a suggestion but the first part "Here's a suggestion" you didn't hyphenate. It needs to be hyphenated to have what you are actually suggesting revealed as the actual suggestion. It is late otherwise I would pick apart more closely the nonsense you wrote. Here's a suggestion: If you are going to call someone stupid, please make sure your post doesn't make yourself look stupid in the process.

Very amusing but sad to see the mental gyrations you trumpanzees are doing just to keep your faith of agent orange going. Did you see the news on trump’s conversation with the Australian PM? I guessed you chose to miss that one. Oh yeah, trump said it was nothingburger so you don’t mind. You guys are on some very weak sauce following him off the plank.

What the heck do you mean that nothing was wrong with what he did???? He admitted EXTORTION! Do you not understand extortion? I posted this the other day but you guys and gals don't seem to care. EXTORTION: The act of obtaining something through force or threats. He bragged that the prosecutor was fired because he threatened to withhold aid to ukraine. In any Extortion 101 class that is Exhibit "A!"

SDSU Aztec wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

Please answer who in the US government investigated this matter. I really want to know which branch of the government investigated and absolved the Bidens of no wrongdoing. It it is legitimate you should have no problem listing it with like 4 seconds of time. Thanks!

Sally, here is the issue. Trump asked a leader of a foreign country to investigate a political rival. In other words, Trump used the power if the presidency in an attempt to benifit himself. This is 100% verified by documentation provided by the White House. His use of the words "reciprocal" and "though" imply that the investigation was considered to be a requirement of receiving aid.

Trump did a bad thing. Do you deny that?

I think there are some issues. I won't deny that. Whether it rises to an impeachable offense I am still wrestling with.

Sally Vix wrote:

I am asking this in earnest.

JFC. A vice-president of the United States doesn't get to do that kind of stuff on his own hook! Biden was representing Obama, who--with other Western leaders--was disturbed that the corrupt Ukrainian prosecutor WASN'T PROSECUTING AS HE SHOULD HAVE BEEN. The West (which, bear in mind, was giving a lot of funds to Ukraine) wanted the do-nothing prosecutor OUT and a stronger, non-corrupt prosecutor WHO WOULD PROSECUTE in his stead.

OF COURSE Biden was crowing about it afterward--how often does a vice-president get to do *anything* of substance, even if it's just at the behest of the President? For one of the rare times in eight years as Veep, Biden was permitted to do something that mattered. You'd crow, too, in similar circumstances.

It's deliberately-obtuse shit like this that prompts people to call you a goddamned troll. The topic was done to death in previous pages and there were multiple links to news sources that explained the whole situation. Jesus!