Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Cankles was correct!

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EFsBXxJXoAENGoP?format=jpg&name=small

KAG2020

Wrong! This is why you are an idiot racist wanker.

Flagpole wrote:

Defender/supporter of Trump are one in the same.

Very minor point, but I know you like being "correct": The phrase is "one and the same."

[Please don't make this a twenty-post "thing"--just know it for the future.]

jesseriley wrote:

Remember, remember the last of September

The Donald Trump treason & plot

I know of no reason the Donald Trump treason

Should ever be forgot.

Thanks. Can we start calling President Trump "Guy Fox"?

Good one!

Classic trumpist move.

Barr knows that there is no basis to an investigation of the beginnings of the Mueller report, so he can't even try to get an investigation started in the US.

So he goes overseas, hoping to find countries with weaker norms and standards to investigate a non-crime.

Once again, everything trump touches dies. Trump is trying to spread his zero morals, zero truth policy to allies. I can only hope they rebuff this rogue administration.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/attorney-general-barr-personally-asked-foreign-officials-to-aid-inquiry-into-cia-fbi-activities-in-2016/2019/09/30/d50cd5c4-e3a5-11e9-b403-f738899982d2_story.html

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Pencil neck has a lot of splainin' to do.

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/09/30/ukraine-mystery-schiff-staffer-made-august-visit-for-think-tank-backed-by-hunter-bidens-old-employer/amp/?__twitter_impression=true

You are crazier than a pouch-less marsupial.

Calyope wrote:

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Cankles was correct!

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EFsBXxJXoAENGoP?format=jpg&name=small

KAG2020

Wrong! This is why you are an idiot racist wanker.

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/people-like-donald-trump/

Ouch!

Incredible that folks like Rigged fall for that kind of thing.

///

Are you embarrassed, Rigged? You should be. But I know the answer - you are a Trumpette.

Will you admit your embarrassing error, Rigged? You should. But I know the answer - you are a Trumpette.

Do you feel any sense of shame in spreading such obvious lies, Rigged? You should. But I know the answer - you are a Trumpette.

It's frightening, really. Trump is proving too stupid to be President and by extension, Americans are proving too stupid to govern themselves.

Watch yourself, little man. Calling for violence is illegal.

Democrats lose again wrote:

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1178477539653771264?s=20

Civil war if Trump is removed. The Democrats, gay wimps, will be easily destroyed.

Democrats lose again!!!

This is what traitors like Ghost don’t understand about the Constitution: in case a few crooks have a change of heart & blow the whistle, there’s a remedy available for all the fascism we’ve had to deal with.

Only alternative is unlimited power for psychos like trump.

Democrats lose again wrote:

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1178477539653771264?s=20

Civil war if Trump is removed. The Democrats, gay wimps, will be easily destroyed.

Democrats lose again!!!

Midwest and south agree.

p.n. wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

Defender/supporter of Trump are one in the same.

Very minor point, but I know you like being "correct": The phrase is "one and the same."

[Please don't make this a twenty-post "thing"--just know it for the future.]

You are...CORRECT! I put the wrong word in there, and for that I was wrong and I apologize unreservedly.

Midwest and south agree wrote:

Democrats lose again wrote:

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1178477539653771264?s=20

Civil war if Trump is removed. The Democrats, gay wimps, will be easily destroyed.

Democrats lose again!!!

Midwest and south agree.

What is your plan to drive, get gas and get food while driving to heavily populated liberal cities to run your civil war? You'll have to drive 1000 miles which is nearly 1000 miles out of your comfort zone, and your safe house.

Democrats lose again wrote:

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1178477539653771264?s=20

Civil war if Trump is removed. The Democrats, gay wimps, will be easily destroyed.

Democrats lose again!!!

Red states win again!!!!

You called it. Barr must have played “Return of the Mack” on his headphones so loud, it fried his brain. He was nobody’s Scourge of God anyhow. Dream on, fatso.

Yes, he did attack me personally. I notice you removed the rest of the thread, which showed that quite clearly. And I don't align with anyone but myself. If I think someone is wrong, I say so. If I think someone is right, I say so. If you've paid attention you would know that, m'lady.

Fat hurts wrote:

Yes, he did attack me personally. I notice you removed the rest of the thread, which showed that quite clearly.

And I don't align with anyone but myself. If I think someone is wrong, I say so. If I think someone is right, I say so.

If you've paid attention you would know that, m'lady.

lets get real wrote:

Nobody attacked you personally, princess.

Flagpole is an imbecile. By aligning yourself with him and defending his idiotic predictions you are just proving that you will overlook idiocy if it comes from your own party. In other words, a partisan hack.

It is possible for both Rigged and Flagpole to be wrong (and both be idiots). I would advise you not to join the two of them on that hayride.

I haven't been on this thread much recently but Fat Hurts don't get your panties in a bunch. The anonymous have attacked me relentlessly calling me all sorts of names. You too and Agip and others have called me many names. One thing you may have not noticed is 2 of the most prominent conservatives here, Rigged and me, are not into name-calling. I was just thinking about this and Rigged never seems to call anyone a bad name. I think I am in the same boat. Maybe the difference between conservatives and liberals.

present, esq. wrote:

All of this talk about Trump's potentially running for President after being impeached and removed (purely hypothetical, of course--will never happen) seems to conflict with Article I, Section 3:

-

"Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States: but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law." [emphases mine]

-

The interesting question: Does that mean punishment won't be *worse* than that, but could be less? For instance, could a president be impeached and convicted but NOT removed?

-

Or, if we think that impeachment and conviction *automatically* means removal . . . does the disqualification to hold federal office automatically follow? Who would decide? Could the Senate make stipulations in its guilty verdict?

Disqualification does not automatically follow. When other office holders have been removed by the senate, they took a separate vote on the question of holding future office. But I think it would be sort of a formality.

What I am saying is that Tiny would still run for president. He would say that if elected he could easily win in court in order to take the office back. And he would have a point. There are parts of the Constitution that would uphold the people's right to decide who they want to serve. So when one part of the Constitution conflicts with another, all bets are off.