Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

agip wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

My last post with you. Weaklings use insults. Learned people stay above the fray. They don't get in the gutter. You continually get in the gutter with the other low-lifes you so detest. Enjoy the filth down there. You will flourish!

actually after re-reading my posts I agree with Sally.

I was over the line - I conflated Rigged with Sally as I multitask.

Sally I apologize - you are not a low life. You are a solid person.

Wow - Agip. I am blown away. I am not sure about the part of me being a solid person (kidding) but I am really impressed that you could do that. We could maybe have a beer together sometime. If you so desire.

agip wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

My last post with you. Weaklings use insults. Learned people stay above the fray. They don't get in the gutter. You continually get in the gutter with the other low-lifes you so detest. Enjoy the filth down there. You will flourish!

actually after re-reading my posts I agree with Sally.

I was over the line - I conflated Rigged with Sally as I multitask.

Sally I apologize - you are not a low life. You are a solid person.

You might have confused two posters, but Sally is not a solid person.

Calyope wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

Pretty much done with you, Agip. I never insult anyone here. But you vigorously get your jollies doing so. Not how I ride. You can continue insulting those who disagree with you but it ain't going to be me. Ciao! Oh ... how many languages do you speak? 1? LOL.

You have said that to many others before, but you have the brain of a fungus gnat and result to commenting to those people again.

Crikey mate, you speak multiple languages? So, you spread your idiocy in multiple languages? Bananas! What's "idiot racist wanker" in all the languages you speak? You are that no matter the language.

I know a number of languages but most that I know don't tell us what "idiot racist wanker" is said in that language. That is perhaps only in your language.

Flagpole wrote:

A helpul hint to a clueless one wrote:

This is not about an election. Election laws do not apply.

Well...depends on how they go about it. It is against federal election law for him to have done what he did. They may decide that bribery is part of this too...unclear on that so far. We will see what else comes from the DNI, the IC IG, and the whistle blower.

Trump abuse has NOTHING to do with election law. It has to do with abuse of the office of the president. That Biden is running to be the candidate for president makes no difference.

2018; Don MacGahn (White House lawyer at the time): Warned Trump if he solicits law enforcement to investigate his political rivals he would face impeachment, because Trump lacked the authority to order such a prosecution.

https://mobile.twitter.com/nytmike/status/1176871326281285633

On CNN Today. Trump: "[Democrats] have been taken over by a radical group of people and Nancy Pelosi, as far as I’m concerned, unfortunately is no longer Speaker of the House."

When will Trump release his executive order removing Pelosi as Speaker of the House?

Uh, the point is the sentence is ambiguously written. The (not-so) internal release reads as though a Ukrainian prosecutor was fired not once, but eight times. You'd expect better from someone who communicates professionally. "Myth: The President urged President Zelenskyy to work with Rudy Giuliani to investigate Biden’s involvement in securing the firing of a Ukrainian prosecutor eight times."

VeePee wrote:

Ernest wrote:

Why did Biden want some Ukrainian prosecutor fired eight times? You'd think once would be sufficient.

FYI: Biden was never president. Trump asked for political help more than 8 times, and that is just from the Ukraine. Putin, Putin, Putin.

agip wrote:

actually after re-reading my posts I agree with Sally.

I was over the line - I conflated Rigged with Sally as I multitask.

Sally I apologize - you are not a low life. You are a solid person.

Let's all be clear.

Rigged is the low life.

agip wrote:

we should all note that Barr is implicated in the readout. And we should also note that it was Barr who said the DNI didn't have to release the whistleblower complaint.

So barr should have recused himself on that since he is part of the story. Whoops.

A brave man like Barr does not run away from his patriotic duty of protecting American people from the Deep State.

He is not a coward like Sessions.

What am I missing? wrote:

I’m a bit confused by the Republicans response. Let’s put aside the 400 million Trump put on hold. We still have Trump going to a foreign leader asking him to reopen a closed investigation into his political opponent. Please explain to me how this is remotely OK.

I think the R argument is that it would be irresponsible for Trump *not* to ask Ukraine to clean up corruption affecting both nations. That presidents are always offering carrots and sticks to encourage other nations to do stuff.

Sally Vix wrote:

agip wrote:

actually after re-reading my posts I agree with Sally.

I was over the line - I conflated Rigged with Sally as I multitask.

Sally I apologize - you are not a low life. You are a solid person.

Wow - Agip. I am blown away. I am not sure about the part of me being a solid person (kidding) but I am really impressed that you could do that. We could maybe have a beer together sometime. If you so desire.

I'll have a virtual beer with you Sally but not real. Lord knows I need my anonymity around these parts.

Same old shitt. Same old Democratic shittt trying to bring down trump THERE IS NOTHING THERE!!!! NoTHING!!!

agip wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

Wow - Agip. I am blown away. I am not sure about the part of me being a solid person (kidding) but I am really impressed that you could do that. We could maybe have a beer together sometime. If you so desire.

I'll have a virtual beer with you Sally but not real. Lord knows I need my anonymity around these parts.

LOL. WE HAVE to keep up our appearances.

A helpul hint to a clueless one wrote: wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

Well...depends on how they go about it. It is against federal election law for him to have done what he did. They may decide that bribery is part of this too...unclear on that so far. We will see what else comes from the DNI, the IC IG, and the whistle blower.

Trump abuse has NOTHING to do with election law. It has to do with abuse of the office of the president. That Biden is running to be the candidate for president makes no difference.

Eh...we will see. It is abuse of the office of the president, yes, but the abuse involves trying to find dirt on a political opponent with the help of a foreign power. They can go at this in many ways. You are wrong to dismiss it.

what a day, boys, what a day.

I'm heading out for a hard workout. Hope I can refocus. Looks like a bright warm day out there.

Kids will be reading about this week in their textbooks for generations. Living through history is difficult and emotional but makes you feel alive, yes? Like a race does.

I'm watching Tiny right now. I've never seen him sounding so dejected.

He's trying to spin this as well as he can, but he's acting like a man at the end of the line.

It's kind of weird.

This is only pre-election posturing. The chances of Trump being impeached are significantly less than zero. First, it never passes a GOP-controlled Senate. Second, every sane Democrat actually wants Trump to run in 2020, their assumption being whatever Donkey Doofus they eventually prop up as their candidate becomes a virtual Shoo-In. But we've heard that before... https://pics.ballmemes.com/thiswillalways-itsn-rigge-youre-just-ote-is-for-s-rop-29308111.png

Sally Vix wrote:

Same old shitt. Same old Democratic shittt trying to bring down trump THERE IS NOTHING THERE!!!! NoTHING!!!

Fat hurts wrote:

I'm watching Tiny right now. I've never seen him sounding so dejected.

He's trying to spin this as well as he can, but he's acting like a man at the end of the line.

It's kind of weird.

The reporter from Fox News should just go kneel down in front of him and unzip his fly. Ridiculous.

Ernest wrote:

This is only pre-election posturing.

The chances of Trump being impeached are significantly less than zero.

First, it never passes a GOP-controlled Senate.

Second, every sane Democrat actually wants Trump to run in 2020, their assumption being whatever Donkey Doofus they eventually prop up as their candidate becomes a virtual Shoo-In. But we've heard that before...

https://pics.ballmemes.com/thiswillalways-itsn-rigge-youre-just-ote-is-for-s-rop-29308111.png

Sally Vix wrote:

Same old shitt. Same old Democratic shittt trying to bring down trump THERE IS NOTHING THERE!!!! NoTHING!!!

Impeachment happens in the House. He WILL be impeached.