Sally Vix wrote:
The people have to be involved in the government. At the same time, 95% of the media coverage of him has been negative. That is a problem. Why can't the press be objective?
I disagree with your 95% figure. A significant fraction has been at least neutral.
But the reason he gets a lot of negative coverage is that he does a lot of bad and/or illegal and/or unconstitutional shit--and reporting that stuff objectively (i.e. *accurately*) means that he's going to get "negative" coverage. Stop doing negative *stuff*, Mr. President, and your coverage will improve.
Besides, now that he's suckered the Dems into an impeachment process, he's going to get billions of dollars' worth of free publicity for his election effort--just as he did in 2016. Well played, sir--I have to wonder whether your administration orchestrated the whole timely "whistleblower" thing?