Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Flagpole wrote:

XC Runner '20 wrote:

Here's the problem. You said that he would be impeached based on the Mueller Report. It didn't happen. You said (or may have said) that he would be impeached based on something he hadn't done yet. Great. We all know that if that didn't come to fruition, you would have said something along the lines of "a normal House would have impeached him, but since this is not a normal House, I am right." The poster would said you were Trump-like is correct. You have an issue admitting when you are incorrect, move goalposts, and flat out lie - similar to Trump.

1) Talk to me when the articles of impeachment are drawn up.

2) Yes, I predicted that he would be impeached based on the Mueller Report, but I ALSO said that if for some reason that didn't happen they would impeach him based on something he had yet to do.

3) You are incorrect about my saying whatever you are saying about a "normal house". I never do anything like that ever, and you will not be able to find an example of it.

4) You can not find one lie I have ever told here. I challenge you to do it.

5) I do not move the goal posts either. I also challenge you to find an example.

6) I have also mentioned MANY times when I was wrong or that I MIGHT be wrong about something. I just did that today in this thread with regard to Miss Thunberg. When I am wrong, I ALWAYS say so, often with the phrase, "I apologize unreservedly", so if you go search for "unreservedly" you will see that I have done that many many times and you will thus see that you are wrong with that accusation.

Trump will be impeached.

Trump will not win in 2020.

The Senate MIGHT NOT convict him. I predicted that it would, so I COULD be wrong abut that. Again, I admit when I am wrong every time without fail.

Trump will go to prison after he is out of office (unless he dies before he gets through the process, or there is criminal or space alien behavior that prevents it).

Mueller is still coming.

The clown is done.

XC Runner '20 wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

1) Talk to me when the articles of impeachment are drawn up.

2) Yes, I predicted that he would be impeached based on the Mueller Report, but I ALSO said that if for some reason that didn't happen they would impeach him based on something he had yet to do.

3) You are incorrect about my saying whatever you are saying about a "normal house". I never do anything like that ever, and you will not be able to find an example of it.

4) You can not find one lie I have ever told here. I challenge you to do it.

5) I do not move the goal posts either. I also challenge you to find an example.

6) I have also mentioned MANY times when I was wrong or that I MIGHT be wrong about something. I just did that today in this thread with regard to Miss Thunberg. When I am wrong, I ALWAYS say so, often with the phrase, "I apologize unreservedly", so if you go search for "unreservedly" you will see that I have done that many many times and you will thus see that you are wrong with that accusation.

Trump will be impeached.

Trump will not win in 2020.

The Senate MIGHT NOT convict him. I predicted that it would, so I COULD be wrong abut that. Again, I admit when I am wrong every time without fail.

Trump will go to prison after he is out of office (unless he dies before he gets through the process, or there is criminal or space alien behavior that prevents it).

Mueller is still coming.

The clown is done.

"Sigh"

So many words, so little substance.

Racket wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

She does have a clear and actionable plan forward. She tells us to unite behind the science. That's as clear as it gets.

That is what a 16 year old can do. She does not have political power. She can not make laws. But she can speak truth to power and effect change.

And it is working. I just hope it is not too late.

Yeah, "unite behind the science" isn't an epic platitude at all. I'd say don't make me laugh, but it's far too late for that.

It's interesting that climate change is/has gone the way of modern politics. The loudest people have hijacked various reasonable environmental movements and pushed them to the extremes. Skeptics claim the government wants all your money and to take over in the name of some sort of Eco-fascsim (which our friend Fat Hurts has actually advocated for in his "We Must Invade Brazil" thesis) and people like Greta have spiraled into some tragic sense of immediate impending doom where the only solution is, at a minimum, to spend trillions of dollars on several green initiatives (all of which are definitely legit of course).

Flagpole wrote:

XC Runner '20 wrote:

Here's the problem. You said that he would be impeached based on the Mueller Report. It didn't happen. You said (or may have said) that he would be impeached based on something he hadn't done yet. Great. We all know that if that didn't come to fruition, you would have said something along the lines of "a normal House would have impeached him, but since this is not a normal House, I am right." The poster would said you were Trump-like is correct. You have an issue admitting when you are incorrect, move goalposts, and flat out lie - similar to Trump.

1) Talk to me when the articles of impeachment are drawn up.

2) Yes, I predicted that he would be impeached based on the Mueller Report, but I ALSO said that if for some reason that didn't happen they would impeach him based on something he had yet to do.

3) You are incorrect about my saying whatever you are saying about a "normal house". I never do anything like that ever, and you will not be able to find an example of it.

4) You can not find one lie I have ever told here. I challenge you to do it.

5) I do not move the goal posts either. I also challenge you to find an example.

6) I have also mentioned MANY times when I was wrong or that I MIGHT be wrong about something. I just did that today in this thread with regard to Miss Thunberg. When I am wrong, I ALWAYS say so, often with the phrase, "I apologize unreservedly", so if you go search for "unreservedly" you will see that I have done that many many times and you will thus see that you are wrong with that accusation.

Trump will be impeached.

Trump will not win in 2020.

The Senate MIGHT NOT convict him. I predicted that it would, so I COULD be wrong abut that. Again, I admit when I am wrong every time without fail.

Trump will go to prison after he is out of office (unless he dies before he gets through the process, or there is criminal or space alien behavior that prevents it).

Mueller is still coming.

The clown is done.

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

Wow...wonder who could have seen this coming? Um...that would be me.

To the Trumpers who want to dispute that, I have said in this thread that if the House didn't impeach Trump due to what was in the Mueller Report, that they would do it based on something he hadn't yet done. Well, that appears to be coming.

It's quite simple. Trump is a criminal. He has long been a criminal. Criminals gonna criminal. Shame on you Trumpers for supporting him. It is long past time for you to have jumped off his dumb*ss bandwagon, but we've got another stop now if you finally want to get off. You should.

The Radical Democrats have been in control of the House for sometime, so I see this as inevitable. I think back to a different time when the Radical Republicans forced the impeachment of Andrew Johnson. It should be great theatre, while the ship that is the American state continues to sail directionless.

Flagpole wrote:

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

The Radical Democrats have been in control of the House for sometime, so I see this as inevitable. I think back to a different time when the Radical Republicans forced the impeachment of Andrew Johnson. It should be great theatre, while the ship that is the American state continues to sail directionless.

Don't need "radical Democrats" to decide to impeach based on what we know.

1) Trump (AND Giuliani and maybe Pence) tried to get Ukraine to investigate Joe Biden for the purposes of his own personal gain to get dirt on Biden to improve his chances in the 2020 election.

2) Trump withheld $250 million in Congress-approve money to go to Ukraine.

3) Trump then called the President of Ukraine to talk about investigating Biden (reportedly brought it up 8 times) while that money was still being withheld.

Cut and dried. Collusion (Conspiracy), bribery, election law violation of some sort.

He will be impeached...as I have long said.

XC Runner '20 wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

1) Talk to me when the articles of impeachment are drawn up.

2) Yes, I predicted that he would be impeached based on the Mueller Report, but I ALSO said that if for some reason that didn't happen they would impeach him based on something he had yet to do.

3) You are incorrect about my saying whatever you are saying about a "normal house". I never do anything like that ever, and you will not be able to find an example of it.

4) You can not find one lie I have ever told here. I challenge you to do it.

5) I do not move the goal posts either. I also challenge you to find an example.

6) I have also mentioned MANY times when I was wrong or that I MIGHT be wrong about something. I just did that today in this thread with regard to Miss Thunberg. When I am wrong, I ALWAYS say so, often with the phrase, "I apologize unreservedly", so if you go search for "unreservedly" you will see that I have done that many many times and you will thus see that you are wrong with that accusation.

Trump will be impeached.

Trump will not win in 2020.

The Senate MIGHT NOT convict him. I predicted that it would, so I COULD be wrong abut that. Again, I admit when I am wrong every time without fail.

Trump will go to prison after he is out of office (unless he dies before he gets through the process, or there is criminal or space alien behavior that prevents it).

Mueller is still coming.

The clown is done.

"Sigh"

So many words, so little substance.

brazen2 wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

1) Talk to me when the articles of impeachment are drawn up.

2) Yes, I predicted that he would be impeached based on the Mueller Report, but I ALSO said that if for some reason that didn't happen they would impeach him based on something he had yet to do.

3) You are incorrect about my saying whatever you are saying about a "normal house". I never do anything like that ever, and you will not be able to find an example of it.

4) You can not find one lie I have ever told here. I challenge you to do it.

5) I do not move the goal posts either. I also challenge you to find an example.

6) I have also mentioned MANY times when I was wrong or that I MIGHT be wrong about something. I just did that today in this thread with regard to Miss Thunberg. When I am wrong, I ALWAYS say so, often with the phrase, "I apologize unreservedly", so if you go search for "unreservedly" you will see that I have done that many many times and you will thus see that you are wrong with that accusation.

Trump will be impeached.

Trump will not win in 2020.

The Senate MIGHT NOT convict him. I predicted that it would, so I COULD be wrong abut that. Again, I admit when I am wrong every time without fail.

Trump will go to prison after he is out of office (unless he dies before he gets through the process, or there is criminal or space alien behavior that prevents it).

Mueller is still coming.

The clown is done.

5) You gave a 100% guarantee that HRC would win. Then you moved the goalposts and claimed that you said it with some BS about Trump cheating. Show me the post where you gave limitations to your guarantee BEFORE the election. And don't come back here with some crap about no one can prove you guaranteed an HRC victory. Everyone over the past 3 years remembers your guarantee one way and no one remembers it with limitations. I'll wait for your "unreserved" apology.

Racket wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

She does have a clear and actionable plan forward. She tells us to unite behind the science. That's as clear as it gets.

That is what a 16 year old can do. She does not have political power. She can not make laws. But she can speak truth to power and effect change.

And it is working. I just hope it is not too late.

Yeah, "unite behind the science" isn't an epic platitude at all. I'd say don't make me laugh, but it's far too late for that.

It's interesting that climate change is/has gone the way of modern politics. The loudest people have hijacked various reasonable environmental movements and pushed them to the extremes. Skeptics claim the government wants all your money and to take over in the name of some sort of Eco-fascsim (which our friend Fat Hurts has actually advocated for in his "We Must Invade Brazil" thesis) and people like Greta have spiraled into some tragic sense of immediate impending doom where the only solution is, at a minimum, to spend trillions of dollars on several green initiatives (all of which are definitely legit of course).