SEE? This is why you don't cut and paste from Fox News.
But anyway, close enough.
SEE? This is why you don't cut and paste from Fox News.
But anyway, close enough.
How old are you? Do you use such filthy language in your day-to-day conversation? Do you use such filthy language with your loved one(s)?
Obvi wrote:
Fat hurts wrote:
All candidates do opposition research. That's what Hillary did.
Tiny used taxpayer money to bribe a foreign government. That's what Tiny did.
Sally is too stupid to understand this concept.
Good on you, mate. Sally is too stupid to understand anything.
Sally Vix wrote:
Wrong again, Agip! Bush's disapproval rating was 71% on 10/10/08. Please try to minimize your errors!
Agip pointed to a poll that said who disliked Trump, not who disapproved of his job performance.
There are people that dislike Trump but approve of what he is doing on the job.
Conversely, there were people that did not dislike W Bush as a person, but they did not approve of the job he was doing at the time.
Trump has a high disapproval rating and people dislike him at a very high rate.
Even you dislike him.
Dis Like wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
Wrong again, Agip! Bush's disapproval rating was 71% on 10/10/08. Please try to minimize your errors!
Agip pointed to a poll that said who disliked Trump, not who disapproved of his job performance.
There are people that dislike Trump but approve of what he is doing on the job.
Conversely, there were people that did not dislike W Bush as a person, but they did not approve of the job he was doing at the time.
Trump has a high disapproval rating and people dislike him at a very high rate.
Even you dislike him.
That is true. I indeed dislike him.
It's an interesting poll result, but the problem is that just because people "dislike" Trump, that doesn't mean they won't vote for him. Trumpers are so nuts and ignorant, that they actively support a lawless guy no matter what he does as long as we don't elect a Democrat who is so evil that they want healthcare for everyone. So, the point is that many of those who say the "dislike" Trump will still vote for him.
It won't be enough though. He will lose.
The House will also impeach him. Democrats simply can not NOT do this now...unless this Ukraine story really falls apart, which for now it doesn't seem like it will.
Trump will go to prison when he is no longer in office.
Mueller is still coming (I have explained many times why this is so).
The clown is done.
Flagpole, since you have 100% integrity 100% of the time I will make it easy for you ...
Flagpole's correct predictions:
1)
2)
3)
Flagpole's wrong predictions:
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
9)
10)
Please copy and paste and fill out if you truly have 100% integrity 100% of the time. If not, then you don't.
Sally, you are a FOOL. Your link to Bush with 71% disapproval is to a poll by GALLUP ... not biased like Fox Polls. Agip's link is to a Fox Poll ... where extreme conservative bias "lifts" drop to 69%.
Night observer wrote:
None of us are happy with the options. Trump is a corrupt fool and the democrats are just indulgent grandparents not up to make making tough decisions.
I don't think Republicans have made any tough decisions either. The only thing they every do is give tax breaks to the wealthy. That's not very tough.
Changing health care is a really tough decision. Just passing Obamacare was a giant of a decision.
Fixing the climate crisis is at the same time the toughest and the easiest decision of them all. It will be tough politically. But fixing the problem is actually an easy decision because doing nothing is suicide.
agip wrote:
eh sorta
the money medicare gives to hospitals is low. If more people went on medicare, if the reimbursement rates stayed the same, much of the health care industry would go out of business. Private healthcare has kept the healthcare industry afloat...medicare works yeah because it is a free rider.
So if medicare expanded, the cost to enroll would have to go up a lot.
That is absolutely false.
There are plenty of hospitals in Florida where almost all patients are on Medicare. Those hospitals are doing great.
Also, Medicare currently covers older people who are the most expensive demographic. Expanding Medicare would cover people under 65 who cost less. Therefore, per-patient cost will go down.
What do I say?
I say Tiny is going to prison.
For which crimes? Please be specific. Not bogus obstruction of justice for a crime he never committed.
Did you ever think that Trump might go to jail for the same charges his attorney is sitting in jail for?
Goin' with Cohen wrote:
Did you ever think that Trump might go to jail for the same charges his attorney is sitting in jail for?
For 3 years I have been relentlessly pummelled with claims made by MSNBC and other media outlets that Trump this (fill in the blank) will be his undoing or this (fill in the blank) will be why he goes to prison. Instead he is still operating out of the Oval Office why the Liberals in the media and the Liberals in Congress have been wrong time and time and time yet again. It just never ends. 3 years and STILL they are trying to undo the 2016 election. When does it end?
Sally Vix wrote:
Fat hurts wrote:
What do I say?
I say Tiny is going to prison.
For which crimes? Please be specific. Not bogus obstruction of justice for a crime he never committed.
He did commit obstruction of justice. Mueller said he can be prosecuted for that when he leaves office.
He was an unindicted co-conspirator along with Michael Cohen. He can be indicted for that when he leaves office.
He apparently committed extortion when he threatened to hold back taxpayer dollars to Ukraine in exchange for digging up dirt on Biden.
That's just for starters. I don't have time to list more, but I'm sure others will chime in.
Fat hurts wrote:
He did commit obstruction of justice. Mueller said he can be prosecuted for that when he leaves office.
Actually, Trump can be prosecuted now if not for Barr's gross, and politcally-biased, misinterpretation of the U.S. Constitution. A Barr "memo" takes precedence over the law. A president cannot be prosecuted for actions directly related to the office. A president can be prosecuted for actions NOT directly related to the office ... like going around Congress, colluding with a foreign rival, spending money NOT authorized by Congress, ... continue endlessly long list of Trump transgressions.
Fat hurts wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
For which crimes? Please be specific. Not bogus obstruction of justice for a crime he never committed.
He did commit obstruction of justice. Mueller said he can be prosecuted for that when he leaves office.
He was an unindicted co-conspirator along with Michael Cohen. He can be indicted for that when he leaves office.
He apparently committed extortion when he threatened to hold back taxpayer dollars to Ukraine in exchange for digging up dirt on Biden.
That's just for starters. I don't have time to list more, but I'm sure others will chime in.
I hate Trump as much as anyone else, but I don't want an ex-POTUS in prison. Unless he murders someone, it just ain't right and it's not going to happen.
If he isn't re-elected it will destroy his ego and he will go home home devastated like no one has before. He will spend the rest of his life watching videos of his rallies and debates and tweeting nonsense about rigged elections and witch hunts. I will find that quite satisfying.
If Biden for example is the nomination the erasing student debt is not a policy he supports. Free insurance and tuition for illegals? Not sure he’s spoken in favor of that.
He has never spoken in favor of reparations.
Fat hurts wrote:
agip wrote:
eh sorta
the money medicare gives to hospitals is low. If more people went on medicare, if the reimbursement rates stayed the same, much of the health care industry would go out of business. Private healthcare has kept the healthcare industry afloat...medicare works yeah because it is a free rider.
So if medicare expanded, the cost to enroll would have to go up a lot.
That is absolutely false.
There are plenty of hospitals in Florida where almost all patients are on Medicare. Those hospitals are doing great.
Also, Medicare currently covers older people who are the most expensive demographic. Expanding Medicare would cover people under 65 who cost less. Therefore, per-patient cost will go down.
yes, hospitals that serve primarily poor people will do better.
but hospitals that depend on the much higher payments from private insurance to subsidize the much lower medicare patients...will do very poorly.
this is all very complicated obviously, but there is little doubt that the much lower reimbursement rates from medicare would put a lot of the health care system in dire straits. Not all, but much.
Des Linden: "The entire sport" has changed since she first started running Boston.
Ryan Eiler, 3rd American man at Boston, almost out of nowhere
Am I living in the twilight zone? The Boston Marathon weather was terrible!
Matt Choi was drinking beer halfway through the Boston Marathon
2024 College Track & Field Open Coaching Positions Discussion