Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Ciro wrote:

Calyope wrote:

Deer don't run from headlights you idiot racist wanker. They stop and stare at them. The point is that they do not run from them. Why do you post here? Wanker.

???

Oh poor Sally.

My big time bad - I think deer ran when in the headlights - I am a dummy!

insane asylum wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

I of course don't hunt animals. But, I would hope if I put headlights on a deer - they would run and not be shot.

Sally, you need to come in immediately. You are long past due for you final check in.

The Insane Asylum

"You can check out time you like / But you can never leave"

Your post made me laugh a lot. Thanks!

Ciro wrote:

Calyope wrote:

Deer don't run from headlights you idiot racist wanker. They stop and stare at them. The point is that they do not run from them. Why do you post here? Wanker.

???

Oh poor Sally.

I guess I am not a hunter. My bad!

Sally Vix wrote:

Ciro wrote:

???

Oh poor Sally.

I guess I am not a hunter. My bad!

I’m not a hunter either but it’s pretty to clear to most everyone else what the phrase means.

Sally Vix wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

Thanks for reminding me. I haven't said this in a long time but it's still true.....

Tiny is going to prison.

Fat Hurts - serious bet. I will bet you $10,000 that he does not go to prison. YOu on?

What is the point in such a bet? It has no impact on the fate of Trump.

Seriously, what is the point other than to prove how macho you are?

Sally Vix wrote:

Calyope wrote:

Deer don't run from headlights you idiot racist wanker. They stop and stare at them. The point is that they do not run from them. Why do you post here? Wanker.

I of course don't hunt animals. But, I would hope if I put headlights on a deer - they would run and not be shot.

You can hope all you want but it won't change the reality - deer freeze, staring into headlights.

It is very weird that you would use this extremely well known saying without knowing what it means. Oh yeah, I forgot, you are an extremely highly educated genius. So it stands to reason that you won't know the simplest thing that everyone knows. SMH

agip wrote:

Now the WH is admitting it is behind the refusal to hand over the whistleblow to congress. it is citing exec privilege of course. Even though the freaking law says the complaint must be handed over to congress.

they are openly saying they won't follow the law.

nice, right wingers, nice. 90% of you support a president who orders people to break the law.

notch another impeachment article.

you aren't conservatives. You are right wingers, and getting close to cultists.

(deleted link)

Getting close???

Fat hurts wrote:

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Remember when Barry did it on television? Double standards apply!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0mgQaFlo_p8

Obama said he might have more flexibility after the election. If that's all Tiny did it would not even be a story.

Whatever Tiny did, it is serious and urgent. The Inspector General said so.

Further, the point is NOT that he said something. The point is that the administration is currently breaking the law.

Rigged - Are you really so stupid that you do not understand that?

1100 wrote:

agip wrote:

you aren't conservatives. You are right wingers, and getting close to cultists.

Getting close???

LOL.

Fat hurts wrote:

Here are the letters from Atkinson to Schiff and Nunes:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/123doUFyqVG-eUN8IKSwTk1YlhBaCzwVW/viewhttps://drive.google.com/file/d/16LEEnrcCTRz3BdgLJZQw6L1IS0Z68wPR/view

I wish I could adequately convey how important this is. This relates directly to a flagrant flouting of the Constitution of the United States.

/

And, of course, if Barack Obama had done the identical thing, the GOP would be SCREAMING--and rightly so.

Their hypocrisy and unpatriotic operation in their own interest, rather than the country's, is appalling...and apparently boundless.

/

This comment comes from someone who has never checked the Democratic box for any office, in any election, in more than 30 years as a voter.

None of this is necessary. Joe Biden handled Corn Pop, he can handle Trump.

present, esq. wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

Here are the letters from Atkinson to Schiff and Nunes:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/123doUFyqVG-eUN8IKSwTk1YlhBaCzwVW/viewhttps://drive.google.com/file/d/16LEEnrcCTRz3BdgLJZQw6L1IS0Z68wPR/view

I wish I could adequately convey how important this is. This relates directly to a flagrant flouting of the Constitution of the United States.

/

And, of course, if Barack Obama had done the identical thing, the GOP would be SCREAMING--and rightly so.

Their hypocrisy and unpatriotic operation in their own interest, rather than the country's, is appalling...and apparently boundless.

/

This comment comes from someone who has never checked the Democratic box for any office, in any election, in more than 30 years as a voter.

I dunno...this country has told each president that he has wide volition in setting foreign policy. Very wide volition. It would be weird for the congress to take that back. I suspect the truth will be embarassing to trump but not illegal. He can pretty much set any foreign policy he wants. It's a flaw in our system - we want an active president so we give the WH broad authority. The system fails when the president is a bad person.

The latest is that the call was with the Ukraine and was about Biden. It's a big deal if true:

and what's the constitutional aspect of this? I think it's a legal issue, a norms issue...not sure it has much to do with the constitution. I could be wrong tho.

Sally Vix wrote:

insane asylum wrote:

Sally, you need to come in immediately. You are long past due for you final check in.

The Insane Asylum

"You can check out time you like / But you can never leave"

Are you saying there is great latitude in my check-in time but my check-out time is highly restricted? I am not sure I like that equation!

If you are past due for your check in then you do not have any latitude in you check in time. You are late, for a very important date ... it is called AWOL in the military.

Why does that need to be explained to you? There is something very wrong with you.

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

agip wrote:

Now the WH is admitting it is behind the refusal to hand over the whistleblow to congress. it is citing exec privilege of course. Even though the freaking law says the complaint must be handed over to congress.

they are openly saying they won't follow the law.

nice, right wingers, nice. 90% of you support a president who orders people to break the law.

notch another impeachment article.

you aren't conservatives. You are right wingers, and getting close to cultists.

https://www.cnn.com/2019/09/19/politics/white-house-justice-department-dni-whistleblower/index.html

Remember when Barry did it on television? Double standards apply!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0mgQaFlo_p8

If President Obama bothered you, you should have made a stink about it then. Donald Trump is your country's President now. Some people are obviously bothered by what he did and are planning to do something about it. Apparently you sat on your arse having a few tinnies back then. Just because you are a man of inaction doesn't mean that others now need to be, mate.

This agip fella is right. You belong to a cult. The guy you support is not a good one.

Sally Vix wrote:

insane asylum wrote:

Sally, you need to come in immediately. You are long past due for you final check in.

The Insane Asylum

"You can check out time you like / But you can never leave"

Your post made me laugh a lot. Thanks!

It wasn't intended to make you laugh. It was a serious comment to point out to you that your comments are not logical and appear to us laymen as a sign you need to be sent to the loony bin. Your comments are almost without fail incorrect to a comical level, mate. So many people telling you that. Go see the doc for some tablets.

SDSU Aztec wrote:

The latest is that the call was with the Ukraine and was about Biden. It's a big deal if true:

Insane, drooling "fixer" Rudy was on CNN tonight confirming, not confirming, denying, saying it's true and all sorts of other wackiness. I suppose the strategy was to admit it was true...sort of...to take away the thunder. A tactic this administration has used in the past.

Treasonous turkey necks lose again...

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/mcconnell-changes-position-backs-250-million-election-security-n1056636