Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Flagpole wrote:

Back Peddler Flagpole wrote:

no, you said he'd be impeached. liar, liar, liar...back peddler.

What about this doesn't say that - "He will resign because he will be told that the Senate has the votes to convict him after the House has impeached him, though it is possible he will hang on and actually let the Senate remove him from office."

Read this part slowly..."after the House has impeached him..."

Good lord.

Look what Flagpole wrote last year. He is saying that Trump will resign after the House has impeached him and realizing that the Senate has the votes to convict and remove him. He is wrong on all counts. The House WILL NOT impeach him, the Senate DOES NOT have the votes and Trump WILL NOT resign. Has Flagpole EVER been right about anything?

Sally Vix wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

What about this doesn't say that - "He will resign because he will be told that the Senate has the votes to convict him after the House has impeached him, though it is possible he will hang on and actually let the Senate remove him from office."

Read this part slowly..."after the House has impeached him..."

Good lord.

Look what Flagpole wrote last year. He is saying that Trump will resign after the House has impeached him and realizing that the Senate has the votes to convict and remove him. He is wrong on all counts. The House WILL NOT impeach him, the Senate DOES NOT have the votes and Trump WILL NOT resign. Has Flagpole EVER been right about anything?

The answer, of course, is "NO". He's been wrong for going on 4 years now.

He's cries wolf over and over and over, and just continues to double down on any desperate speculation, in hopes of being right about something/anything.

Amusingly, quite often the exact opposite of his prediction actually comes true. Currently, we've now had the DOJ recommend prosecution for both Comey and McCabe, for actions that aren't even the "worst things" that they did. Comey for lying, leaking, and McCabe for lying to the FBI itself. Barr is tactfully waiting on the much bigger, more criminal acts to be confirmed. Wait until the two other investigations (one on the FISA abuse using the garbage Steele dossier, and the other into who really started the Russia Collusion Hoax) are wrapped up. Great times are ahead!

Mueller? NOPE.

Clownpole? DOPE.

Barr IS COMING.

Look at the comments from the peanut gallery Left from back during the Kavanaugh charade:

Trollminator: "Stick a fork in Kav. Ford came across as extremely credible. The details provided and level of transparency without much hesitation we’re pretty convincing. There should be a proper and official FBI investigation regarding this particular case. The reasons why it wasn’t done yet or whatever anyone thinks about her motives for finally speaking out is all irrelevant at the moment - she showed up and is telling her story and it’s credible."

hahaha! Literally zero other human beings on the face of the earth stepped forward to corroborate a single fact of her story.

Clownpole: "I agree that Ford is extremely credible."

hahaha! Oh yeah? How'd that workout for her, moran?

These Lefties on this thread have lost all their marbles. Their basic reasoning capacity is long gone.

Mueller NEVER.

Clownpole FOREVER.

Barr IS COMING, baby!

Concerning the attack on Saudi oil infrastructure, nobody is saying where the attack originated from. The Saudis are now saying it was Iranian weapons and that the attack did not come from Yemen.

I find it hard to believe that the US and Saudi Arabia do not know the origin of the attack. I'm sure they monitor anything flying in the region.

And if they don't know where it came from, how do they know it did not come from Yemen?

According to CNN, "a US official familiar with the intelligence assessment told CNN the recent attack on oil facilities in Saudi Arabia likely involved cruise missiles and attack drones. The official said that the attacks did not originate from Iraq but would not say whether they originated from Iran or Yemen."

Why wouldn't they know if it was missiles or drones or both?

Nobody seems to want the truth to come out right now.

agip wrote:

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

When you start making correct political predictions, then you can brag. You and Clownpole have a non-existent batting average.

as far as I'm concerned, it's 1:1.

you got 2016 right and I got 2018 right.

So now we're looking at 2020.

You feeling lucky?

You got Mueller wrong

You got the impeachment wrong

You got Kavanaugh wrong

And there's more that I'm missing

Your batting average is pitiful.

Fat hurts wrote:

I find it hard to believe that the US and Saudi Arabia do not know the origin of the attack. I'm sure they monitor anything flying in the region.

Including U.S. drones which have stealth tech and only the U.S. can monitor. I wonder if Trump will slip up and post a image from a U.S. drone of the attack while it occurred. That would be a major oops on the magnitude of Trump showing a high resolution image of an explosion accident at an Iranian facility, while he forgot that he claimed the U.S. drones WERE NOT flying over Iran; only over international airspace.

not sure of the degree of certainty the US or SA have in determining all this.

I will say that SA would lie if trump told them to.

And trump has told many, many. many, many, people to lie and they proceeded to lie or break the law.

So in the end as long as trump is president we can't trust anything. The word of the USA is compromised - our official statements should be disregarded.

Only a matter of time before the US gets involved in bombing/attacking a country of brown people to save the POTUS' skin. It's been the MO of Presidents of all parties throughout the history of the US.

Americans love when we bomb other countries, particularly those with a population of non-whites.

Look at this group.

You have Iran which has been a bad player in the world and threatened to destroy Israel.

You have the US that made a multinational deal with Iran to ease sanctions in exchange for verifiable nuclear research reduction.

You have the new US president that tore up that deal with no replacement.

You have Saudi Arabia that assassinated a reporter that resided in the US and lied about it.

We can't trust anything we here from this group.

I agree except that I think it's the Saudis who are telling Tiny what to say.

Over the weekend, he tweeted:

So Tiny is saying that he is just waiting until the Saudis tell him what to do.

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

agip wrote:

as far as I'm concerned, it's 1:1.

you got 2016 right and I got 2018 right.

So now we're looking at 2020.

You feeling lucky?

You got Mueller wrong

You got the impeachment wrong

You got Kavanaugh wrong

And there's more that I'm missing

Your batting average is pitiful.

You're missing A CRAPLOAD more. The Lefties here have proven to take the side of anything the Trump-hating MSM says, right? So here you go:

-Perpetuating Charlottesville Lie (claiming his "very fine people" was about the Antifa and White Supremecists, when it was actually about the people EXCLUSIVE of those groups on both sides of the removing statues argument.)

-The red M-A.G-A hat kid harassing an Indian that never happened (maybe wait a couple hours for the full video evidence to come out? LOL).

-And you really can't group all of the Russia Collusion Hoax into one line called, "Mueller", because there were SO MANY lies that were perpetuated by the MSM for over two years. So many.....

-Trump had a secret server to communicate with the Russians.....

-Cohen went to Prague.....

-Manafort visiting Julian Assange in Ecuadorian Embassy.....

-Cohen claims Trump knew about the Trump Tower meeting in advance.....

-Trump told Cohen to lie about Congress.....

-Don Jr was offered advance access to Wikileaks emails archive.....etc, etc.

ALL were proven false. However, MSM provided ZERO corrections or apologies. Just water under the bridge, I guess.

-Claiming Comey, McCabe, Strzok, Page, Brennan, etc were not working against Trump (pretty clear now that they were, as little by little the DOJ shows the facts of what these criminals were up to).

-Pushing Obstruction of a fake investigation being used to hamper his presidency.

-It just goes on and on.

Funny Agip says he "got 2018 right"..... Are you kidding me?!

what's going to happen wrote:

Only a matter of time before the US gets involved in bombing/attacking a country of brown people to save the POTUS' skin. It's been the MO of Presidents of all parties throughout the history of the US.

Americans love when we bomb other countries, particularly those with a population of non-whites.

yeah well Roosevelt was pretty popular for bombing a bunch of white people so maybe it's just the bombing.

quick question - who won the midterm elections? Asking for a friend.

what's going to happen wrote:

Only a matter of time before the US gets involved in bombing/attacking a country of brown people to save the POTUS' skin. It's been the MO of Presidents of all parties throughout the history of the US.

Americans love when we bomb other countries, particularly those with a population of non-whites.

I think there is a good chance that Tiny will take us to war. I've been saying that for a long time.

But I'm not sure how well it is going to work this time around. This is September 2019, not September 2001. The American public won't be too enthusiastic about a new war.

Fat hurts wrote:

what's going to happen wrote:

Only a matter of time before the US gets involved in bombing/attacking a country of brown people to save the POTUS' skin. It's been the MO of Presidents of all parties throughout the history of the US.

Americans love when we bomb other countries, particularly those with a population of non-whites.

I think there is a good chance that Tiny will take us to war. I've been saying that for a long time.

But I'm not sure how well it is going to work this time around. This is September 2019, not September 2001. The American public won't be too enthusiastic about a new war.

yeah and trump ran partly on keeping the US out of foreign wars. He's in a tough spot...a war would bring some normal conservatives to trump's side but a war might alienate some of the 'america first' people who want nothing to do with foreign wars.

In the end, I think almost all Rs would stand up, tears in their eyes and salute Captain Bone Spurs if he sent $300 or $400 milion of cruise missiles into Iranian posts in Iraq and Syria. They're all in with Spanky. All in.

DiscoGary wrote:

We will now learn the difference between an agitator and a leader. This is how we can keep track.

The number of times the President blames his predecessor:

Obama: 6,342 ... and counting

Trump: 0 so far

^That was from day one of this thread.

Here is how it has gone since:

Trump constantly blames everything on Obama.

He even publicly blamed Obama for air conditioning issues at the White House.

bedfellows wrote:

DiscoGary wrote:

We will now learn the difference between an agitator and a leader. This is how we can keep track.

The number of times the President blames his predecessor:

Obama: 6,342 ... and counting

Trump: 0 so far

^That was from day one of this thread.

Here is how it has gone since:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dqeb93OJRv4

Trump constantly blames everything on Obama.

He even publicly blamed Obama for air conditioning issues at the White House.

And Trump blamed Obama for LED lighting which he claims is the reason he looks orange, and thus that lighting must be banned. (Never mind that Trump looks orange is sunlight. And he looked orange before LEDs were invented. Please ignore those pesky facts.)

anyway, I would not want to be a worker in a Saudi or Iranian oil facility right now. Can you imagine working knowing hundreds of missiles are targeting your head?