Ugh... wrote:
Have you looked? wrote:
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/b68abf839b6879fe20c27e223a272c7be5422a5db655f4631564e384817c3b80.jpgSo gross.
Fat shaming Trump isn't going to get you a Democrat POTUS. Biden is a feeble old man with a memory issue. There is no way he can withstand the role of President. He simply is too old and out of touch.
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
These are the libs of LR every single day until Jan 2025:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EEAoGn0VAAAWpd9?format=jpg&name=smallWaaaah.....
KAG2020
How is this coming from you? You are the biggest cry baby here, planning to run away like a b!tch when Trump loses in 2020.
Sally Vixxxxxens wrote:
agip wrote:
anyone who supports this administration is a bad american. That's all I can say. He or she is not serving the nation.
JFC.
The white house threatened to fire people at the national weather agency unless they supported the president on his fake weather forecast. A cabinet member conveyed the threat.
Rigged, this means you. Sally too. Bad Americans and bad citizens.
WASHINGTON — The Secretary of Commerce threatened to fire top employees at NOAA on Friday after the agency’s Birmingham office contradicted President Trump’s claim that Hurricane Dorian might hit Alabama, according to three people familiar with the discussion.
That threat led to an unusual, unsigned statement later that Friday by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration disavowing the office’s own position that Alabama was not at risk. The reversal caused widespread anger within the agency and drew criticism from the scientific community that NOAA, a division of the Commerce Department, had been bent to political purposes.
Officials at the White House and the Commerce Department declined to comment.
agip - if what you are saying is true then it really needs to be investigated. But remain cautious about the story - one of the main "publications" writing on this is Vanity Fair which has no credibility whatsoever. The Washington Post, however, is a different story.
Shut your vegemite hole you idiot racist wanker!
agip wrote:
Sally Vixxxxxxxens wrote:
I am absolutely the last person to be soaked in Russian propaganda. But let me guess ... you are still on that phony narrative that the Russians influenced the election. They maybe tried to but I seriously doubt they had any effect. The Media has been running with that load of crapola for 3 years and it is just that. I said three things about hillary - was even one wrong? Of course not but you won't even concede anything.
When you cite russian propaganda and you take no steps to dissuade yourself of russian propaganda, and you spew it on social media....then you are a putin lickspittle. That's you. Putin's lickspittle.
Google. Wikipedia. It's there for people like you. Go crazy. Find the truth. Just cut loose, man!
Why do you try to teach this idiot? Sally and Rigged are both idiot racist wankers and need to be called out. No reasoning with them is possible because they are both just too f*ckin' stupid to understand anything.
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Sally Vixxxxxxxens wrote:
Rigged - has any Liberal here expressed concern about the election? Not one - instead they cite poll after poll saying that Biden or Warren or Sanders or whoever will run roughshod over Trump. Why don't they ever say that Trump may win the 2020 election? Why do they admit that the election is up for grabs? Are they deathly afraid that Trump WILL win his second term?
The libs live in denial. Seriously, none of these dem candidates are going to beat Trump. There is no Obama, there is no Bill Clinton & there is no JFK this time around. No charisma, no excitement, no "it" factor. This reeks of Cankles v2.0
This election reminds me of Walter Mondale in 1984 and Michael Dukakis in 1988- neither had a realistic shot to win. Biden, Pocahontas and Crazy Bernie have NO shot to win in 2020.
KAG2020
You've got sh!t for brains you idiot racist wanker!
Numbskull republicans lose again
Sarah Palin's husband 'files for divorce'
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Ugh... wrote:
So gross.
Fat shaming Trump isn't going to get you a Democrat POTUS. Biden is a feeble old man with a memory issue. There is no way he can withstand the role of President. He simply is too old and out of touch.
You seem quite worried about this Biden guy...
Calyope wrote:
Sally Vixxxxxens wrote:
agip - if what you are saying is true then it really needs to be investigated. But remain cautious about the story - one of the main "publications" writing on this is Vanity Fair which has no credibility whatsoever. The Washington Post, however, is a different story.
Shut your vegemite hole you idiot racist wanker!
Vanity Fair is not credible because it offends the dear leader...
https://www.vanityfair.com/style/2017/09/donald-trump-small-hands-hurricane-reliefTrump Dorian tweets: Weather staff 'faced sacking threat' over Alabama https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-49645498
closer than you think wrote:
Conundrum wrote:
On the date of inauguration Biden will be 78. ... Trump will 74...
Biden will be two months past 78. Trump will be five months short of 75. They are closer less than 3-1/2 years apart in age.
Good point. The Republicans seem to be genuinely afraid of Biden. They are quite focused on attacking him with silliness such as being too old when he is close in age to trump. They sound desperate.
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Biden is looking feeble- you libs are in denial.
Here is a test of sanity for Rigged.
Who do you think would win a 5k race between Trump and Biden?
Who looks more feeble?
Who has slurred more words?
I’m sure Biden does seem like a lib to trumpers, whose candidate loves North Korean ruler-deities.
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
The libs live in denial. Seriously, none of these dem candidates are going to beat Trump. There is no Obama, there is no Bill Clinton & there is no JFK this time around. No charisma, no excitement, no "it" factor. This reeks of Cankles v2.0
This election reminds me of Walter Mondale in 1984 and Michael Dukakis in 1988- neither had a realistic shot to win. Biden, Pocahontas and Crazy Bernie have NO shot to win in 2020.
KAG2020
I actually agree with this (except Trump is way more unpopular than Regan was at this point in the presidency I think; maybe I'll look up the numbers later).
The fact that the DNC is pushing for Joe Biden, an old white career politician with decades of baggage (but a good resume on paper!) just 3 years after Hillary Clinton lost what should have been an easy election is just pathetic. He is practically the male version of her and basically running on the exact same carefully crafted moderate/slight left platform.
People wanted Barrack Obama to be their president. Do any of you want any of the current candidates to be president? I don't. Sure, they'll do a better job and I'd rather have one of them than Trump, but that's not really saying much is it? The only thing we can really agree on is that we really don't want Trump for 4 more years, and I question if that is motivating enough.
I mean, what's the lesson learned from 2016? Did the DNC not do a sort of moratorium on what went wrong?
My bet is that this is going to be like Kerry vs Bush. It'll be close, and everyone will know the incumbent is retarded, but he's not a liberal at least! And that's when I realized that no organization on Earth is better at snatching defeat from the jaws of victory like the DNC.
So far manafort is winning the defeats-from-victory race. They haven’t locked up the dems yet!
They keep losing wrote:
Numbskull republicans lose again
Sarah Palin's husband 'files for divorce'
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-49645950
#GOPFamilyvalues
Sally Vixxxxxxxens wrote:
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Biden is too old, too tired and losing it mentally. Pocahontas is too socialist. The moderates are not voting for either. Trump wins again.
KAG2020
Rigged - has any Liberal here expressed concern about the election? Not one - instead they cite poll after poll saying that Biden or Warren or Sanders or whoever will run roughshod over Trump. Why don't they ever say that Trump may win the 2020 election? Why do they admit that the election is up for grabs? Are they deathly afraid that Trump WILL win his second term?
I've been saying for years it's a 60/40 election.
Fat hurts wrote:
agip wrote:
my current view on why the dems should chose biden:
1) Trump fatigue is massive. The country has been trying to fire him for two years. Every election has shown this. There is no reason to think that in 2020 the nation will suddenly change course and want to rehire him.
2) Trump is his own worst enemy. It's not his policies that people loathe...it's him. They want him out. Even HS educated white women now consider him unfavorable.
3) therefore make the election a referendum on Trump.
4) DO NOT give trump a tool to make the election a vote on this candidate or that candidate. Warren would be that gift. She is EXACTLY WHAT MILLIONS OF SWING VOTERS DON'T want. A pointy head wild far left radical who promises...PROMISES to take an eggbeater to the economy and push all kinds of PC battles. People do not want the feds pushing PC transgender ID politics.
5) The balance is keeping the young dem radicals interested and getting them, finally, to vote. I think Trump will drive that. The loathing they have for trump is enough. They dont' need anymore.
6) The thing needed is to give suburban and lower educated women and african americans something to vote for. Biden is that. 'Return to normalcy, don't be afraid' will work for the women, and 'Obama's right hand man' will work for the A-As.
Warren is a weapon handed to the Rs. It's not necessarily suicide...I think Warren would still win...but better to make the election a referendum on Trump, not a choice between conservative policy and far left policy.
some of that is cribbed from Axelrod.
Biden is easier to beat than Warren. He has lost a step. That will become clear to more and more voters as the primary season goes on.
Biden is stronger on paper. But candidates don't win on paper. They have to go out and earn it. Warren earns it every day.
It's tricky...you are making the argument that policy doesn't matter...that people elect personalities...people they want to have as a boss, or people they want to have a beer with.
Because the nation is nowhere near the leftiness of warren, and not even the Dem party is near the leftiness of warren. Biden is a solid representation of the Dem party, ideologically. Clinton/Obama type politics. Center left.
So that's the deal I suppose. Does the electorate get thrilled to death over a rich super liberal 70 year old massachuseets senator because of her personality....or do they follow their politics and select Biden.
I think they'll chose biden but I can see either way. Remember the quiet voters are the majority. They dont' go to rallies but they vote. That's why HRC clobbered Bernie in 2016 even though he had more enthusiastic ralliers.
agip wrote:
Sally Vixxxxxxxens wrote:
Rigged - has any Liberal here expressed concern about the election? Not one - instead they cite poll after poll saying that Biden or Warren or Sanders or whoever will run roughshod over Trump. Why don't they ever say that Trump may win the 2020 election? Why do they admit that the election is up for grabs? Are they deathly afraid that Trump WILL win his second term?
I've been saying for years it's a 60/40 election.
You liberals need to wake up. America is not electing a socialist POTUS in 2020 and making illegal aliens first. Those same oversampled Dem polls guaranteed a victory for Cankles. How did that work out for ya? Again, the only polls that matter:
Norpoth
13 Keys
Cafepress
IBD/TIPP
KAG2020
This is one of my fondest hopes for 2021 and beyond - that a president biden will work to give power back to the congress, after years of the reverse.
I think Warren would likely try to grab even more power for the WH...Biden might be just the right guy to be willing to hand it back.
Jakob Ingebrigtsen has a 1989 Ferrari 348 GTB and he's just put in paperwork to upgrade it
Is there a rule against attaching a helium balloon to yourself while running a road race?
Strava thinks the London Marathon times improved 12 minutes last year thanks to supershoes
How rare is it to run a sub 5 minute mile AND bench press 225?
Mark Coogan says that if you could only do 3 workouts as a 1500m runner you should do these
Am I living in the twilight zone? The Boston Marathon weather was terrible!
Move over Mark Coogan, Rojo and John Kellogg share their 3 favorite mile workouts
