Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Racket wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

I never disputed what you just said.

I'm just agreeing with the Union of Concerned Scientists. If you are dumb enough to question their conclusions, take it up with them.

Wow no-one called you out on backing an inherently anti-science organization (lol @ their attempt though). I must say I've never encountered a Bible beating postmodernist before so that's kind of neat I guess.

Who are you saying is anti-science?

Looks like Trump is helping Russia again

https://www.politico.com/story/2019/08/28/trump-ukraine-military-aid-russia-1689531

Awesome, awesome quote on Comey's swampy actions:

"What is not permitted is the unauthorized disclosure of sensitive information, obtained during the course of FBI employment, in order to achieve a personally-desired outcome."

This is after the report basically describes what NOT to do as an FBI employee (let alone the LEADER of the FBI!).

Even better, for those of us that actually follow the facts of what transpired from summer of 2016 through the summer of 2017, we know this is just the tip of the iceberg. This was just Comey trying to frame the president with Obstruction charges (since even he knew the Russia collusion nonsense would one day be proven to be a disgusting hoax on the American people).

But even having something less critical (relative to the FISA abuse to spy on and then set up the Trump campaign) like this finally be admitted to the public is encouraging that perhaps the IG will follow the rule of law with these scumbags.

The IG Horowitz Reports on 1) the FISA abuse, and 2) the "How the Russia hoax started" Report from the Barr-appointee Durham are going to rock half of the country that follow Lefty, Trump-hating news outlets. Some of my liberal friends don't even know who Bruce and Nellie Ohr are! LOL!

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/doj-inspector-general-says-comey-violated-policies-with-memos-documenting-private-conversations-with-trump

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Mr "I'm not getting my way so I'll take my ball and go home ...?"

Exactly how Trump behaved at G-7 a few days ago.

Love it.

In the report: "Comey set a dangerous example for the over 35,000 current FBI employees."

Sounds about right.

The IG Reports (2) will shed light on the much more damning actions from Jimmy:

"Why didn't you notify the President that you were running survellience operations on his campaign?" (which is standard operating procedure)

"Why didn't you inform the FISA court that the Steele Dossier, which was used as the basis for 4 consecutive approvals, was actually opposition research funded by HRC and the DNC, and authored by Mr Steele, who was "desperate for Trump to not become the President?" (which is required per FISA regulations)

Calyope wrote:

Rigged and Sally still defending Trump. He told workers on the border to illegally take land and that he would pardon them.

You two idiot racist wankers.

Pardons are only for conviction of crimes that were already committed. The only way to get a presidential pardon is to get convicted first. So, his minions would spend bigly money on lawyers, and have to spend some time in prison before Trump got around to them. Any Trump minion doing his bidding are playing Russian Roulette and will have to pray they are convicted long enough before January 2020 for Trump to remember to pardon them.

Sally Vix wrote:

Conundrum wrote:

Yes, and a criminal often can often go a few years before being caught and convicted. So "they have caught me yet" is not a badge of honor showing innocence. It also is not evidence that they won't be caught.

What is happening with the impeachment proceedings? You guys say that they are ongoing but how come I don't see any witnesses called? You can hear a pin drop in the Impeachment room (and I don't mean there is a room in the House called the Impeachment room).

They probably are assessing the political ramifications.

Question for you. WHAT IS IT ABOUT TRUMP THAT YOU DO NOT LIKE? You have repeated said that you are not a Trump fan and I wondered why?

(excuse me for shouting, but I had to get your attention)

Sally Vix wrote:

Thanks for all that. I just meant that I was surprised I hear nothing about the impeachment proceedings.

Which you will never hear anything about on Fake News Right-Wing Media. So, stop watching Fox News, and reading Breitbart and listening to Infowars.

Sally Vix wrote:

Trump is ALWAYS Right! wrote:

Found this gem of a tweet from the Cheeto Jesus from back in 2012...

https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/266038556504494082?s=12

Patriotic Americans ALWAYS agree with Trump! Therefore, I assume Sally, Rigged, DFF, and Jamin-loper are in lock step with Trump on this issue.

It is more like Trump is in lockstep with Senate Democrats ...

Wow . . . now you are claiming Trump is a Democrat!

Trumpers can attack Comey all they want but the fact still remains that Trump fired the FBI director for not dropping the Russia investigation with Flynn.

That's obstruction.

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

So? Trump was a democrat back then and that was and is still your stance.

Amazing .... Sally and Rigged both bring up Trump is/was a democrat in posts just minutes apart. The odds of the coincidence being just a coincidence is less than zero. .... Are Sally and you holding hands right now, Rigged?

Conundrum wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

What is happening with the impeachment proceedings? You guys say that they are ongoing but how come I don't see any witnesses called? You can hear a pin drop in the Impeachment room (and I don't mean there is a room in the House called the Impeachment room).

They probably are assessing the political ramifications.

Question for you. WHAT IS IT ABOUT TRUMP THAT YOU DO NOT LIKE? You have repeated said that you are not a Trump fan and I wondered why?

(excuse me for shouting, but I had to get your attention)

I frankly like little about him. In general he is a despicable individual. What I like even less is the fact that he was duly elected and ever since his election Democrats have done everything to overturn the election. Some of his policies I like. Not all of them. I would not have liked almost all of Hillary's policies. She would have ruined this country. I do like the Supreme Court justices that he nominated. Again, Hillary would have selected very liberal justices and the Court would have tilted left for decades. You can undo in relatively little time what a president does. The Supreme Court is a different story.

Just like Sally wrote:

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

So? Trump was a democrat back then and that was and is still your stance.

Amazing .... Sally and Rigged both bring up Trump is/was a democrat in posts just minutes apart. The odds of the coincidence being just a coincidence is less than zero. .... Are Sally and you holding hands right now, Rigged?

Again, so what? You can pull up a lot of pro-democrat views from Trump many years ago.

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Just like Sally wrote:

Are Sally and you holding hands right now, Rigged?

Again, so what?

It was a simple yes-or-no question. We'll take your answer as a definite yes.

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

I wonder why you still believe in fake news?

All the POTUS needs to do is disclose the loan docs and tax returns. That'll solve the issue in favor of the POTUS.

Right?

Trump is ALWAYS Right! wrote:

Found this gem of a tweet from the Cheeto Jesus from back in 2012...

https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/266038556504494082?s=12

Patriotic Americans ALWAYS agree with Trump! Therefore, I assume Sally, Rigged, DFF, and Jamin-loper are in lock step with Trump on this issue.

Well, it WAS a disaster then. That was before. Now it is making America great again.

Come on, put on your red thinking cap!

Sally Vix wrote:

. . . Of course not. Trump will always be guilty in the eyes of Liberals and they will never pronounce him innocent of all the claims against him. I am not saying he is innocent or he is guilty. I am just saying he will always be guilty in the eyes of those on the left no matter what.

You forgot to say, "He will always be innocent in the eyes of those on the right no matter what."

I wonder why you forgot that part.

yes or no wrote:

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Again, so what?

It was a simple yes-or-no question. We'll take your answer as a definite yes.

A definite yes. We are both chilling

here at Rigged's crib smoking a few doobies. We take turns on the computer. We often confer with one another before posting.

yet committed wrote:

Calyope wrote:

Rigged and Sally still defending Trump. He told workers on the border to illegally take land and that he would pardon them.

You two idiot racist wankers.

Pardons are only for conviction of crimes that were already committed. The only way to get a presidential pardon is to get convicted first. So, his minions would spend bigly money on lawyers, and have to spend some time in prison before Trump got around to them. Any Trump minion doing his bidding are playing Russian Roulette and will have to pray they are convicted long enough before January 2020 for Trump to remember to pardon them.

This is not true.

Not only can a president grant a pardon to someone who was not convicted, a president can grant a pardon before someone is even indicted.

Ford did this for Nixon.

So Tiny could, in theory, grant a blanket pardon to anyone committing crimes in the pursuit of building his wall.