Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Non-Running Politics

Page 3,239 of 6,315

1 3,238 3,239 3,240 6,315

4 years ago 08/02/2019 10:24am EDT

re: SiIly WilIy

SiIly WilIy wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
And, just in case no one noticed...
The Justice Department as decided not to prosecute Comey.
This of course goes against what the most insane Trumpers here have said. I won't mention names because that's not how I roll, and I no longer respond to or mention by name the most insane Trumpers here...and you know who you are.
So, just know that you were wrong about that.
Mueller is coming.
The clown is done.
Clownpole-
Do you only read headlines? I think that may be why you end up looking so foolish all the time.
They decided not to prosecute Comey ONLY FOR THE "LEAKING CLASSIFIED MEMOS" issue.
It was a potential CRIMINAL REFERRAL from the IG's office. Re-read that. The IG referred Comey's actions to Barr for prosecution. These were admitted acts by Comey. And yet, Barr decided not to, because the memos weren't designated as classified until after Comey leaked them, and intent would be hard to prove. Prosecuting something as minor as this would look petty and vindictive.
This has nothing to do with 1) the clear FISA abuses that occured under Comey, or 2) how the Russia Collusion Hoax and subsequent obstruction of justice setup by Mr Comey were set in motion.
But THAT'S where Comey is in trouble. And THAT'S what Barr is having his team look into.
They used an opposition research document- which was paid for by Clinton and funneled through Perkins-Coie and Fusion GPS- to spy on a presidential campaign. The person they said they needed to spy on, by the way, was never charged with anything (C Page)! These are the facts.
Mueller NOPE.
Clownpole DOPE.
Barr is on his way.

I notice Clownpole is ramping up the posting today- LOL!! You're just wasting precious moments of your life, pal. Three years being wrong hasn't been enough, huh?

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/joe-digenova-barr-james-comey-leaks-decision

4 years ago 08/02/2019 10:24am EDT

re: Rater of Classes

Rater of Classes wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
Actually, using "such language" has been shown NOT to be a sign of higher intelligence -
https://www.sciencealert.com/swearing-is-a-sign-of-more-intelligence-not-less-say-scientists
Now, you might say there's a difference between intelligence and class, and technically you would be correct there, but I use bad language sparingly and only where deserved. This a$$hole President and stupid-ass Trump supporters deserve the language.
I also have never called a woman a "whore" here. I called a particular one a "gold-digging whore". Whores exist. There is a word that describes them. I have also called Trump a whore and even said he was more of one than Melania. You attempting to protect women just shows your need for a paternalistic society which is the view of a weak man. I view them all as equals.
https://vtfishandwildlife.com/sites/fishandwildlife/files/images/Learn%20More/VT%20Critters/common_loons_1170x540.png

Indeed.

4 years ago 08/02/2019 10:24am EDT

re: Flagpole

Flagpole wrote:
. . .
I also have never called a woman a "whore" here. I called a particular one a "gold-digging whore". . .

So, you are saying that Melania is not a woman?

Or are you saying that a red car is not a car?

4 years ago 08/02/2019 10:26am EDT

re: SiIly WilIy

SiIly WilIy wrote:
SiIly WilIy wrote:
Clownpole-
Do you only read headlines? I think that may be why you end up looking so foolish all the time.
They decided not to prosecute Comey ONLY FOR THE "LEAKING CLASSIFIED MEMOS" issue.
It was a potential CRIMINAL REFERRAL from the IG's office. Re-read that. The IG referred Comey's actions to Barr for prosecution. These were admitted acts by Comey. And yet, Barr decided not to, because the memos weren't designated as classified until after Comey leaked them, and intent would be hard to prove. Prosecuting something as minor as this would look petty and vindictive.
This has nothing to do with 1) the clear FISA abuses that occured under Comey, or 2) how the Russia Collusion Hoax and subsequent obstruction of justice setup by Mr Comey were set in motion.
But THAT'S where Comey is in trouble. And THAT'S what Barr is having his team look into.
They used an opposition research document- which was paid for by Clinton and funneled through Perkins-Coie and Fusion GPS- to spy on a presidential campaign. The person they said they needed to spy on, by the way, was never charged with anything (C Page)! These are the facts.
Mueller NOPE.
Clownpole DOPE.
Barr is on his way.
I notice Clownpole is ramping up the posting today- LOL!! You're just wasting precious moments of your life, pal. Three years being wrong hasn't been enough, huh?
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/joe-digenova-barr-james-comey-leaks-decision

Didn't you hear. His predictions are right the VAST majority of the time. He's only been wrong for three years of his 60+ years.

Whomever is posting the pictures of a loon is spot on.

4 years ago 08/02/2019 10:28am EDT

re: Flagpole

Flagpole wrote:
Macheesemo Man wrote:
Ahhh. False machismo as in "my biceps are HUGE" or the whole "I mow the lawn with my shirt off." You mean that kind? LOL
Don't take the Alan's challenge, Flagpole. We wouldn't have anyone to laugh at if you had to leave.
That's REAL macheesemo, brother!

CORRECTED!

4 years ago 08/02/2019 10:37am EDT

re: Flagpole

Flagpole wrote:
Conundrum wrote:
I am with Nancy on this.
I am not sure you are with Nancy on this. She is being very politically strategic, but she definitely has the door open on supporting impeachment.

Actually I am with Nancy on this. If the Dems find more reason to pull the trigger on impeachment and if they think its politically advantageous to do so, I'm all in on it. But I don't want Trump to be seen as a partisan victim and I don't want distraction from the election.

I guess I partial to the political judgement of the older veterans such as Biden, Obama, Nancy and Schumer.

4 years ago 08/02/2019 10:42am EDT

re: Flagpole

Flagpole wrote:
And, just in case no one noticed...
The Justice Department as decided not to prosecute Comey.
This of course goes against what the most insane Trumpers here have said. I won't mention names because that's not how I roll, and I no longer respond to or mention by name the most insane Trumpers here...and you know who you are.
So, just know that you were wrong about that.
Mueller is coming.
The clown is done.

Barr is coming!

Beware denizens of the Deep State !

(tee hee)

4 years ago 08/02/2019 10:44am EDT

re: Conundrum

Conundrum wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
I am not sure you are with Nancy on this. She is being very politically strategic, but she definitely has the door open on supporting impeachment.
Actually I am with Nancy on this. If the Dems find more reason to pull the trigger on impeachment and if they think its politically advantageous to do so, I'm all in on it. But I don't want Trump to be seen as a partisan victim and I don't want distraction from the election.
I guess I partial to the political judgement of the older veterans such as Biden, Obama, Nancy and Schumer.

No impeachment is the right call at this point.

4 years ago 08/02/2019 10:46am EDT

re: Flagpole

Flagpole wrote:
Monkeys typing wrote:
Gerald Ford was right, it would be immensely divisive to prosecute a former president for actions in any way related to politics.
Expose him, pardon him, then move on and so the country can heal.
That's not a failure of the justice system so much as a necessity for a functional democracy.
Trumps crimes are beyond just political ones. F*ck those who have supported this criminal serial lying President. A lawless President should not be tolerated. Healing can begin with a President who isn't a criminal racist serial lying a$$hole.

Trump has your blood pressure up today, eh.

4 years ago 08/02/2019 10:51am EDT

re: Ciro

Ciro wrote:
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/455616-james-comeys-next-reckoning-is-imminent-this-time-for-leaking
Barr is coming.
The Comey is done.
Not exactly.

nice follow up.

another right wing conspiracy theory tossed in the garbage, as they all will be, one by one.

4 years ago 08/02/2019 10:59am EDT

re: agip

agip wrote:
Conundrum wrote:
No I don't, because convicting someone after they leave office sends a very strong message and a valuable precedent.
Here's my concern, you have seen how republican leaders and trump supporters have responded to the most heinous behavior from Trump. The impeachment will only make them come to his defense even more so and will create even more extreme tribalism. Nothing will be revealed that will change his supporters feelings and those against Trump already feel pretty strong.
Yes I would love to see him held accountable and go through impeachment but lets play long ball and get him after he is out of office. I am with Nancy on this.
I actually flip the other way on this.
Going after previous political leaders after they are out of office is very third world and destabilizing.
Whereas going after them with the courts while they are in office is not, because it is using systems put in place to prevent lawless politicians.
I think prosecuting your political enemies in the courts after they leave is fraught. Although we'll have to do it in this case.
And I'm not sure Nancy is so anti-impeachment. We'll see by October - that's the last time it could really start I think.

Point taken. But obviously, "using systems put in place to prevent lawless politicians" are currently non-functioning systems.

I think any legal action after Trump leaves office shouldn't involve the new president (......Joe Biden) but if possible, be completely independent.

4 years ago 08/02/2019 11:15am EDT

re: Conundrum

Conundrum wrote:
Runningart2004 wrote:
Trump will lose and lose big.
Flagpole you have too much faith in the justice system. Did Clinton ever go to jail? You think Reagan didn't know about Iran-Contra. A former president, no matter the crime, isn't going to jail, isn't being indicted.
Mueller laid it all out for Congress. He stomped his foot. Congress will not impeach him. They will simply do what they've been doing all along, investigate and keep his wrongdoings in the news. That is the best way to go as an impeachment process has a start and end date.
Alan
Many democrats don't want Trump impeached. I am one of them. Does Trump deserved to be impeached, of course he does. He will never be convicted and the impeachment trial will distract from the election.
Defeat Trump in the election, then start legal proceedings against him after he is out of office.
Don't impeach.

Don't impeach. Let him continue the destruction of the GOP. Trump WILL NOT win in 2020. Another republican (John Kasich) stands a better chance.

4 years ago 08/02/2019 11:19am EDT

re: Conundrum

Conundrum wrote:
PS I am for keeping the pressure on with further investigations.

Yes, because Trump revealing more and more what a revolting person he is. He keeps losing moderate GOPers, and his base is losing some people. Not good for him. Wonderful for real Americans.

4 years ago 08/02/2019 11:19am EDT

re: Fat hurts

Fat hurts wrote:
Clintonettes Cry wrote:
Yes, Clintonettes can't argue the facts, they only voted for a known crook/liar/scum and when she loses they whine about the other party. You lost Fat Hurts, accept it. 2020, who knows for sure, but you voted for the losing side on a 100% positive victory that was proven wrong when Trump won. Now your life is this thread, trying to prove your point to make you feel better. The stock market goes up, it's Obama's credit, it goes down it's Trump's fault. Gas is low, it's Obama, you'll never accept anything about him.
Obama surely didn't lie, right? Oh, that's so 2016, so look other there, quickly now!
Unprecedented transparency? What a big FAT HURTS lie. But if you disagree or go against him, you're a racist.
https://www.gop.com/the-top-10-broken-promises-of-the-obama-presidency/
Another Trumper who can't handle the facts. Still talks about Hillary to keep his mind off the fact that his hero is a criminal.

Yep, I'm Fat Hurts and I supported a known liar whom I tried to get into Office by casting my vote.

She lost.

Now I don't wanna talk about her corruptness as my leader FP said that she was the most qualified.

I bow to FP, he knows all.

I've said that he's going to prison, but he won't, I just like to post that so that my head won't explode.

Basically, I'm a liar who knows my side is worse, but to feel better, I post garbage here so I can pretend to be smart.

I'm not smart, I'm an old guy who doesn't like conservatism, only liberalism, but don't take any money from my pocket.

I'm a racist who gives nothing to anybody, I like my money to stay with me, except when Obama raises my taxes.

Obama is a lying liberal, but...he's a liberal.

Since he had 8 years and wasn't impeached like my other buddy, Bill, I look the other way.

Basically, he got elected, but I'm still a sore loser.

If Trump wins again, I'm moving.

Oh wait, I said that time.

I'm a lost cause.

Your candidate was worse than Trump will ever be. Once you start accepting that, you'll find more happiness in your lowly life.

4 years ago 08/02/2019 11:20am EDT

re: Conundrum

Conundrum wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
I am not sure you are with Nancy on this. She is being very politically strategic, but she definitely has the door open on supporting impeachment.
Actually I am with Nancy on this. If the Dems find more reason to pull the trigger on impeachment and if they think its politically advantageous to do so, I'm all in on it. But I don't want Trump to be seen as a partisan victim and I don't want distraction from the election.
I guess I partial to the political judgement of the older veterans such as Biden, Obama, Nancy and Schumer.

Yes, you like Obama the racist liar. You enjoy being lied to, eh?

4 years ago 08/02/2019 11:21am EDT

re: Trumpette

Trumpette wrote:
Barr is coming!
Beware denizens of the DERP State !
(tee hee)

^ Fixed that for you.

Derp State: Trumpland

4 years ago 08/02/2019 11:24am EDT

re: Derp State

[

Clintonette wrote:
Barr is coming!
^ Fixed that for you.
Derp State: Clintonland

Corrected my bias a$$. I meant to type Clinton the Corrupt Witch whom I voted for.

4 years ago 08/02/2019 11:24am EDT

re: PRss

PRss wrote:
No impeachment is the right call at this point.

Nope. Let the Trump base keep shrinking. Don't throw them any red meat.

4 years ago 08/02/2019 11:28am EDT

re: Flagpole

Flagpole wrote:
And, just in case no one noticed...
The Justice Department as decided not to prosecute Comey.
This of course goes against what the most insane Clintonettes here have said. I won't mention names because that's not how I roll, and I no longer respond to or mention by name the most insane Clintonettes on here...and you know who you are.
Realize this, I read every thread and it gets in my head even though I won't respond as I've been proven wrong about Trump being re-elected, Trump being found NOT guilty, and Trump winning again. I just like to act important and think people care, but I now realize that they are indeed laughing at me.
Mueller is never coming. I don't even watch the news & I like to make sh*t up in my tiny brain?
The clown, Flagpole, is done.

My predictions have all been wrong, I accept defeat now. Mueller is done and Hillary may be going to prison.

Hi Flagpole! You've read this entire post and you're going insane and getting riled up by the minute.

4 years ago 08/02/2019 11:30am EDT

re: RIP GOP

RIP GOP wrote:
Conundrum wrote:
Many democrats don't want Trump impeached. I am one of them. Does Trump deserved to be impeached, of course he does. He will never be convicted and the impeachment trial will distract from the election.
Defeat Trump in the election, then start legal proceedings against him after he is out of office.
Don't impeach.
Don't impeach. Let him continue the destruction of the GOP. Trump WILL NOT win in 2020. Another republican (John Kasich) stands a better chance.

Don't put Hillary in prison for her crimes, let the left self-destruct from the inside out. Trump will win in 2020.

Hi LL, another new handle for you pal? Clinton was impeached, but Trump won't be. You guys are still crying 3 years later.

Page 3,239 of 6,315

1 3,238 3,239 3,240 6,315

Next Last

Reply Replying to

Username

Password

Leave the password field blank to post anonymously.

Post Preview

By posting you acknowledge that you have read and abide by our Terms and Conditions.

Remember me on this device.

Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Of General Interest

This thread has already been deleted.

You have been subscribed.

Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Jump To A Page

Follow Conundrum

Block Conundrum

Follow agip

Block agip

Follow Conundrum

Block Conundrum

Jump To A Page

Of General Interest

This thread has already been deleted.

Reply Replying to

You have been subscribed.