——————————————
Shut up! His walk back was solely in regards to his comment with Lieu...NOTHING ELSE! He did so because his answer to Lieu was making a determination on Trump. Which he said he could not do due to DOJ policy and principles of fairness.
There is no way in hell you can sit there as an unbiased individual and say the 10 instances listed in the report in regards to OOJ were not crimes! Mueller in his testimony said they amounted to crimes.
I have also attached that video so truly unbiased people who are competent enough to understand what’s being said can see exactly what was said about OOJ and what Mueller statement in Thursday walked back.
I truly despise intentionally disingenuous people. Y’all are amongst the worse humans that can exist!
https://youtu.be/K459NBUK_GU[/quote]
Quit lying dude. Just quit ly9ng.[/quote]
——————————————————-
All other comments you were able to muster up some words to defend your position. Now no such words exists...truth is silencing!
Before you attempt to “walk back”....here’s some questions I will ask and answer for you because I actually like to read and I will reference that damn report:
Did the report in Volume I, Page 182 say: “If we had CONFIDENCE after a thorough investigation of the FACTS that THE PRESIDENT clearly DID NOT COMMIT OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, WE WOULD STATE SO.”
Yes it fucking does! And how exactly are you saying that this says the report clears him of Obstruction crimes? Oh yea you’re saying it with lies, smoke, and mirrors! Trying to make it words seem unclear...your debate tactic is obvious!
BUT WAIT THERES MORE ?
In that same volume did it say: “...Based on THE FACTS and THE APPLICABLE LEGAL STANDARDS, we are unable to reach THAT JUDGMENT.”?
Yes it does and what is “that” referencing? That the president committed a crime! So clearly if he didn’t commit a crime and the report says they would have so said (they didn’t), and they said they couldn’t say so because of DOJ policy (aka in this report as legal standards which Watergate)...The report went even further to address the talking point your biased butt is spewing...that just because they could conclude (based on the aforementioned reasons in the report and swore testimony)....it also does NOT exonerate him!! I bet Mueller wrote that especially for the Trump campaign because he knew they’d spin it.
Unfortunately, Trumps campaign knows that his followers won’t read, can’t read, or just wont care and will keep recycling their spin/lies!
Which leads us to you Sally!!