Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

What of the above came from CNN? What above is wrong? Nothing mentally-disturbed at all about stating what will happen when it is GOING to happen.

1) Pelosi and Nadler made it clear that they are working toward impeachment and will not wait forever. Best-case for them is to get as much evidence due to court decisions as possible, but they will go forward eventually even if they don't have all they would like. And, when they do, the House WILL impeach.

2) Trump will be indicted when he is no longer President. He's a criminal, and he will be held legally accountable when he is no longer in office.

Donald Trump is a serial liar. He's a complete phony (as Mitt Romney correctly stated). He's a racist. He's incompetent. He's a threat to our democracy and the rule of law.

Because of the lying, because of the spending, because of the promises not kept -- no wall, no Hillary behind bars, no even talk of Mexico paying for the wall, no repeal and replace of Obamacare, no progress toward WIPING OUT THE NATION DEBT IN 8 YEARS -- he SAID THAT! -- there are only two reasons why a non-elected person still supports Trump today:

1) JUST stupid.

2) Racist.

There are no other possibilities.

Runningart2004 wrote:

And like I've said....100% chance Trump loses. It won't be close. If he wins I leave Letsrun.

Alan

Pack your bags, LEG.

Mueller didn't look into money laundering. It appears that this investigation is being handled elsewhere.

Mueller testified that Tiny did perjure himself by lying in his written answers.

It's true that Mueller concluded that there was not enough evidence to charge Tiny with conspiracy.

And don’t worry, trumpers. When trump loses & healthcare passes, we’ll get you the help you need.

Racket wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

CORRECT!

Listening to Pelosi this evening, it is 100% clear that the House is ultimately going to go forward with impeachment.

She said they are still waiting for the courts to make some decisions on some subpoenas, but that they won't wait forever.

That's called stalling for time and she isn't fooling anyone. There is a zero percent chance of success in the Senate and impeachment in the House would only hurt Democrats chances in 2020 and she knows it. The voters that they need to win in the next election cycle are begging them to move on and just forget it.

I do think the timing is right to start an impeachment inquiry when congress returns in September.

But we don't know everything Nancy knows. Whether or not impeachment is politically successful depends on the substance of evidence uncovered.

I presume Nancy is making her political calculation based on both timing and substance. I trust that she will do the right thing.

You are the hero of the stupid. Just shut up and go away, Flagpole.

Flagpole is either the biggest moran on Let's Run or the most elaborate troll ever, sometimes its hard to distinguish.

Black Rifles Matter wrote:

Runningart2004 wrote:

And like I've said....100% chance Trump loses. It won't be close. If he wins I leave Letsrun.

Alan

Pack your bags, LEG.

Wow even Gary/BRM felt emboldened.. we might even see a DFF appearance sometime.

I see the obsession with Flagpole has only worsened too.

Impeachment wasn’t a bad idea, but too much time has passed with inaction. If the Dems want to still go ahead with it, they will need fresh ammo which they don’t have at the moment. Voters are not sick of the issue, they are sick of inaction so yes moving on and focusing on election is probably a better idea then beating around the bush. However, heck no they shouldn’t stop attacking trump... that’s fuel for the flames on the liberal side. Remember, the biggest motivator by far for liberals to vote is to get rid of trump, not to pick a candidate they like.

The Mueller testimony was absolutely hilarious. God lord, he's the same age and Trump, but acted like he was 95!

You could see that Mueller was embarrassed (he would look down and drop his head a lot) by not being allowed to answer all the Republicans' questions about the origins and the setup against Trump. Even basic questions like "Why wasn't Mufsid indicted?" (The report points out that he lied several times.)

It was SO clear that Mueller let a team of Trump-haters go after whoever they wanted to, and did NOT care about justice at all. Which is why there was no indictment for obstruction of justice. It simply did not occur.

The reaction by the MSM is all you need to know on impeachment. Not happening. It was just ANOTHER attempt that blew up in the faces of the idiot DemonRats.

Mueller did NOT come (despite actually showing up- LOL).

The Clown steadfastly remains Flagpole.

Barr IS COMING. (All those unanswered questions from the Republicans yesterday.....)

Runningart2004 wrote:

Same arguments, different election.

The right is always a bunch crazy hillbillies clinging to guns and religion or old rich people out of touch/

The left is always a bunch of baby killing socialists.

The argument is the same in 2020 as it was in 2016, 2012, 2008, 2004, 2000, 1996, 1992.....

The voters who decide an election are typically uneducated about the issues and policy. They vote in gut and likeability. If Dems put up a candidate that has a likeability rating higher than Clinton they win. Policy doesn't matter.

Beyond that it's about making sure your strongest supporters, your base, gets to the polls.

And like I've said....100% chance Trump loses. It won't be close. If he wins I leave Letsrun.

Alan

OF COURSE YOU WILL- BECAUSE YOU'LL BE MOCKED LIKE FLAGPOLE DOES NOW ON A DAILY BASIS!!! You fools have been wrong for 3 years for Christ's sake!

But to your poor point- You omit the fact that Trump's strategy was to steal a large portion of the traditionally blue collar Democrat voters. That was the difference in 2016. If he doesn't do that, Hillary wins over Rubio with those same old BS arguments. Trump took several positions traditionally held by the Left, and then oddly didn't even put up a fight.I mean, the Democrats used to take pride in representing the blue collar/union/middle class voter. Now, it's all about skin color for them. It was a terrible decision.

And that's why 300-400 counties that voted for Obama at least once voted for Trump in 2016.

Remember Clownpole used to say "Mueller is coming"?

Hahaha haha ha hahaha

just remember that Trump asked for Russian help, received Russian help, expressed gratitude to them for it, and afterwards said he'd do it again. Mueller said all that was illegal and wrong.

Also remember that the Republican Party is doing what it can to stop tightening election security.

These are the people who are supposed to be serving us.

what kind of a crazy party suffers a blow when tailpipe emissions are reduced?

I mean seriously.

"Four of the world’s largest automakers struck a deal with California to reduce tailpipe pollution, in a blow to the Trump administration.

Breaking7m ago"

I keep hearing that Pelosi won't impeach because she wants the voters to decide to not to have him back.

What if this was early in his second term and he was not eligible to run again?

What would be the excuse for not impeaching him for the crimes she believes he committed then?

agip wrote:

just remember that Trump asked for Russian help, received Russian help, expressed gratitude to them for it, and afterwards said he'd do it again. Mueller said all that was illegal and wrong.

Also remember that the Republican Party is doing what it can to stop tightening election security.

These are the people who are supposed to be serving us.

They are serving half the country with entertainment and owning the other half (aka “winning”). Remember, we have a lot of dumb and gullible people in this country who still think Obama was a foreign-born Muslim. The GOP and trump told lies for years and they stuck like crazy glue. Now they are capitalizing on it, Dems don’t “get it”. Rigged and Sally are elated.

The only question is, do enough Dems hate trump enough to go vote for whoever the winner of the primary is? Trump has his 44-46% in the bag, that’s all he’s going for, but he can pull off a win if Dems continue to be lazy.

Subway Surfers wrote:

One of these things is not like the others wrote:

Reparations and forgiving all college debt are both idiotic ideas that very much should be losing ideas (not sure about the gratuitous and basically meaningless "hard working people" add-on).

But Medicare for all should not be lumped with those. It would improve the health of the nation's people while saving an absolutely enormous amount of money in the process. When presented accurately it is a big time winning idea.

Medicare for all should won't be affordable with open borders and free health care for illegals. And a disproportionate amount will go to the largest 5 cities not to people in Iowa, Michigan, New Hampshire and Wisconsin. They in turn will utilize their power under a electoral college and vote in a Trump-like figure.

Sorry, but your premise is simply FALSE and deliberately misleading.

(1) Nobody outside of the Trumpettes is talking about open borders.

(2) Medicare for all would literally save Trillions even including free health care for people who are in this country illegally.

(3) A COMPLETELY proportionate amount would go to people wherever they are. It would also be funded in a proportionate way by people wherever they are. Are you suggesting that spending an equal amount per person for people in NYC as for people in Iowa is somehow unfair?

Try to think. Think, dude. Think.

agip wrote:

what kind of a crazy party suffers a blow when tailpipe emissions are reduced?

I mean seriously.

"Four of the world’s largest automakers struck a deal with California to reduce tailpipe pollution, in a blow to the Trump administration.

Breaking7m ago"

That is because most of the rest of the world is expected to follow California's emissions limiting lead. It is part of the compliance with the Paris Accords. Accords which only Trump bailed out on because a "black" man who was president agreed the U.S. would be a world leader on. So, why would major manufacturers, who sell worldwide, design two different versions of their cars? one model for the real world, which includes California and many other U.S. states, and a Trump model which spews noxious gases from its end pipe. That does not make sense from a business perspective; something Trump is entirely clueless about.

Runningart2004 wrote:

Same arguments, different election.

The right is always a bunch crazy hillbillies clinging to guns and religion or old rich people out of touch/

The left is always a bunch of baby killing socialists.

The argument is the same in 2020 as it was in 2016, 2012, 2008, 2004, 2000, 1996, 1992.....

The voters who decide an election are typically uneducated about the issues and policy. They vote in gut and likeability. If Dems put up a candidate that has a likeability rating higher than Clinton they win. Policy doesn't matter.

Beyond that it's about making sure your strongest supporters, your base, gets to the polls.

And like I've said....100% chance Trump loses. It won't be close. If he wins I leave Letsrun.

Alan

That seems so backward. Why are you going to reward yourself for being wrong?

Spineless Dems wrote:

I keep hearing that Pelosi won't impeach because she wants the voters to decide to not to have him back.

Nope. It is to keep Trump from having impeachment manna to feed his rabid base. Don't feed the base and a lot fewer Trumpanzees will vote in 2020.