Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

It’s important to ask trumpers who they would enjoy running against, ha ha.

jesseriley wrote:

It’s important to ask trumpers who they would enjoy running against, ha ha.

It’s Trump vs the JV Squad for 2020, haha

Smartest move he’s made so far. No one is paying any attention to the clowns running in the Dem primary. ?

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

jesseriley wrote:

It’s important to ask trumpers who they would enjoy running against, ha ha.

It’s Trump vs the JV Squad ?

JV = JaVanka

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

jesseriley wrote:

It’s important to ask trumpers who they would enjoy running against, ha ha.

It’s Trump vs the JV Squad for 2020, haha

Smartest move he’s made so far. No one is paying any attention to the clowns running in the Dem primary. ?

Actually it is an effective move that helps both Trump and "the Squad". Trump is hated so when he attacks someone the people he attacks are look upon more favorably and their stature increases.

The mistake he made here is that he did it too soon. This conflict will be old history in a few months. His gain from it will diminish.

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

jesseriley wrote:

It’s important to ask trumpers who they would enjoy running against, ha ha.

It’s Trump vs the JV Squad for 2020, haha

Smartest move he’s made so far. No one is paying any attention to the clowns running in the Dem primary. ?

No one from the Squad will be running for President in 2020. Trump represents the Republican party and the Democrat nominee will represent Democrats. People buying into Trump's schtick about the Squad trying to destroy the country were already going to vote for Trump.

That four Freshman Congresswomen,who are going to have a hard time being reelected in 2020, represent the party is ridiculous.

Creepy Uncle Joe strikes again. Poor girl...

https://t.co/sceiPcnLr1

Dealing with all the big issues quietly as always.

https://news.yahoo.com/swedish-prime-minister-warns-donald-211637891.html

ewgwt wrote:

Runningart2004 wrote:

This is going to be the largest Electoral win since Bush rode the aura of Reagan to victory in '88. The dem candidate will approach 400.

I'd love you to be right, but I think you're dead wrong.

As others have asked: How does Donald Trump lose 35 electoral votes? And once someone has convincingly explained that, tell us how he loses a HUNDRED more.

Easy...

He loses MI, WI and PA right from the start. His tariffs have sunk his chances in the rust belt. That's 55 right there...

Iowa's farmers are getting killed by tariffs...6

Arizona and Ohio are almost lost....29....

NC and FL are almost slipping away.....44....

IN is slipping....11

And then the great state of TX is very sour on his immigration policies. TX has been shifting back to the left for a decade. I don't know if it can move that many points.....but the result on Election Day will be within 3-4pts. TX is a long shot but would be 38.

GA is another long shot but still in the conversation. 16

The only certainties are MI and WI. PA and IA are next followed by the rest.

Alan

Slow down, Mister 400 EV votes. Why are you bringing up polls now? Wait until late Sep/early Oct 2020.

These are the polls to focus on in 2020:

13Keys

Norpoth

IBD/TIPP

CafePress

If they all show the Dem leading, you will win. If not, you will self ban and stay out of Indiana (I threw in the second item because of your Flagpolian prediction of 400 EV's)

How much cross over has there been between Fox News and Trumps administration?

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/ex-white-house-spokesman-raj-shah-joins-fox-corporation-as-senior-vice-president/ar-AAECnoU?li=BBnbfcL&ocid=mailsignout

Damn media.

Ciro wrote:

How much cross over has there been between Fox News and Trumps administration?

Damn media.

Fox will hire Trump in Jan 2020. Trump will need a job to pay his YUGE legal bills after Barr can no longer protect him from Trump's bigly number of illegal acts. Fox will sue to allow them to broadcast the Trump Show from Trump's padded, white prison cell. (Epstein and Hasted will be his cellmates).

How's your reading comprehension?

I never said 400. I said approach 400. 350 is "approaching" 400 in my book.

It could be as low as 300 or as high as 400 all swung by a 3-5% change in the state's popular vote.

Go back to 2016. How many states did Trump win by less than 5%?

This presidency, and its polling, is unlike any other in history. His approval has been steady within a tight margin of error. When good things or bad thing happen you would expect a bounce or drop. Other than his government shutdowns there really hasn't been movement. He's also headed for another shutdown this fall because he's a hell of an idiot and always doubles down. And the bell will likely toll on this economic growth before Nov 2020. The signs are there.

So.....

At minimum he loses WI, MI and PA and that loses him the election. He then most likely loses IA. That's like nearly 300 right there.

My best guess is he loses AZ, OH or IN but not all 3. He loses FL or NC but not both. And GA and TX are a pipe dream....

The GOP isn't going to paint Biden or Harris as ideological nut bags....they are both opportunists. The GOP playbook has for years been trying to scare the American public into believing all of the Dems are crazy Socialists!! Ooooh scary!!!

Policy doesn't win presidential elections. Personality and likeability does. And everyone hates Trump.

Alan

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Creepy Uncle Joe strikes again. Poor girl...

https://t.co/sceiPcnLr1

He kissed his granddaughter. You are the creep for misrepresenting it.

And before you express your phony outrage because the kiss was on the lips, note that it's common in many families. There is nothing sexual about it.

Of course, in Tiny's family, the father talks openly about how he'd like to date his daughter.

Also....no one else has taken the Runningart Challenge. Put up or shut up!! Stop being spineless pansies!!

The math simply isn't there for Trump. He has not increased his base. The changing population dynamics in states like WI, MI and PA is just enough to get a Dem candidate over the hump even if they perform as horrendously as Clinton in '16. Old people die, Hispanics have more babies, increasing popularity of leftist ideas (before the price tag of course!!), etc

Alan

Alan

Runningart2004 wrote:

The math simply isn't there for Trump. He has not increased his base. The changing population dynamics in states like WI, MI and PA is just enough to get a Dem candidate over the hump even if they perform as horrendously as Clinton in '16. Old people die, Hispanics have more babies, increasing popularity of leftist ideas (before the price tag of course!!), etc

Alan

Alan

Even with everything against him, Tiny can still win by cheating.

If Tiny loses he will claim the other side cheated and he is therefore still the president.

Then what happens?

Runningart2004 wrote:

Also....no one else has taken the Runningart Challenge. Put up or shut up!! Stop being spineless pansies!!

The math simply isn't there for Trump. He has not increased his base. The changing population dynamics in states like WI, MI and PA is just enough to get a Dem candidate over the hump even if they perform as horrendously as Clinton in '16. Old people die, Hispanics have more babies, increasing popularity of leftist ideas (before the price tag of course!!), etc

Alan

Alan

Clinton takes at least two of those states without Bernie and Jill Stein running.

Bernie Jill wrote:

Runningart2004 wrote:

Also....no one else has taken the Runningart Challenge. Put up or shut up!! Stop being spineless pansies!!

The math simply isn't there for Trump. He has not increased his base. The changing population dynamics in states like WI, MI and PA is just enough to get a Dem candidate over the hump even if they perform as horrendously as Clinton in '16. Old people die, Hispanics have more babies, increasing popularity of leftist ideas (before the price tag of course!!), etc

Alan

Alan

Clinton takes at least two of those states without Bernie and Jill Stein running.

Bernie didn't run in the general.

Stein barely had over 1.5mil votes total.

Johnson had 4.5mil votes total.

The types of voters who vote for third party candidates are not going to vote for the mainstream candidates anyway.

I think people get too worked up over third party candidates thinking they are stealing votes away from "their candidate". When in reality they would likely just stay home on Election Day.

Alan

Runningart2004 wrote:

Easy...

He loses MI, WI and PA right from the start. His tariffs have sunk his chances in the rust belt. That's 55 right there...

Iowa's farmers are getting killed by tariffs...6

Arizona and Ohio are almost lost....29....

NC and FL are almost slipping away.....44....

IN is slipping....11

And then the great state of TX is very sour on his immigration policies. TX has been shifting back to the left for a decade. I don't know if it can move that many points.....but the result on Election Day will be within 3-4pts. TX is a long shot but would be 38.

GA is another long shot but still in the conversation. 16

The only certainties are MI and WI. PA and IA are next followed by the rest.

Alan

https://morningconsult.com/tracking-trump/

Slow down, Mister 400 EV votes. Why are you bringing up polls now? Wait until late Sep/early Oct 2020.

These are the polls to focus on in 2020:

13Keys

Norpoth

IBD/TIPP

CafePress

If they all show the Dem leading, you will win. If not, you will self ban and stay out of Indiana (I threw in the second item because of your Flagpolian prediction of 400 EV's)[/quote]

How's your reading comprehension?

I never said 400. I said approach 400. 350 is "approaching" 400 in my book.

It could be as low as 300 or as high as 400 all swung by a 3-5% change in the state's popular vote.

Go back to 2016. How many states did Trump win by less than 5%?

This presidency, and its polling, is unlike any other in history. His approval has been steady within a tight margin of error. When good things or bad thing happen you would expect a bounce or drop. Other than his government shutdowns there really hasn't been movement. He's also headed for another shutdown this fall because he's a hell of an idiot and always doubles down. And the bell will likely toll on this economic growth before Nov 2020. The signs are there.

So.....

At minimum he loses WI, MI and PA and that loses him the election. He then most likely loses IA. That's like nearly 300 right there.

My best guess is he loses AZ, OH or IN but not all 3. He loses FL or NC but not both. And GA and TX are a pipe dream....

The GOP isn't going to paint Biden or Harris as ideological nut bags....they are both opportunists. The GOP playbook has for years been trying to scare the American public into believing all of the Dems are crazy Socialists!! Ooooh scary!!!

Policy doesn't win presidential elections. Personality and likeability does. And everyone hates Trump.

Alan[/quote]

Alan, we agree that you said near 400 EV and 350 isn't near. I'm simply rounding up to 400 and if your candidate gets 380 or above then that's fine.

You prediction will flop just as Clownpole has many done times. How's that Beto prediction working out for ya?

KAG2020

Fat hurts wrote:

Runningart2004 wrote:

The math simply isn't there for Trump. He has not increased his base. The changing population dynamics in states like WI, MI and PA is just enough to get a Dem candidate over the hump even if they perform as horrendously as Clinton in '16. Old people die, Hispanics have more babies, increasing popularity of leftist ideas (before the price tag of course!!), etc

Alan

Alan

Even with everything against him, Tiny can still win by cheating.

If Tiny loses he will claim the other side cheated and he is therefore still the president.

Then what happens?

Then he gets escorted off the WH grounds on Jan 20, 2021.