Gordon Frank wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
Did you know that Yale 10 years ago was considered the least competitive of any school in the nation? I had one B in 5 years. I didn't go to an Ivy league school but it is a top 50 in the world.
No it wasn't Dumb Dumb. Name the college and I will tell you how good it is. You won't do it.
UT Austin.
Fat hurts wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
The only reason I continually go to that abortion thing is because it astounds me how supposedly very well educated individuals and reasonable in most other aspects of life (not referring to you as you are pro-life) are okay with denying medical aid to a baby who survives an abortion and is alive and breathing and is a viable baby. All these Democratic candidates - pretty much every one- are in favor of denying medical aid to that baby. That is barbaric. That IS Infanticide. I really have a MAJOR problem with anyone who would not mandate that that baby gets medical attention. Just horrific.
This is why you don't strike me as someone well-educated.
You keep bringing up this idea that people are "okay with denying medical aid to a baby who survives an abortion and is alive and breathing and is a viable baby." But there is not a single example of anyone who holds that view.
Governor Northam did not say that. He was not referring to a viable baby. He only said that a doctor would work with the mother to decide what should be done.
And you just continue with this ridiculous story despite being totally wrong about its premise. Well-educated people don't do that.
Sally shows a continued inability to learn or understand anything beyond an extremely low level, and that is being kind. I actually have seen no ability to learn coming from this man with a woman's name. I do not believe he is the academician he claims to be. Just no evidence of that at all.
Sally Vix wrote:
Fat hurts wrote:
This is why you don't strike me as someone well-educated.
You keep bringing up this idea that people are "okay with denying medical aid to a baby who survives an abortion and is alive and breathing and is a viable baby." But there is not a single example of anyone who holds that view.
Governor Northam did not say that. He was not referring to a viable baby. He only said that a doctor would work with the mother to decide what should be done.
And you just continue with this ridiculous story despite being totally wrong about its premise. Well-educated people don't do that.
You missed my two links which supported my claims. Go back and read them. I was not even talking about the governor - I was talking about members of Congress.
Here is one where Dems are denying aid to babies - just despicable ....
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/democrats-block-senate-gop-bill-on-infants-surviving-abortions
Did you even read the article?
Democrats had very good reasons to vote against that bill. And none of those reasons had anything to do with rendering aid to a viable baby. It was a bad bill that would mandate additional pain and suffering to the non-viable child and the family.
So you still haven't produced even one quote from someone who says medical aid should not be given to a viable baby.
Your brotherhood of Trumpets.
WhyRegisterHere? wrote:
You're probably familiar with the Brown Shirts
Fat Hurts ...
Gov. Northam said during a radio interview that under a proposed Democratic-led bill, an infant who survived an abortion attempt “would be resuscitated if that’s what the mother and the family desired.”
So - if that is not what the family desired - , the fetus would be killed or left to die by a doctor .
You were always voting for Trump.
WhyRegisterHere? wrote:
If you represent what the left is becoming, then I want no part of it.
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
Ciro wrote:
I don’t want to speak for another poster but I think Maddie is crap, annoying too, but mostly just not good at her job.
That of course is highly irrelevant to the link you’ve shared, you’re dragging Maddow into the discussion to distract from a link you’re incapable of defending.
I will be more than happy to defend a link that does a pretty good job of documenting possible fraud by Representative Omar. I bet you a beer this goes somewhere.
Another perspective Ghost, again I wasn’t there and I don’t know but maybe worth a read and an open mind on the matter.
https://news.yahoo.com/ilhan-omar-marriage-smear-went-084303668.htmlI won't drag this abortion thing on. All sides are set in. Just as everyone is with Global Warming. No one is moving on any issue.
Gordon Frank wrote:
Fat hurts wrote:
This is why you don't strike me as someone well-educated.
You keep bringing up this idea that people are "okay with denying medical aid to a baby who survives an abortion and is alive and breathing and is a viable baby." But there is not a single example of anyone who holds that view.
Governor Northam did not say that. He was not referring to a viable baby. He only said that a doctor would work with the mother to decide what should be done.
And you just continue with this ridiculous story despite being totally wrong about its premise. Well-educated people don't do that.
Sally shows a continued inability to learn or understand anything beyond an extremely low level, and that is being kind. I actually have seen no ability to learn coming from this man with a woman's name. I do not believe he is the academician he claims to be. Just no evidence of that at all.
Why should anyone put any merit into anything you say? You have no idea how the latin honors programs work. You obviously were not part of that celebrated group of well-doers. I was and yet you call me a dummy and still have no idea how the latin honors programs work. Just embarrassing, Gordon.
Sally Vix wrote:
Gordon Frank wrote:
No it wasn't Dumb Dumb. Name the college and I will tell you how good it is. You won't do it.
UT Austin.
If you really went to UT Austin then you would be smart enough to understand the college rankings. UT Austin is #49 in the national universities category. That means it is not even in the top 50 overall in the US, much less in the world.
Lots of schools far better than UT Austin are not considered national universities in the US News rankings. National universities are categorized as large schools with master's and doctorate programs. For instance, nobody would say that UT Austin is a better school than Amherst or Wellesley.
Worldwide, there are probably hundreds better than UT Austin.
Sally Vix wrote:
YOu will say Fox News on the last one but here is PBS ...
pbs org/newshour/politics/democrats-block-senate-gop-bill-on-infants-surviving-abortions
Keyword. GOP Bill. -- A Republican bill that would have threatened prison for doctors who don’t try saving the life of infants born alive during abortions.
Now maybe if Sally volunteered to take in all of those infants, then she an her GOP clown show might be on to something. But, no; the bill provided absolutely $0 for the care of such infants, and $0 for helping with adoption.
FYI: The GOP knew it was a dead duck bill, and loaded with zero dollars to force their own bill to fail.
Sally Vix wrote:
I won't drag this abortion thing on.
^ An obvious Sally Lie.
Sally Vix wrote:
Fat Hurts ...
Gov. Northam said during a radio interview that under a proposed Democratic-led bill, an infant who survived an abortion attempt “would be resuscitated if that’s what the mother and the family desired.”
So - if that is not what the family desired - , the fetus would be killed or left to die by a doctor .
Right. And that said nothing about failing to render aid to a viable baby. Viability was not part of the conversation because a viable baby is almost never the result of an abortion.
Again, you fail to come up with a single example to prove your point. You just keep throwing up stuff and hoping something sticks. Well-educated people don't do that.
Sally Vix wrote:
Gordon Frank wrote:
No it wasn't Dumb Dumb. Name the college and I will tell you how good it is. You won't do it.
UT Austin.
Well, I goaded you into that. Top 50 in the world!? Hilarious assertion!
US News and World Report ranks it as the 49th best "National University." That list doesn't even come close to listing all the great liberal arts colleges in the United States that they don't consider "National Universities" that are so much better that UT at Austin; schools like Williams and Vassar and Davidson and the colleges in Claremont, CA and on and on. So, not top 50 in the United States, let alone the world. You do know that there are scores of great colleges outside of the United States, right? Ones that are much better than UT at Austin, right? FYI, Boston University is ranked higher.
Farrah Fawcett and Matthew McConaughey went to UT at Austin. Mental giants to be sure.
Fat hurts wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
UT Austin.
If you really went to UT Austin then you would be smart enough to understand the college rankings. UT Austin is #49 in the national universities category. That means it is not even in the top 50 overall in the US, much less in the world.
Lots of schools far better than UT Austin are not considered national universities in the US News rankings. National universities are categorized as large schools with master's and doctorate programs. For instance, nobody would say that UT Austin is a better school than Amherst or Wellesley.
Worldwide, there are probably hundreds better than UT Austin.
Fat Hurts - you are upping the ante on your looking foolish. I mean big-time foolish. Here are the Shanghai Rankings for THE WORLD. Worldwide there are hundreds better than UT Austin? Really? UT Austin is 40 in the WORLD RANKINGS. So, there are hundreds better? Seriously, dude. Did you even go to college? How would you not know that UT Austin is top 50 and really top 40. I can name probably 40 of the top 50 and you really went to college? Just embarrassing Fat Hurts. Which school did you go to? Please don't tell me - I know you would be embarrassed.
Here are the rankings
http://www.shanghairanking.com/ARWU2018.htmlGordon Frank wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
UT Austin.
Well, I goaded you into that. Top 50 in the world!? Hilarious assertion!
US News and World Report ranks it as the 49th best "National University." That list doesn't even come close to listing all the great liberal arts colleges in the United States that they don't consider "National Universities" that are so much better that UT at Austin; schools like Williams and Vassar and Davidson and the colleges in Claremont, CA and on and on. So, not top 50 in the United States, let alone the world. You do know that there are scores of great colleges outside of the United States, right? Ones that are much better than UT at Austin, right? FYI, Boston University is ranked higher.
Farrah Fawcett and Matthew McConaughey went to UT at Austin. Mental giants to be sure.
Hey idiot the US News and World is a joke ranking - The gold standard is Shanghai - they are 40th in the world idiot -
http://www.shanghairanking.com/ARWU2018.htmlSally Vix wrote:
I won't drag this abortion thing on. All sides are set in. Just as everyone is with Global Warming. No one is moving on any issue.
That's funny. Since you are losing an abortion argument, you can't holler "abortion!". So now you try to change the subject to Global Warming.
You still can't cite a single example for your ridiculous claim that Democrats don't want to render aid to a viable baby.
Sally Vix wrote:
Why should anyone put any merit into anything you say? You have no idea how the latin honors programs work. You obviously were not part of that celebrated group of well-doers. I was and yet you call me a dummy and still have no idea how the latin honors programs work. Just embarrassing, Gordon.
You know not of what you speak.
Sally Vix wrote:
Fat hurts wrote:
Worldwide, there are probably hundreds better than UT Austin.
Here are the rankings
shanghairanking com/ARWU2018.html
Aka. Shanghai Ranking.
The ranking is condemned for "relying too much on award factors" thus undermining the importance of quality of instruction and humanities. … A 2007 paper published in the journal Scientometrics found that the results from the Shanghai rankings could not be reproduced from raw data. … The researchers themselves think that the quality of universities cannot be precisely measured by mere numbers and any ranking must be controversial. They suggest that university and college rankings should be used with caution and their methodologies must be understood clearly before reporting or using the results. The rankings have been criticised by the European Commission as well as some EU member states for "favour[ing] Anglo-Saxon higher education institutions".
PS to Sally (before she criticizes the spelling). The underlined parts are in British English because they come from the European Commission.
Gordon Frank wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
Why should anyone put any merit into anything you say? You have no idea how the latin honors programs work. You obviously were not part of that celebrated group of well-doers. I was and yet you call me a dummy and still have no idea how the latin honors programs work. Just embarrassing, Gordon.
You know not of what you speak.
You were dead wrong on the latin honors programs for Boston University. Why would ANYONE put any merit in ANYTHING you say? You were never a honors candidate or recipient - just some clown here insulting the well-educated. Hey Gordon, go back to college!
RIP: D3 All-American Frank Csorba - who ran 13:56 in March - dead
RENATO can you talk about the preparation of Emile Cairess 2:06
Running for Bowerman Track Club used to be cool now its embarrassing
Great interview with Steve Cram - says Jakob has no chance of WRs this year
Hats off to my dad. He just ran a 1:42 Half Marathon and turns 75 in 2 months!
2017 World 800 champ Pierre-Ambroise Bosse banned 1 year for whereabouts failures