Ciro wrote:
I don’t want anything to be true, I simply want the truth to come out regardless of who was involved or not involved as the case maybe.
You jumped into the middle of a conversation and missed the point completely and refuse backdown even though you appear to foolish to anyone who read the entire conversation, let it go.
1) Anyone who read the entire conversation would think that anyone who continues to go on has issues. That includes you. That includes me.
2) But I do like the fact that you deleted the entire conversation from your post in which you make your claim about the entire conversation. Pretty cute!
Here it is:
Ciro: People do need to view this.
There were a lot of connections between Trump and Epstein regarding women.
This happened to be recorded.
poo poo: no one cares
trump having a good time at a party with cheerleaders and other billionaires? pure catnip to the spankists. That's the trump they like. They want the movie star, bigger than life, entertainment industry Spanky.
if they cared about him hanging out with criminals and prostitutes they would have made that clear already.
agip: I agree, but IF Trump was involved with trafficked underage girls or willingly turned a blind eye to Epstein's illegal activities would his base care?
honestly, no, they wouldn't care.
They've chosen to overlook all his personal foibles as long as he continues to own the libs.
Ciro: Up to and including involvement with a child trafficking?
I’d like to think that’s not the case.
Obvi: What you'd like to think and what is true are not necessarily the same thing.
Ciro: The issue here is your reading comprehension. I said IF, I even put it in big letter to emphasize it.
Obvi: Here is precisely what you said that I responded to - word for word, letter for letter:
"Up to and including involvement with a child trafficking?
I’d like to think that’s not the case."
Pretty sure there is no "IF" in that post.
Ciro: Jesus wept, scroll up man.
I started the discussion on this issue with an IF.
Obvi: Cool beans, son.
I am perfectly aware that you started the discussion with an IF. Problem is, that fact is simply not relevant to my statement which you reacted to. Not even 1%. Zip.
So, I can only say that you might want to work on your reading comprehension.
Oh yeah, and what you'd like to think and what is true are not necessarily the same thing.
///
So, as one can easily see, you would like to think (read; you DO think, crossing your fingers) that he could not get away scot-free with child trafficking. And you would be WRONG. Anything else you'd like to be wrong about?