Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

These are the folks who won't enter the Runningart challenge:

http://33.media.tumblr.com/857a

Let's try that again. For the libs and Never Trumpers who wil not take the Runningart challenge:

https://wifflegif.com/gifs/599058-know-your-chicken-cibo-matto-gif

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Let's try that again. For the libs and Never Trumpers who wil not take the Runningart challenge:

https://photos.clevescene.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/TRUMP_2986.jpg

????

What? No Flagpole? wrote:

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Correct! No other lib or Never Trumper has the guts to take the Runningart challenge. The Dem nominee, whoever that will be has no chance, absolutely zero chance to defeat Trump.

KAG2020

Surely, Flagpole has accepted the pledge.

(and yes, I called him Shirley)

Nope. That is akin to a bet, and I do not bet because it is low class.

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

agip wrote:

for the record, mueller found (more or less) that collusion took place but it didn't rise to the level of a crime.

if that's what you traitorous spankers want to hang your hats on, ok fine. We'll vote on it in November.

We voted on it last november and it was a historic blue typhoon.

And you will cry with gigantic liberal tears when Trump wins next year. If you are so sure of a Trump loss, then enter the Runningart challenge and risk a self ban. You talk a good game but don't have the guts to back it up.

I'm a professional investor. I don't place big bets on 60/40 odds.

agip wrote:

for the record, mueller found (more or less) that collusion took place but it didn't rise to the level of a crime.

if that's what you traitorous spankers want to hang your hats on, ok fine. We'll vote on it in November.

We voted on it last november and it was a historic blue typhoon.

Educate yourself. He absolutely DID NOT find collusion took place. Again, this article is written by a guy that hates Trump and is extremely far Left. But he has a brain.

Also- Historic blue typhoon? LOL. The GOP gained two Senate seats (almost 4). The House gain was much smaller than after Obama's first two years. Nice try, LIAR.

Silliest of Willies wrote:

agip wrote:

for the record, mueller found (more or less) that collusion took place but it didn't rise to the level of a crime.

if that's what you traitorous spankers want to hang your hats on, ok fine. We'll vote on it in November.

We voted on it last november and it was a historic blue typhoon.

Educate yourself. He absolutely DID NOT find collusion took place. Again, this article is written by a guy that hates Trump and is extremely far Left. But he has a brain.

Also- Historic blue typhoon? LOL. The GOP gained two Senate seats (almost 4). The House gain was much smaller than after Obama's first two years. Nice try, LIAR.

https://theintercept.com/2019/04/18/robert-mueller-did-not-merely-reject-the-trumprussia-conspiracy-theories-he-obliterated-them/

I just read it again. He has like a dozen quoted paragraphs directly from the Mueller Report that specifically say there is ZERO evidence of Trump-Russia Collusion found at all.....

.....and yet, Agip / Eric A. Blair still believe.

Trump Derangement Syndrome destroys brains.

Mueller NOPE.

Clownpole DOPE.

Silliest of Willies wrote:

agip wrote:

for the record, mueller found (more or less) that collusion took place but it didn't rise to the level of a crime.

if that's what you traitorous spankers want to hang your hats on, ok fine. We'll vote on it in November.

We voted on it last november and it was a historic blue typhoon.

Educate yourself. He absolutely DID NOT find collusion took place. Again, this article is written by a guy that hates Trump and is extremely far Left. But he has a brain.

Also- Historic blue typhoon? LOL. The GOP gained two Senate seats (almost 4). The House gain was much smaller than after Obama's first two years. Nice try, LIAR.

/

Call this whatever you want. I'll call it non-criminal collusion. You can call it...call it....I don't know. Poking the libs.

Conspiracy or coordination

The investigation found there were over 100 contacts between Trump campaign advisors and individuals affiliated with the Russian government, before and after the election, but the evidence was insufficient to show an illegal conspiracy.[93] The New York Times estimated as many as 140 contacts between "Mr. Trump and his associates and Russian nationals and WikiLeaks or their intermediaries" in the report.[94]

The special counsel identified two methods the Russian government tried to communicate with the Trump campaign. "The investigation identified two different forms of connections between the IRA and members of the Trump Campaign. [...] First, on multiple occasions, members and surrogates of the Trump Campaign promoted – typically by linking, retweeting, or similar methods of reposting – pro-Trump or anti-Clinton content published by the IRA through IRA-controlled social media accounts. Additionally, in a few instances, IRA employees represented themselves as U.S. persons to communicate with members of the Trump Campaign in an effort to seek assistance and coordination on IRA-organized political rallies inside the United States", the report states.[80]

Secondly, the report details a meeting at Trump Tower in June 2016. The intent of the meeting was to exchange "dirt" on the Clinton campaign. There was speculation that Trump Jr. told his father. However, the special counsel could not find any evidence that he did.[80] The office declined to pursue charges for two reasons: the office "did not obtain admissible evidence" that would meet the burden of proof principle beyond a reasonable doubt that the campaign officials acted with general knowledge about the illegality of their conduct; secondly, the office expected difficulty in valuing the promised information that "exceeded the threshold for a criminal violation" of $2,000 for a criminal violation and $25,000 for a felony punishment.[95]

The Report cited several impediments to investigators' ability to acquire information, including witnesses invoking their Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination, witnesses deleting electronic communications or using encrypted or self-destructing messaging apps, limitations of interviewing attorneys or individuals asserting they were members of the media, information obtained through subpoenas that was screened from investigators due to legal privilege, and false or incomplete testimony provided by witnesses.[6][7][96][8][97]

Fat hurts wrote:

Are you F'n serious? wrote:

Except the Saturday Night massacre occurred after an actual crime took place.

Are you pretending that you don't know the law?

Obstruction of justice does not require an underlying crime.

If Tiny and Barr planned to shut down the Mueller investigation and then carried it out then that is obstruction of justice and abuse of power. Tiny and Barr could easily go down for that.

Get a clue, dude.

Yes, Trump got rid of Sessions to obstruct justice.

Yes, Trump inserted Barr to obstruct justice.

Where have you been for the last 12 months? Hiding under a rock? I don't know a single person who doesn't know these things. And this is a revelation to you? WTF?

No, Trump will not be impeached because of this amazing revelation.

And, no, there isn't a snowball's chance in Hell that the Senate would ever go along with it if he did get impeached.

Seriously, dude, stop embarrassing yourself.

Silliest of Willies wrote:

Silliest of Willies wrote:

Educate yourself. He absolutely DID NOT find collusion took place. Again, this article is written by a guy that hates Trump and is extremely far Left. But he has a brain.

Also- Historic blue typhoon? LOL. The GOP gained two Senate seats (almost 4). The House gain was much smaller than after Obama's first two years. Nice try, LIAR.

https://theintercept.com/2019/04/18/robert-mueller-did-not-merely-reject-the-trumprussia-conspiracy-theories-he-obliterated-them/

I just read it again. He has like a dozen quoted paragraphs directly from the Mueller Report that specifically say there is ZERO evidence of Trump-Russia Collusion found at all.....

.....and yet, Agip / Eric A. Blair still believe.

Trump Derangement Syndrome destroys brains.

Mueller NOPE.

Clownpole DOPE.

Great ending to the article. The Clownpole, Agip/Eric A Blair, Fat Hurts-types are clearly being referred to below. Again, this is from a Trump HATER!

"But certain facts will never go away no matter how much denial they embrace. The sweeping Mueller investigation ended with zero indictments of zero Americans for conspiring with Russia over the 2016 election. Both Donald Trump, Jr. and Jared Kushner – the key participants in the Trump Tower meeting – testified for hours and hours yet were never charged for perjury, lying or obstruction, even though Mueller proved how easily he would indict anyone who lied as part of the investigation. And this massive investigation simply did not establish any of the conspiracy theories that huge parts of the Democratic Party, the intelligence community and the U.S. media spent years encouraging the public to believe.

Those responsible for this can refuse to acknowledge wrongdoing. They can even claim vindication if they want and will likely be cheered for doing so.

But the contempt in which the media and political class is held by so much of the U.S. population – undoubtedly a leading factor that led to Trump’s election in the first place – will only continue to grow as a result, and deservedly so. People know they were scammed, that their politics was drowned for years by a hoax. And none of that will go away no matter how insulated media and political elites in Washington, northern Virginia, Brooklyn, and large West Coast cities keep themselves, and thus hear only in-group affirmation while blocking out all of that well-earned scorn."

Silliest of Willies wrote:

agip wrote:

for the record, mueller found (more or less) that collusion took place but it didn't rise to the level of a crime.

if that's what you traitorous spankers want to hang your hats on, ok fine. We'll vote on it in November.

We voted on it last november and it was a historic blue typhoon.

Also- Historic blue typhoon? LOL. The GOP gained two Senate seats (almost 4). The House gain was much smaller than after Obama's first two years. Nice try, LIAR.

m/

measurements differ. I'll go with this one. Watergate was 44 years ago.

WASHINGTON - Democrats won the popular vote in the House by the largest margins since the Watergate scandal and resignation of Republican President Richard Nixon, according to an analysis by NBC News.

The analysis found Democrats led Republicans in House races by a whopping 8.6 million votes in this year's midterms. NBC News reports that number is the largest margin that Democrats have defeated Republicans in a midterm House election since 1974.

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Let's try that again. For the libs and Never Trumpers who wil not take the Runningart challenge:

https://wifflegif.com/gifs/599058-know-your-chicken-cibo-matto-gif

This thread is supposed to be for adults.

Flagpole wrote:

What? No Flagpole? wrote:

Surely, Flagpole has accepted the pledge.

(and yes, I called him Shirley)

Nope. That is akin to a bet, and I do not bet because it is low class.

Nice try at a cop-out, but it is not akin to a bet. It is an agreement.

P wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

Are you pretending that you don't know the law?

Obstruction of justice does not require an underlying crime.

If Tiny and Barr planned to shut down the Mueller investigation and then carried it out then that is obstruction of justice and abuse of power. Tiny and Barr could easily go down for that.

Get a clue, dude.

Yes, Trump got rid of Sessions to obstruct justice.

Yes, Trump inserted Barr to obstruct justice.

Where have you been for the last 12 months? Hiding under a rock? I don't know a single person who doesn't know these things. And this is a revelation to you? WTF?

No, Trump will not be impeached because of this amazing revelation.

And, no, there isn't a snowball's chance in Hell that the Senate would ever go along with it if he did get impeached.

Seriously, dude, stop embarrassing yourself.

We don't know that this is what happened. Barr was never asked about it. Mueller has not told us the circumstances that led to the completion of his investigation.

You might think you know. But the American public does not know this at all.

Mueller may come to the hill and testify something like, "Barr met with me and ordered me to stop investigating. There was a lot more that should have been done, but my hands were tied."

If that happens, all bets are off.

Flagpole wrote:

What? No Flagpole? wrote:

Surely, Flagpole has accepted the pledge.

(and yes, I called him Shirley)

Nope. That is akin to a bet, and I do not bet because it is low class.

You take part in other low class things. Why not betting?

Looking for a fast way to last page.

This thread is too long and cumbersome.

So Trump is obviously not a normal candidate.

Trump won in 2016 with 46% LOSING the popular vote.

IF he maintains the same demographic %s he LOSES WI, PA and MI and loses the election.

A normal candidate would not be doubling down on his far right base. Trump wholly believes he can win with just his hard right base plus moderates not paying attention or voting holding their noses. He fails to understand the demographic math.

Trump loses because the GOP demographics are dying or not reproducing at as fast a rate as Dem demographics.

Hence, Trump 100% loses.

If the economy comes to a grinding halt as I have predicted by Nov 2020 and the border humanitarian crises remains on the TV screen with all of those 'poor women and children' *sob* then Trump loses in historic fashion and loses TX.

It's primary season so as usual too much is made out of this or that candidates policy. Policy doesn't win elections. Likeability and gut feelings win the casual votes needed to win the presidency.

100%. All In. Epic.

Alan

Collusion is a nonterm. The legal term is to conspire with a foreign to change an election, in other words treason. So let's all celebrate trump wasn't found to engage in treason. That bar is set pretty low, and it just be embarrassing to trumpsters to celebrate their guy is not a traitor.

It's pretty clear evidence points to obstruction of justice.

Biden beats trump in general election!

Lots of "ifs."

Good for you for putting yourself out there. I just hope that you don't pull a Flagpole.