Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

FAX Only Please wrote:

Oh dear, I feel I should come back....

Oh, deer! No one here cares about how you "feel".

Sally Vix wrote:

I don't deal with high school kids who have no knowledge of anything. Next!

Instead, you can only mentally deal with retards who never made it emotionally and mentally past the first grade; like Trump, Rigged and yourself.

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

A parade to celebrate the TRUMP of July is “too expensive” . . . TRUMP MATH FAIL

^ Truth Bomb

How do "liberal" cities not follow the laws? You're probably referring to sanctuary cities which would be one law. Not contacting ICE when an illegal is pulled over for a minor traffic violation is not an unreasonable policy. If you did some research you would find there are some compelling arguments in support of it.

You can have your opinions, but the way you describe sanctuary cities is BS.

Sanctuary cities like San Fran have already said they will not follow American law. Can you imagine them doing that in France circa 1787? The would be beheaded. Do you not want American laws followed or should America allow every illegal into the cuuntry when WE ALREADY HAVE 20 MILLION ILLEGALS. Do you not care about law? About borders?

sals, here's a conservative commentator on sanctuary cities.

nutshell: localities don't have to help the feds enforce federal law. The feds are forbidden from forcing the states to enforce federal law.

Meanwhile, SCOTUS has said clearly that states must provide social services to non-citizens.

You seem to all in the weeds on this one.

https://www.creators.com/read/judge-napolitano/12/16/are-sanctuary-cities-legal

You mean, those liberal cities are like the POTUS who is refusing to follow the court order on the census question? Wow! I didn't know they had so much in common.

Sally Vix wrote:

SDSU Aztec wrote:

How do "liberal" cities not follow the laws? You're probably referring to sanctuary cities which would be one law. Not contacting ICE when an illegal is pulled over for a minor traffic violation is not an unreasonable policy. If you did some research you would find there are some compelling arguments in support of it.

You can have your opinions, but the way you describe sanctuary cities is BS.

Sanctuary cities like San Fran have already said they will not follow American law. Can you imagine them doing that in France circa 1787? The would be beheaded. Do you not want American laws followed or should America allow every illegal into the cuuntry when WE ALREADY HAVE 20 MILLION ILLEGALS. Do you not care about law? About borders?

1) Wrong again, Sally. It is up to American agents, (ICE, etc.), to enforce American law. Sanctuary cities have simply stated that LOCAL law enforcement authorities will not do the job of the Feds for them.

2) France circa 1787? Oh yes, I see how that is relevant!

3) These people are not "illegals" unless everyone who breaks a law is an "illegal". I suspect that this would make nearly every adult an "illegal". (have you ever exceeded the speed limit?)

Try again, Sally dear!

Sally Vix wrote:

SDSU Aztec wrote:

How do "liberal" cities not follow the laws? You're probably referring to sanctuary cities which would be one law. Not contacting ICE when an illegal is pulled over for a minor traffic violation is not an unreasonable policy. If you did some research you would find there are some compelling arguments in support of it.

You can have your opinions, but the way you describe sanctuary cities is BS.

Sanctuary cities like San Fran have already said they will not follow American law. Can you imagine them doing that in France circa 1787? The would be beheaded. Do you not want American laws followed or should America allow every illegal into the cuuntry when WE ALREADY HAVE 20 MILLION ILLEGALS. Do you not care about law? About borders?

Can you make a logical point? Can you name any politician who wants to let every potential imigrant into the country? And the official estimate is 11.5 million.

In regard to SF, let's say an illegal is working two jobs to support a family and he is pulled over for a rolling stop. The police notify ICE and he's deported. Does that not seem cruel to you? And how does him being deported help you personally?

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

A parade to celebrate the 4th of July is “too expensive,” but providing healthcare to 11,000,000 illegal aliens isn’t? ?

Lib math FAIL

You are already providing their healthcare you dumb ape.

Alan

Also undocumented immigrants use less healthcare for obvious reasons:

https://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20180808/NEWS/180809934/study-finds-immigrants-use-fewer-u-s-healthcare-resources

The problem with using less healthcare, less preventative care is that is has a greater negative impact down the road on that individual and those individuals around him.

Also, uncompensated care runs close to $100 billion annually and this cost has to be recouped somewhere (ie: your premium).

Overall, ensuring ALL residents of a country have access to healthcare is a net positive to personal and group income, overall health, etc.

It's big boy math so it may be hard for the knuckle draggers and inbreds to figure out.

Alan

Runningart2004 wrote:

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

A parade to celebrate the 4th of July is “too expensive,” but providing healthcare to 11,000,000 illegal aliens isn’t? ?

Lib math FAIL

You are already providing their healthcare you dumb ape.

Alan

Why not? They pay taxes and contribute to keep Social Security solvent.

Undocumented immigrants pay $12 billion of taxes every single year.

Undocumented immigrants pay $13 billion to social security every single year.

Runningart2004 wrote:

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

A parade to celebrate the 4th of July is “too expensive,” but providing healthcare to 11,000,000 illegal aliens isn’t? ?

Lib math FAIL

You are already providing their healthcare you dumb ape.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/theapothecary/2018/02/26/how-american-citizens-finance-health-care-for-undocumented-immigrants/

Alan

And in the same article the writer said that it was a bad idea. Doh!!!

Again, putting the needs of illegal aliens over the needs of our US citizens and our homeless or veterans who cannot afford healthcare is bad policy.

You live in the LRC socialist bubble, America will not elect a dem to the White House in 2020. You will ban yourself, leave LR forever and stay out of Indiana (somebody else keeps saying that).

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Again, putting the needs of illegal aliens over the needs of our US citizens and our homeless or veterans who cannot afford healthcare is bad policy.

Trump stealing money from the National Parks, and the Military, to pay for his egofest masturbation is BIGLY bad policy.

BTW: How much of his personal campaign money is Trump contributing to pay for the Trump of July?

PS. VIP ticket giveaways are going BIGLY bad. Rigged, hope on the a plane--pay your own way--and grab a free ticket for Trump's "bread and circuses" cluster-f*ck show.

"bread and circuses": to generate public approval, not by excellence in public service or public policy, but by diversion, distraction or by satisfying the most immediate or base requirements of a populace.

Sally Vix wrote:

This iz easy wrote:

Pick a post....any post.

I don't deal with high school kids who have no knowledge of anything. Next!

You don't look in the mirror?

That's where "no knowledge of anything" exists in your world.

Yes, O2 is consumed during respiration.

But your 4th Grade teacher wasn't lying to you when she said, "During photosynthesis, plants breathe in carbon dioxide and breathe out oxygen." The net effect is CO2 in and O2 out. This applies to the plants of the Amazon as well.

I will "half-eat" some crow here. I went looking for the original citation showing 20% of O2 is created in the Amazon. While I found lots and lots of articles that repeat this, the original citation could not be found.

That the Amazon also consumes O2 is irrelevant because the Amazon is not a closed system. Whether it consumes roughly the same amount of O2 as it produces is also irrelevant.

The fact is that the Amazon produces a large portion of world's O2 and consumes a large portion of its CO2. When Brazil burns down large swaths of the Amazon, CO2 is released without any means to recapture it and covert to O2. And that's what IS relevant for all of mankind. I don't know how many more ways I can say that.

Fat hurts wrote:

I will "half-eat" some crow here. I went looking for the original citation showing 20% of O2 is created in the Amazon. While I found lots and lots of articles that repeat this, the original citation could not be found.

I'll spit out some of that crow.

I did find a scholarly article stating that the Amazon is responsible for 15% of global terrestrial photosynthesis. By "terrestrial", I'm pretty sure he means "on land" rather than "on earth". So it appears that 20% of all O2 production is not possible. But 15% of all terrestrial plant-based O2 production is still a pretty large amount.

And there are plenty of scholarly articles to back up everything else I've been saying.

So Tiny thinks that our troops took over airports during the American Revolution:

In June of 1775 the Continental Congress created a unified Army out of the Revolutionary Forces encamped around Boston and New York, and named after the great George Washington, commander in chief,” Trump read in his speech. “The Continental Army suffered a bitter winter at Valley Forge, found glory across the waters of the Delaware and seized victory from Cornwallis at Yorktown. Our Army manned the air, it rammed the ramparts, it took over airports, it did everything it had to do and at Ft. McHenry under the rocket’s red glare had nothing but victory. When dawn came, the star-spangled banner waved defiant.

Does anyone still believe he should be president?

Fat hurts wrote:

So Tiny thinks that our troops took over airports during the American Revolution:

In June of 1775 the Continental Congress created a unified Army out of the Revolutionary Forces encamped around Boston and New York, and named after the great George Washington, commander in chief,” Trump read in his speech. “The Continental Army suffered a bitter winter at Valley Forge, found glory across the waters of the Delaware and seized victory from Cornwallis at Yorktown. Our Army manned the air, it rammed the ramparts, it took over airports, it did everything it had to do and at Ft. McHenry under the rocket’s red glare had nothing but victory. When dawn came, the star-spangled banner waved defiant.

Does anyone still believe he should be president?

This is the problem when you elect 70+ yr olds. Reagan was the same in his second term. Same reason we shouldn't nominate Biden.

Alan