Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

helping u out here wrote:

up the .... wrote:

What is going on is that you have "Your head up Trump's Yuge Butt" Syndrome.

#Truth

Well, except for the fact that I think that Trump is stunningly ignorant, completely amoral, a pathological liar, by far the worst President of all time and one of the worst human beings I have any knowledge of.

Yeah, sounds like I am a big fan of his.

////////////

Did anyone ever tell you that you have the IQ of a retarded earthworm?

^ We found the thin-skinned Trump snowflake.

actual socialist wrote:

You guys talking about radical leftists in these primaries would shit your pants if there was an actual radical leftist in the race. Biden is right of center based on his record. Harris qualifies as a liberal on pretty much no criteria. People like Warren and Sanders are very moderate candidates.

we're talking in an American context obviously. By most measures Harris and Warren are the very most left members of the US senate. That has to mean something, even in a global context there are obvi far more lefty people out there.

my criticism is that in a nation that traditionally prefers center left to harder left....do we want to nominate harder left people?

The primary system rewards the base and the extremists...that can be a serious error in a general.

Anonymous Poster.. wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

Under Brazil's new Trumpian leader, deforestation of the Amazon has increased 60%. Every minute, an area equal to one and a half soccer fields is destroyed.

The Amazon provides 20% of the world's oxygen.

We must force Brazil to stop. Even if that means taking military action.

Who really cares about the long term effects we won't be around by the time they are felt. Why not use all of our resources now and enjoy our short time on earth as much as possible? I'm all for what Brazil is doing.

^ An incel speaks his small mind.

WTF^n wrote:

PLEASE shut up. You are making non-Trumpers look like loonies.

^ Clueless Trumpanzee posting from his padded basement cell.

FAX Only Please wrote:

Fact: As with nearly all mature ecosystems, the Amazon consumes as much oxygen as it "provides". That is, it "provides" zero oxygen to the rest of the world.

^ One of the most IGNORANT post ever on this thread.

No man is an island. (No ecosystem is closed inside a dome.)

agip wrote:

short answer: a radical left agenda will not get through congress and then all those crises will just be owned by the dems rather than the Rs.

if you want things done, unless you have the house, 60 votes in the senate and the WH, you need to find common ground. the common ground moderates can find.

There are no moderates in the Republican caucus and there is no common ground to find.

I remain absolutely gobsmacked from your inability to think critically.

WTF^n wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

Under Brazil's new Trumpian leader, deforestation of the Amazon has increased 60%. Every minute, an area equal to one and a half soccer fields is destroyed.

The Amazon provides 20% of the world's oxygen.

We must force Brazil to stop. Even if that means taking military action.

You gave up whatever credibility you may have once had a long time ago. But this ^ is the first time that you have outed yourself as a dangerous (and possibly borderline psychotic) individual.

PLEASE shut up. You are making non-Trumpers look like loonies.

Truth! I like Fat hurts psychotic episodes, always good comedy.

Flagpole wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

Under Brazil's new Trumpian leader, deforestation of the Amazon has increased 60%. Every minute, an area equal to one and a half soccer fields is destroyed.

The Amazon provides 20% of the world's oxygen.

We must force Brazil to stop. Even if that means taking military action.

I agree with you on most things, but that is a bridge too far for me. Military action should always be the last resort, only used after all other efforts have failed and only if there is imminent danger to human life. Lives can not be brought back, but trees can be planted.

https://interestingengineering.com/jadav-payeng-the-man-who-planted-an-entire-forest-by-himself

I agree with you on that Flagpole. Violence should always be the last resort.

But human lives do hang in the balance and military action should not be off the table.

actual socialist wrote:

You guys talking about radical leftists in these primaries would shit your pants if there was an actual radical leftist in the race. Biden is right of center based on his record. Harris qualifies as a liberal on pretty much no criteria. People like Warren and Sanders are very moderate candidates.

Correct.

ecosys wrote:

FAX Only Please wrote:

Fact: As with nearly all mature ecosystems, the Amazon consumes as much oxygen as it "provides". That is, it "provides" zero oxygen to the rest of the world.

^ One of the most IGNORANT post ever on this thread.

No man is an island. (No ecosystem is closed inside a dome.)

Couldn't have said it better myself.

Fat hurts wrote:

actual socialist wrote:

You guys talking about radical leftists in these primaries would shit your pants if there was an actual radical leftist in the race. Biden is right of center based on his record. Harris qualifies as a liberal on pretty much no criteria. People like Warren and Sanders are very moderate candidates.

Correct.

Well, I wouldn't describe Sanders as "very moderate", but I get your drift.

spotter of snowlfakes wrote:

helping u out here wrote:

Well, except for the fact that I think that Trump is stunningly ignorant, completely amoral, a pathological liar, by far the worst President of all time and one of the worst human beings I have any knowledge of.

Yeah, sounds like I am a big fan of his.

////////////

Did anyone ever tell you that you have the IQ of a retarded earthworm?

^ We found the thin-skinned Trump snowflake.

0/10

////////////

Oh yeah, almost forgot - A Trump-Pence-Putin world takeover did not come about today. Neither did WWIII. Weird.

No Common ground left wrote:

agip wrote:

short answer: a radical left agenda will not get through congress and then all those crises will just be owned by the dems rather than the Rs.

if you want things done, unless you have the house, 60 votes in the senate and the WH, you need to find common ground. the common ground moderates can find.

There are no moderates in the Republican caucus and there is no common ground to find.

I remain absolutely gobsmacked from your inability to think critically.

obviously not true - the Rs had house, senate, wh for two years and all they got done was tax cuts for the rich.

if there were no moderates in the R party the Rs would have accomplished a whole lot more.

And of course the great losses the Rs suffered in 2018 show that moderates in the R party are quite upset with Spanky, and they gave the House to the Ds.

So yes, there are moderates in the R party. And if you add in all the moderates who have quit the R party and are now indies or Dems, that makes their numbers even larger.

The Dem party needs those people. Pushign them away with extreme candidates like Harris, Warren, Sanders is very unwise.

and in a patriotic sense...we need DC to hold the nation together. warren harris sanders would not do that.

ecosys wrote:

FAX Only Please wrote:

Fact: As with nearly all mature ecosystems, the Amazon consumes as much oxygen as it "provides". That is, it "provides" zero oxygen to the rest of the world.

^ One of the most IGNORANT post ever on this thread.

No man is an island. (No ecosystem is closed inside a dome.)

Really? Let's explore who is ignorant here, shall we?

So, you think that the Amazon is "providing" oxygen to the rest of the world? It is fair to assume that you know that this means that the Amazon is taking a proportionate amount of carbon from the rest of the world? Or is that too big of a leap for you?

Assuming that you understand this most basic item (probably not a safe assumption) let me ask you - where is all that carbon going in a mature ecosystem such as the Amazon?

I will await a further display of your ignorance.

Fat hurts wrote:

ecosys wrote:

^ One of the most IGNORANT post ever on this thread.

No man is an island. (No ecosystem is closed inside a dome.)

Couldn't have said it better myself.

Ah, but do try.

Let's explore who is ignorant here, shall we?

So, you think that the Amazon is "providing" oxygen to the rest of the world? It is fair to assume that you know that this means that the Amazon is taking a proportionate amount of carbon from the rest of the world? Or is that too big of a leap for you?

Assuming that you understand this most basic item (probably not a safe assumption) let me ask you - where is all that carbon going in a mature ecosystem such as the Amazon?

I will await a further display of your ignorance.

helping u out here wrote:

////////////

Oh yeah, almost forgot - A Trump-Pence-Putin world takeover did not come about today. Neither did WWIII. Weird.

Your knuckles are dragging Trumpanzee.

So, you were hoping for a Trump-Pence-Putin world takeover. Sucks to be you.

FAX Only Please wrote:

ecosys wrote:

^ One of the most IGNORANT post ever on this thread.

No man is an island. (No ecosystem is closed inside a dome.)

Really? Let's explore who is ignorant here, shall we?

So, you think that the Amazon is "providing" oxygen to the rest of the world? It is fair to assume that you know that this means that the Amazon is taking a proportionate amount of carbon from the rest of the world? Or is that too big of a leap for you?

Assuming that you understand this most basic item (probably not a safe assumption) let me ask you - where is all that carbon going in a mature ecosystem such as the Amazon?

I will await a further display of your ignorance.

Earth 101.

Trees take in CO2.

Trees release Oxygen.

See, that wasn't so hard.

FAX Only Please wrote:

ecosys wrote:

^ One of the most IGNORANT post ever on this thread.

No man is an island. (No ecosystem is closed inside a dome.)

Really? Let's explore who is ignorant here, shall we?

So, you think that the Amazon is "providing" oxygen to the rest of the world? It is fair to assume that you know that this means that the Amazon is taking a proportionate amount of carbon from the rest of the world? Or is that too big of a leap for you?

Assuming that you understand this most basic item (probably not a safe assumption) let me ask you - where is all that carbon going in a mature ecosystem such as the Amazon?

I will await a further display of your ignorance.

Like "FAX Only Please" said, no ecosystem is closed inside a dome.

When you cut down a tree (and fail to replant), CO2 is released. The tree is no longer there to take CO2 out of the atmosphere and produce O2. This leads to global warming, ocean acidification, wildfires, and other feedback loops that further increase CO2 and decrease the ability to create O2.

So when we say the Amazon provides 20% of the world's oxygen, that is shorthand for also talking about the enormous amount of carbon it stores. If you cut the Amazon down, CO2 is released without the ability to convert it to O2.

agip wrote:

actual socialist wrote:

You guys talking about radical leftists in these primaries would shit your pants if there was an actual radical leftist in the race. Biden is right of center based on his record. Harris qualifies as a liberal on pretty much no criteria. People like Warren and Sanders are very moderate candidates.

we're talking in an American context obviously. By most measures Harris and Warren are the very most left members of the US senate. That has to mean something, even in a global context there are obvi far more lefty people out there.

my criticism is that in a nation that traditionally prefers center left to harder left....do we want to nominate harder left people?

The primary system rewards the base and the extremists...that can be a serious error in a general.

In your version of america where we only elected the kind of people you call "moderates" we would have no labor protections (not just for union organizing, but no overtime pay or child labor protections), we would have no social security, we would have no food stamps, we would have no Medicare, we would have no PBGC.

You'd be screaming about how divisive those programs were.