Ghost of Igloi wrote:
I was joking, the majority of the posters here are always calling a source they don’t agree with as right wing....
Oh okay Ghost. LOL. Nice one.
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
I was joking, the majority of the posters here are always calling a source they don’t agree with as right wing....
Oh okay Ghost. LOL. Nice one.
directored wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
He was the "editor" of the Harvard Law Review and never publishing ANYTHING. What kind of editor has ever done that? He is a clown.
How many Apprentice shows did Trump write and direct? A: Zero. Trump is a clown.
Huge difference. An editor WRITES. That is what he or she lives for. He or she yearns to publish. Some game show is totally different. You have 50 people involved in the process.
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
I was joking, the majority of the posters here are always calling a source they don’t agree with as right wing....
Obviously Breitbart is right wing. It’s got nothing to do with what anyone agrees with.
Flagpole wrote:
By the way...just one more thing in an exhaustive list of things I was right about.
I think that you meant to say "extensive."
Sally Vix wrote:
directored wrote:
How many Apprentice shows did Trump write and direct? A: Zero. Trump is a clown.
Huge difference. An editor WRITES.
A writer writes.
An editor edits.
Got it?
Sadly, no. Get your head out of your butt.
Oh, but CNN, MSNBC and Huffington Post are left wing....and I am not saying they should be discounted as a news source, just their obvious slant....
Exhaustively extensive wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
By the way...just one more thing in an exhaustive list of things I was right about.
I think that you meant to say "extensive."
You list of accomplishment myself the short enough to be extensive, and not long enough to be exhaustive.
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
I was joking, the majority of the posters here are always calling a source they don’t agree with as right wing....
It's interesting how 100% of your "jokes" are in one particular direction. Surprising since you are so unbiased.
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
Oh, but CNN, MSNBC and Huffington Post are left wing....and I am not saying they should be discounted as a news source, just their obvious slant....
Nope. They have actual conservative writers on those news sources. Breitbart, Fox and Zerohenge having democrats write for them. not so much.
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
Oh, but CNN, MSNBC and Huffington Post are left wing....and I am not saying they should be discounted as a news source, just their obvious slant....
There’s media with a left bias and media with right bias. Did you really not know this?
Megyn Kelly wrote:
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
Oh, but CNN, MSNBC and Huffington Post are left wing....and I am not saying they should be discounted as a news source, just their obvious slant....
There’s media with a left bias and media with right bias. Did you really not know this?
Of course I do, something that is lost on all the “right wing media hair on fire” posters.
directored wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
Huge difference. An editor WRITES.
A writer writes.
An editor edits.
Got it?
Sadly, no. Get your head out of your butt.
Why the insult? Is that how you ride? Editors write often. If you don't know that you have never been in the publishing business. I have.
This is a great song for impeachment:
This is a great video for Russian Collusion insanity:
Sally Vix wrote:
Why
Get your head out of you ass.
Feel better now?
Sally Vix wrote:
directored wrote:
A writer writes.
An editor edits.
Got it?
Sadly, no. Get your head out of your butt.
Why the insult? Is that how you ride? Editors write often. If you don't know that you have never been in the publishing business. I have.
Hmmm . . . you have been insulting President Obama on the topic of writing and editing.
Please try tp grow up before you scream about being insulted.
Should be called 'Trump, Russia, there was collusion.'
Another song about collusion:
Flagpole wrote:
Racket wrote:
I'm curious what the blight of the Earth that is Sally Vix has done or said to convince you that the person behind the username isn't a troll.
Atypical trolling strategy including concessions to being wrong or NOT knowledgeable about a specific thing on occasion and a civil tone now and again. Some might say that is evidence of a very GOOD troll, but I don't believe that's what we're seeing here with Sally. Sally is just a Trumper who doesn't understand really much about the investigation or the consequences of supporting a man who is out to destroy our democracy and The Rule of Law among other things.
Sally is remarkably knowledgeable about points that support his position and completely unwilling to acknowledge points against his position even after repeated corrections. Call it trolling or call it something else, but it surely isn't a good faith discussion.
I hope everyone on this thread gets along.
I will have more peace of mind when DJT has been impeached.
Greg wrote:
I hope everyone on this thread gets along.
I will have more peace of mind when DJT has been impeached.
You may need a sedative since that is very unlikely to happen.