Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Non-Running Politics

Page 2,969 of 6,318

1 2,968 2,969 2,970 6,318

4 years ago 05/15/2019 12:48pm EDT

re: Wrong again

Wrong again wrote:
Runningart2004 wrote:
So Beto is finally having a CNN Town Hall on the 21st. If his polling numbers don’t jump up to 20% or so due to this national exposure then I’m jumping off the Beto band wagon.
Biden is polling around 40% already. While that does mean 60% are supporting someone other than Biden many of those supporters have Biden as a second choice. By the time a 2016 Republican nominee had 40% it was all basically over. Really by the time anyone had 30% it was over with such a large field.
I think Biden is too old. He has too much baggage having held public office for so long. On the plus side he’s been posturing for a Trump fight since 2016 when he should have ran. I think he gets steamrolled by any typical Republican, but Trump isn’t typical.
Alan
How’s that Beto love affair working out for you?
You continue to be wrong about everything.

What have I been wrong about? I don’t believe I’ve made any predictions yet. Other than Trump will lose in 2020, 100%.

I think you are confusing me with Flagpole.

Aka

4 years ago 05/15/2019 12:49pm EDT

re: Flagpole

Their momentum started and ended Election Night 2016. Train wreck ever since.

4 years ago 05/15/2019 12:56pm EDT

re: PJT

PJT wrote:
SDSU Aztec wrote:
Most people go to college to improve their chances of getting a full-time job that will provide long-term security. That's what I did and you probably did to. If her family needed financial support, what she did was irresponsible.
Working for Ted Kennedy does not qualify her to be an expert on climate change. Her proposals of making buildings more energy efficient, using electric cars and reducing air travel by building high-speed rail are not new ideas. Without providing a cost/benifit analysis and identifying the souces of funding, her plan is meaningless. It was not in her final plan, but posting a QA mentioning farting cows and eliminating air travel damaged her ability to be taken seriously.
Those of us who are intelligent enough to understand the importance and feasibility of the Green New Deal can overlook a mistake by an intern.

Her QA was going to be viewed by millions so AOC certainly reviewd it. If she allowed an intern to write and post it without her knowledge, it would be staggering managerial incompetence on her part.

How do you know it is feasable if the plan contains no estimated costs?

4 years ago 05/15/2019 12:57pm EDT

re: TED Talk

TED Talk wrote:
Fat hurts wrote:
There is a lot more to her than bartending. AOC has an impressive pre-congress resume for someone at age 29. She did work part time as a bartender and waitress but that was never her main job. Her family needed the extra money.
Some look at the bartending thing as a plus. Some as a negative.
To many, bartending is the only thing they know about her past. They don't know that she worked for Ted Kennedy or that she got second in the Intel International Science Fair or that she was an exceptional college student, etc.
What did she do for Ted K? He died 10 years ago? How old was she when she worked for him?

According to Wikipedia:

During college, she served as an intern in the office of U.S. Senator Ted Kennedy, in his section on foreign affairs and immigration issues. "I was the only Spanish speaker, and as a result, as basically a kid—a 19-, 20-year-old kid—whenever a frantic call would come into the office because someone is looking for their husband because they have been snatched off the street by ICE, I was the one that had to pick up that phone," Ocasio-Cortez said. "I was the one that had to help that person navigate that system."

4 years ago 05/15/2019 12:57pm EDT

re: SDSU Aztec

SDSU Aztec wrote:
Fat hurts wrote:
There is a lot more to her than bartending. AOC has an impressive pre-congress resume for someone at age 29. She did work part time as a bartender and waitress but that was never her main job. Her family needed the extra money.
Some look at the bartending thing as a plus. Some as a negative.
To many, bartending is the only thing they know about her past. They don't know that she worked for Ted Kennedy or that she got second in the Intel International Science Fair or that she was an exceptional college student, etc.
Most people go to college to improve their chances of getting a full-time job that will provide long-term security. That's what I did and you probably did to. If her family needed financial support, what she did was irresponsible.

Bartending was a second job. She went to College. She supported her mother and brother after her father died when she was 19. She's founded a niche publishing company on the side.

Working for Ted Kennedy does not qualify her to be an expert on climate change. Her proposals of making buildings more energy efficient, using electric cars and reducing air travel by building high-speed rail are not new ideas. Without providing a cost/benifit analysis and identifying the souces of funding, her plan is meaningless. It was not in her final plan, but posting a QA mentioning farting cows and eliminating air travel damaged her ability to be taken seriously.

Curious which climate mitigation proposal you do favor.

4 years ago 05/15/2019 12:58pm EDT

re: Runningart2004

Reports: Iran “threat” is a trump scam to provoke them. Isn’t that typical?

4 years ago 05/15/2019 1:00pm EDT

re: Voice of Reason

Voice of Reason wrote:
I'm on neither side of this debate.
I don't see the harm in the current investigations into the alleged "plot." We should have transparency.

I agree. Have at it. The fact of the matter is that this "investigating the investigators" is a political ploy to try to paint anyone other than Trump as the same as Trump (criminal), and of course that isn't true. He's a criminal, and the FBI will be proven to have done either nothing wrong at all, or they may decide the FBI could have done something better than it did. In any event, nothing big will come of investigating the investigators.

Trump is a criminal. Those supporting him are abetting.

Trump is backed into a corner which is why he is fighting and will continue to fight all investigations into him and his family as much as he can. Hoping to run out the clock on an impeachment. Hoping to put things off long enough so that he can put off prison as long as possible. There is no other reason for his current actions.

Criminals gonna criminal. He is obstructing justice in plain sight right now. He WILL do other illegal things too until he is imprisoned or dies or escapes to exile (and even there he will likely break the law).

4 years ago 05/15/2019 1:06pm EDT

re: Flagpole

Flagpole wrote:
Voice of Reason wrote:
I'm on neither side of this debate.
I don't see the harm in the current investigations into the alleged "plot." We should have transparency.
I agree. Have at it. The fact of the matter is that this "investigating the investigators" is a political ploy to try to paint anyone other than Trump as the same as Trump (criminal) . . .

Sounds good.

Can't wait for 2021 when the new POTUS will announce the launching of a new investigation to investigate the investigations of the investigators investigating Russian interference. Can never have too many investigations because we want the TRUTH, gosh darn it!

#Clowncountry

4 years ago 05/15/2019 1:06pm EDT

re: agip

agip wrote:
this is not good for the country - a falling birthrate and the president wants to cut immigration in all forms.
Fifty years from now we will look back and this period and be stunned that the country pushed away young people who came here to work and succeed. national suicide.
There will be a huge battle over the next century to attract young people to mature nations to pay for us all living to 90. But the oldsters who vote for trump and watch fox will be dead by then.

That's ok. SCOTUS will take care of that pretty soon.

4 years ago 05/15/2019 1:11pm EDT

re: SDSU Aztec

SDSU Aztec wrote:
Fat hurts wrote:
There is a lot more to her than bartending. AOC has an impressive pre-congress resume for someone at age 29. She did work part time as a bartender and waitress but that was never her main job. Her family needed the extra money.
Some look at the bartending thing as a plus. Some as a negative.
To many, bartending is the only thing they know about her past. They don't know that she worked for Ted Kennedy or that she got second in the Intel International Science Fair or that she was an exceptional college student, etc.
Most people go to college to improve their chances of getting a full-time job that will provide long-term security. That's what I did and you probably did to. If her family needed financial support, what she did was irresponsible.
Working for Ted Kennedy does not qualify her to be an expert on climate change. Her proposals of making buildings more energy efficient, using electric cars and reducing air travel by building high-speed rail are not new ideas. Without providing a cost/benifit analysis and identifying the souces of funding, her plan is meaningless. It was not in her final plan, but posting a QA mentioning farting cows and eliminating air travel damaged her ability to be taken seriously.

I find it funny that people get so up in arms over a junior member of Congress...want to pick apart her credentials, etc. We've had politicians who entered national politics who were former baseball players and football players and farmers and teachers and actors (The Love Boat's Gopher!).

Members of Congress have had these other jobs before being elected:

Car dealer

Rodeo Announcer

Welder

Funeral home owner

Software engineer

Physician

Dentists

Veterinarians

Psychiatrist

Psychologists

Optometrist

Nurse

Minister

Physicist

Engineer

Microbiologist

Radio talk show host

Journalist

Accountant

Pilot

Astronaut

Filmmaker

Almond orchard owner

Vintner

Fisherman

Social worker

Stockbroker

4 years ago 05/15/2019 1:13pm EDT

re: Monkeys typing

Monkeys typing wrote:
SDSU Aztec wrote:
Most people go to college to improve their chances of getting a full-time job that will provide long-term security. That's what I did and you probably did to. If her family needed financial support, what she did was irresponsible.
Bartending was a second job. She went to College. She supported her mother and brother after her father died when she was 19. She's founded a niche publishing company on the side.
Working for Ted Kennedy does not qualify her to be an expert on climate change. Her proposals of making buildings more energy efficient, using electric cars and reducing air travel by building high-speed rail are not new ideas. Without providing a cost/benifit analysis and identifying the souces of funding, her plan is meaningless. It was not in her final plan, but posting a QA mentioning farting cows and eliminating air travel damaged her ability to be taken seriously.
Curious which climate mitigation proposal you do favor.

It's probably already been done, but something prepared by climate and economic experts that would be readable and would have a chance of being approved by Congress. What AOC and her interns put together is not even a first step. It should have also focused on climate change rather including idiotic, utopian bullit points. Among other things, it suggested we close all of our overseas military bases. I don't believe she thought that one through.

4 years ago 05/15/2019 1:13pm EDT

re: SDSU Aztec

SDSU Aztec wrote:
PJT wrote:
Those of us who are intelligent enough to understand the importance and feasibility of the Green New Deal can overlook a mistake by an intern.
Her QA was going to be viewed by millions so AOC certainly reviewd it. If she allowed an intern to write and post it without her knowledge, it would be staggering managerial incompetence on her part.
How do you know it is feasable if the plan contains no estimated costs?

Where are your estimated costs.

P.S. Learn how to spell correctly.

4 years ago 05/15/2019 1:15pm EDT

re: Flagpole

Flagpole wrote:
SDSU Aztec wrote:
Most people go to college to improve their chances of getting a full-time job that will provide long-term security. That's what I did and you probably did to. If her family needed financial support, what she did was irresponsible.
Working for Ted Kennedy does not qualify her to be an expert on climate change. Her proposals of making buildings more energy efficient, using electric cars and reducing air travel by building high-speed rail are not new ideas. Without providing a cost/benifit analysis and identifying the souces of funding, her plan is meaningless. It was not in her final plan, but posting a QA mentioning farting cows and eliminating air travel damaged her ability to be taken seriously.
I find it funny that people get so up in arms over a junior member of Congress...want to pick apart her credentials, etc. We've had politicians who entered national politics who were former baseball players and football players and farmers and teachers and actors (The Love Boat's Gopher!).
Members of Congress have had these other jobs before being elected:
Car dealer
Rodeo Announcer
Welder
Funeral home owner
Software engineer
Physician
Dentists
Veterinarians
Psychiatrist
Psychologists
Optometrist
Nurse
Minister
Physicist
Engineer
Microbiologist
Radio talk show host
Journalist
Accountant
Pilot
Astronaut
Filmmaker
Almond orchard owner
Vintner
Fisherman
Social worker
Stockbroker

Don't forget Community Organizer

4 years ago 05/15/2019 1:16pm EDT

re: forgetfulled

4 years ago 05/15/2019 1:19pm EDT

re: Flagpole

Yeah, and that brothel owner in Nevada who died. Gaetz of Florida, a lawyer who specialized in witness intimidation at the Cohen Hearing (where he had no role). Clown ? acorns don’t fall far from the trump tree!

4 years ago 05/15/2019 1:24pm EDT

re: jesseriley

Forgot “Russia’s Favorite Congressman” (CA), wiped out in the 2018 Revolt, er, election.

4 years ago 05/15/2019 1:25pm EDT

re: SilIy WiIly

SilIy WiIly wrote:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/no-do-over-on-mueller-probe-white-house-lawyer-tells-house-panel-saying-demands-for-records-staff-testimony-will-be-refused/2019/05/15/1ad19728-7715-11e9-b3f5-5673edf2d127_story.html?utm_term=.2a3ed8f3ddd4
Trump is sticking it to the House and owning the libs!

In one breath, the WH says that the president cannot be indicted...and that the congress cannot investigate him for possible impeachment either.

It's absurd. Every judge in the country will shoot this down.

The problem is that it will take 18 months to shoot it down.

4 years ago 05/15/2019 1:35pm EDT

re: Flagpole

Flagpole wrote:
SilIy WiIly wrote:
You clearly don't know what being "proven right" even means. I've been right for over 3 years vs you.
You have ZERO to show for any of your THOUSANDS of posts. Nothing.
You know what's great about being right so often? You don't have to visit these boards every day. You can go WEEKS without checking, come back, and know that nothing has changed- just a bunch of losers whining to each other.
But it's not going to happen.
Mueller failed.
Clownpole wailed.
Barr though? Oh yeah, he's a COMIN'!!
Nope.
I was proven right about the 2016 election (because Trump cheated). I was proven right about all of those who cooperated with Mueller. I was proven right that Avenatti would be a big thorn in the sides of Cohen and Trump (his work is responsible for the FELONY campaign finance charges that Cohen is spending time in prison for and that Trump will also spend time in prison for). I was proven right that Manafort would be found guilty and imprisoned for a long time. I was proven right that Stone would be indicted. I was proven right that Repeal and Replace would not be "so easy" as Trump said it would. I was proven right that he would not ever share his taxes and that Mexico would never pay for a wall. I'm for sure not even remembering all the things I was right about...and the string isn't over either.
If Trump doesn't die first, he WILL be indicted and will be found guilty of multiple crimes, and he WILL go to prison (unless he is pardoned or there is criminal activity that prevents it or space aliens prevent it).
Obstruction of Justice WILL be one of the charges. He will also face some sort of fraud (bank, wire, insurance, tax), and his organization will be labeled a criminal enterprise (RICO will take him and it down). He will face other charges including FELONY campaign finance law violation and emoluments clause violation ad perhaps even witness tampering.
He's in big big trouble. To think otherwise is to be ignorant of what is coming his way.
Barr has proven to be a crook too, and he had really better watch his step or he will face Obstruction of Justice charges also. That a bunch of people in the FBI are going to be in big trouble over any of this is right-wing hope and noise.
Mueller is coming.
The clown is done.

YEP.

Your list of being wrong:

"Trump has ZERO chance to win the election." He won, you cried, and continue to cry like a little bich.

"Trump cheated." Actually, we now have verifiable proof that Hillary cheated first against Bernie and then also against Trump. And the idiot still lost.

"Evidence of Trump colluding with Russia will be found" (paraphrasing). It was of course proven that it did not happen AT ALL.

"Trump will be indicted for obstructing justice." No again. He actually was very open to all of his associates cooperating fully with the investigation. Don Jr testified for 25+ hours, Kushner for close to 30.

"Trump will be charged with [everything under the sun...you had a list of like 15 things." Nope. Nuthin. Zero.

"Avenatti is a pitbull and thorn in Trump's side." You later considered supporting him for a 2020 election bid. Now, HE'S IN JAIL. LOL!!

Manafort and Stone were indicted for things completely not related to the Russian Collusion Hoax, which you MOST CERTAINLY were implying would happen. For you to have been correct, you would have had to predict that Manafort will be charged with tax evasion/fraud, which of course you did not.

You never predicted anything about Repeal and Replace, or his taxes, or the Wall funding. Nice try though. You continue to flail around, trying to react to Trump and claim he's in trouble. All to no avail, however. You continue to show how much of a fool you are. A 5'3" fool, by the way.

You are amusing though. As I've been saying for years now, you're "silly."

Get ready for the real conspiracy to be proven out. You had your chance to complete the hoax. Mueller failed to prove.

Ignoring the mountain of evidence of anti-Trump bias and actions prior to and after the election has been and will continue to be your downfall. Your desperation is impairing your critical thinking ability, which was suspect to begin with.

Again...

Mueller failed.

Clownpole wailed.

Barr IS COMING, punks.

4 years ago 05/15/2019 1:36pm EDT

re: agip

Trump will drain the swamp, but only when he’s in prison. So he will need to slow down the process.

4 years ago 05/15/2019 1:38pm EDT

re: SilIy WiIly

I am attracted to Mike Pence.

Page 2,969 of 6,318

1 2,968 2,969 2,970 6,318

Next Last

Reply Replying to

Username

Password

Leave the password field blank to post anonymously.

Post Preview

By posting you acknowledge that you have read and abide by our Terms and Conditions.

Remember me on this device.

Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Of General Interest

This thread has already been deleted.

You have been subscribed.

Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Jump To A Page

Follow Runningart2004

Block Runningart2004

Follow jesseriley

Block jesseriley

Follow SDSU Aztec

Block SDSU Aztec

Follow Fat hurts

Block Fat hurts

Follow Monkeys typing

Block Monkeys typing

Follow jesseriley

Block jesseriley

Follow Flagpole

Block Flagpole

Follow The Fokus

Block The Fokus

Follow Flagpole

Block Flagpole

Follow SDSU Aztec

Block SDSU Aztec

Follow jesseriley

Block jesseriley

Follow jesseriley

Block jesseriley

Follow agip

Block agip

Follow jesseriley

Block jesseriley

Jump To A Page

Of General Interest

This thread has already been deleted.

Reply Replying to

You have been subscribed.