This is true. Donald and Melania had been separated for about a year when he met Melania. Some of you calling her a gold-digging whore need to apologize.
This is true. Donald and Melania had been separated for about a year when he met Melania. Some of you calling her a gold-digging whore need to apologize.
He will just st make up some claim that since he has 100%....that his daughter would never do such a thing because she has 100% bulls!t, I mean integrity too. Lol
Will surprises never cease? wrote:
Runningart2004 wrote:
Disagree about military de-escalation. The one thing I can count on with a GOP President is increased pay and promotion rates. I’ll take my bonus thank you very much.
The military is basically an arm of our foreign policy. With it we can share arm leg and technology to our allies. With it we can train with our allies. With it our reach is great. This is to ensure when our allies decide to become our enemies we know how to defeat them since we gave them their tech/arms.
Also, bodies win wars. More equipment wins wars. When you have a 3:1 advantage in equipment and tech then you really can’t lose. That’s the reason we have such a large military.
Alan
Military guy does not want military de-escalation. What a surprise!
Talk to seasoned military personnel and you will get many different viewpoints on how the military should be used. Among our soldiers, you will find doves and hawks and everything in between.
Melania is a waste of sympathy; she’s had every benefit of USA but she won’t stick up for others just like her. Like donny, she’s a hypocrite, and people die & are abused for policies she could fight at any time. Babies are in concentration camps; Hitler would be so proud!
“When you make it to the top, don’t forget to send the elevator back down.”
I don't know who taught you to argue by OCD-like enumeration like this but seriously, read some Demosthenes or Cicero.
The simple fact of the matter is (in what appears to be a unironic invocation of the classic Scarlet Letter) that you've decided to shame her through intentionally charged language in a way that reduces her status as a person and as a woman simply because she had an affair once. This, it would seem to you, is worthy of the permanent label "whore," and would seemingly, in your made up world where everyone is destined to carry the weight of their worst mistakes for all eternity both publicly and humiliatingly, apply even if she had atoned for this sin. Your presumption on her personal relationship with Trump, whether it involves simple motivations of money or not, stands.
Honestly I could go on but it's like arguing with you is much like arguing with a Trump supporter. Their mind is made up, built on a presumption of whatever preconceived notions originating within themselves must be correct, dominated by a single monolithic ideal that the universe is black and white and is the way I perceive it and nothing less with an almost Candide-like conviction.
"I have 100% integrity 100% of the time" has become as much of a trope as "I'm not racist, I have black friends."
I remember now that I have defended Melania in the past. And it is exactly from this charge.
You don't know Melania. Obviously, she did something very wrong by helping to break up a marriage.
But she probably regrets that now and she apparently hates her life as a result of what she has done. A person like that should be treated with compassion. See John 4:4-26.
Again, when Donald met Melania, he and Marla Maples had been separated for about a year.
Sally Vix wrote:
Again, when Donald met Melania, he and Marla Maples had been separated for about a year.
I commend you for your newfound interest in factual accuracy. Will you now be going back and correcting your own serial nonsense over the past few months?
She took an oath for citizenship just like he did for the presidency.
Melania may not uphold USA, but fortunately several trumpers are currently guests of the State, and anyone who thinks they’ll be silent to help trump is dreamin’!
Jonathan T. wrote:
banned Pete wrote:
I agree, FP has gone much too far calling the First Lady names. Not cool. Disturbingly uncool.
Definitely a low class move.
I concur.
Low class.
Desperation, thy name is Sally, who always avoided posting this early! Early conference call with vladdy?
That dishwater they call tea in Russia ?? won’t work, Sally! You’re no spring chicken, babuschka! Get some real coffee & get in the game!
And Mexico ?? will pay for the wall!
RunnerXY wrote:
Jonathan T. wrote:
Definitely a low class move.
I concur.
Low class.
I lost some serious respect for Flagpole.
The zero chance that Trump would win was idiocy.
The Trump "is" done mantra lost value over a year ago.
But the whore comments are interestingly Trumpian themselves (like Flagpole's arrogance)
As a liberal, I would like to trade him for one those Republicans jumping ship.
He's not fiscally liberal anyway.
Yes Butt wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
How does me calling her what she is shame her? She doesn't know I've said this. If you've ever seen her interviewed, it is pretty clear she has a very high bar of shame.
I never use language as a weapon. I use it to be accurately descriptive.
Tons of 72 year old fat men who work paycheck to paycheck married to arguably attractive 49 year old former nude models out there.
You are a LIAR. And you are LYING here. Further, every single person on this thread knows it (even you). And there is absolutely nothing you can do to change that, your inevitable nonsense about 100% integrity notwithstanding.
I am done with you. No interest in LIARS. So, LIE away.
Nope. I am not lying and I do not lie.
Why would I call her that at family functions? I have already said this isn't something to yell at someone to their face. Also, since I raised her right, she has a serious boyfriend that she is likely to marry, and he is the same age as her.
1) Her label of Gold-Digging Whore has nothing to do with any affairs that may or may not have happened (rumors of affairs on her part since their marriage, but I'm not considering any of that).
2) Enumeration makes things clear, but also, it's part of my persona...like calling people "brother", having HUGE biceps, etc.
3) Why is it that my view of her is monolithic, but yours is not? You agree with me on subjects we agree on, but you disagree with me when we disagree (obviously by definition). Why is YOUR view correct when we disagree? Why is it that YOU are not just like a Trump supporter with YOUR mind made up?
4) Again, if Melania isn't a Gold-Digging Whore, then Gold-Digging Whores do not exist.
Pookie Washington wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
This is true. Donald and Melania had been separated for about a year when he met Melania. Some of you calling her a gold-digging whore need to apologize.
Whether Melania met Bone Spurs before or after he was separated has absolutely nothing to do with her being a Gold Digging Whore. There shouldn't even be a debate on if Melania is a Gold Digging Whore......its pretty obvious. If you think she married him for love you also probably think Bone Spurs is not releasing his tax return because he is under audit. You also may believe Bone Spurs had the biggest inauguration crowd ever.
CORRECT!
You should really stop. You’re making a fool of yourself.
L L wrote:
RunnerXY wrote:
I concur.
Low class.
I lost some serious respect for Flagpole.
The zero chance that Trump would win was idiocy.
The Trump "is" done mantra lost value over a year ago.
But the whore comments are interestingly Trumpian themselves (like Flagpole's arrogance)
As a liberal, I would like to trade him for one those Republicans jumping ship.
He's not fiscally liberal anyway.
1) I was proven right about the 2016 election, because he cheated.
2) Trump is done. There is no time frame on his doneness.
3) You can lose respect for me for any reason you choose, but my truthful label here is not Trumpian at all. He calls people names based on lies or things they can not change about themselves.
Jakob Ingebrigtsen has a 1989 Ferrari 348 GTB and he's just put in paperwork to upgrade it
Strava thinks the London Marathon times improved 12 minutes last year thanks to supershoes
Is there a rule against attaching a helium balloon to yourself while running a road race?
NAU women have no excuse - they should win it all at 2024 NCAA XC
Mark Coogan says that if you could only do 3 workouts as a 1500m runner you should do these
2024 College Track & Field Open Coaching Positions Discussion
Clayton Murphy is giving some great insight into his training.