Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

bang away wrote:

Racket wrote:

I don't give a sh!t about her personal life or her immigration status. She's not one the selling the country out to the Russians and embarrassing the office of the presidency. Only some anti-infidelity crusader would go out of his/her way to call her a whore totally unprovoked.

Your backpedaling is weak. You asked. You got the answer. You don't like the answer. Now you claim you never cared. But, too late because you asked.

What is this, epilepsy? Your little posturing is cute and amuses me though. Yeah I don't care about her personal life and let me know when immigration status and sexual proclivities are linked enough to warrant whore status, or did you mean to throw that total non-sequitur out there?

What is the difference if Melania was attracted to Trump for his money as opposed to his intelligence, handsome face or sense of humor?

You call Melania what you do in order to attempt to shame her. You do not do it simply as a matter of fact. You use your language as a weapon. For that you should be ashamed.

Pointing It Out Again wrote:

bang away wrote:

ahem, melania was banging trump while he was still married. and she was the cause of a divorce. she is a disgraceful first lady. plus she cheated on her visa, work when she was not supposed to, and would not leave the usa past the end date of her visa.

Ummm . . . Trump and wife are responsible for their marriage - nobody else. A third party is NEVER the cause of a divorce. The cause is ALWAYS the husband and/or wife.

Now do try to keep up.

Your observation is correct. However, it is disrespectful and deceitful to bed a married man and disrespectful and deceitful for him to have sex outside of his marriage...unless of course they have an arrangement.

No need to feel too bad for Marla Maples though...she was a Gold Digging Whore too who cheated with Trump when he was married to Ivana.

Flagpole wrote:

Racket wrote:

I don't give a sh!t about her personal life or her immigration status. She's not one the selling the country out to the Russians and embarrassing the office of the presidency. Only some anti-infidelity crusader would go out of his/her way to call her a whore totally unprovoked.

Racket,

We are what we are. If someone sings, they are a singer. We then call that person a singer. There doesn't need to be provocation to call that person a singer.

Melania Trump is a Gold Digging Whore, and we know that based on her actions. Some sort of Disney fantasy to believe she isn't.

Oh OK that makes sense, next time walk by a homeless person I'll call him a "dirty, probably mentally ill, drug addicted loser" in your honor.

Again, the monolithic ideas that get passed around here is hilarious and of high entertainment value to me, as is the focus on the wholly immaterial.

How does me calling her what she is shame her? She doesn't know I've said this. If you've ever seen her interviewed, it is pretty clear she has a very high bar of shame.

I never use language as a weapon. I use it to be accurately descriptive.

Tons of 72 year old fat men who work paycheck to paycheck married to arguably attractive 49 year old former nude models out there.

Racket wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

Racket,

We are what we are. If someone sings, they are a singer. We then call that person a singer. There doesn't need to be provocation to call that person a singer.

Melania Trump is a Gold Digging Whore, and we know that based on her actions. Some sort of Disney fantasy to believe she isn't.

Oh OK that makes sense, next time walk by a homeless person I'll call him a "dirty, probably mentally ill, drug addicted loser" in your honor.

Again, the monolithic ideas that get passed around here is hilarious and of high entertainment value to me, as is the focus on the wholly immaterial.

That would be pretty presumptive of you to call a homeless person that.

Besides, even though I have 100% integrity 100% of the time which requires honesty at all times, I still also have sense and class and would never say that to someone's face; and NO, it isn't because of any immediate retribution I might suffer, it's because it's not my goal to make someone feel bad or make them think I am trying to make them feel bad. On a message board though when someone is asking for defense of this horrid family, I will tell the truth.

And, I DID say she's not a criminal as far as I know...other than the work visa issue.

For all I know, she's proud of being a gold-digging whore. She did get to stay here and got to bring her parents here.

Flagpole wrote:

How does me calling her what she is shame her?

Because not only have you chosen to define her by her worst (in your opinion) mistake, you have chosen to use intentionally inflammatory language to do so in an effort to degrade her status as not only a person in society, but also as woman. By your own standard, Donald Trump is also a whore and yet you choose not to identify him as that. Strange. Do you also use the n word to describe black people and say "well they are what they are" ? If you think she's a bad person then maybe you should just say "I think she's a bad person" but better yet, why don't you focus on the people that are actually hurting the country.

Besides, do you know their relationship personally? Perhaps they're very much in love.

It's pretty presumptuous of you calling her a gold digger. You don't know their relationship. Is it likely she is? Well, statistics say homeless people are likely to be addicted to drugs and mentally ill, but we wouldn't want to be presumptuous would we now?

Racket wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

How does me calling her what she is shame her?

Because not only have you chosen to define her by her worst (in your opinion) mistake, you have chosen to use intentionally inflammatory language to do so in an effort to degrade her status as not only a person in society, but also as woman. By your own standard, Donald Trump is also a whore and yet you choose not to identify him as that. Strange. Do you also use the n word to describe black people and say "well they are what they are" ? If you think she's a bad person then maybe you should just say "I think she's a bad person" but better yet, why don't you focus on the people that are actually hurting the country.

Besides, do you know their relationship personally? Perhaps they're very much in love.

1) Oh...he is also a whore...I agree. He doesn't have the "gold-digging" label, but he's a whore for sure...in more ways than Melania is even.

2) I have no motive in calling her a gold-digging whore other than being factual. Even if that aspect of her being didn't exist, she wouldn't really have any "status" to degrade. She doesn't work. She wasn't elected to anything. She happens to be the wife of the President. Same status as any other woman who is also a wife who doesn't work. She though is ALSO a gold-digging whore.

3) Your 'n word' thing is ridiculous. No one can choose the color of their skin. People CAN though decide not to be a whore. Melania chose what she chose.

4) Melania is ALSO a bad person because she supports her criminal husband...makes her a bad person. But, she is ALSO a gold-digging whore.

5) Sally is the one who asked us to comment on the Trump family. I did. Obviously the bulk of my words is against the worst president in the history of the United States.

6) It is clear you don't believe her to be a gold-digging whore. You and I will have to disagree.

Pookie Washington wrote:

Yes Butt wrote:

What is the difference if Melania was attracted to Trump for his money as opposed to his intelligence, handsome face or sense of humor?

You call Melania what you do in order to attempt to shame her. You do not do it simply as a matter of fact. You use your language as a weapon. For that you should be ashamed.

"What is the difference if Melania was attracted to Trump for his money"? The difference is that makes her a Gold Digging Whore!!

Word!

Racket wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

Racket,

We are what we are. If someone sings, they are a singer. We then call that person a singer. There doesn't need to be provocation to call that person a singer.

Melania Trump is a Gold Digging Whore, and we know that based on her actions. Some sort of Disney fantasy to believe she isn't.

Oh OK that makes sense, next time walk by a homeless person I'll call him a "dirty, probably mentally ill, drug addicted loser" in your honor.

Again, the monolithic ideas that get passed around here is hilarious and of high entertainment value to me, as is the focus on the wholly immaterial.

What you fail to grasp about Melania is:

- She broke the law by working during her Visa stay,

- She got involved with a married man while on her Visa.

- She overstayed her Visa.

- She starting living with Trump while he was still married. So, Trump was harboring a criminal.

- Her now husband is deporting people who have lived here a long time and have done exactly what Melania has done. Melania cheers him on.

- Foreign wives of US citizens are being deported because of some claimed Visa violation. But Melania is hands off;

Flagpole wrote:

Yes Butt wrote:

What is the difference if Melania was attracted to Trump for his money as opposed to his intelligence, handsome face or sense of humor?

You call Melania what you do in order to attempt to shame her. You do not do it simply as a matter of fact. You use your language as a weapon. For that you should be ashamed.

How does me calling her what she is shame her? She doesn't know I've said this. If you've ever seen her interviewed, it is pretty clear she has a very high bar of shame.

I never use language as a weapon. I use it to be accurately descriptive.

Tons of 72 year old fat men who work paycheck to paycheck married to arguably attractive 49 year old former nude models out there.

You are a LIAR. And you are LYING here. Further, every single person on this thread knows it (even you). And there is absolutely nothing you can do to change that, your inevitable nonsense about 100% integrity notwithstanding.

I am done with you. No interest in LIARS. So, LIE away.

Pookie Washington wrote:

Yes Butt wrote:

What is the difference if Melania was attracted to Trump for his money as opposed to his intelligence, handsome face or sense of humor?

You call Melania what you do in order to attempt to shame her. You do not do it simply as a matter of fact. You use your language as a weapon. For that you should be ashamed.

"What is the difference if Melania was attracted to Trump for his money"? The difference is that makes her a Gold Digging Whore!!

Thanks for confirming that you also are using language as a weapon to try to dehumanize her. I'm sure that you don't mind when people call you a n!gger. Just calling it like it is, right?

What you fail to grasp is that Racket failed to grasp none of that.

Other than your absurd claim that Racket failed to grasp your points, your post is actually quite reasonable. Certainly more reasonable than our resident blowhard in chief with his inappropriate, childish and offensive name calling.

Trump and Marla Maples jointly announced they where getting divorced in 1997. Trump met Melania in 1998 while he was separated and no longer living with Marla.

You are a liar

Lying Clownpole

Flagpole - You typically agree with me on political matters. However, I find these recent posts by you shameful. I’m sorry. People who make comments like those cannot claim to have integrity all the time. Clean up your act. You are embarrassing yourself.

I agree, FP has gone much too far calling the First Lady names. Not cool. Disturbingly uncool.

Since you (as a man with 100% integrity 100% of the time) are obligated to speak the truth at ALL TIMES, and let's say your daughter decides to marry an older rich guy simply for his money, will you be similarly calling your daughter a gold-digging whore at family functions?

banned Pete wrote:

I agree, FP has gone much too far calling the First Lady names. Not cool. Disturbingly uncool.

Definitely a low class move.