Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Suck on that, Buttjudge lovers.

Flagpole (page 787):

Likely charges against Trump in order of likelihood;

Obstruction of justice

Money laundering

Perjury

Conspiracy against the United States

Result of charges:

Impeachment by House and then either conviction and removal by Senate or resignation by Trump.

No one is above the law, and if Hillary gets caught up in this too, then more power to the fact finders.

Mueller is coming.

The clown is done.

Nice point. Or, when Flagpole tells us how genius he is all the time. Do you think Einstein or Newton ever told people how smart they are?

Democrats lose again wrote:

https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/gallup-trump-approval-rating-ticks-up-to-new-high-of-46-percent/

Suck on that, Buttjudge lovers.

So you think 46% is good?

Looks pretty dismal to me.

It's almost like Glenn Greenwald is specifically talking about our resident Clown, Flagpole here:

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2019/05/04/glenn_greenwald_democrats_sound_a_doomsday_cult_with_russia_continue_to_promise_its_coming.html

Mueller did NOT come.

The Clown is STILL (always has been, always will be) Flagpole.

Barr IS COMING.

Fat hurts wrote:

Democrats lose again wrote:

https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/gallup-trump-approval-rating-ticks-up-to-new-high-of-46-percent/

Suck on that, Buttjudge lovers.

So you think 46% is good?

Looks pretty dismal to me.

Do you think the people in Wisconsin, Ohio, or Pennsylvania are going to be voting for Bernie Sanders or Kamala Harris when the unemployment rate is at 3.6% and the economy doing so great? Seriously?

Sally Vix wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

So you think 46% is good?

Looks pretty dismal to me.

Do you think the people in Wisconsin, Ohio, or Pennsylvania are going to be voting for Bernie Sanders or Kamala Harris when the unemployment rate is at 3.6% and the economy doing so great? Seriously?

The Midwest will not even consider the democrats. They are a collection of hillary clones and weirdos.

Sally Vix wrote:

Do you think the people in Wisconsin, Ohio, or Pennsylvania are going to be voting for Bernie Sanders or Kamala Harris when the unemployment rate is at 3.6% and the economy doing so great? Seriously?

You cannot possibly be so clueless. The unemployment rate is a bogus number, manipulated by Trump. 200,000 jobs added, BUT 600,000 people DROPPED by Trump from the employment count since February. The drop is the largest decline rate ever. Why did 600,000 get dropped? Most because they were UNEMPLOYED for too long of a time. Therefore, Trump claims, they are no longer considered UNEMPLOYED. Just ignore that almost all of those people are still hoping to get a job.

Sally Vix wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

So you think 46% is good?

Looks pretty dismal to me.

Do you think the people in Wisconsin, Ohio, or Pennsylvania are going to be voting for Bernie Sanders or Kamala Harris when the unemployment rate is at 3.6% and the economy doing so great? Seriously?

But the economy is NOT good for people in these states. Maybe the top 1%, but not for the other 99%.

Ah, yes, the prosperous Midwest! You’ve never been there.

Sally Vix wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

So you think 46% is good?

Looks pretty dismal to me.

Do you think the people in Wisconsin, Ohio, or Pennsylvania are going to be voting for Bernie Sanders or Kamala Harris when the unemployment rate is at 3.6% and the economy doing so great? Seriously?

I'm not sure that they'd vote for Sanders or Harris, but a whole lot won't be voting for Trump. (Not exactly the same thing, I realize.)

Anyway, I see that for the last 27 months President Trump (in the poll-of-polls) has never had an approval rating that was as high as his disapproval rating. That may simply reflect the population--he didn't win a plurality of American votes in 2016, after all, much less a majority--but you'd really expect higher ratings for someone who's presiding over this good an economy.

Sad.

Runningart2004 wrote:

Latest polls have Trump losing the general to every major candidate. 20-40% have never even heard of Beto or Harris or Buttigieg but they are beating Trump. Beto by 10%.

Trump has 0% chance. If he wins I’ll ban myself from Letsrun.

Alan

Noooo, what you'll really do is run and hide for 2-3 months to weep from your epic devastation, and then come back to Letsrun (possibly as another handle, like Agip / Eric A Blair did) and start doubling down, making even bolder (but dumber) statements predicting doom against POTUS. Whatever the MSM narrative is at the moment will be what you parrot.

Meanwhile, several of the DOJ/FBI officials that tried to undermine democracy in 2016 by letting Hillary off the hook and subsequently crating the Russian Collusion Hoax will be indicted or serving prison terms.

Yeah, about that... wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

Do you think the people in Wisconsin, Ohio, or Pennsylvania are going to be voting for Bernie Sanders or Kamala Harris when the unemployment rate is at 3.6% and the economy doing so great? Seriously?

I'm not sure that they'd vote for Sanders or Harris, but a whole lot won't be voting for Trump. (Not exactly the same thing, I realize.)

Anyway, I see that for the last 27 months President Trump (in the poll-of-polls) has never had an approval rating that was as high as his disapproval rating. That may simply reflect the population--he didn't win a plurality of American votes in 2016, after all, much less a majority--but you'd really expect higher ratings for someone who's presiding over this good an economy.

Sad.

You realize Obama's approval and disapproval ratings were essentially the same at Trump's at this point in their presidencies, right?

It's pretty normal for most politicians to have lower approval than disapproval ratings (currently for example, Pelosi, Schumer, and McConnell all have approval ratings significantly below Trump's).

Most Americans disapprove of Trump as a president despite the low unemployment, so yes I think there’s a pretty good shot that Trump will lose those states that Obama won twice.

His base is more dug in but not any bigger.

The hate for him has grown and he’s made no effort to make people like him that voted against him last time.

L L wrote:

Most Americans disapprove of Trump as a president despite the low unemployment, so yes I think there’s a pretty good shot that Trump will lose those states that Obama won twice.

His base is more dug in but not any bigger.

The hate for him has grown and he’s made no effort to make people like him that voted against him last time.

How could he ever make an effort to make people like him that voted against him last time? The media reports on him 95% negatively. Let me say that again ... the coverage of him by the media is 95% negative. What the heck could he ever do to change that?

Silliest of Willies wrote:

Yeah, about that... wrote:

Anyway, I see that for the last 27 months President Trump (in the poll-of-polls) has never had an approval rating that was as high as his disapproval rating. That may simply reflect the population--he didn't win a plurality of American votes in 2016, after all, much less a majority--but you'd really expect higher ratings for someone who's presiding over this good an economy.

Sad.

You realize Obama's approval and disapproval ratings were essentially the same at Trump's at this point in their presidencies, right?

Precisely eight years ago, Obama had approval/disapproval ratings of 51.5/42.4. So no, not "essentially the same" at all, even though at that point the country was still slowly working its way out of the Bush recession and the economy could not yet be called good.

Obama's approval ratings went up and down, of course, but by this stage in his presidency he'd had lengthy stretches wherein his approval rating was higher than his disapproval rating. For the last 27 months Trump has NEVER had that. Even though the economy seems to be doing great.

Sad.

1) You can not have 110% integrity.

2) No it isn't the same. I still have made the prediction, but it is a stronger statement to say "zero chance", and I did not say that.

Flagpole wrote:

decider of things wrote:

Saying "Trump will not finish his first term" has the same meaning that he has zero chance of finishing his first term.

It's true because I have 110% integrity 100% of the time.

1) You can not have 110% integrity.

2) No it isn't the same. I still have made the prediction, but it is a stronger statement to say "zero chance", and I did not say that.

Flagpole are you playing us for idiots???? YOu said he had no chance. Your credibility is ZERO>

Flagpole wrote:

Sadly, I will be VERY surprised if Trump serves jail time though I definitely believe he deserves to...for his very likely criminal financial behavior (see Felix Sater) and for his likely involvement in collusion or at least attempted collusion with the Russians. What we will see though is a Trump who doesn't finish his first term...he will resign before it's over and blame everyone and their brother. ZERO chance he finishes his first term.