Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Prediction: Mitt Romney will enter the race for president.

He will be ready to pounce and throw his hat in as soon as investigations in the House and SDNY start to bear fruit.

I think he can win the Republican nomination. And he matches up better against Democrats than Tiny does.

Mitt has not only been needling the president on twitter, he is even working on his own "market-based" climate change legislation.

If he still wants to be president, now is the time.

Fat hurts wrote:

Prediction: Mitt Romney will enter the race for president.

He will be ready to pounce and throw his hat in as soon as investigations in the House and SDNY start to bear fruit.

I think he can win the Republican nomination. And he matches up better against Democrats than Tiny does.

Mitt has not only been needling the president on twitter, he is even working on his own "market-based" climate change legislation.

If he still wants to be president, now is the time.

I think Mitt and HRC are doing the stand-by thing. They are staying in the headlines to stay relevant but not really running. If trump has a heart attack or a scandal that even Rs care about, Mitt can jump in. If the Dems have a serious problem with their nominee or a contested convention, HRC will be ready.

but neither will run in a normal sense.

(btw, a contested Dem convention is almost likely given their new rules. Totally shot themselves in the foot)

Oiled wrote:

Pay for play. No wonder Trump approved of Israel's claim to the Golan Heights. It makes much more sense now,

Israel has granted a U.S. company the first license to explore for oil and gas in the occupied Golan Heights, John Reed of the Financial Times reports. A local subsidiary of the New York-listed company Genie Energy — which is advised by former vice president Dick Cheney and whose shareholders include Jacob Rothschild and Rupert Murdoch — will now have exclusive rights to a 153-square mile radius in the southern part of the Golan Heights.

What the heck does "a 153-square mile radius in the southern part of the Golan Heights" even mean?

(I know those are not your words - just a quote from the article. But I have no idea what they mean)

HRC is not running. Period.

Mitt WILL get in unless Tiny's numbers improve a lot over the summer. He would have a very good shot at going all the way. I'd say his chances are better than Biden's.

"They chose Avenatti..." LOL- Just like Clownpole, Fat Hurts, LL, Troll, Agip / Eric A Blair, etc. Remember the praise they gave him? They were prepared to back him to POTUS.

How can Liberals be so wrong, so often here? So silly.

"They had a choice of a Harvard law professor for 50 years who’s been getting it right, who’s a centrist liberal and who has credibility, or Michael Avenatti. And they picked Michael Avenatti. In fact one night I got a call from CNN saying ‘We have to cancel you. We have Avenatti! He is coming on tonight.’ He became their go-to guy and every one of his predictions turned out to be false...

He promised us that Trump would be out of office soon and that his lawsuit would be the downfall of Trump and he was proved wrong on every occasion. I really think the networks need to be held accountable for their predictions. I would love to see on your show or other shows, just systematically showing what the pundits on the other networks predicted. And how they came true or not true, so we can evaluate the credibility of various pundits..."

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2019/04/21/dershowitz_media_gets_f_grade_on_mueller_coverage_cnn_chose_to_trust_avenatti_over_me.html

weird how spankists choose to believe the mueller report was good for their man.

Mueller's key findings

● Mueller rejects the argument that the president is shielded from obstruction laws.

●Trump, when told of appointment of special counsel Mueller, said: “This is the end of my presidency.”

● “Substantial evidence” supports Comey over Trump in account of Flynn meeting.

●Trump campaign attempted to obtain Hillary Clinton’s private emails.

● Campaign expected to benefit from stolen information released by the Russians.

● Mueller probe spawned 14 other investigations, including two unidentified cases that remain ongoing.

● Putin stepped up outreach to Trump after election.

● Special counsel team concluded Trump intended to obstruct probe in tweeting support for Manafort.

● Mueller appears to kick obstruction question to Congress.

hey, the senate perked up a tiny bit after the mueller report. Cain is out as fed nominee.

I wonder if the senate is a little queasy about having a liar and obstructor tell them what to do.

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1120360773807693826

agip wrote:

weird how spankists choose to believe the mueller report was good for their man.

Mueller's key findings

● Mueller rejects the argument that the president is shielded from obstruction laws.

●Trump, when told of appointment of special counsel Mueller, said: “This is the end of my presidency.”

● “Substantial evidence” supports Comey over Trump in account of Flynn meeting.

●Trump campaign attempted to obtain Hillary Clinton’s private emails.

● Campaign expected to benefit from stolen information released by the Russians.

● Mueller probe spawned 14 other investigations, including two unidentified cases that remain ongoing.

● Putin stepped up outreach to Trump after election.

● Special counsel team concluded Trump intended to obstruct probe in tweeting support for Manafort.

● Mueller appears to kick obstruction question to Congress.

agip - is there an actual audio recording of Trump saying, "This is the end of my presidency?" The Mueller report is the biggest thing I am planning to use for a big Texas A & M-like bonfire. The whole premise of it was to investigate whether the trump campaign colluded with Russian in the 2016 election. THERE WAS NO EFFING COLLUSION. Everything else is bogus. Democrats started a bogus election to overturn the 2016 legitimate election of the one person on Earth they despise more than anyone else. Trump won the election fair and square. No Collusion. Just wait for a bit more than a year and win back the presidency in a legitimate way.

Fat hurts wrote:

agip wrote:

I think Mitt and HRC are doing the stand-by thing. They are staying in the headlines to stay relevant but not really running. If trump has a heart attack or a scandal that even Rs care about, Mitt can jump in. If the Dems have a serious problem with their nominee or a contested convention, HRC will be ready.

but neither will run in a normal sense.

(btw, a contested Dem convention is almost likely given their new rules. Totally shot themselves in the foot)

HRC is not running. Period.

Mitt WILL get in unless Tiny's numbers improve a lot over the summer. He would have a very good shot at going all the way. I'd say his chances are better than Biden's.

Mitt Romney is a loser of epic proportions. Not only did he lose in 2012 (and failed in 2008 too), he also failed to convince establishment Republicans to vote against Trump in 2016. And then he went to Trump and bowed the knee in hopes to get Secretary of State lol.

If the Republicans want to run someone against Trump, they'd be smart to avoid this tried and rehashed loser. Besides, I doubt Romney wants it at this point.

Racket wrote:

agip wrote:

Seriously, Racket? We're usually trying to keep up with you, not vice versa.

1) Warren

2) Beto

Well I didn't know Beto was emo and I forgot Elizabeth Warren was (is still technically?) a professor at Harvard.

If Harvard had any standards (and was not so liberal), she would be expunged from the faculty for lying on her application.

you know, Hillary's email scandal was bogus. The investigation was into Benghazi, and there was no crime in Benghazi, so everything else is just bogus.

You know, Lewinsky gate was bous. The investigation was into whitewater, and there was no crime in Whitewater, so everything else is bogus.

Do you have your logic right? You are now saying HRC did nothing wrong in regard to Benghazi and Bill did nothing wrong with Lewinsky? Yes?

Excellent. I disagree with you, but at least you are more tolerant of democrats now,.

It’s all about spin and misdirection. Republicans did it with Nixon, Democrats did it with Clinton, Republicans are doing it now with Trump.

Conway, Guiliani, etc are really going all in on: “you can’t impeach a Republican president based on a Democrat investigation”, “you can’t impeach a president who is doing a good job” and “you can’t obstruct if there is no crime”. It’s like they are counting on the general population’s ignorance. Typically you obstruct an investigation so that investigation ends up in your favor resulting in no indictment.

If the House has evidence of high crimes and misdemeanors, and if the House believes the Mueller Report shows evidence of that, then they need to impeach. However, I think the House is seeking more ammo via Trump and Trump Org financial records instead of just relying on the Mueller Report.

Politically they simply don’t have the time.

As far as 2020 Dems go. Nothing matters until the debates. Buttigieg is getting a nice little bump because people know who he is now. He’s the man of the moment. Wake me after the first Dem debates this summer. Keep in mind with these polls....more people are siding with “someone other than X”. Polling at 20-30% really doesn’t matter if you can’t get any higher than that. It will quickly become a 3 or 4 person race, then a 2 person race.

So yes I’m still with Beto. He has more upside and experience politically vs Buttigieg.

Alan

I messed up again some words - korrekted version bellow:

//

you know, Hillary's email scandal was bogus. The investigation was into Benghazi, and there was no crime in Benghazi, so everything else, including her email problems, is just bogus.

You know, Lewinsky gate was bous. The investigation was into whitewater, and there was no crime in Whitewater, so everything else, including perjury, is bogus.

Do you have your logic right? You are now saying HRC did nothing wrong in regard to emails and Bill did nothing wrong with Lewinsky/perjury? Yes?

Excellent. I disagree with you, but at least you are more tolerant of democrats now,.

Also the impeachment process is broken. It was broken when Clinton was acquitted.

Also DOJ needs to change its policy toward indicting a sitting president. With a split Congress a President can get away with murder.

Alan

Runningart2004 wrote:

Also the impeachment process is broken. It was broken when Clinton was acquitted.

Also DOJ needs to change its policy toward indicting a sitting president. With a split Congress a President can get away with murder.

Alan

Lol maybe people shouldn't vote in political hardliners who would acquit a president of murder as their representative.

There's nothing wrong with the impeachment process. The problem lies in the fact that average Americans are terribly stupid and generally obnoxious "oh yeah!? well watch this!!!!" types of morons.

Avenatti may be a sleaze but he produced one of the biggest events in this presidency with the unveiling of the Stormy Daniels payment that landed Cohen in jail for acting on Trump's orders.

Remember, some of the most serious of Trump's offenses don't have anything to do with the Mueller Report.

There was no reason for Nancy to wait for Mueller to move forward with impeachment. It was an excuse to delay.

The latest excuse is they may bring in Mueller to question. They could have done that at any time.

How was Hillary's email scandal bogus. I want you to answer these specific questions agip. As secretary of state she was sending classified emails over an unsecured server. BIG TIME CRIME. She destroyed 30,000 emails after they were requested. They were the property of the US government. BIG TIME CRIME. She bleached and shattered a server that was the property of you, agip, and me and the rest of the American government. BIG TIME CRIME. I could go on but ....

Using Trump logic.....she was investigated and not indicted therefore nothing happened right?

Trump and associates were investigated. Although some evidence of wrongdoing or unethical behavior was found not enough evidence was found to indict.

Meanwhile Trump possibly obstructed the investigation not once, not twice, but ten times. Mueller couldn’t come to a conclusion on obstruction because of the DOJ policy to not indict a sitting president. Therefore he left it up to Congress to determine the final outcome on obstruction.

If not for the DOJ Policy Trump might find himself with 12 charges going back to the Cohen payment.

Alan

What about Trump's unsecure phone use?

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2018/05/trumps-unsecured-iphones-make-clintons-basement-server-look-like-fort-knox

As president, no less.