Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

His car must have been redacted!

jesseriley wrote:

I just saw Manafort walking in prison. He won’t be walking out anytime soon.

What you in for? They give you unlimited internet privileges, I see.

Guilty of organizing 5 transcons

If any Spankists want to claim the FBI opened its investigation because of the Steele Dossier, here. Mueller says you are wrong. The FBI investigation was opened just as we always thought it was - after Papad. drunkenly blabbed to Australian intelligence that Spankists knew Russia had stolen emails.

Not that you people will ever, ever let facts determine your judgments.

https://twitter.com/AshaRangappa_/status/1119663089329344515

agip wrote:

If any Spankists want to claim the FBI opened its investigation because of the Steele Dossier, here. Mueller says you are wrong. The FBI investigation was opened just as we always thought it was - after Papad. drunkenly blabbed to Australian intelligence that Spankists knew Russia had stolen emails.

Not that you people will ever, ever let facts determine your judgments.

https://twitter.com/AshaRangappa_/status/1119663089329344515

Oh no, you don't! Don't go bringing up facts while I'm here!

agip wrote:

If any Spankists want to claim the FBI opened its investigation because of the Steele Dossier, here. Mueller says you are wrong. The FBI investigation was opened just as we always thought it was - after Papad. drunkenly blabbed to Australian intelligence that Spankists knew Russia had stolen emails.

Not that you people will ever, ever let facts determine your judgments.

. . . and what about Hillary's emails?

Trump doesn’t drink; now we know why.

Flat BS.

Sally Vix wrote:

. . . Clinton HAS been found to be a fat out liar. . . .

So Clinton is bad because he's a liar and Trump is a what?

Sally B Troll wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

. . . Clinton HAS been found to be a fat out liar. . . .

So Clinton is bad because he's a liar and Trump is a what?

Both Liars.

Flagpole, you are an apologist for Clinton. YOU are banned. Voila!

Sally wants to party like it’s 1999, ha ha.

How’s that Russian collusion working out for you hillary lovers?

Mueller has come and gone and Trump is still President!!!!

So suck on that, you democrat pieces of trash!!!!

Democrats lose again wrote:

https://twitter.com/KidRock/status/805849258461110275?s=20

How’s that Russian collusion working out for you hillary lovers?

Mueller has come and gone and Trump is still President!!!!

So suck on that, you democrat pieces of trash!!!!

Don't call them that. Many are good guys. But the mainstream media and Congressional Dems had a hardd-on for the Mueller report and it did the exact opposite of what they expected. They are becoming pathetic in pursuing this crap further.

These are your trumpers (above)...

Sally Vix wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

Flat BS.

Flagpole, you are an apologist for Clinton. YOU are banned. Voila!

Good for me that you've banned me; means less responding to crazy or ignorance for me. You have said that before and didn't keep with that, so I won't hold my breath. You'll notice that when I have said that to people, I have kept my word.

I am no apologist for Clinton. He hasn't been charged with any of those crimes. You apparently are not a rule of law person. The reason that I am not a hypocrite and you are is because both Clinton and Trump have sexual harassment and sexual assault accusations against them (some still pursuing with regard to Trump, and a greater number against Trump plus his admission on tape of grabbing women "by the pvssy" without consent which is him admitting to assaulting women) and yet you give Trump a pass and say he was just being immature and had affairs. I put them both in the same boat here...both accused (not convicted) sexual harassers and abusers, and I am no longer a supporter of Clinton's and haven't been for a long time. You continue to support Trump. You can not claim that Clinton is guilty here while Trump is not. You also can't call Clinton a rapist because no law says that he is.

Finally, neither Clinton is the President. Trump is the President. They have nothing to do with Trump's criminality, serial lying, and incompetence.

Mueller is coming.

The clown is done.

Sally Vix wrote:

Democrats lose again wrote:

https://twitter.com/KidRock/status/805849258461110275?s=20

How’s that Russian collusion working out for you hillary lovers?

Mueller has come and gone and Trump is still President!!!!

So suck on that, you democrat pieces of trash!!!!

Don't call them that. Many are good guys. But the mainstream media and Congressional Dems had a hardd-on for the Mueller report and it did the exact opposite of what they expected. They are becoming pathetic in pursuing this crap further.

You really are ignorant beyond belief.

1) Go read the report, and don't lie to me and tell me that you have.

2) The Mueller Report shows that Russia DID attack our electoral system and that Trump and his campaign welcomed the help.

3) Trump and his staff have done nothing to push back on Russia or anyone else for that matter from doing it again.

4) Trump took 10 defined steps to to obstruct the investigation.

5) Mueller said he could not exonerate him from Obstruction of Justice.

6) Mueller made it clear that he was punting to the House to decide what to do with regard to Obstruction of Justice.

7) Mueller make it clear that Trump could indeed be indicted after he is out of office. He didn't have to say that.

8) Trump told McGahn to fire Mueller. McGahn refused. Later Trump told him to lie about that.

I could list more things, but you should read it to know.

The House has some options here...they could impeach...they could decide not to impeach and just allow him to be indicted after he is out of office, they could decide to pursue both things.

Mueller said the President "does not have immunity after he leaves office" and that his team "conducted a thorough factual investigation in order to preserve the evidence when memories were fresh and documentary materials were available." He said this for a reason.

Absolutely ridiculous of you to call Democrats pathetic for pursuing this, and it definitely is NOT crap.

Again, you should be asking questions here, not stating your ignorant opinion. You do not know what you're talking about.

Right, they won’t read it.

Pull butt cheeks apart, insert head up inside, trumpers.

So, should the House begin impeachment proceedings?

As a strict duty bound constitutionalist they should. It is their duty IF they think the Mueller Report shows high crimes and misdemeanors. Then they can debate it all they want during the impeachment hearings. That’s what the hearings are for. Debate of the facts. Take the report and argue each side.

As a purely political process should they? No. The 2020 debates start this summer. A long drawn out impeachment process that ultimately results in acquittal in the Senate would overshadow the Dems fighting for the 2020 nomination and embolden Trump’s supporters. IF you can get more than 50 Senators to agree with impeachment, even though it’s not the 2/3rd required it does send a message that can be framed in the 2020 Dems favor.

Alan