Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Sally Vix wrote:

Runningart2004 wrote:

You don’t really know how the special counsel works do you? The special counsel has broad and far reaching authority to investigate any crime it comes across over the course of its investigation. That’s why we got Lewinskygate when Whitewater was a Nothing burger.

Alan

Alan, it doesn't seem that you know much about the special counsel. The investigations done by Ken Starr and the Watergate investigators were different than the one done by Mueller. Back then they were independent investigations free of the Dept. of Justice. They pretty much reported to Congress. Many members of Congress did not like this situation and implemented a "Special Counsel" that was under the direction of the Dept. of Justice. Before you begin telling me how a "special counsel" works you might want to learn what a special counsel is.

You are right they changed the law since Starr.

But you seem to have tightened up your argument that the people trying to 'overturn an election' are the Republican controlled Department of Justice, not Dems. Do we agree on that?

Runningart2004 wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

The Dems in the House can pursue impeachment proceedings. I welcome the Dems executing their oversight powers. What the Mueller investigation was a witch hunt. It had limited parameters but it looked at everything Trump.

You don’t really know how the special counsel works do you? The special counsel has broad and far reaching authority to investigate any crime it comes across over the course of its investigation. That’s why we got Lewinskygate when Whitewater was a Nothing burger.

Alan

Oh, and the narrative of the liberal media now that the Mueller investigation returned nothing is how limited the scope of the investigation was which is a crock because Rosenstein gave Mueller far-reaching parameters to investigate anything. Mueller was looking into everything Trump but found NOTHING. So, don't tell me I know nothing how a special counsel works.

agip wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

Alan, it doesn't seem that you know much about the special counsel. The investigations done by Ken Starr and the Watergate investigators were different than the one done by Mueller. Back then they were independent investigations free of the Dept. of Justice. They pretty much reported to Congress. Many members of Congress did not like this situation and implemented a "Special Counsel" that was under the direction of the Dept. of Justice. Before you begin telling me how a "special counsel" works you might want to learn what a special counsel is.

You are right they changed the law since Starr.

But you seem to have tightened up your argument that the people trying to 'overturn an election' are the Republican controlled Department of Justice, not Dems. Do we agree on that?

Not sure where you are coming from in that respect. I said before and say now that the only ones trying to overturn an election are the Democrats. I am surprised that Nancy Pelosi might be the only level-headed one in that group but that is apparently to save her hide and Speakership.

Sally Vix wrote:

agip wrote:

You are right they changed the law since Starr.

But you seem to have tightened up your argument that the people trying to 'overturn an election' are the Republican controlled Department of Justice, not Dems. Do we agree on that?

Not sure where you are coming from in that respect. I said before and say now that the only ones trying to overturn an election are the Democrats. I am surprised that Nancy Pelosi might be the only level-headed one in that group but that is apparently to save her hide and Speakership.

Ok so when I asked you how the dems are trying to overturn the election...you cited the mueller report. BUt then I pointed out that the Mueller investigation was run by Republicans. So now you are back claiming the Dems are trying to overturn an election. But you haven't said how.

So. How are the Dems trying to overturn an election?

Mueller found that Trump’s attorney facilitated illegal payments on behalf of Trump and lied to investigators and Congress to protect Trump and sent him to jail.

That’s nothing?

We still don’t know what Flynn’s cooperation with Mueller was.

But we know he discussed sanctions with the Russians during the transition.

And we know Trump fired Comey to stop him from investigating Flynn’s connections to Russia.

L L wrote:

Mueller found that Trump’s attorney facilitated illegal payments on behalf of Trump and lied to investigators and Congress to protect Trump and sent him to jail.

That’s nothing?

We still don’t know what Flynn’s cooperation with Mueller was.

But we know he discussed sanctions with the Russians during the transition.

And we know Trump fired Comey to stop him from investigating Flynn’s connections to Russia.

Barr will not redact that part. He will pull the offensive section completely. Ergo, he did not redact it because he did not edit the text.

Sally Vix wrote:

didn't know... wrote:

your leader, trump, probably had no idea there were Muslim's in Indonesia... and that is not to be meant as a joke.

What is not a joke is your using an apostrophe to make "Muslim" plural. Instead of calling Trump an idiot maybe you should go back to school.

So you've got nothing then?

I actually didn't call your leader, trump, an idiot but you are certainly right.... he is.

and, yes, you really showed me. i had no idea how to use an apostrophe until now... well, either that or i just didn't care because this is a stupid message board.

Sally Vix wrote:

Ciro wrote:

Not everyone is going to be as proficient as Trump when he tweets.

Sally why set the bar higher for a poster on a message board than you do for your own President?

Trump, as I have stated previously, is a buffoon. A blowhard. I expect more of the people here.

as if you've never had a typo or made a mistake on one of your posts...

i'll be keeping an eye out for any mistakes from you and i'll be sure to point them out...

i expect more from people on here... smh...

stop defending trump.... i expect more from people on here.

M.A.T.H.

Sally Vix wrote:

yet wrote:

LOL . . . . . .

With every new Trump "idea" you adopt that idea.

With every Trump flip-flop you flip-flop.

With every Trump lie you defend him.

I don't defend Trump. I defend his presidency against those trying to overturn it. He was elected fair and square. Liberals have spent the last 2-plus years trying to undermine his presidency and even overturn it. Just shameful.

you absolutely defend him and half your posts are filled with nonsensical jiberish

I don't have to watch the news to know that Tiny terrorizes brown people. He started his campaign saying they were rapists and murderers. He continued this kind of rhetoric throughout the campaign.

Then, the day after he was elected, my wife had to deal with sobbing children in her classroom. And no, not one of these kids was the child of an illegal alien. But they were still afraid because they happened to be Hispanic.

Their families were worried about what would happen and their kids picked up on it. The "denaturalization task force" is exactly the kind of thing they were afraid of.

Sally Vix wrote:

Flagpole, that made me chuckle. My level of education far surpasses yours. I was much faster than you and I am still much faster than you. I would wager 20K on a race with you. And I am 58.

1) I somehow missed this gem earlier.

2) Good for you and your education. Your education has nothing to do with you knowing what you're talking about. I know a woman with a Masters Degree who thought that Canada was a US state. I know another woman with a Ph.D. who thought a fax machine could physically send the piece of paper to the destination. Beyond those extreme examples, I have no idea what your level of education is (please don't tell me as I'm sure not to be impressed), but whatever it is has nothing to do your ability to understand anything that is discussed in this thread.

3) You know that I don't wager on anything because that is low class.

4) Even if I did wager, I would not bet anything on a race with another 50+ year old. I have a hard time thinking of something more lame than your suggestion.

5) So, you were faster than me and you believe you still are (not sure how you can come to that conclusion). My best PR of all of mine is a 14:58 5,000. I have never claimed to be a great runner. I am just a fan of it. If you ran faster than that, then good for you...we are both in the top 1% of all runners.

You started this racing me thing after I had stopped reading Letsrun earlier today because I actually had some work to do...contrary to popular belief. I see several seem interested in this.

1) As I already said, I don't bet anything...not money, not actions. Low class.

2) Also, ONE of the reasons I don't bet is that I do not need or want for any money that would result as part of a bet, so your offer to pay for airfare and hotel is not an incentive at all.

3) Also...just to reiterate...this is a lame suggestion. FUNNY though, but lame.

Sally Vix wrote:

yet wrote:

LOL . . . . . .

With every new Trump "idea" you adopt that idea.

With every Trump flip-flop you flip-flop.

With every Trump lie you defend him.

I don't defend Trump. I defend his presidency against those trying to overturn it. He was elected fair and square. Liberals have spent the last 2-plus years trying to undermine his presidency and even overturn it. Just shameful.

He was NOT elected fair and square. Two FELONIES that were committed for the purpose of getting him elected say otherwise. Also, he has since being elected, engaged in behavior that makes him worthy of the criticism he is getting and is indeed impeachable. We don't judge the worthiness of a President based only on what people thought about him on election day.

Sally’s just a bit desperate, like all trumpers are becoming. She’s also an unregistered foreign agent who aspires to share a jail cell with Manafort: hardly someone you’d trust with a bet or anything else.

It’s trump who wants to overturn the election; the midterm election that installed 40 new dems who are actually doing their jobs, overseeing an executive branch that wants to operate secretly. Not a chance, trumpers.

All you missed, Flagpole, was pages & pages about Sally which magically appeared as soon as Barr made his bizarre announcement about delaying the Report until after a press conference? Ha ha, so he can take questions about a report no one has seen! Widely mocked by every reporter.

Barr the Bizarre, our mighty AG!

“It’ll look like a fu_kin_ coloring book!”: reaction to Barr’s color-coded redacting plan. You can’t make up an administration this incompetent!

spanky is acting totally innocent this morning.

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1118848431932493824

agip wrote:

spanky is acting totally innocent this morning.

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1118848431932493824

Or better put, Spanky is acting totally exonerated this morning.