Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

The Rule of Law wrote:

Sim-Sam wrote:

Like Obama.

Flagpole walked right into that one. Everyone else saw it coming and left it alone.

The guy is not too bright.

100% dumb 100% of the time.

braggadoco wrote:

The Rule of Law wrote:

Flagpole walked right into that one. Everyone else saw it coming and left it alone.

The guy is not too bright.

100% dumb 100% of the time.

Hey now! Not fair.

He did back Avenetti in his run for Prez. Ya know the guy who ripped off a mentally ill paraplegic (Avenetti, not Flagpole).

I can see why Flagpole identifies with him. Wink, wink, nod, nod.

qualify myself wrote:

Saying it up front so no one calls me a trumper - I'm a moderate liberal.

The deflection cry of a rabid Trumper.

Hint: Less than 1/2 (

OK OK OK wrote:

L L wrote:

Again-

So, if he can be indicted for these (Cohen crimes) if he weren't president, why is he not impeached for these very crimes since he is president?

OK, that's got to be the dumbest question on this entire thread - from Trumpers OR anti-Trumpers.

Impeachment is a political process. Indictments are a judicial process.

///

Good Dog! Please try not to post anything so lame in the future.

LL foolishly predicted Trump would no longer be in office by July 1st. He also mentioned that he would stop posting if his prediction was wrong.

Fat hurts wrote:

Mega. wrote:

60 Top Corporations Paid $0 Federal Taxes Under Trump Tax Law

Amazon, Netflix, Chevron, Eli Lilly, Delta Airlines, General Motors, IBM and Goodyear are reaping tax cut benefits and paying nothing.

https://itep.org/notadime/

Yeah. We need an alternative minimum tax for corporations.

He allowed 4-5 alternative energy companies to avoid half a billion in taxes. Where will it stop.

UR a Trumper wrote:

qualify myself wrote:

Saying it up front so no one calls me a trumper - I'm a moderate liberal.

The deflection cry of a rabid Trumper.

Hint: Less than 1/2 (

Thanks, but half of 0 is still 0. Anyone have a REAL answer.

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

OK OK OK wrote:

OK, that's got to be the dumbest question on this entire thread - from Trumpers OR anti-Trumpers.

Impeachment is a political process. Indictments are a judicial process.

///

Good Dog! Please try not to post anything so lame in the future.

LL foolishly predicted Trump would no longer be in office by July 1st. He also mentioned that he would stop posting if his prediction was wrong.

so did flagpole. wasn't true to his word.

Evil Evil wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

Yeah. We need an alternative minimum tax for corporations.

He allowed 4-5 alternative energy companies to avoid half a billion in taxes. Where will it stop.

Just yesterday there was a guy on here wondering if AOC declared all of her tips as a waitress when she filed her taxes. He'd love to see her tax returns.

The guy probably works his ass off like everyone else but instead of focusing on billionaires gaming the system he's allowed millionaires like Hannity/Carlson to focus his attention on former waitresses.

Ciro wrote:

Evil Evil wrote:

He allowed 4-5 alternative energy companies to avoid half a billion in taxes. Where will it stop.

Just yesterday there was a guy on here wondering if AOC declared all of her tips as a waitress when she filed her taxes. He'd love to see her tax returns.

The guy probably works his ass off like everyone else but instead of focusing on billionaires gaming the system he's allowed millionaires like Hannity/Carlson to focus his attention on former waitresses.

It's been stated several times on this thread that all felonies are the same. Billionaires and minimum-wagers should be equal in the eyes of the law.

I didn't say that I would have that problem, but there are those who will.

Zero Sum wrote:

Ciro wrote:

Just yesterday there was a guy on here wondering if AOC declared all of her tips as a waitress when she filed her taxes. He'd love to see her tax returns.

The guy probably works his ass off like everyone else but instead of focusing on billionaires gaming the system he's allowed millionaires like Hannity/Carlson to focus his attention on former waitresses.

It's been stated several times on this thread that all felonies are the same. Billionaires and minimum-wagers should be equal in the eyes of the law.

That's fine but tell me how the tax returns of a waitrsss would prove anything?

If you've worked in the service industry you'll know that you scan just make up a number and it can't be proven or tracked.

Also the fundamental difference is that what the corporate billionaires are doing is legal thanks to the GOP.

Not So Fast My Friend wrote:

Hey now! Not fair.

He did back Avenetti in his run for Prez. Ya know the guy who ripped off a mentally ill paraplegic (Avenetti, not Flagpole).

I can see why Flagpole identifies with him. Wink, wink, nod, nod.

Um...you know I didn't back him for President. I haven't backed anyone yet.

Here is the thing though...if I HAD backed him for President, now that we see what he's been charged with (still needs to have his day in court, but it isn't looking good for him), I would have taken back all support for him...as you Trumpers should do with The Orange One.

I once supported Bill Clinton, but after seeing who he really was, I stopped being a supporter of his. I once thought Bill Cosby seemed like a decent guy. No political person or public person deserves unfettered support.

Hank Johnson wrote:

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

LL foolishly predicted Trump would no longer be in office by July 1st. He also mentioned that he would stop posting if his prediction was wrong.

so did flagpole. wasn't true to his word.

Noooo...I have said he wouldn't make it to the end of his term. I also have never said I would stop posting for any reason. Besides, even if I did say that, it isn't July 1 yet. You can get a calendar for a dollar...also right there on your computer, brother.

BREAKING!

Fox News Smashes Trump!

Shep Smith and Chris Wallace come down hard on Trump’s latest immigration boondoggle ... over his illegal plan to ship immigrants to sanctuary cities.

Needless to say, many rabid Trumpers are making threats to stop watching Fax News for not defending Trump's law breaking.

I would hope that the republicans here and also the Democrats would support Trump's decision to send illegal migrants to sanctuary cities. The heads of these sanctuary cities as well as Flagpole, Alan, agip, LL, Fat Hurts and others here are against enforcing border security and against enforcing our immigration laws and surely would welcome those illegals whom they covet here to come to those democratic bastions that so covet them. A win-win situation. The cities who care about enforcing immigration laws don't have to deal with the illegals and the cities who want nothing to do with enforcing immigration laws can have those illegals they so dearly want to vote Democrat in the next election.

I would hope that the Trumpers here would demand for Trump to send illegal migrants to red states to work as bigly cheap labor. Some can even be sent to work at Mara Lago where they can get stiffed by Trump for the work they do.

The Red Staters cherish the law. We don't want illegals here. We want immigration laws enforced. If the Blue Staters are going to get off on having illegals here, then they should bear the brunt of them.

Viva la vida locas wrote:

I would hope that the republicans here and also the Democrats would support Trump's decision to send illegal migrants to sanctuary cities. The heads of these sanctuary cities as well as Flagpole, Alan, agip, LL, Fat Hurts and others here are against enforcing border security and against enforcing our immigration laws and surely would welcome those illegals whom they covet here to come to those democratic bastions that so covet them. A win-win situation. The cities who care about enforcing immigration laws don't have to deal with the illegals and the cities who want nothing to do with enforcing immigration laws can have those illegals they so dearly want to vote Democrat in the next election.

What exactly are our current immigration laws? Like the asylum laws? The ones Trump doesn’t want border patrol to follow?

Alan

Ciro wrote:

Zero Sum wrote:

It's been stated several times on this thread that all felonies are the same. Billionaires and minimum-wagers should be equal in the eyes of the law.

That's fine but tell me how the tax returns of a waitrsss would prove anything?

If you've worked in the service industry you'll know that you scan just make up a number and it can't be proven or tracked.

Also the fundamental difference is that what the corporate billionaires are doing is legal thanks to the GOP.

As you stated, one broke the law and one didn't. As a Rule of Law person, my belief is that we should go after the people who break the law.