Putin didn’t collude with the Russians, either, ha ha.
Putin didn’t collude with the Russians, either, ha ha.
L L wrote:
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
Cast your vote:
https://thenypost.files.wordpress.com/2019/03/26n.muellermadnessbracket.jpgThat's actually a pretty clever chart.
Agreed, although they definitely did not put much thought into the seeding.
One for “Trump’s Swamp” would be good too. You could divide by Congress, Senate, WH admin and non-govt circle. I guess the winner would be the most repulsive or corrupt.
A former boss from another life, die hard right winger loved this rag. He’d sit there in his office laughing while scanning the Post and would talk back at NPR all day long. The job was $hit as it was, but had to put up with that as well. He didn’t last though, got squeezed out by a young feminist.
The Democrats are so predictable.
They'll just shift the goal posts per usual, start investigating Trump's 'treasonous' business, tax and accounting affairs.
And then you'll get the usual suspects on these boards buying into the usual nonsense.
And why wouldn't they? It's too much for delusional Dems to admit that the corporate media complex conned them from the very beginning. Remember, these are the same brain-dead lemmings who thought Trump wasn't seriously running, that Hillary would win, that the economy would implode, that we'd be in world wars, that ISIS would flourish, that Mueller was 'coming,' that Trump would be impeached, and on and on and on...
At the end of the day, just not the sharpest tools in the shed.
Fat hurts wrote:
Hardloper wrote:
Russian involvement was minimal and amateur. They spent $100k on Facebook ads for their dud memes, that's nothing when the Presidential campaign cost $1.3 billion. This was a total waste of money and airtime other than to shut up the conspiracy theorists.
You are completely wrong about how much they spent by orders of magnitude. I have corrected you on this assertion before so stop spreading lies.
The Mueller report concluded that Russia:
1) Conducted a highly-targeted illegal campaign on social media.
2) Hacked the DNC, stole emails, and weaponized them through WikiLeaks.
Again, the Mueller investigation itself was not only legitimate, it was extremely important to our nation.
Notice how not a single Dem will even acknowledge independent research showing that Google likely skewed 3 MILLION votes in Hillary's favor. Trump won with literally every social media giant and corporate media syndicate against him.
How dumb can the Left be to have ALL of the institutional advantages and still lose so handily in the electoral?
The problem with the Democrats (aside from low IQs) is that they don't know how to play the long game. It's called "4D Chess" for a reason, geniuses. The Dems blow their wad early like the betas they are, and then we come in and take over. It's very simple. We let you trip over yourselves, making a mockery of your party and pushing moderates and centrists toward our M A G A agenda.
And then we WIN.
The only "collusion" was between the technocrats and the Left:
https://www.wnd.com/2018/12/democrat-researcher-proves-googles-anti-trump-bias/
Trollminator wrote:
L L wrote:
That's actually a pretty clever chart.
Agreed, although they definitely did not put much thought into the seeding.
One for “Trump’s Swamp” would be good too. You could divide by Congress, Senate, WH admin and non-govt circle. I guess the winner would be the most repulsive or corrupt.
A former boss from another life, die hard right winger loved this rag. He’d sit there in his office laughing while scanning the Post and would talk back at NPR all day long. The job was $hit as it was, but had to put up with that as well. He didn’t last though, got squeezed out by a young feminist.
. Spankites are going to shout 'no collusion' from now until 2020 but most of the country knows what is going on in the WH. Collusion is very low on voters' minds compared to all the stuff this WH is doing.
https://www.sltrib.com/opinion/bagley/2019/03/25/bagley-cartoon-no/?fbclid=IwAR0OEK4hBlteANNvnq68hKK69EGWj0SU__T7bZz2jDWzv7DjMJMLzvpuAVETrumpers posting fast & long!
Trump decrees March Madness made permanent...
Midterms leaned significantly Dem in 2018 based on healthcare to a great extent.
So Trump decides to run a eliminate Obamacare altogether move up the flag pole right as he's been handed a golden goal by Barr. Likely to play a much larger role in the 2020 election than anything to do with what the last 20,000 pages of this thread have discussed.
I can't imagine defunding the Special Olympics is going to win a lot of good PR either.
Donald...dude.... wrote:
Midterms leaned significantly Dem in 2018 based on healthcare to a great extent.
So Trump decides to run a eliminate Obamacare altogether move up the flag pole right as he's been handed a golden goal by Barr. Likely to play a much larger role in the 2020 election than anything to do with what the last 20,000 pages of this thread have discussed.
I can't imagine defunding the Special Olympics is going to win a lot of good PR either.
Trump does not want anyone to figure out that his entire family would qualify for the Special Olympics. With this "bone sure" Trump could easily qualify to play in golf. He would need to use a golf cart to get around, including driving a cart on the putting greens--golfing blasphemy.
agip wrote:
Trollminator wrote:
Agreed, although they definitely did not put much thought into the seeding.
One for “Trump’s Swamp” would be good too. You could divide by Congress, Senate, WH admin and non-govt circle. I guess the winner would be the most repulsive or corrupt.
A former boss from another life, die hard right winger loved this rag. He’d sit there in his office laughing while scanning the Post and would talk back at NPR all day long. The job was $hit as it was, but had to put up with that as well. He didn’t last though, got squeezed out by a young feminist.
. Spankites are going to shout 'no collusion' from now until 2020 but most of the country knows what is going on in the WH. Collusion is very low on voters' minds compared to all the stuff this WH is doing.
https://www.sltrib.com/opinion/bagley/2019/03/25/bagley-cartoon-no/?fbclid=IwAR0OEK4hBlteANNvnq68hKK69EGWj0SU__T7bZz2jDWzv7DjMJMLzvpuAVE
It was until it wasn’t.
That day was Sunday. Interesting how suddenly no one cares. I heard the talking heads in CNN say that this morning. I’m sure that’s where you got it. lol
agip wrote:
the weird thing about sally is that she seems sincere and not a troll, but she is factually messed up on so many things. I don't think she writes stupid things to own the libs. But she gets so many facts wrong.
Which is different from a poster like Rigged who is just hateful and willfully lies and shouts because his goal is to own the libs and little else.
She's on odd one.
I don't think she is a she at all. I think Sally is just another pseudonym for DiscoGary, who has been missing for some time. But I think SallyVix and DiscoGary were both just jamin, anyways.
Rigged is just part of the B3 crew...the big baby bitches. He doesn't care about moving forward. He's another crab in a bucket who wants to "own libs". How lame!
Tucker Carlson said I'm free to read the Mueller Report and make up my own mind.
Where can I read this Mueller Report?
tarckstar wrote:
Tucker Carlson said I'm free to read the Mueller Report and make up my own mind.
Where can I read this Mueller Report?
You can read the summary.
Alan's DEFLECTION wrote:
Runningart2004 wrote:
Man do y’all work? Y’all have had a busy day.
Who cares about the “Russia Thing” as Trump calls it. It still looks shady as hell...Flynn...Comey....Tower....Trump Moscow, etc. Its all about the Benjamins. Ok moving on....
Here’s this again:
https://morningconsult.com/tracking-trump/See how drastically Trump’s approval has changed in states he won in 2016 and will need to win again.
And now he’s trying to completely kill the ACA without a replacement?? Are you kidding? Is he trying to hand the Dems the presidency on a silver platter?
Again....He loses WI, MI, and PA by a mile. If Beto is the nominee he loses TX.
Alan
Give it a rest you old fart! You're cherry picking you dimwitted little wuss. Does anyone but Trump do anything not pleasing to you and your idol Flagpole? You followed him down the dark path and were made to look the fool. Nooooooowwwww, let's not talk about the Russian thing after 2 plus years of investigating, let's move on since they found nothing (no more than they found on the Clintons). Serious question, how stupid are you and what do you do for a living, please don't say teacher? My cousins are in Colorado and North Carolina and Michigan. I'd cringe knowing that you were a lying liberal teacher.
Such name calling little man. Does that make you feel like a “real man”?
1. I’ve said all along the Mueller report wasn’t going to be worth much. It was never going to lead to anything impeachable, it was always going to be used by both sides to support their argument. I came to this conclusion a number of months ago. Please try to keep up. So please try not to lump me and Flagpole together. He’s a little delusional.
2. You really haven’t been paying attention if you haven’t figured out my occupation. I’m a “real man”.
I noticed you didn’t at all counter my argument about Trump losing and his support is under water in many states he needs to win. Glad we could agree.
Alan
here's your answer wrote:
You can read the summary.
We don't want the summary! We want the report.
I don't get much from an abstract from a journal paper....so why would I be satisfied with a summary?
Honey, I've Never Had Sex that Wasn't Awkward wrote:
here's your answer wrote:
You can read the summary.
We don't want the summary! We want the report.
I don't get much from an abstract from a journal paper....so why would I be satisfied with a summary?
Just so it's on the record, you believe the full report actually does show collusion, and the Attorney General's summary covers it up?
here's your answer wrote:
Just so it's on the record, you believe the full report actually does show collusion, and the Attorney General's summary covers it up?
B!tch, did I ever allude to saying ANYTHING about collusion? I want to read the full report, not a summary. How hard is that to understand?
here's your answer wrote:
Honey, I've Never Had Sex that Wasn't Awkward wrote:
We don't want the summary! We want the report.
I don't get much from an abstract from a journal paper....so why would I be satisfied with a summary?
Just so it's on the record, you believe the full report actually does show collusion, and the Attorney General's summary covers it up?
this issue is similar to the HRC email scandal. HRC's actions did not rise to the level of criminality. But they were bad and they hurt her politically.
Same thing here. The campaign and WH behaved very badly in many ways, but Mueller decided not to charge them. What the campaign and WH did should be made public so voters can decide if they should punish Rs in the elections.
Honey, I've Never Had Sex that Wasn't Awkward wrote wrote:
here's your answer wrote:
Just so it's on the record, you believe the full report actually does show collusion, and the Attorney General's summary covers it up?
B!tch, did I ever allude to saying ANYTHING about collusion? I want to read the full report, not a summary. How hard is that to understand?
What exactly are you hoping to find in this report that wasn't covered in the summary?
