Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

cucks, cucks everywhere wrote:

The whole point of this 'investigation' was to squeeze the small guys around Trump and try to get 'em to rat him out. All Mueller and his cronies had on Trump's associates were process crimes and past infractions that most of us who did our homework already knew about.

In reality, there was nothing to rat on. No "collusion" occurred between Trump and the Russians, nothing out of the ordinary for campaigns and administrations anyway, and so Mueller and co. kept digging and digging, desperate to find anything from Trump's past.

Of course, if there *had* been actual dirt, we would've known about it years ago given that Trump's been under heavy scrutiny, totally in the spotlight, for decades. Obviously, the whole Russia canard was more projection than anything. From Uranium One, to Rusnano and the Podestas, to the "private inner sanctum," to Moscow speeches to pictures with Putin and Pelosi and just all the ridiculous stuff you couldn't make up, it goes on and on and on with the Democrats. They just project and project.

Unfortunately for Mueller, he *does* have a truly dirty past. What with the coverups linked to 9/11 and pedophilia... (Whoops!)

But in the end, it's pretty obvious what happened. At least if you're smart. Basically the media dressed up a nothingburger as a juicy filet mignon about 100,000 times, parroted it across all stations, and convinced 50% of the braindead lemmings in the U.S. that the president was literally a robotoid engineered by the Kremlin.

It would be more funny if people weren't so stupid.

Fat hurts wrote:

cucks, cucks everywhere wrote:

The whole point of this 'investigation' was to squeeze the small guys around Trump and try to get 'em to rat him out. All Mueller and his cronies had on Trump's associates were process crimes and past infractions that most of us who did our homework already knew about.

In reality, there was nothing to rat on. No "collusion" occurred between Trump and the Russians, nothing out of the ordinary for campaigns and administrations anyway, and so Mueller and co. kept digging and digging, desperate to find anything from Trump's past.

Of course, if there *had* been actual dirt, we would've known about it years ago given that Trump's been under heavy scrutiny, totally in the spotlight, for decades. Obviously, the whole Russia canard was more projection than anything. From Uranium One, to Rusnano and the Podestas, to the "private inner sanctum," to Moscow speeches to pictures with Putin and Pelosi and just all the ridiculous stuff you couldn't make up, it goes on and on and on with the Democrats. They just project and project.

Unfortunately for Mueller, he *does* have a truly dirty past. What with the coverups linked to 9/11 and pedophilia... (Whoops!)

But in the end, it's pretty obvious what happened. At least if you're smart. Basically the media dressed up a nothingburger as a juicy filet mignon about 100,000 times, parroted it across all stations, and convinced 50% of the braindead lemmings in the U.S. that the president was literally a robotoid engineered by the Kremlin.

It would be more funny if people weren't so stupid.

You act like this is over.

This is just the beginning.

You have no idea what's to come.

cucks, cucks everywhere wrote:

The whole point of this 'investigation' was to squeeze the small guys around Trump and try to get 'em to rat him out. All Mueller and his cronies had on Trump's associates were process crimes and past infractions that most of us who did our homework already knew about.

In reality, there was nothing to rat on. No "collusion" occurred between Trump and the Russians, nothing out of the ordinary for campaigns and administrations anyway, and so Mueller and co. kept digging and digging, desperate to find anything from Trump's past.

Of course, if there *had* been actual dirt, we would've known about it years ago given that Trump's been under heavy scrutiny, totally in the spotlight, for decades. Obviously, the whole Russia canard was more projection than anything. From Uranium One, to Rusnano and the Podestas, to the "private inner sanctum," to Moscow speeches to pictures with Putin and Pelosi and just all the ridiculous stuff you couldn't make up, it goes on and on and on with the Democrats. They just project and project.

Unfortunately for Mueller, he *does* have a truly dirty past. What with the coverups linked to 9/11 and pedophilia... (Whoops!)

But in the end, it's pretty obvious what happened. At least if you're smart. Basically the media dressed up a nothingburger as a juicy filet mignon about 100,000 times, parroted it across all stations, and convinced 50% of the braindead lemmings in the U.S. that the president was literally a robotoid engineered by the Kremlin.

It would be more funny if people weren't so stupid.

Hardloper. wrote:

Runningart2004 wrote:

So were you ok with Clinton being impeached over something not at all connected to Whitewater? Just wondering if your position is politically motivated or not.

The current investigation has been more successful than any special counsel in history in terms of indictments and in that it has proven that there was Russian interference, it proved the campaign committed felonies during the campaign (Cohen, hush money). it has shown suspicious and possibly illegal activity between the campaign and Russian or Russia connected associates (Manafort and polling data, Stone and Wikileaks), it has shown the numerous lies made by the campaign on subjects it shouldn’t have a reason to lie about if everything was ethical and legal (Trump Tower Meeting, Trump Moscow Project). But hey F the Dems right? Reagan and HW.Bush would be sickened by the Republican support for this charlatan.

Everything is peaches as long as one side WINS and the other LOSES right?

Alan

So you were all right with Hillary lying under oath and getting a free ride. Just wondering if your position is politically motivated or not. Alan, you are a peabrain.

cucks, cucks everywhere wrote:

The whole point of this 'investigation' was to squeeze the small guys around Trump and try to get 'em to rat him out. All Mueller and his cronies had on Trump's associates were process crimes and past infractions that most of us who did our homework already knew about.

In reality, there was nothing to rat on. No "collusion" occurred between Trump and the Russians, nothing out of the ordinary for campaigns and administrations anyway, and so Mueller and co. kept digging and digging, desperate to find anything from Trump's past.

Of course, if there *had* been actual dirt, we would've known about it years ago given that Trump's been under heavy scrutiny, totally in the spotlight, for decades. Obviously, the whole Russia canard was more projection than anything. From Uranium One, to Rusnano and the Podestas, to the "private inner sanctum," to Moscow speeches to pictures with Putin and Pelosi and just all the ridiculous stuff you couldn't make up, it goes on and on and on with the Democrats. They just project and project.

Unfortunately for Mueller, he *does* have a truly dirty past. What with the coverups linked to 9/11 and pedophilia... (Whoops!)

But in the end, it's pretty obvious what happened. At least if you're smart. Basically the media dressed up a nothingburger as a juicy filet mignon about 100,000 times, parroted it across all stations, and convinced 50% of the braindead lemmings in the U.S. that the president was literally a robotoid engineered by the Kremlin.

It would be more funny if people weren't so stupid.

Sally Vix wrote:

The point of this investigation was to bring Trump down at all costs. To reverse the 2016 election in which every Liberal was so sure Hillary would win. Once Trump won, those in the FBI and DOJ conspired and engaged in the biggest federal corruption in the history of the United States, with Donald Trump, whom the Liberals despise so much that it borders on derangement, as the victim. McCabe, Rosenstein, Comey, John Brennan (what a scoundrel he is!) and everyone else did everything they could to malign everyone associated with the Trump campaign and the Trump clan in an attempt to bring the Donald to his knees. The one person who had some scruples, as it turns out, was the one person who the Liberals were frothing at the mouth to make sure he was allowed to finish his investigation. Well he finished, and the Liberals are ready to tar and feather the former "The Honorable and highly decorated Robert Mueller." Just a laughable expose on how deranged the Liberals have become. Not all but everyone like Adam Schiff, Schumer, Cummings, and everyone else. It is saying something when Nancy Pelosi is considered the level-headed one of the House Democrats. Shame on you Democrats. I don't mean the Liberals here. But those in the deep state and those in the media.

jamin wrote:

agip wrote:

You think many dems think there should not have been any investigations into Benghazi? I don't think that is true. People died, mistakes were made. I'm sure Dems would want to figure that all out.

But one would have been fine , not the repeated, over and over investigations finding nothing new.

I don't see how the Benghazi Investigations can be compared to the Trump-Russia Investigations.

First of all, the Benghazi Investigations didn't dominate the news cycles. The Trump-Russia Investigations got 10,000x more coverage.

Second of all, the Benghazi Investigations were to get more information about an event that actually occurred. The Trump-Russia Investigations had no defined purpose and were based on speculations that are easily disproved with facts and logic (For example, the ridiculous idea that the Russian government's hackers broke into DNC email servers and left evidence that could be traced to the Russian government).

Fat hurts wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

agip - Paul Manafort committed his crimes prior to being Trump's campaign manager but the mainstream media will forever link refer to him as Trump's campaign manager just to cast a stain on Trump. Flynn lying? What did that have to do with Trump? Michael Cohen? He is the only person EVER to have lied to Congress and Congress later called him to testify in front of them. How many of the 37 indictments included Russians who Trump even never knew about? Again, I respect the sincerity of the convictions here but not of the media and those Dems in Congress. I am not lauding the Repubs in Congress either.

Again with the lies.

Myself and others have pointed out to you that Cohen is NOT the only person ever to to have lied to congress and congress later called him back to testify. That has happened many times.

It's one thing to get your facts wrong. When you repeat something you know is wrong, that's called a lie.

agip wrote:

jamin wrote:

I don't see how the Benghazi Investigations can be compared to the Trump-Russia Investigations.

First of all, the Benghazi Investigations didn't dominate the news cycles. The Trump-Russia Investigations got 10,000x more coverage.

Second of all, the Benghazi Investigations were to get more information about an event that actually occurred. The Trump-Russia Investigations had no defined purpose and were based on speculations that are easily disproved with facts and logic (For example, the ridiculous idea that the Russian government's hackers broke into DNC email servers and left evidence that could be traced to the Russian government).

dude, every intelligence agency agreed that Russia was working to get trump elected. Then trump fired people investigating him, saying he didn't want anyone investigating his connections to russia. Trump asked russia to help his campaign. Then it turned out many many trumpers had connections to russia, and many many trumpers lied about those connections.

Hell, the president's campaign team literally met with russian intelligecne officers in order to get illegal information on HRC. Then trump lied about that too.

Then trump gave russians classified military information.

Don't come at us with 'nothingburger' arguments. There were counter intelligence operations to figure out all this, and they were mightily justified.