Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Make America Great Again wrote:

HRC

LOOK, SQUIRREL!

LOOK, SQUIRREL!

LOOK, SQUIRREL!

LOOK, SQUIRREL!

LOOK, SQUIRREL!

LOOK, SQUIRREL!

LOOK, SQUIRREL!

LOOK, SQUIRREL!

LOOK, SQUIRREL!

LOOK, SQUIRREL!

LOOK, SQUIRREL!

What the f*ck is his obsession with the deceased John McCain?

It's weird.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ZPt8odZWnHI#fauxfullscreen

Runningart2004 wrote:Presidential elections are rarely won by the candidate with the most experience or knowledge. If that were the case HW Bush would have served 2 terms and McCain would have beaten Obama. In fact McCain was getting hammered until that loon from Alaska was added to the ticket. Jeb or Kasich should have been the nominee in 2016 but Jeb couldn’t get over his last name and Kasich was boring.

Why?

Charisma Baby Yeah!!!

Alan

This is why Trump was elected in 2016 and will be reelected in 2020. He has more charisma than all the Republican contenders in 2016 combined, and more than all the Democratic contenders in 2020 combined. His charisma is unmatched in the history of presidential election.

So Tiny* just referred to George Conway as the "husband from hell".

I know this is creepy, but that sounds like the result of pillow talk with Kellyanne.

* I've gone back to calling him "Tiny". It just flows better than Individual-1. And Trump is a very small person.

Fat hurts wrote:

So Tiny* just referred to George Conway as the "husband from hell".

I know this is creepy, but that sounds like the result of pillow talk with Kellyanne.

* I've gone back to calling him "Tiny". It just flows better than Individual-1. And Trump is a very small person.

It is very obvious that Kellyanne is letting Trump rest his head on her two pillows. She looks Ivanka will look in another 15 years. Creepy.

Ciro wrote:

What the f*ck is his obsession with the deceased John McCain?

It's weird.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ZPt8odZWnHI#fauxfullscreen

Because it turns on his base. To them McCain was Benedict Arnold.

Remember Trump won the nomination on worse remarks.

Alan

Make America Great Again wrote:

Runningart2004 wrote:Presidential elections are rarely won by the candidate with the most experience or knowledge. If that were the case HW Bush would have served 2 terms and McCain would have beaten Obama. In fact McCain was getting hammered until that loon from Alaska was added to the ticket. Jeb or Kasich should have been the nominee in 2016 but Jeb couldn’t get over his last name and Kasich was boring.

Why?

Charisma Baby Yeah!!!

Alan

This is why Trump was elected in 2016 and will be reelected in 2020. He has more charisma than all the Republican contenders in 2016 combined, and more than all the Democratic contenders in 2020 combined. His charisma is unmatched in the history of presidential election.

It’s a sad state of affairs when charisma is more important than competence.

foo wrote:

Make America Great Again wrote:

This is why Trump was elected in 2016 and will be reelected in 2020. He has more charisma than all the Republican contenders in 2016 combined, and more than all the Democratic contenders in 2020 combined. His charisma is unmatched in the history of presidential election.

It’s a sad state of affairs when charisma is more important than competence.

Reagan? Clinton? W.Bush? Obama? Trump? They didn’t win because they were more competent than the competition. The average voter doesn’t really know the issues and doesn’t really care.

Alan

foo wrote:

Make America Great Again wrote:

This is why Trump was elected in 2016 and will be reelected in 2020. He has more charisma than all the Republican contenders in 2016 combined, and more than all the Democratic contenders in 2020 combined. His charisma is unmatched in the history of presidential election.

It’s a sad state of affairs when charisma is more important than competence.

two things to that - political parties used to be stronger - there was a time when primaries meant nothing - presidential candidates were picked in smoky rooms. That used to ensure experienced fellows would win. Less democratic, but kept thieves like Trump out of the WH.

the other is that the main reason democracy works is that we can get rid of the bad apples, and do. Democracy does not pretend to elect the most worthy candidate. It only ensures that he or she will have to leave office.

I don’t think any of this is going to matter when it comes time to vote. Trump has proven to be so repulsive that everyone is going to get behind who ever the fk wins the Dem nomination. That’s why 15 people and counting are running, Trump has given Dems a massive tailwind.

And the right wing media is doing right now is excellent for Dems. They are portraying them as a divided party with a divided base which is basically translating into false hope for conservatives. This could translate into complacency and hurt their turnout. While it’s true that Trump was able to easily high jack the GOP, that nonsense is far from being present in the Dems. People will get behind anybody that can replace Trump. One major reason is that unlike Raegan who also had a very low approval rating going into his re election bid, Trump is doubling down on his extreme positions to retain the base, while the more strategic move would be to appeal to moderates because he needs more votes. Also, the view on trump has definitely changed from more centrist to extremely conservative. I can’t see him changing course and thus he will get $hit beaten in.

Fat hurts wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

Apparently only little-known and inconsequential Republican Sen. Johnny Isakson from Georgia has the stones to do it...well, and I guess Romney tweeted.

Shameful Republicans! Shameful!

Isakson seems to be a decent man. Maybe that's why he hasn't risen to national prominence in Republican circles. But he always gets easily re-elected because he has that great reputation in Georgia.

There is more than one way to be a successful politician.

(Oh, and there is no US senator that is inconsequential. All of them wield tremendous power.)

Well, relatively speaking he is inconsequential. It's not the same as if Mitch McConnell or about half the other Republican Senators spoke up. Good for him, but he's not widely known.

I do agree that he appears to be a decent man. Weird that it has come to this...we identify someone as decent when he is one of a very few to condemn the despicable language of our hateful President. Our idiot Orange President consistently says bad things about a guy who has died...a guy who is an American Hero, served our national honorably in many ways, and this one little-known Republican Senator is the only one really to rebuke him.

WTF Republicans.

Shame!

A proposal has been floating around in several blue states for months to award the EC votes to whoever wins the popular vote nationally. That would not be considered rigging, just like NJ soon to demand that any presidential candidate that wants to be on their state ballot release their tax return. All these traditions are loose and come with caveats, perhaps that’s the real power of our democracy - adaptation.

Ciro wrote:

What the f*ck is his obsession with the deceased John McCain?

It's weird.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ZPt8odZWnHI#fauxfullscreen

McCain dissed him by saying he didn't want him at his funeral. He can not handle being criticized or upstaged in any way. George Conway is correct...Trump has some personality disorders for freakin' sure. Still though, it's the criminality that he needs to answer to.

Ciro wrote:

What the f*ck is his obsession with the deceased John McCain?

It's weird.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ZPt8odZWnHI#fauxfullscreen

My theory is that this is not just about ripping on the man he could never measure up against, but it’s about hurting Mueller by association. Mueller is another war hero, real patriot, law and order guy, that is of course part of the “deep state” out to get him. This is a continued attempt to discredit these types of patriots who are out there to get at truth and put our country first. I don’t think even Trump realizes this is his intention, but I think that is what is ultimately driving this ongoing obsession.

Pillowss wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

So Tiny* just referred to George Conway as the "husband from hell".

I know this is creepy, but that sounds like the result of pillow talk with Kellyanne.

* I've gone back to calling him "Tiny". It just flows better than Individual-1. And Trump is a very small person.

It is very obvious that Kellyanne is letting Trump rest his head on her two pillows. She looks Ivanka will look in another 15 years. Creepy.

Between trump and the conways, it would be difficult to find a bunch that is more slimy, egotistical and deserving of everything bad that comes their way. They can all keep tripping over each with nastiness for all I care.

Runningart2004 wrote:

foo wrote:

It’s a sad state of affairs when charisma is more important than competence.

Reagan? Clinton? W.Bush? Obama? Trump? They didn’t win because they were more competent than the competition. The average voter doesn’t really know the issues and doesn’t really care.

Alan

While this is all true and has been for a long time, developements like superpacs have helped ensure that less qualified and “screened” candidates have a better shot at winning, which is bad for our country.

Flagpole wrote:

McCain dissed him by saying he didn't want him at his funeral. He can not handle being criticized or upstaged in any way. George Conway is correct...Trump has some personality disorders for freakin' sure. Still though, it's the criminality that he needs to answer to.

Most likely the head boob is a bit nonplussed by the public revelation that McCain passed the Steele dossier to the FBI.

The Fokus wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

McCain dissed him by saying he didn't want him at his funeral. He can not handle being criticized or upstaged in any way. George Conway is correct...Trump has some personality disorders for freakin' sure. Still though, it's the criminality that he needs to answer to.

Most likely the head boob is a bit nonplussed by the public revelation that McCain passed the Steele dossier to the FBI.

There are many reasons Trump would dislike McCain. I don't believe McCain to have been a vindictive person, but he was still a HUMAN, and Trump said about him, "He's a hero because he was captured. I like people who weren't captured." That's what you get when you disrespect someone like that...when they have a chance to get back at you, they just might do it. So, McCain had access to the Steele Dossier. Sucks to be Trump then after disparaging him in that way. He plays in the gutter and says bad stuff about people all the time and yet he expects them to still love him, and to thank him for doing something any President would have done for McCain. He's such an ass.

ThomasJefferson wrote:

George Washington wrote:

I beg to differ.

You are wrong, George. You were never a member of a political party when you were "elected", not during your term in office.

Please point out where in my post I said, or in any way intimated, that I was "a member of a political party when (I was) 'elected', (or) during (my) term in office."

If you are unable to do so then as penance please publicly admit that your post was asinine.

Thank you.