Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Pookie Washington wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

I agree. Flaggy, you really stepped out of bounds on that one. There is no reason to attack Melania like that.

I say the same to Pookie. You have no idea if she is intelligent or not. And it really doesn't matter.

Do you guys really deny the fact that Melania is a gold digging whore? Would she be with a fat orange 70 something accountant or IT guy? Hell no. She is most definitely a gold digging whore!! Stevie Wonder can see she has absolutely no love for him. You can look at Michele and Barack and can easily tell she would be with him whether he was POTUS or a school teacher.

I honestly don't know and I don't care.

I've known couples that I thought were blissfully happy. Next thing I know they are getting a divorce.

I've known other couples that seem to fight all the time but they stay together.

You just never know.

As for the president's relationship with his wife? I really don't care. It doesn't matter.

The only way it would matter is if Melania decides to become a cooperating witness.

Fat hurts wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

Doesn't matter what he said. Do YOU not agree that it is an emergency???

It doesn't matter what the president said? Really?

When this goes to court it will matter a lot what the president said.

My point was that regardless of what the president said, if it is an emergency, it IS an emergency. If your house is one fire and your wife says not to worry, you WORRY! And you are right to worry.

Peace by Love >> Peace by Force wrote:

In today's news:

A 16-Year-old climate activist is nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize

Meanwhile, Dotard Trump fails to get nominated for the same prize for stopping a non-existent nuclear war with Rocket Man.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-47568227

Watch her TED talk. It's quite good.

P wrote:

Racket wrote:

Beto is still a loser (couldn't even win his home state against Ted Cruz) and Joe Biden is 77

He lost one race in a Red state and that makes him a "loser"?!?

Yes.

Just a reminder, everyone loses sometimes. And he's a "loser" right up until he wins the White House.

///

Now I won't go and call you a moron because that's just not the way I roll. But if people notice that your post was moronic, well that's on you, not me.

I won't tell you to jump off a tall building as I would never want anyone to do that and it would be a tragedy. So, if you were to do that, then it'd be on you and not me.

Fat hurts wrote:

Peace by Love >> Peace by Force wrote:

In today's news:

A 16-Year-old climate activist is nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize

Meanwhile, Dotard Trump fails to get nominated for the same prize for stopping a non-existent nuclear war with Rocket Man.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-47568227

Watch her TED talk. It's quite good.

In fact, I just watched it again. It's so good that I'm going to do something I rarely do. I'm posting a link:

Trollminator wrote:

Racket wrote:

Misspelling aside, I think you underestimate how hard it is to beat an incumbent president.

No I am not. Trump will have a lot more money and almost full support of his party, but the reality is turnout is always poor for re elections, with this time being a huge exception IMO. Liberals are really fired up, and do you honestly think Trump will be able to boost his vote count from last time?

So you're basically saying "This time, it's different! I can really feel it!"

Racket wrote:

Trollminator wrote:

No I am not. Trump will have a lot more money and almost full support of his party, but the reality is turnout is always poor for re elections, with this time being a huge exception IMO. Liberals are really fired up, and do you honestly think Trump will be able to boost his vote count from last time?

So you're basically saying "This time, it's different! I can really feel it!"

Tell that to Bush the Elder.

Sally Vix wrote:

Runningart2004 wrote:

No, and your numbers are inaccurate.

Alan

I can substantiate my numbers. What are your numbers?

Total APPREHENSIONS:

How many come in without being apprehended? That number is harder to pin point, but it’s nowhere near 100,000.

Alan

Did he say Tim Cook or Tim Apple?

Trump getting some major congressional broadsides today - they are seeing these polls come out where trump loses to every democrat. And they see what a D controlled house will turn up on the trump white house.

Rs are abandoning ship.

The entire house votes to release the mueller report.

59 or 60 senators vote to end his national emergency.

Trump is losing his grip on elected repubs

Other data from CBP:

https://www.factcheck.org/2018/06/illegal-immigration-statistics/

Trump threatens military action against “the left.” Go for it, donny boy! You’re even dumber than we thought! Talk about an emergency. Desperation is a stinky cologne.

Fat hurts wrote:

But also, _its_baddude, why do you just post these random links?

You won't convince anyone that way. I can find a link that supports almost any position I want to take on anything. There are plenty of flat earth links, fake moon landing links, etc.

If you want to argue a point, then make the argument. I don't think anyone is convinced because you posted a link to some site we don't trust.

True.

After all, we definitely trust "_its_baddude" implicitly. No sense losing all of that trust with untrustworthy links. :-)

Senate Republicans vote with Democrats to block Trump’s emergency.

Take that you white supremacist appeasing republican pieces of trash

agip wrote:

Trump getting some major congressional broadsides today - they are seeing these polls come out where trump loses to every democrat. And they see what a D controlled house will turn up on the trump white house.

Rs are abandoning ship.

The entire house votes to release the mueller report.

59 or 60 senators vote to end his national emergency.

Trump is losing his grip on elected repubs

It is too bad that it has nothing to do with integrity but just them beginning finally to see how criminal he is and that ultimately they want to protect themselves politically. To be clear, I don't think the vast majority of politicians have an acceptable level of integrity, but Republicans the last 2+ years have really shown to be sorely lacking. It's a shame. There are some Republicans with integrity, and they are all the ones who oppose Donald Trump.

Mueller is coming.

The clown is done.

This ^ is spot on.

P wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

I honestly don't know and I don't care.

I've known couples that I thought were blissfully happy. Next thing I know they are getting a divorce.

I've known other couples that seem to fight all the time but they stay together.

You just never know.

As for the president's relationship with his wife? I really don't care. It doesn't matter.

The only way it would matter is if Melania decides to become a cooperating witness.

This ^ is spot on.

I think it's fair to judge the character of a man by how he treats his family. And by all measures, Trump has treated his family like garbage, with zero respect.

We're electing people to represent and make decisions for us...if a person makes terrible, mean, cruel decisions against his family, it's fair game and good democracty to hold that against him or her.

P wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

I honestly don't know and I don't care.

I've known couples that I thought were blissfully happy. Next thing I know they are getting a divorce.

I've known other couples that seem to fight all the time but they stay together.

You just never know.

As for the president's relationship with his wife? I really don't care. It doesn't matter.

The only way it would matter is if Melania decides to become a cooperating witness.

This ^ is spot on.

I don't care that she is one either, but she is. Just being factual.

agip wrote:

P wrote:

This ^ is spot on.

I think it's fair to judge the character of a man by how he treats his family. And by all measures, Trump has treated his family like garbage, with zero respect.

We're electing people to represent and make decisions for us...if a person makes terrible, mean, cruel decisions against his family, it's fair game and good democracty to hold that against him or her.

The problem is the trailer park dwellers and other FOX watchers voted on his false promises to further their anti-libt@rd agenda, not on his character. So he gets a pass on any ethical and moral wrongdoings. In other words they know he is a piece of sheit but did not hesitate to elect him. We are talking about a third-tier celebrity who scammed investors, buyers and renters his whole life, cheated on his wives, lied every time he opened his mouth, and who fkn tans and can’t help his social media addiction like a “look at me” juvenile. What does that say about most of his supporters?