No. Try again.
No. Try again.
Flagpole wrote:
Concur wrote:
Hi Flagpole!
Nope. Not me.
WEJO, DO AN IP CHECK, AND IF I LIE, BAN ME FOR LIFE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The easiest sign of an insecure person. Constantly trying to gain the approval of others with desperate posts using all caps. Also using more than one exclamation point (mark) as if that will add volume to the meaning of the symbol. He needs people to know that "it's not me" as if he's above using an anonymous handle and you have to believe him. F. Scott Fitzgerald is laughing at you Flagpole!
*Overly frequent use of the exclamation mark is generally considered poor writing, for it distracts the reader and devalues the mark's significance.[15][16]
Cut out all these exclamation points...An exclamation point is like laughing at your own joke.
— F. Scott Fitzgerald[17]
agip wrote:
Iowa poll out -
Biden 27%
Sanders 25%
Warren 9%
Harris 7%
Beto 5%
Apparently that is worse than last time for Biden and Beto, better for Bernie.
Klobuchar is not getting much traction - that's a neighboring state.
The polls right now mean absolutely nothing. They are all really about name recognition. Warren should be worried. She’s had a high profile name because of Trump for a while now. Everyone knows Biden and Sanders. Even if you live under a rock and don’t watch TV you know Biden and Sanders.
Really nothing matters until the debates. Just ask Trump. The polls after the first debate will tell us a lot. Then once we get down to about 5 candidates it will really matter.
Alan
Proofer of Proofer of Proving Stuff! wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
Nope. Not me.
WEJO, DO AN IP CHECK, AND IF I LIE, BAN ME FOR LIFE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The easiest sign of an insecure person. Constantly trying to gain the approval of others with desperate posts using all caps. Also using more than one exclamation point (mark) as if that will add volume to the meaning of the symbol. He needs people to know that "it's not me" as if he's above using an anonymous handle and you have to believe him. F. Scott Fitzgerald is laughing at you Flagpole!
*Overly frequent use of the exclamation mark is generally considered poor writing, for it distracts the reader and devalues the mark's significance.[15][16]
Cut out all these exclamation points...An exclamation point is like laughing at your own joke.
— F. Scott Fitzgerald[17]
Flagpole is a better writer than Fitzgerald. You can’t prove he isn’t, so you can’t prove I’m not right. Therefore, I am right.
I think Beto has been getting all his ducks in a row, getting all his donors in a row. He wants to come out like a rock star. He wants a big 24hr donation number. At this point that’s all we have to distinguish candidates....their opening speech and donation numbers.
Alan
Good morning! How are all you LRC stable geniuses doing this fine am?
agip wrote:
Iowa poll out -
Biden 27%
Sanders 25%
Warren 9%
Harris 7%
Beto 5%
Apparently that is worse than last time for Biden and Beto, better for Bernie.
Klobuchar is not getting much traction - that's a neighboring state.
Meh...Beto is getting +1000 to win POTUS. Harris at +600.
Little chance wrote:
agip wrote:
Iowa poll out -
Biden 27%
Sanders 25%
Warren 9%
Harris 7%
Beto 5%
Apparently that is worse than last time for Biden and Beto, better for Bernie.
Klobuchar is not getting much traction - that's a neighboring state.
Meh...Beto is getting +1000 to lose the POTUS race to Trump. Harris at -600.
Yep^!
Little chance wrote:
Little chance wrote:
Meh...Beto is getting +1000 to lose the POTUS race to Trump. Harris at -600.
Yep^!
Beto will enter the race soon and will be the Dem nominee. I am not sure if he’ll win or if this is really a good idea for him to run now. In an ideal world he would get some more experience and age behind before running for POTUS but everyone who has entered the race on the Dem side so far really have no chance against Trump in the general election.
Beto seems to be the best candidate for the Dems out there right now.
On the micro level there will be changes in certain religions/sects.
On the macro level, “religion” will change little and certainly NOT disappear.
A few primary differences that religion scholars cite for future religious remaining relatively static are 1) current method of spreading religion, 2) separation of religion and govts (partly related to #1), and global communications.
There are others, but the consensus is that there will not be much change in “religion” for the foreseeable future.
Little chance wrote:
Little chance wrote:
Meh...Beto is getting +1000 to lose the POTUS race to Trump. Harris at -600.
Yep^!
Again what were Trump’s chances this far out? Obama’s? B.Clintons? Heck even Reagan was a long shot this far out. Now I’m not saying Beto is THE GUY but at this point everyone is the same.
Let history be your guide. Literally nothing matters right now.
Alan
in touch wrote:
Democrats lose again wrote:
Democrats are totally out of touch with the American people.
Meanwhile, Rich Trump supporters get in touch with prostitutes at a Mar-a-Lago massage parlor owned by a Chinese woman.
Who is this Rich Trump guy and why do people support him?
There is no evidence that Trump knew what Yang did for a living or even knew her personally. She probably was invited to the SB party only because she has donated to his campaign.
Scott Free wrote:
in touch wrote:
Meanwhile, Rich Trump supporters get in touch with prostitutes at a Mar-a-Lago massage parlor owned by a Chinese woman.
Who is this Rich Trump guy and why do people support him?
There is no evidence that Trump knew what Yang did for a living or even knew her personally. She probably was invited to the SB party only because she has donated to his campaign.
EXACTLY! ^This. She was probably just one of many who made sure the Trump2016 campaign had a happy ending.
EXACTLY, my bruh! wrote:
Scott Free wrote:
Who is this Rich Trump guy and why do people support him?
There is no evidence that Trump knew what Yang did for a living or even knew her personally. She probably was invited to the SB party only because she has donated to his campaign.
EXACTLY! ^This. She was probably just one of many who made sure the Trump2016 campaign had a happy ending.
So, the head hooker was give pearl necklaces, maybe even shots on goal, by Trump supporters. Then they paid her in cash. And she passed on part of cash to Trump. Sounds legit.
Little chance wrote:
agip wrote:
Iowa poll out -
Biden 27%
Sanders 25%
Warren 9%
Harris 7%
Beto 5%
Apparently that is worse than last time for Biden and Beto, better for Bernie.
Klobuchar is not getting much traction - that's a neighboring state.
Meh...Beto is getting +1000 to win POTUS. Harris at +600.
betting odds have Biden and Bernie tied as co-frontrunners.
then a bit of a drop and Harris and Beto tied.
Then a big mess o'dems.
Pookie Washington wrote:
LIAR Sally Rigged wrote:
No one believes anything you say. You constant lying is the reason why.
You only started posting "recently"? LOL. You claim you were banned for several years. You claim dozens of your name have been stolen over the years. And your whining about how tire you are of reading all the negative comments about your orange hero indicate you have been on this thread for years. Then there is the fact how Rigged-like your comments are. Rigged is your twin. You are Rigged's twin. Plain and simple.
And you are who? You post anonymously and accuse someone else. Wow, talk about being hypocritical?
Hello Flagpole;)
LIAR Sally Rigged is a lowly little liberal hiding behind his handle.
Nope. Not me.
WEJO, DO AN IP CHECK, AND IF I LIE, BAN ME FOR LIFE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Yeah, we already know that. Thanks for pointing out the obvious. Flagpole is a loon, it's been pointed out by more than one poster. Religion going away? That's laughable on too many levels. Flagpole might be an atheist, who knows?
Flagpole wrote:
Pookie Washington wrote:
And you are who? You post anonymously and accuse someone else. Wow, talk about being hypocritical?
Hello Flagpole;)
LIAR Sally Rigged is a lowly little liberal hiding behind his handle.
Nope. Not me.
WEJO, DO AN IP CHECK, AND IF I LIE, BAN ME FOR LIFE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The insecure one takes time out of his Sunday to post that it's not him. Oh dear!
Whoever posted insecurity nailed it!
IP Checker wrote:
The insecure one takes time out of his Sunday to post that it's not him. Oh dear!
Whoever posted insecurity nailed it!
And the even more insecure one cannot help but reply this Sunday morning. Oh, dear!
I finished a 10 mile long hours ago. How about you, IP checker? Are you still out on your Sunday run? Speed up, dude.
The GOP is raging civil war against itself in Bama--calling each other Fake Republicans. All over a horrible 10-cent tax increased approved by GOPers. … The HORROR!