Who is the Secretary of Defense now? Serious question.
Who is the Secretary of Defense now? Serious question.
Flagpole wrote:
Runningart2004 wrote:
As far as my political leanings....you have not been paying attention. Being against Trump does not mean you are totally against the Republican Party. My views are relatively equally split. I’m a social progressive, with a mixed view on abortion. I’m pro gun, pro military, big government. I want to raise your taxes too.
Not all soldiers support Trump blindly....maybe you should look at....the POLLS! Hahaha!
Alan
Here are the views of this self-described liberal - social progressive, pro choice, I’m pro gun, but also pro gun control, pro military, medium-sized government, and I want to cut spending, not raise taxes.
Side point:
Should it even be a goal to have a balanced budget? Even most states end up in the red. We’ve been running red for decades now.
Where are these spending cuts going to come from? Everyone says “spending cuts” like it’s some magical unicorn problem solver. Like Ronnie Coleman said, “Everybody wants to be a bodybuilder. But nobody want to lift no heavy ass weights”. Any spending cuts that don’t include cuts to the military, social security or Medicare is just fools gold. It ain’t working. Meanwhile we keep cutting taxes again and again and wonder why the deficit keeps skyrocketing.
So assuming a balanced budget is a defined goal and assuming you don’t want to cut the big three then we must raise taxes.
Alan
No, you really don’t need a balanced budget.
Whether the budget is balanced or not, the government gets the money from tax payers to fund everything.
If the budget is balanced, the wealthy make up the difference in extra taxes that is their expense that they don’t get back.
If the budget is not balanced, the wealthy make up the difference by buying govt bonds that is an asset to them until they sell later and someone else buys.
Cutting government spending is bad because wherever you cut it is a pay cut for someone.
Be specific when you say you want to cut spending and say exactly whose pocket you want to take the money from.
It’s not easy.
Yup, and.... wrote:
Things to do in Denver when you’re dead wrote:
Wow. Is that from his resignation letter? What an honorable man.
Who is the Secretary of Defense now? Serious question.
Serious answer, Javanka.
Pookie Washington wrote:
Welcome to Trumps AmeriKKKKa. The Good Ol South.
Check out @shaunking’s Tweet:
https://twitter.com/shaunking/status/1102662829402927107?s=09
Even in the good ol south there are going to be some ramifications for those kids:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/ncna979146L L wrote:
No, you really don’t need a balanced budget.
Whether the budget is balanced or not, the government gets the money from tax payers to fund everything.
If the budget is balanced, the wealthy make up the difference in extra taxes that is their expense that they don’t get back.
If the budget is not balanced, the wealthy make up the difference by buying govt bonds that is an asset to them until they sell later and someone else buys.
Cutting government spending is bad because wherever you cut it is a pay cut for someone.
Be specific when you say you want to cut spending and say exactly whose pocket you want to take the money from.
It’s not easy.
Thanks for the explanation.
But is that sustainable forever? Is the deficit just a political football?
Alan
Pookie Washington wrote:
SDSU Aztec wrote:
Even in the good ol south there are going to be some ramifications for those kids:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/ncna979146I doubt it. Most likely there will be no ramifications.
Are you serious? It's getting national attention and the kids' HS has been identified. The school class is also 24% black. Those kids are in some deep sh*t.
noballs wrote:
noballs wrote:
Hey Rigged at least show some balls and post with your handle when you mock a vet
A vet? What's his real name? You know zero about him, only what he says.
So where are your balls at Mr. Anonymous Noballs? Pot2Kettle
Ok calm down snowflake, no need to get all butt hurt now
Runningart2004 wrote:
Interesting read:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/johntamny/2017/09/24/forget-the-protests-of-conservatives-deficits-really-dont-matter/
I find the analysis to be terribly simplistic. Take this paragraph as an example:
"In short, federal debt is the least of the U.S.’s problems. As evidenced by plummeting yields on the 10-year over the decades, investors figure that future debt servicing will be exceedingly easy. As for reasons why, the speculation from here is that we’re on the verge of a staggering productivity boom thanks to amazing advances in technological pursuits of the automation and robotics variety. Figure that if the discovery of dirty, prosaic coal rendered American workers twenty times more productive, imagine what internet, automation and robotic advances will mean for our future output. It’s just a guess, but these surges in our individual capacity to create will unleash stunning wealth creation on a level that we can’t presently contemplate such that Treasury debts will become exceedingly small."
Not exactly what one might consider to be hard logic and sound evidence. Basically, it is "Hey, the market knows best and it says 'no worries'" garnished with a bit of "Hey, there's going to be this miracle that "we can't presently contemplate."
Deficits do matter. More importantly, the debt does matter. And markets invariably "have infinite wisdom and foresight and have already priced in future risks inherent in enormous debt levels so there is nothing to worry about" . . . until there is. Every single bubble that has ever existed has been justified as "this time is different" and there was never anything to worry about because just look at how the market is pricing this stuff until . . .
Pookie Washington wrote:
SDSU Aztec wrote:
Are you serious? It's getting national attention and the kids' HS has been identified. The school class is also 24% black. Those kids are in some deep sh*t.
They are in Trump KKKountry. It didn't happen in school. They gonna come up with some free speech crap. One of the dumb bittches is the daughter of the guy who owns Hoover Toyota in town. Rich White girl will not pay a price for her ignorance. I hope I'm wrong but I doubt it.
Hillary beat Trump 51 to 44 in Birmingham. Trump lost just about every decent sized city in the country.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v4zwsvMJ5uQFagpole wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ya4ukUAQDs0Trump is done. Muller is coming.
I'm an idiot.
So at what point will deficits matter? The national debt rose $1.2 trillion in 2018. So we’re adding a trillion a year now. Awesome.
Alan
Good morning! How are all you LRC stable geniuses doing this fine am?
The major problem with the modern GOP is they claim to be fiscally conservative but are really very fiscally irresponsible. Politically they know that tax cuts play to their base. They also know that when their base screams for “spending cuts” what their base means is “cut everyone’s benefits but MINE”. Cutting Medicare and social security—which needs to happen right NOW and which needs to be applied to BOOMERS and CURRENT retirees—would be political suicide for the GOP despite all their rhetoric on spending. Thus, the major problem with GOP tax cuts is they NEVER “get to govt spending cuts” that they promise and they never will.
How dumb are people? Why do they forget so quickly? The modern GOP is NOT fiscally conservative. They have cut taxes before—several times in most of our lifetimes—and they NEVER get to cutting spending.
I suppose a tax cut would be fine IF they passed legislation slashing government spending FIRST. In other words, cut spending by X amount so they know how much less revenue they’ll be taking in and then give X amount back to tax payers. But that’s not what happens. We’ve seen this playbook before—recently.
The GOP controlled both houses of Congress AND had a GOP POTUS for 6 of the 8 Bush II years—this was not that long ago, the early 2000s. They passed a massive tax cut. What else did they do? Well they 1) said the tax cuts would “pay for themselves by driving economic growth (aka magical thinking) 2) they simultaneously MASSIVELY INCREASED government spending!
What happened? We had a short term boom followed by a MASSIVE economic collapse AND a MASSIVE increase in the national debt. But since the economic collapse happened several years later dumb people with short attention spans that are obsessed with tax cuts who think that the minute tax legislation is passed the full effect of said tax legislation is felt—are and where mentally unable to connect the collapse to the very bad tax & spend policies of the GOP.
So, what is happening now? 1) the GOP is saying the same thing about “tax cuts paying for themselves” by driving economic growth 2) CEOs are smart and know that if they throw peons short term benefits (like a one time bonus rather than a permanent increase in worker salaries...which are peanuts to the CEOs and which do nothing to address the real issue of wage stagnation) that they can connect that to the tax cuts and say “see trickle down works! What’s good for corporations is good for individuals”...meanwhile those same corporations pocket > 90% of the benefit from the tax cut 3) the GOP is proposing MASSIVE increases in defense spending, infrastructure spending, and spending for a southern “boarder” wall with no plan to pay for any of it.
These tax cuts will have the same effect as prior cuts—a huge increase in the national debt and an eventual economic collapse that disproportionately effects individuals (who, yeah, got a short term increase in $) while corporations make out like bandits (their cuts are permanent). Plus, all the benefits (short term) will be attributed to the current admin, while the long term effects will be blamed on whomever is in office when the $hit hits the fan in several years.
Why do you tax obsess Morans not understand that at this point in our history the ONLY rational approach is an INCREASE in taxes coupled with a DECREASE in spending. We owe too much already to get tax cuts. Tax cuts are a bad idea, fiscally irresponsible, and morally reprehensible.
Javanka wrote:
Yup, and.... wrote:
Who is the Secretary of Defense now? Serious question.
Serious answer, Javanka.
Yikes! Well, that’s terrifying. Likely true in a process sense though given Kushner got a top secret clearance despite objections from the highest level of the Trump admins own intelligence officials many of whom Trump had appointed himself.
Has there ever been a more idiotic, inept president? He’s almost so clueless that you think he might be doing this carp on porpoise!
Jerome Corsi apologizes for falsely trashing a dead man, Seth Rich (after a successful lawsuit of course). Then the big news: he says he’s a Christian! Would not have guessed that!
Runningart2004 wrote:
https://www.salon.com/2019/02/19/why-the-22-trillion-national-debt-doesnt-matter-heres-what-you-should-worry-about-instead_partner/Runningart2004 wrote:
So at what point will deficits matter? The national debt rose $1.2 trillion in 2018. So we’re adding a trillion a year now. Awesome.
Alan
Alan, whether or not deficits and balanced budgets matter is a question of which economic theory to which you ascribe. There are many that call for intentional deficits during periods of contraction, such as the Keynesian model. Even monetarists (which today mostly consists of ill informed college freshman equipped with one or two Milton Friedman quotes) accept that a little bit of a deficit is probably OK.
There has been an embrace lately of a new model called Modern Monetary Theory which basically advocates indefinite deficit spending. This is the proposed method for funding the "Green New Deal" and pretty much everyone agrees it's the liberal version of Reaganomics.
RIP: D3 All-American Frank Csorba - who ran 13:56 in March - dead
RENATO can you talk about the preparation of Emile Cairess 2:06
Running for Bowerman Track Club used to be cool now its embarrassing
Hats off to my dad. He just ran a 1:42 Half Marathon and turns 75 in 2 months!
Great interview with Steve Cram - says Jakob has no chance of WRs this year
Rest in Peace Adrian Lehmann - 2:11 Swiss marathoner. Dies of heart attack.