Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Racket wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

Um...you don't read here very often if you believe Racket is a "Flagpole puppy boy". He's actually the best question-asker in this entire thread, and he does so to keep people honest. He's a bit skeptical of any declarations at this point in the process on either side (those sides are Right and Wrong, which are akin to Anti-Trump and Trump, NOT Democrat and Republican), and he's just looking for clarity from those who dare to make a declaration. He will be of the judiciary when all this is over, and he will be a fair and impartial judge. He didn't even know I knew this about him, but I did.

You though "Racket's Crush is..." didn't get it at all.

Flagpole, I'm flattered, really.

You are correct. I will be most judicious and very fair. If you are wrong I will point it out. You have provided plenty of clarification on your terms of Mueller arriving and the clown being done and if that does indeed occur then I will upload your prognostication and serve as witness to your correctness.

Flagpole wrote:

When Comey gave information out about Hillary Clinton during the campaign, that supposedly broke from tradition with the DOJ and FBI that they don't give information out about an investigation like that if the person wasn't indicted. Democrats say that has set a precedent and that they (Democrats) can use that to make the DOJ give up all the information that will be in the Mueller Report if they believe much has been hidden from them and from the public.

Well, THIS Democrat says NO to that.

We can't just hope to use a bad judgement to our advantage and hope to continue the bad judgement. That's not how things are supposed to work. That is not how integrity works.

The DOJ should decide for certain what their policy is and then abide by that until they decide AS A BODY that the policy has changed.

Now, there ARE other arguments to make to get the full report from the DOJ, but this precedent one is bad form.

Just one more example in a line of many that I don't just go with whatever the Democrats say. I am driven by truth, justice, and integrity at all times with no exceptions.

Mueller is coming.

The clown is done.

Fiagpole wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

When Comey gave information out about Hillary Clinton during the campaign, that supposedly broke from tradition with the DOJ and FBI that they don't give information out about an investigation like that if the person wasn't indicted. Democrats say that has set a precedent and that they (Democrats) can use that to make the DOJ give up all the information that will be in the Mueller Report if they believe much has been hidden from them and from the public.

Well, THIS Democrat says NO to that.

We can't just hope to use a bad judgement to our advantage and hope to continue the bad judgement. That's not how things are supposed to work. That is not how integrity works.

The DOJ should decide for certain what their policy is and then abide by that until they decide AS A BODY that the policy has changed.

Now, there ARE other arguments to make to get the full report from the DOJ, but this precedent one is bad form.

Just one more example in a line of many that I don't just go with whatever the Democrats say. I am driven by truth, justice, and integrity at all times with no exceptions.

Mueller is coming.

The clown is done.

Bright, you aren't. Go back to your Yamaha kid's keyboard and keep practicing Mary had a Little Lamb, eventually you'll get it. What an ignorant post. Those you follow your advice are being lead to the river by the Pied Piper himself, unhinged Flagpole and his other handles. THAT was a dumb post.

Sally Vix wrote:

Runningart2004 wrote:

Like always and like most people you miss the details. I’ll let you research some more. Just stay off Fox News.

Alan

Alan, Why not just point out the errors in what he said? This IS Infanticide and quite sickening.

This is from the Washington Post:

Senate blocks bill on medical care for children born alive after attempted abortion

Sen. Ben Sasse (R-Neb.). (Jacquelyn Martin/AP)

By Mike DeBonis and

Felicia Sonmez February 25 at 9:41 PM

The Senate voted Monday to block consideration of a measure that would punish any doctor who fails to provide medical care to a child born alive after an attempted abortion.

All but three Democrats voted against a procedural motion on the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, denying it the necessary 60 votes to proceed. The final vote count was 53 in favor and 44 opposed.

The bill would require a health-care practitioner to “exercise the same degree of professional skill, care, and diligence to preserve the life and health of the child” as he or she would to “any other child born alive at the same gestational age.” The bill includes criminal penalties, a right of civil action for an affected mother and a mandatory reporting requirement for other health providers.

Opponents of the bill argued that it represented an unjustified attack on abortion rights, preventing doctors from exercising their best medical judgment and exposing them to possible lawsuits or prosecution.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) has sought to put Democrats — and 2020 candidates in particular — on the record on the issue after recent comments made by Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam (D). McConnell also plans to hold a vote in the coming weeks on the Green New Deal climate change legislation as he has cast the Democrats as extreme.

In remarks on the Senate floor ahead of Monday’s vote, McConnell described the measure as “a straightforward piece of legislation to protect newborn babies.” Democrats, he argued, “seem to be suggesting that newborn babies’ right to life may be contingent on the circumstances surrounding their birth.”

Runningart2004 wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

Alan, Why not just point out the errors in what he said? This IS Infanticide and quite sickening.

This is from the Washington Post:

Senate blocks bill on medical care for children born alive after attempted abortion

Sen. Ben Sasse (R-Neb.). (Jacquelyn Martin/AP)

By Mike DeBonis and

Felicia Sonmez February 25 at 9:41 PM

The Senate voted Monday to block consideration of a measure that would punish any doctor who fails to provide medical care to a child born alive after an attempted abortion.

All but three Democrats voted against a procedural motion on the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, denying it the necessary 60 votes to proceed. The final vote count was 53 in favor and 44 opposed.

The bill would require a health-care practitioner to “exercise the same degree of professional skill, care, and diligence to preserve the life and health of the child” as he or she would to “any other child born alive at the same gestational age.” The bill includes criminal penalties, a right of civil action for an affected mother and a mandatory reporting requirement for other health providers.

Opponents of the bill argued that it represented an unjustified attack on abortion rights, preventing doctors from exercising their best medical judgment and exposing them to possible lawsuits or prosecution.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) has sought to put Democrats — and 2020 candidates in particular — on the record on the issue after recent comments made by Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam (D). McConnell also plans to hold a vote in the coming weeks on the Green New Deal climate change legislation as he has cast the Democrats as extreme.

In remarks on the Senate floor ahead of Monday’s vote, McConnell described the measure as “a straightforward piece of legislation to protect newborn babies.” Democrats, he argued, “seem to be suggesting that newborn babies’ right to life may be contingent on the circumstances surrounding their birth.”

This:

"Opponents of the bill argued that it represented an unjustified attack on abortion rights, preventing doctors from exercising their best medical judgment and exposing them to possible lawsuits or prosecution."

It's also already a felony to kill infants....

Alan

Embarrassment of Riches wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

You people get it wrong all the time. I didn't say I have made hundreds of thousands of dollars. I said I paid for my house and music gear and then some. While my house is NOW worth hundreds of thousands of dollars, that was not the purchase price nor what I have paid for it. It is a tad less than "Hundreds of thousands if dollars".

Regarding the rest of my music stuff, I truly have played paying gigs for over 30 years, mostly in blues and rock bands. No fraud.

Here is the stuff to focus on...I AM one of the top 50 piano players in the world, and I have HUGE biceps. You KNOW it to be true also.

Just stop. dude. You are embarrassing yourself.

You've never played in front of an audience. You are a lying fraud. It's been proven and you admitted it. Move on.

Runningart2004 wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

Alan, Why not just point out the errors in what he said? This IS Infanticide and quite sickening.

This is from the Washington Post:

Senate blocks bill on medical care for children born alive after attempted abortion

Sen. Ben Sasse (R-Neb.). (Jacquelyn Martin/AP)

By Mike DeBonis and

Felicia Sonmez February 25 at 9:41 PM

The Senate voted Monday to block consideration of a measure that would punish any doctor who fails to provide medical care to a child born alive after an attempted abortion.

All but three Democrats voted against a procedural motion on the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, denying it the necessary 60 votes to proceed. The final vote count was 53 in favor and 44 opposed.

The bill would require a health-care practitioner to “exercise the same degree of professional skill, care, and diligence to preserve the life and health of the child” as he or she would to “any other child born alive at the same gestational age.” The bill includes criminal penalties, a right of civil action for an affected mother and a mandatory reporting requirement for other health providers.

Opponents of the bill argued that it represented an unjustified attack on abortion rights, preventing doctors from exercising their best medical judgment and exposing them to possible lawsuits or prosecution.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) has sought to put Democrats — and 2020 candidates in particular — on the record on the issue after recent comments made by Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam (D). McConnell also plans to hold a vote in the coming weeks on the Green New Deal climate change legislation as he has cast the Democrats as extreme.

In remarks on the Senate floor ahead of Monday’s vote, McConnell described the measure as “a straightforward piece of legislation to protect newborn babies.” Democrats, he argued, “seem to be suggesting that newborn babies’ right to life may be contingent on the circumstances surrounding their birth.”

This:

"Opponents of the bill argued that it represented an unjustified attack on abortion rights, preventing doctors from exercising their best medical judgment and exposing them to possible lawsuits or prosecution."

It's also already a felony to kill infants....

Alan