Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

L L wrote:

Hey, I made a guess and it didn't happen. (it's not like said 100% chance or something stupid like that)

Similar to people trying to predict spots scores or running times.

At least I put something out there.

I feel Congress has failed to act on the information that has come to light.

Have any of your predictions here ever been right?

Seems like you're about 0 for 5 by now.

Do you believe there's a participation trophy for making wrong predictions because "at least you put something out there"?

Give us the predictions you made and the registered name you posted under.

You sir, are a man of integrity. Thank you for your honesty.

I wish others on this thread would take your lead.

food stamp henny wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

You obviously didn't watch the speech. I guess because she is black you think that she was there to stoke racism.

She gave a very powerful, positive speech. Stacy Abrams is super-smart, an inspiring speaker, and a rising star in the Democratic party. She will probably be the next senator from Georgia.

That's why she was chosen.

Why us she so fat?

Probably the same reason our president is so fat.

Yep and when Trump wins reelection, Clownpole can add another Flagpolian Flop to the list.

Impeachment never

Mueller never

Clownpole forever

Are you saying that Trump will be re-elected in 2020?

L L wrote:

Are you saying that Trump will be re-elected in 2020?

Hello? Been saying that for months.

L L wrote:

Are you saying that Trump will be re-elected in 2020?

Yes, he will. You heard it here :)

JH

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

L L wrote:

Are you saying that Trump will be re-elected in 2020?

Hello? Been saying that for months.

Trump will most certainly increase his prison sentence in 2020.

Trump's invitee -- bullied Joshua Trump -- shares his opinion of Trump's speech.

http://www.kataeb.org/uploads/files/miscellaneous/kid-trump.jpg

Just so that the libs have no question about my Trump predictions:

Impeachment never

Indictment never

Prison never

Reelection winner

Full two terms served

Mueller never

Clownpole forever

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Just so that the libs have no question about my Trump predictions:

Impeachment never

Indictment never

Prison never

Reelection winner

Full two terms served

Mueller never

Clownpole forever

Any qualifications?

Just so that the libs have no question about my Trump predictions:

Impeachment YES

Indictment MULTIPLE

Prison MULTIPLE LIFE TERMS

Reelection HAHAHAHAHAHA

Full two LIFE PRISON terms served

Mueller WINNER

clownRIGGED 4ever

Runningart2004 wrote:

nancytrump wrote:

Pretty uncool for Trump to basically threaten Congress not to investigate. They will investigate, and when (unrelated) the economy tanks, he'll blame it on the investigation. #sad

Nixon basically said the same thing in his SOTU.

I would be willing to bet Clinton said the same thing about his investigation (might be wrong).

That’s just how these things go.

Alan

You are right about Nixon. You are incorrect about Clinton.

Silly Willy wrote:

But look at that, 76% approved of his message. 59% strongly approved. Congress needs to stop the silly butthurt partisanship.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2019/02/05/cnn_instant_poll_76_of_viewers_approved_of_trump_state_of_the_union.html

1) Yes, 76% of those who viewed the SOTU approved.

2) But the group that viewed it was not a random cross-section of all U.S. voters. In fact it was the most partisan audience in eighteen years, and it's predictable enough that a heavily pro-Trump audience would mostly approve of his performance.

3) OTOH I'm pleased that you now accept polls from CNN as reliable, and I conclude that you will continue to see CNN as a trustworthy news source in the future. Good for you. (Personally, I never--as in never--watch CNN.) We'll check their next regular presidential-approval poll to see how DJT actually stands with the voting public at large.

Fat hurts wrote:

Wrong choice wrote:

That was perhaps the worst choice of a SOTU response I've seen in 40+ years of watching the SOTU. I guess it is good she didn't take a sip of water.

I thought she was fantastic.

Stacy Abrams gave the best response in recent memory.

I thought she was pretty good. I think she could have left out at least half of the personal stories; gave it a touch of a self-serving tone. But still, pretty good.

Silly Willy wrote:

Wrong choice wrote:

That was perhaps the worst choice of a SOTU response I've seen in 40+ years of watching the SOTU. I guess it is good she didn't take a sip of water.

Yeah, pretty ridiculous. Why would you put a recent losing candidate up there in the first place? And then have her ramble on trying to stoke "racism" themes the entire time?

But this is what happens when your brain is taken over by T.D.S. Your decision-making skills become that of a spiteful 8 year old.

But look at that, 76% approved of his message. 59% strongly approved. Congress needs to stop the silly butthurt partisanship.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2019/02/05/cnn_instant_poll_76_of_viewers_approved_of_trump_state_of_the_union.html

The reason she was chosen is that the DNC loves her for a Federal job and wants to keep her in the spotlight.

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

L L wrote:

Are you saying that Trump will be re-elected in 2020?

Hello? Been saying that for months.

As long as you admit that it will be a great flop on your part if he is not re-elected.

I took you up on your impeachment date -- I said before end of his term.

For what it's worth, Feb. 2 was a decent call, and I give you credit for picking a specific date. In the grand scheme of things, you likely won't be too far off. Bottom line is that it WILL happen...unless he resigns before that or there is illegal activity (cheating) or aliens from space come down here and make it not so.

Mueller's actions of farming stuff out to other offices says to me that he's not going to tie EVERYTHING up with a bow anytime soon, so I agree with you there. Some of the more complex financial stuff is going to be handled elsewhere (still borne of Mueller's investigation), and that will likely continue even after the serial lying criminal is no longer in office.

This is why Mueller is coming and the SDNY is coming and many other prosecutors are coming, almost all of it originating from Mueller's investigating. Trumpers have been mocking Avenatti, but that's ridiculous. Michael Cohen is going to prison partly because of Avenatti, flipped on Trump because of him, and Trump has been named as an unindicted co-conspirator to TWO FELONIES because of Avenatti. The damage Avenatti has done to Trump is severe...he's the impetus for Weisselberg and probably Pecker to take immunity deals and cooperate.

With all those people coming, led by Mueller, the clown is done.