as have the . . . . wrote:
As have the republicans . . . overreacted. They believe that Shultz will only get democrats vote. But he will also get independents, AND republicans who cannot stand Trump. Not that Trumpers will believe that.
He's not Ross Perot (not to suggest that Perot was very impressive himself). He won't get 19% of the vote. He won't get 9% of the vote. He won't get 5% of the vote. Maybe 3% if he even bothers to get in/stay in the race.
PIO!!! wrote:
as have the . . . . wrote:
As have the republicans . . . overreacted. They believe that Shultz will only get democrats vote. But he will also get independents, AND republicans who cannot stand Trump. Not that Trumpers will believe that.
He's not Ross Perot (not to suggest that Perot was very impressive himself). He won't get 19% of the vote. He won't get 9% of the vote. He won't get 5% of the vote. Maybe 3% if he even bothers to get in/stay in the race.
Ross Perot . . . LOL . . the PowerPoint guy . . . LOL
You are really dumb.
Flagpole wrote:
With the exception of Mueller responding recently to the Buzzfeed article about Roger Stone and Trump, Mueller has been tight-lipped about everything.
Ummm... I thought that the Buzzfeed story was about Trump and Cohen. (Whether Trump had directed Cohen to lie to Congress.) What does Stone have anything to do with that?
Prophetess Sarah Sanders: “God meant for trump to be president.”
So he could be punished really long & slowly, I guess. Along with everyone he colluded with. Trump’s the best candidate liberals have ever had!
as have the wrote:
PIO!!! wrote:
He's not Ross Perot (not to suggest that Perot was very impressive himself). He won't get 19% of the vote. He won't get 9% of the vote. He won't get 5% of the vote. Maybe 3% if he even bothers to get in/stay in the race.
Ross Perot . . . LOL . . the PowerPoint guy . . . LOL
You are really dumb.
Ross Perot is why Clinton was elected...twice!
Third party candidates got 4.9% of the vote in 2016, up from 1.7% in 2012 and 1.4% in 2008. But we had two of the most unlikeabke candidates of all time.
At the end of the day Rs will be in their corner and Ds in there. The final vote willl be determined by gut feelings and how much do I like this guy/girl.
Alan
Good morning! How are all you LRC stable geniuses doing this fine am?
And while we’re at it Nader cost Gore the election in 2000. Well that and a SCOTUS overreach, but the vote total would have still ended up with Bush ahead.
Alan
SDSU Aztec wrote:
Just say No wrote:
Why just not vote for him in the election? Isn't that the democratic way instead of trying to financially ruin him before he runs?
Financially ruin him? The guy is worth $3B and I doubt all if it is in Starbucks common stock and if this strike reduces sales by more than 5%, I would be surprised.
Are the many Dems calling for a boycott just stupid?
Flagpole wrote:
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Yep. Nobody is talking about the Virginia Gov's pics in blackface and with a KKK outfit and he's a democrat.
Ok, well CNN covered it:
https://www.cnn.com/2019/02/01/politics/northam-blackface-photo/index.htmlDemocrats are calling for his resignation:
https://www.cnn.com/2019/02/01/politics/democrats-call-on-northam-to-resign/index.htmlI'll talk about it: he should resign. This has nothing to do with the criminality that is Donald Trump, but ok. Northam is an a$$hole apparently, and he should resign because of this abhorrent behavior.
You are an idiot.
This has nothing to do with HIM.
Flagpole wrote:
Thisthreadisridiculous wrote:
No response.....very very quiet......
I wouldn't be so froggy about the news of the day if I were you.
1) Because a Democrat does a bad thing means nothing at all when it comes to Trump and the investigations into him. Northam is hardly the first Democrat to do something they shouldn't have done, and he won't be the last. He should resign.
2) You are taking the word of Donald Trump, a serial liar and epic distorter of the truth that Rosenstein told him he was not a target. When did Rosenstein tell him that? Trump did not say. We DO know that Rosenstein told him that very early on in the investigation, but we don't know if that is still true or if Rosenstein told him that more recently or if the Mueller investigation knows that Trump will be considered a target eventually. There clearly is no reason for you Trumpers to celebrate here. You should not trust a single thing Trump says, and if you do, you are a fool.
With all the smoke around Trump...with all the facts that show he only hires criminals...with Stone already softening his stance on whether he will flip on Trump or not...there's no reason to celebrate for you Trumpers.
Mueller is coming. The SDNY is coming (stuff referred to them by Mueller, so Mueller still gets an assist there).
The clown is done.
LOOK!!!! SQUIRREL!!!!!!
Flagpole wrote:
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Yep. Nobody is talking about the Virginia Gov's pics in blackface and with a KKK outfit and he's a democrat.
Ok, well CNN covered it:
https://www.cnn.com/2019/02/01/politics/northam-blackface-photo/index.htmlDemocrats are calling for his resignation:
https://www.cnn.com/2019/02/01/politics/democrats-call-on-northam-to-resign/index.htmlI'll talk about it: he should resign. This has nothing to do with the criminality that is Donald Trump, but ok. Northam is an a$$hole apparently, and he should resign because of this abhorrent behavior.
It’s the Trump effect. He’s turning the whole country racist.
Even Democrats aren’t safe.
PIO!!! wrote:
as have the . . . . wrote:
As have the republicans . . . overreacted. They believe that Shultz will only get democrats vote. But he will also get independents, AND republicans who cannot stand Trump. Not that Trumpers will believe that.
He's not Ross Perot (not to suggest that Perot was very impressive himself). He won't get 19% of the vote. He won't get 9% of the vote. He won't get 5% of the vote. Maybe 3% if he even bothers to get in/stay in the race.
And Trump has zero chance to win, right Flagpole?
Squirreally wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
I wouldn't be so froggy about the news of the day if I were you.
1) Because a Democrat does a bad thing means nothing at all when it comes to Trump and the investigations into him. Northam is hardly the first Democrat to do something they shouldn't have done, and he won't be the last. He should resign.
2) You are taking the word of Donald Trump, a serial liar and epic distorter of the truth that Rosenstein told him he was not a target. When did Rosenstein tell him that? Trump did not say. We DO know that Rosenstein told him that very early on in the investigation, but we don't know if that is still true or if Rosenstein told him that more recently or if the Mueller investigation knows that Trump will be considered a target eventually. There clearly is no reason for you Trumpers to celebrate here. You should not trust a single thing Trump says, and if you do, you are a fool.
With all the smoke around Trump...with all the facts that show he only hires criminals...with Stone already softening his stance on whether he will flip on Trump or not...there's no reason to celebrate for you Trumpers.
Mueller is coming. The SDNY is coming (stuff referred to them by Mueller, so Mueller still gets an assist there).
The clown is done.
LOOK!!!! SQUIRREL!!!!!!
To be fair the CAMPAIGN has been the target, hence so many plea deals and indictments for those involved in his CAMPAIGN. So it ultimately becomes a “who knew what and when” sort of deal and how far the rabbit goes down the hole. His CAMPAIGN committed felonies. The people involved are being prosecuted.
I’ve said all along I think it’s going to be hard to near impossible to tie anything to Trump. He’s stupid but he’s not an idiot. He knows what he’s doing. It’s the same shtick he’s pulled for 40 years. A good con man never gets caught actually pulling a con.
So it becomes a political debate. Do the American People want a president who seemingly can’t control his campaign or administration from commiting felony after felony? Do they want a president who is so toxic to work with he can’t seem to keep important positions filled without someone being “fired” or quitting? Many just don’t give a flying F as long as they have a good job and benefits.
Alan
A record number of people cared enough to vote, with dems having a record 8% advantage.
Why???! wrote:
Are the many Dems calling for a boycott just stupid?
Re: The War on Christmas
Donald Trump, 2015: "We should boycott Starbucks"
https://www.cnn.com/2015/11/09/politics/donald-trump-starbucks-boycott-christmas/index.htmlThe DONALDS wrote:
PIO!!! wrote:
He's not Ross Perot (not to suggest that Perot was very impressive himself). He won't get 19% of the vote. He won't get 9% of the vote. He won't get 5% of the vote. Maybe 3% if he even bothers to get in/stay in the race.
And Trump has zero chance to win, right Flagpole?
I am NOT Flagpole. You know what should have been your first clue? "Flagpole" starts with tbe letter "F" while "PIO!!!" starts with the letter "P". "F" and "P" are different letters.
WEJO, DO AN IP CHECK, AND IF I LIE, BAN ME FOR LIFE!!!!!
jesseriley wrote:
A record number of people cared enough to vote, with dems having a record 8% advantage.
True but will they care enough in 2020?
Trump hasn’t lost any support from his base. Those people will still vote for Trump.
HRC was unelectable hence many stayed home.
I’ve said this time and time again. It’s all about getting your people to the polls. If we had higher turnout then it would be about changing votes, but it’s not. It’s about exciting your vote enough to get them off their butts to vote.Plenty of fanatical Rs and Ds stay home and just debate on FB instead of actually voting.
Alan
Just Another LRC Idiot wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
With the exception of Mueller responding recently to the Buzzfeed article about Roger Stone and Trump, Mueller has been tight-lipped about everything.
Ummm... I thought that the Buzzfeed story was about Trump and Cohen. (Whether Trump had directed Cohen to lie to Congress.) What does Stone have anything to do with that?
Yes. Cohen and Trump, not Roger Stone. Had Stone on the brain apparently. I apologize unreservedly.
Dem tRump wrote:
Why???! wrote:
Are the many Dems calling for a boycott just stupid?
Re: The War on Christmas
Donald Trump, 2015: "We should boycott Starbucks"
https://www.cnn.com/2015/11/09/politics/donald-trump-starbucks-boycott-christmas/index.html
LOL!!!!!
The DONALDS wrote:
PIO!!! wrote:
He's not Ross Perot (not to suggest that Perot was very impressive himself). He won't get 19% of the vote. He won't get 9% of the vote. He won't get 5% of the vote. Maybe 3% if he even bothers to get in/stay in the race.
And Trump has zero chance to win, right Flagpole?
Without the cheating, no he didn't. I said several times that there could not be cheating involved by him or his campaign, and that has clearly happened. I can wait until it is official to declare I was right, but that will happen.
RIP: D3 All-American Frank Csorba - who ran 13:56 in March - dead
RENATO can you talk about the preparation of Emile Cairess 2:06
Great interview with Steve Cram - says Jakob has no chance of WRs this year
Hats off to my dad. He just ran a 1:42 Half Marathon and turns 75 in 2 months!
2024 College Track & Field Open Coaching Positions Discussion
Running for Bowerman Track Club used to be cool now its embarrassing