Nice stroll down memory lane here. Great list. I think some of the [dis]honorable mentions are certainly worthy of top 10.
Nice stroll down memory lane here. Great list. I think some of the [dis]honorable mentions are certainly worthy of top 10.
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
I don’t need to defend Trump, he has attorneys for that. Just like the media does not need to try Trump, Mueller has the ability to charge and refer for prosecution or report to Congress. That seems not to be enough for you. Like the Kavanaugh hearing, much that turned out to be wrong and politically motivated. The constant harranging and theorizing here seems over the top. That’s all.
The constant "harranging and theorizing" is what desperate people do. Think about it. It's all they have. There's zero indictments of Russian Collusion or Obstruction. Then, Mueller was forced to come out of a long silence to correct a fake story about Trump doing an unlawful act. Every time they think "they've got him on [something]!", it falls flat.
The huge problem is that currently there is a huge gap of unaccountability of these people - particularly high profile individuals and politicians - who jump to conclusions, cause mob chaos on social media, and are then able to delete their old tweets/posts that end up being completely false. It's happened time and time again now, without any tangible penalty for the offenders.
Silly Willy wrote:
Nice stroll down memory lane here. Great list. I think some of the [dis]honorable mentions are certainly worthy of top 10.
https://theintercept.com/2019/01/20/beyond-buzzfeed-the-10-worst-most-embarrassing-u-s-media-failures-on-the-trumprussia-story/
I wonder what the SDNY would have to say about the Buzzfeed story.
nokaman wrote:
WhyBotherBruh wrote:
There are only two trumpers left on this thread. One cites incorrectly translated Armenian news articles as fact and the other can’t stop consuming ZeroHedge. Using logic won’t help you much here.
Haha! You libs are fools, falling for every fake news story and making ridiculous predictions about Trump which will NEVER happen.
Mueller never
Clownpole forever
Bump.
Have Flagpole and his cronies apologized for yet another MASSIVE FLAGPOLE??!!
Mueller NOPE.
Clownpole DOPE.
Silly Willy wrote:
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
I don’t need to defend Trump ...That’s all.
The constant "harranging and theorizing" is what desperate people do.
Yup. Desperate, and deranged, rabid Trumpers, like Iggy and you, HardLoper,
BREAKING: Trump Defeated!
DACA is OFF-THE-TABLE!
The SCOTUS took no action on Trump’s request that it review DACA to decree he has the authority to end the program.
So, DACA remains in place, and Trump's bogus offer to temporarily extend the program for three-years is a YUGE NOTHINGBURGER!
Marbles player Trump just lost his only marble.
RIP -- Trump's Wall of Ego
https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/426397-supreme-court-takes-no-action-on-daca
Silly Willy wrote:
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
I don’t need to defend Trump, he has attorneys for that. Just like the media does not need to try Trump, Mueller has the ability to charge and refer for prosecution or report to Congress. That seems not to be enough for you. Like the Kavanaugh hearing, much that turned out to be wrong and politically motivated. The constant harranging and theorizing here seems over the top. That’s all.
The constant "harranging and theorizing" is what desperate people do. Think about it. It's all they have. There's zero indictments of Russian Collusion or Obstruction. Then, Mueller was forced to come out of a long silence to correct a fake story about Trump doing an unlawful act. Every time they think "they've got him on [something]!", it falls flat.
The huge problem is that currently there is a huge gap of unaccountability of these people - particularly high profile individuals and politicians - who jump to conclusions, cause mob chaos on social media, and are then able to delete their old tweets/posts that end up being completely false. It's happened time and time again now, without any tangible penalty for the offenders.
Dude! Sorry you missed so much news! here, I'll help you get back up to speed, with a list of indictments of trumpers and associates. . And we're not done yet, obvi - Don Jr, Ivanka, POTUS are still up the food chain. It's an old fashioned Gambine-style roll-up!
George Papadopoulos,
Paul Manafort (gave secret internal polling info to russian intelligence!)
Rick Gates
Michael Flynn
13 Russian nationals and three Russian companies
Richard Pinedo
Alex van der Zwaan
Konstantin Kilimnik
12 Russian GRU officers
Michael Cohen
Ok, now proceed with your 'but those weren't collusion' and quickly abandon all your moral standing and admit you are an amoral political creature who only cares about his political party winning.
Silly Willy wrote:
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
I don’t need to defend Trump, he has attorneys for that. Just like the media does not need to try Trump, Mueller has the ability to charge and refer for prosecution or report to Congress. That seems not to be enough for you. Like the Kavanaugh hearing, much that turned out to be wrong and politically motivated. The constant harranging and theorizing here seems over the top. That’s all.
The constant "harranging and theorizing" is what desperate people do. Think about it. It's all they have. There's zero indictments of Russian Collusion or Obstruction. Then, Mueller was forced to come out of a long silence to correct a fake story about Trump doing an unlawful act. Every time they think "they've got him on [something]!", it falls flat.
The huge problem is that currently there is a huge gap of unaccountability of these people - particularly high profile individuals and politicians - who jump to conclusions, cause mob chaos on social media, and are then able to delete their old tweets/posts that end up being completely false. It's happened time and time again now, without any tangible penalty for the offenders.
First, you don't know what you are talking about. Tiny's campaign chairman, Paul Manafort has already been convicted of collusion. In legal terms it's known as conspiracy. That's right. The president's campaign chairman was convicted of Conspiracy against the United States of America.
Second, we don't actually need to theorize and speculate. 33 people and companies have been indicted so far. Many have already been convicted.
But it is interesting to theorize and speculate about where we go from here. It's fun to try to predict the future.
And given what we know, here is a prediction that is very likely to come true:
Tiny is going to prison.
more of these and maybe the Rs in the Senate will start sending out some mixed messages on DJT
head to head polling just released. Dems, any dems, crushing the least popular president in modern history.
Biden 53%, Trump 41%
Sanders 51%, Trump 41%
Harris 48%, Trump 41%
O’Rourke 47%, Trump 41%
Warren 48%, Trump 42%
Booker 47%, Trump 42%
Gillibrand 47%, Trump 42%
Silly Willy wrote:
nokaman wrote:
Haha! You libs are fools, falling for every fake news story and making ridiculous predictions about Trump which will NEVER happen.
Mueller never
Clownpole forever
Bump.
Have Flagpole and his cronies apologized for yet another MASSIVE FLAGPOLE??!!
Mueller NOPE.
Clownpole DOPE.
I don't know if you consider me to be one of Flagpole's cronies, but we do agree more often than not.
I will state for the record that I have never commented on this incident. I don't understand why anyone ever found it interesting or important.
Also for the record, agip did apologize.
Silly Willy wrote:
nokaman wrote:
Haha! You libs are fools, falling for every fake news story and making ridiculous predictions about Trump which will NEVER happen.
Mueller never
Clownpole forever
Bump.
Have Flagpole and his cronies apologized for yet another MASSIVE FLAGPOLE??!!
Mueller NOPE.
Clownpole DOPE.
Check out @roflinds’s Tweet:
https://twitter.com/roflinds/status/1087486166939680768?s=09Those white boys were looking for trouble. They are the same type of cockazoid troglodytes who display Trump banners and shout "Trump Trump" or "Build the wall" at high school sporting events against Black opponents. They knew exactly what they were doing but yet they try to act like they are shocked and surprised by the reaction of others.
honestly, if you are going to judge people on that very short clip, then you have learned nothing from this whole episode.
agip wrote:
more of these and maybe the Rs in the Senate will start sending out some mixed messages on DJT
head to head polling just released. Dems, any dems, crushing the least popular president in modern history.
Biden 53%, Trump 41%
Sanders 51%, Trump 41%
Harris 48%, Trump 41%
O’Rourke 47%, Trump 41%
Warren 48%, Trump 42%
Booker 47%, Trump 42%
Gillibrand 47%, Trump 42%
Anyone test Michael Bloomberg?
Wonder if Fox News will show this video wrote:
Pookie Washington wrote:
Check out @roflinds’s Tweet:
https://twitter.com/roflinds/status/1087486166939680768?s=09Take a look at these poor misunderstood white RepubliKKKKan kids doing what they do best. Notice in the comments how the right wingers try to make excuses for their behavior. They all want to make up shittt that COULD have happen. Thats one of the favorite go to lines of the racist right when faced with police brutality videos. "We don't know what happen before the video started". How about admitting that they are a bunch of little a$$holes.
By the way, did you notice that no Caucassians came to the defense of Kareem Hunt by using their go to "We don't know what happen before the video started" excuse.
Wow...so these idiots are not the choir boys Fox News made them out to be.
I wish those brats would have left the Mall and traveled up 7th Street to Howard University wearing those stupid azz clown hat's screaming build the wall. Get up in somebody's face up there and the result would have been much different. I can say with complete confidence that smug look would have been forcibly removed from his face.
agip wrote:
more of these and maybe the Rs in the Senate will start sending out some mixed messages on DJT
head to head polling just released. Dems, any dems, crushing the least popular president in modern history.
Biden 53%, Trump 41%
Sanders 51%, Trump 41%
Harris 48%, Trump 41%
O’Rourke 47%, Trump 41%
Warren 48%, Trump 42%
Booker 47%, Trump 42%
Gillibrand 47%, Trump 42%
Source?
That’s scary and not in a good way for either party. It’s like a blank check to allow any Dem in office only because he/she is not Trump.
We don’t need a “not-Trump” in the same way we don’t need a “not-Clinton” or “not-Obama”.
Alan
Runningart2004 wrote:
agip wrote:
more of these and maybe the Rs in the Senate will start sending out some mixed messages on DJT
head to head polling just released. Dems, any dems, crushing the least popular president in modern history.
Biden 53%, Trump 41%
Sanders 51%, Trump 41%
Harris 48%, Trump 41%
O’Rourke 47%, Trump 41%
Warren 48%, Trump 42%
Booker 47%, Trump 42%
Gillibrand 47%, Trump 42%
Source?
That’s scary and not in a good way for either party. It’s like a blank check to allow any Dem in office only because he/she is not Trump.
We don’t need a “not-Trump” in the same way we don’t need a “not-Clinton” or “not-Obama”.
Alan
well, to be fair, those are all US senators and reps etc. - we're not talking some guy of the street.
https://www.publicpolicypolling.com/polls/trump-polling-at-only-41-42-against-possible-democratic-foes/agip wrote:
more of these and maybe the Rs in the Senate will start sending out some mixed messages on DJT
head to head polling just released. Dems, any dems, crushing the least popular president in modern history.
Biden 53%, Trump 41%
Sanders 51%, Trump 41%
Harris 48%, Trump 41%
O’Rourke 47%, Trump 41%
Warren 48%, Trump 42%
Booker 47%, Trump 42%
Gillibrand 47%, Trump 42%
I wonder how such numbers compare to similar polling numbers for recent first term presidents? Sitting presidents have a huge advantage as is born out with reelection results in the past. Did polls 2 years prior to the reelection point to the sitting POTUS winning reelection? Or were they more like the above?
Wonder if Fox News will show this video wrote:
Pookie Washington wrote:
Check out @roflinds’s Tweet:
https://twitter.com/roflinds/status/1087486166939680768?s=09Take a look at these poor misunderstood white RepubliKKKKan kids doing what they do best. Notice in the comments how the right wingers try to make excuses for their behavior. They all want to make up shittt that COULD have happen. Thats one of the favorite go to lines of the racist right when faced with police brutality videos. "We don't know what happen before the video started". How about admitting that they are a bunch of little a$$holes.
By the way, did you notice that no Caucassians came to the defense of Kareem Hunt by using their go to "We don't know what happen before the video started" excuse.
Wow...so these idiots are not the choir boys Fox News made them out to be.
Them being choir boys (or not) is not relevant to what happened in the widely publicized videos.
agip wrote:
Runningart2004 wrote:
Source?
That’s scary and not in a good way for either party. It’s like a blank check to allow any Dem in office only because he/she is not Trump.
We don’t need a “not-Trump” in the same way we don’t need a “not-Clinton” or “not-Obama”.
Alan
well, to be fair, those are all US senators and reps etc. - we're not talking some guy of the street.
https://www.publicpolicypolling.com/polls/trump-polling-at-only-41-42-against-possible-democratic-foes/
It is not obvious to me that we do any better by taking some guy from the US Senate or House of Reps rather than taking some guy off the street.
Runningart2004 wrote:
agip wrote:
more of these and maybe the Rs in the Senate will start sending out some mixed messages on DJT
head to head polling just released. Dems, any dems, crushing the least popular president in modern history.
Biden 53%, Trump 41%
Sanders 51%, Trump 41%
Harris 48%, Trump 41%
O’Rourke 47%, Trump 41%
Warren 48%, Trump 42%
Booker 47%, Trump 42%
Gillibrand 47%, Trump 42%
Source?
That’s scary and not in a good way for either party. It’s like a blank check to allow any Dem in office only because he/she is not Trump.
We don’t need a “not-Trump” in the same way we don’t need a “not-Clinton” or “not-Obama”.
Alan
I’m more than happy to see the not-Trumps compete for the spot. These figures are just a simple reflection of his massive incompetence.
Jakob Ingebrigtsen has a 1989 Ferrari 348 GTB and he's just put in paperwork to upgrade it
Is there a rule against attaching a helium balloon to yourself while running a road race?
Strava thinks the London Marathon times improved 12 minutes last year thanks to supershoes
How rare is it to run a sub 5 minute mile AND bench press 225?
Mark Coogan says that if you could only do 3 workouts as a 1500m runner you should do these
Am I living in the twilight zone? The Boston Marathon weather was terrible!
Move over Mark Coogan, Rojo and John Kellogg share their 3 favorite mile workouts