Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Not only wrote:

Brighto stooge wrote:

Aren't you the guy who guaranteed Trump would not win the election and who further promised to never return to letsrun if you were proved wrong?

Will you make the same promise about your current claims?

And this time keep your promise when proved wrong?

Don’t forget that Kavanaugh would NOT be confirmed.

One of his many “I told you so” moments.

It’s funny that he’ll throw out 100 “guarantees” and if one of them happens to end up being correct, he’ll point out the fact. However, he never mentions the other 99.

Lol

Meh. I was wrong about Kavanaugh. Big deal. I was never as adamant about that as I am about Trump. Also, I didn't "guarantee" Kavanaugh wouldn't be confirmed and I never said ZERO chance like I did about Trump either. Finally, go find all these 100 guarantees I have made...you won't be able to.

I have been very strong about exactly four things here at Letsrun since 2001:

1) Ritz would break 13:00 for 5000. -- HAPPENED

2) Obama would beat Romney. -- HAPPENED

3) Trump had ZERO chance to win the 2016 election...with the caveat that there was no cheating or aliens from space didn't make us vote for him. -- HAPPENED (for conspiracy has occurred, but I'm willing to put this off until it is official)

4) That the clown is done. -- STILL WAITING, BUT THIS WILL BE TRUE ALSO.

Runningart2004 wrote:

Dontwe wrote:

Don't we already know?

We already know the campaign conspired with Russia. That’s why Guliani is walking back his statesments about the campaign and now saying Trumo didn’t do.... There is also the appearance of obstruction but again it’s hard to prove what someone is thinking when acting.

Alan

You are CORRECT! The will successfully prove obstruction of justice. Trump told us on national television that he fired Comey because of Russia. That is iron clad. Then there are just too many other things too.

Runningart2004 wrote:

Dontwe wrote:

Don't we already know?

We already know the campaign conspired with Russia. That’s why Guliani is walking back his statesments about the campaign and now saying Trumo didn’t do.... There is also the appearance of obstruction but again it’s hard to prove what someone is thinking when acting.

Alan

My comment on what we'll know was to the Buzzfeed story.

Giuliani seems to be setting up a "no matter what the campaign did, Trump wasn't part of it" strategy moving forward on the interaction between members of the Trump campaign and Russia.

agip wrote:

re; the buzzfeed article

Sounds to me that the most likely explanation is that Cohen claims Trump told him to lie, or at leastmade the expectation of lying perfectly clear, but Mueller has no documents that can prove it.

Cohen has a couple of investigations of him occurring at the same time. It's possible that the investigation which came up with the Buzzfeed story was the SDNY investigation and not the SC investigation. That would lead to the carefully worded statement from the SC which was in no way a complete denial of the story. If the SC wanted to issue a denial, they would have simply put out a one liner doing so.

The Fokus wrote:

Runningart2004 wrote:

We already know the campaign conspired with Russia. That’s why Guliani is walking back his statesments about the campaign and now saying Trumo didn’t do.... There is also the appearance of obstruction but again it’s hard to prove what someone is thinking when acting.

Alan

My comment on what we'll know was to the Buzzfeed story.

Giuliani seems to be setting up a "no matter what the campaign did, Trump wasn't part of it" strategy moving forward on the interaction between members of the Trump campaign and Russia.

That is exactly what he is doing. He knows the campaign is dead to rights on this, including Don Jr., so he's just trying to protect Trump at this point.

If we weren’t in the middle of a shutdown then I think this deal would go through. The issue is that the shutdown hurts Trump much more than it hurts anyone else. It’s going to get exponentially worse as we get into Feb. I’m talking financial and personal crisis for millions and millions of people.

Alan

The Wall for DACA deal is bad for the Trump base.

A wall deal isn’t going to have much of a effect on illegal immigration short term and may be even long term. It’s a visual gimmick. A PR stunt. Those heathens will still get in.

But passing a DACA law means these brown people here now get to stay and openly be employed. They hate that.

Did he get Anne Coulter’s permission to offer this?

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

Again, the issue is not who paid for the dossier. The issue is whether it is true or not.

So far, everything that can be verified has been found to be true. Nothing in the dossier has been found to be false.

If it's all baloney, why have there been so many indictments and convictions?

We know the collusion happened and we know it was pretty extensive.

Tiny is going to prison.

Huh? You are really insane buddy.

No, I'm just right.

You got it. February is when it all hits the fan. Not only will the shutdown get exponentially worse, that's also when we expect to see a report from Mueller.

I'm saying there might be a connection. Tiny needs an alternate crisis to be happening when Mueller calls for an indictment.

Originally, I thought Tiny was just too stupid to see that the shutdown would drive bad poll numbers which would help to sink him in a fight with Mueller. I still think that is true.

But I also think that Tiny is stupid enough to believe that creating chaos is a good strategy for dealing with Mueller. Other than escape to exile, it might be the only card he has left to play.

In a few minutes, Tiny is expected to speak about the shutdown and the wall. If he strikes a conciliatory tone with Democrats then I'll be proven wrong. I really hope that I am wrong indeed. But I'm not optimistic.

seekers wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

you could do a comprehensive deal that:

1. Opens the government

2. Funds the wall

3. Provides permanent residence and a path to citizenship for the dreamers...

3. needs to be not only a non-Trump erasable path for dreamers, but also for future dreamers, and asylum seekers. Asylum seekers must be allowed a proper path to entry into the country and citizenship, and not played around with as Trump, and his racist, Stephen Miller, having been doing.

Trump will never agree to do a proper fix for DACA, dreamers, future dreamers, and proper asylum seekers. His base would further lose their minds.

I think Democrats would give him the $5 billion in exchange for a DACA fix on its own. But Tiny won't take the deal.

by any other name wrote:

Hey Dude [HardLoper] wrote:

Hey Dude, your name wouldn't happen to be Steve-Kid, would it?

- Bilbo Baggins

No, Hardloper, it is not.

Good Dog, but you are stupid!

L L wrote:

The Wall for DACA deal is bad for the Trump base.

A wall deal isn’t going to have much of a effect on illegal immigration short term and may be even long term. It’s a visual gimmick. A PR stunt. Those heathens will still get in.

But passing a DACA law means these brown people here now get to stay and openly be employed. They hate that.

Did he get Anne Coulter’s permission to offer this?

No, he didn't get her permission. That's another reason why it won't happen.

Anne is the most powerful person in government right now.

How would you like to be Mitch McConnell and find out that the bill you just passed with the full blessing of the president is now being vetoed by Anne Coulter?

That's exactly what happened and I think Mitch is still sulking about it.

Hey Dude [HardLoper] wrote:

by any other name wrote:

No, Hardloper, it is not.

Good Dog, I AM SO stupid!

Agree.

What makes you think we see a Mueller report in February?

McCONnell has passed the decision making to the Dems and Trump. McCONnell is now in tears because the Dems just shot down Trump deal. He cannot hold a vote until Trump agrees with the Democrats. Oh, the agony!

Trump’s ‘compromise’ proposal asking for billions for border wall preemptively shot down by Democrats as ‘wasteful and ineffective’

Democrats are already pushing back at Trump before he makes his national address.

There have been reports about Mueller wrapping up in the February time frame.

Of course, I don't accept those reports at face value, but I've always thought that the beginning of this year makes sense because the nation needs to digest Mueller's findings before the presidential campaigns get into full swing.

Also, I think he will wait until Barr is sworn in as AG. Mueller doesn't want something of this magnitude to be handled by Whittaker. I'm guessing that Whittaker doesn't want to be the one to deal with it either.

Meuller asked for a 6 month extension, it won’t be released in February. Dems and Flagpole all along should of just waited until the actual report itself came out to get excited or hope President Trump loses in 2020. Judging by Flagpoles comments he doesn’t seem confident Trump will lose in 2020.

Thisthreadisridiculous wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

What makes you think we see a Mueller report in February?

Meuller asked for a 6 month extension, it won’t be released in February. Dems and Flagpole all along should of just waited until the actual report itself came out to get excited or hope President Trump loses in 2020. Judging by Flagpoles comments he doesn’t seem confident Trump will lose in 2020.

Mueller only asked that the grand jury be extended by up to 6 months. That's a standard extension time for a grand jury. If he had not asked for that extension then the grand jury term would have expired already.

So there is nothing stopping Mueller from issuing a report in February and then asking the grand jury to be excused. Also, I'm pretty sure he could issue the report and continue working with the grand jury to tie up loose ends. How it plays out will be at the discretion of the new AG.

Thisthreadisridiculous wrote:

Dems and Flagpole all along should of just waited until the actual report itself came out to get excited or hope President Trump loses in 2020.

0/10

Trumpers have yet to STOP commenting on this thread about Trump's "chances" and "innocents".

PS: Learn to troll better. Thanks.