Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Not even CLOSE to when he said he would. Please do your homework properly Alan, Obama lied.

Merry Christmas!

Ray wrote:

How is it this assclown is still supported by any sane GOP congressman?

The same way idiots on the Left supported Bill Clinton 100% after he lied and not one of them voted to impeach him, not one! Short memory span, eh?

B.O. had the same support from his side, and he lied every day!

But, I still say Merry Christmas Brother Ray!

liberals short memory span is laughable wrote:

The same way idiots on the Left supported Bill Clinton 100% after he lied and not one of them voted to impeach him, not one! Short memory span, eh?

"Five Democrats (Virgil Goode of Virginia, Ralph Hall of Texas, Paul McHale of Pennsylvania, Charles Stenholm of Texas and Gene Taylor of Mississippi) voted in favor of three of the four articles of impeachment, but only Taylor voted for the abuse of power charge."

I suppose it's better to have a short memory span than it is to "remember" things that are WRONG.

I will take this unique opportunity to all Trump supporters to say I hope you have an awful holiday.

liberals short memory span is laughable wrote:

Bill Clinton

B.O.

LOOK! SQUIRRELS!!!

Trump is wagging a bigly WAR on Christmas.

-- turned off the lights on the national Christmas tree

-- quibbled over a 7-year-old's belief in Santa Claus

-- called America "a disgrace"

Fock you too, tRump.

PIO! wrote:

Fentrekker wrote:

This is not Israel, true, but most Americans support Israel and its policies, which are made in the image of what the United States did to Native Americans. The Palestinian people will in 50 years time be as inconsequential and as subdued as American Indians.

Good DOG, you are dumb!

The Native Americans would not be "inconsequential and subdued" if they vastly outnumbered everyone else (as the Palestinians will in 50 years time).

A much better analogy for Israel/Palestinians would be South Africa/Black South Africans.

The conversation is about a comparison between the US and Israel, no reason to bring in SA. The demographic rise about Arabs is overstated, and make no mistake, we will bury the Palestinians within two generations. AntiZionists think they can malign us but they are merely complimenting us when they say we will marginalize the Arabs. They can breed in Egypt if they want but they will not be in Israel in 50years.

LhatiSissou wrote:

I will take this unique opportunity to all Trump supporters to say I hope you have an awful holiday.

That's a rotten thing to say, even in jest.

Grace and peace to you all.

ShimonH wrote:

PIO! wrote:

Good DOG, you are dumb!

The Native Americans would not be "inconsequential and subdued" if they vastly outnumbered everyone else (as the Palestinians will in 50 years time).

A much better analogy for Israel/Palestinians would be South Africa/Black South Africans.

The conversation is about a comparison between the US and Israel, no reason to bring in SA. The demographic rise about Arabs is overstated, and make no mistake, we will bury the Palestinians within two generations. AntiZionists think they can malign us but they are merely complimenting us when they say we will marginalize the Arabs. They can breed in Egypt if they want but they will not be in Israel in 50years.

Your stupidity is all-encompassing.

Good job!

Fat hurts wrote:

LhatiSissou wrote:

I will take this unique opportunity to all Trump supporters to say I hope you have an awful holiday.

That's a rotten thing to say, even in jest.

Grace and peace to you all.

Why say grace and peace if you don’t really mean it? At least I am being honest. It’s not like most Americans care if their resource footprint screws over the rest of the world.

LhatiSissou wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

That's a rotten thing to say, even in jest.

Grace and peace to you all.

Why say grace and peace if you don’t really mean it? At least I am being honest. It’s not like most Americans care if their resource footprint screws over the rest of the world.

I do mean it.

What does that have to do with a resource footprint?

Fat hurts wrote:

LhatiSissou wrote:

Why say grace and peace if you don’t really mean it? At least I am being honest. It’s not like most Americans care if their resource footprint screws over the rest of the world.

I do mean it.

What does that have to do with a resource footprint?

I'm right of center. I don't agree with Fat Hurts and he doesn't agree with me. But...I believe he's a good guy and means what he says.

PIO! wrote:

ShimonH wrote:

The conversation is about a comparison between the US and Israel, no reason to bring in SA. The demographic rise about Arabs is overstated, and make no mistake, we will bury the Palestinians within two generations. AntiZionists think they can malign us but they are merely complimenting us when they say we will marginalize the Arabs. They can breed in Egypt if they want but they will not be in Israel in 50years.

Your intellect is all-encompassing.

Good job!

Sorry, had to fix my own post.

PIO! wrote:

PIO! wrote:

Your intellect is all-encompassing.

Good job!

Sorry, had to fix my own post.

On second thought, only Flagpole can match my intellect

Runningart2004 wrote:

This whole Syria and Afghanistan decision is a really bad idea. I think this is the millionth time we’ve betrayed the Kurds dating back to the first Gulf War. Without a continued voice in Syria and Afghanistan we won’t have a voice in the aftermath or the future. It’s short sighted and flies against his advisors.

I think the Afghanistan pullout is the worse decision, assuming his plan is eventual complete pullout. Afghanistan will become the new ISIS training ground. These decisions do nothing but ensure another middle eastern conflict.

Alan

Alan, it already IS the next ISIS training ground. It has been for the past 17 years. Their government has done nothing but waste our time and pocket our money while slowly just giving in to the Taliban.

It’s already the longest war in US history and it’s gotten us nowhere. Why are we still even there? The Taliban is as influential now as they were before we invaded and they’re just as unwilling to negotiate. It is a waste of time and money to be in Afghanistan and there is nothing there for us except trillions of wasted dollars. They hate us, and they don’t want us there.

PIO! wrote:

PIO! wrote:

Sorry, had to fix my own post.

On second thought, only Flagpole can match my ignorance on politics

I fixed it for good. Us libs, Flagpole and I, don't know squat and we love to bend the truth in our favor.

sysy wrote:

liberals short memory span is laughable wrote:

The same way idiots on the Left supported Bill Clinton 100% after he lied and not one of them voted to impeach him, not one! Short memory span, eh?

"Five Democrats (Virgil Goode of Virginia, Ralph Hall of Texas, Paul McHale of Pennsylvania, Charles Stenholm of Texas and Gene Taylor of Mississippi) voted in favor of three of the four articles of impeachment, but only Taylor voted for the abuse of power charge."

https://www.politico.com/story/2017/10/08/house-votes-to-impeach-clinton-oct-8-1998-243550

I suppose it's better to have a short memory span than it is to "remember" things that are WRONG.

Nope, you proved your stupidity and bias once again Flagpole. Clinton's Liberal buddies on the left would NOT vote against him.

Try reading the whole truth.

Here's the quote in case the link is too much for you too handle;)

"no member of his own Democratic Party voted guilty on either charge. Clinton, like Johnson a century earlier, was acquitted on all charges."

Corrector of Flagpole wrote:

sysy wrote:

"Five Democrats (Virgil Goode of Virginia, Ralph Hall of Texas, Paul McHale of Pennsylvania, Charles Stenholm of Texas and Gene Taylor of Mississippi) voted in favor of three of the four articles of impeachment, but only Taylor voted for the abuse of power charge."

https://www.politico.com/story/2017/10/08/house-votes-to-impeach-clinton-oct-8-1998-243550

I suppose it's better to have a short memory span than it is to "remember" things that are WRONG.

Nope, you proved your stupidity and bias once again Flagpole. Clinton's Liberal buddies on the left would NOT vote against him.

Try reading the whole truth.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeachment_of_Bill_Clinton

Here's the quote in case the link is too much for you too handle;)

"no member of his own Democratic Party voted guilty on either charge. Clinton, like Johnson a century earlier, was acquitted on all charges."

Impeachment takes place in the HOUSE. Members of the HOUSE do not vote guilty or not guilty; they vote to impeach or not.

Conviction-and-removal or acquittal takes place in the SENATE. Members of the SENATE vote guilty or not guilty; they do not vote to impeach.

The original statement from "liberals short memory span is laughable" was that "not one" Democrat voted to impeach Clinton. LSMSIL was wrong five times over.

Fat hurts wrote:

LhatiSissou wrote:

Why say grace and peace if you don’t really mean it? At least I am being honest. It’s not like most Americans care if their resource footprint screws over the rest of the world.

I do mean it.

What does that have to do with a resource footprint?

I think, probably, the point was that it doesn’t really matter what most people say who live in the developed world, left, right or center, because you live at the expense of those in the developing world. You can say all the nice stuff you want; you are still part of a system of exploitation. No doubt it makes you sleep better to say certain things. It does about as much good as putting a bag over your head.