TruthforAmerica wrote:
some incredibly verbose drivel
Hey, Lying Gary! Come on, Lying Gary, you can to better than that regurgitated drivel.
Can't you?
TruthforAmerica wrote:
some incredibly verbose drivel
Hey, Lying Gary! Come on, Lying Gary, you can to better than that regurgitated drivel.
Can't you?
The throes of death of the GOP continue. Oh, the agony.
Kansas GOPers Dinah Sykes and Stephanie Clayton flip to Democrat because far-right takeover is getting worse
I'm not interested in reading something you pasted from the internet.
Please post your own thoughts and opinions.
Fat hurts wrote:
TruthforAmerica wrote:
some incredibly verbose drivel
I'm not interested in reading something you pasted from the internet.
Please post your own thoughts and opinions.
Lying Gary doesn't have thoughts. He has regurgitations.
Is the sand getting in your eyes? Don't have time for advice from a distinguished Russia scholar?
TruthforAmerica wrote wrote:
Fat hurts wrote:
I'm not interested in reading something you pasted from the internet.
Please post your own thoughts and opinions.
Is the sand getting in your eyes? Don't have time for advice from a distinguished Russia scholar?
0/10. You failed to name the supposed distinguished Russia scholar.
TruthforAmerica wrote wrote:
Fat hurts wrote:
I'm not interested in reading something you pasted from the internet.
Please post your own thoughts and opinions.
Is the sand getting in your eyes? Don't have time for advice from a distinguished Russia scholar?
This is a discussion board. Something you pasted from the internet is not a discussion.
A small quote from an expert will be read by me if it is in the context of your own analysis.
When I want to read expert opinions, I go to those sources.
Fat hurts wrote:
TruthforAmerica wrote wrote:
Is the sand getting in your eyes? Don't have time for advice from a distinguished Russia scholar?
This is a discussion board. Something you pasted from the internet is not a discussion.
A small quote from an expert will be read by me if it is in the context of your own analysis.
When I want to read expert opinions, I go to those sources.
Except you don't bother to go to those sources. His name is Stephen F. Cohen
TruthforAmerica wrote:
Fat hurts wrote:
This is a discussion board. Something you pasted from the internet is not a discussion.
A small quote from an expert will be read by me if it is in the context of your own analysis.
When I want to read expert opinions, I go to those sources.
Except you don't bother to go to those sources. His name is Stephen F. Cohen
What kind of Russian name is Stephen F. Cohen?
Russka wrote:
TruthforAmerica wrote:
Except you don't bother to go to those sources. His name is Stephen F. Cohen
What kind of Russian name is Stephen F. Cohen?
Well, things are not so bad in this country yet that Jews from the South can't become fluent in Russian and spend a lifetime learning the history that is denied to most Russians. He is a world expert on the country.
TruthforAmerica wrote:
Fat hurts wrote:
This is a discussion board. Something you pasted from the internet is not a discussion.
A small quote from an expert will be read by me if it is in the context of your own analysis.
When I want to read expert opinions, I go to those sources.
Except you don't bother to go to those sources. His name is Stephen F. Cohen
-- Cathy Young characterized Cohen's 2014 article on "Kiev's atrocities" (mentioned above) as "error-riddled" and an "embarrassing" repetition of Kremlin propaganda.
Putin’s Pal
Stephen Cohen was once considered a top Russia historian. Now he publishes odd defenses of Vladimir Putin. The Nation just published his most outrageous one yet.
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2014/07/stephen-cohen-vladimir-putins-apologist-the-nation-just-published-the-most-outrageous-defense-of-the-russian-president.htmlAnother great day for Trump!
Stock market down another 350 points.
Walks back a promise to shut down the government over border wall funding, can't keep his word and the wall won't be built (and even if it was, we'd be paying for it, not Mexico).
Bans bump stocks, far more significant than any gun control legislation passed by Obama/Dems, despite promises to defend 2nd amendment.
Trump just keeps selling out his base, and they keep coming back for more.
evaluation wrote:
TruthforAmerica wrote:
Except you don't bother to go to those sources. His name is Stephen F. Cohen
-- Cathy Young characterized Cohen's 2014 article on "Kiev's atrocities" (mentioned above) as "error-riddled" and an "embarrassing" repetition of Kremlin propaganda.
Putin’s Pal
Stephen Cohen was once considered a top Russia historian. Now he publishes odd defenses of Vladimir Putin. The Nation just published his most outrageous one yet.
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2014/07/stephen-cohen-vladimir-putins-apologist-the-nation-just-published-the-most-outrageous-defense-of-the-russian-president.html
So, Lying Gary is spouting the gospel of a Putin propagandist. Why am I not surprised?
TruthforAmerica wrote:
Fat hurts wrote:
This is a discussion board. Something you pasted from the internet is not a discussion.
A small quote from an expert will be read by me if it is in the context of your own analysis.
When I want to read expert opinions, I go to those sources.
Except you don't bother to go to those sources. His name is Stephen F. Cohen
I read expert opinions every day.
What I don't do is paste them or post links to them when I want to make a point. I use my own words to express my own thoughts.
By the same token, I'm not interested in what you've read, but I might be interested in what you personally have to say.
Stephen Cohen? Really?
Good morning! How are all you LRC stable geniuses doing this fine am?
The Criminal Justice Reform Bill was a big deal, so instead of talking about that and how it was a bipartisan success it’s overshadowed by some seemingly drunk ISIS tweet and follow on marketing video. Maybe Trump is upset because the bill wasn’t single handedly directed by him? As the Commander in Chief he can pretty much direct the military to do what he wants, even though everyone at the Pentagon and every Republican in Congress is telling him it’s a bad idea. I think he just wanted a win that was his own and to fulfill a campaign promise before he starts the run up to 2020.
It makes political and military sense to keep a few thousand troops in Iraq and Afghanistan for training purposes. Heck the Army even has new Brigades just recently created for this purpose (SFAB).
Alan
Runningart2004 wrote:
It makes political and military sense to keep a few thousand troops in Iraq and Afghanistan for training purposes. Heck the Army even has new Brigades just recently created for this purpose (SFAB).
Alan
Serious question : why? How many more green on blue attacks until it's the last straw? How many more tax payers dollars wasted? The Taliban has more of a presence in Afghanistan now than they did in 2001. We have literally gone backwards and the only thing we have to show for it is an unholy credit card bill and the lost lives of many. I understand wanting to be the leaders of the free world and inspiring other nations, but God himself would not be able to bring peace to that region.
Just saw this in the news :
North Korea said it wouldn’t give up its nuclear arsenal until the U.S. first removed its nuclear threat, raising fresh doubts about a breakthrough in stalled bilateral talks
lol
PIO! wrote:
Runningart2004 wrote:
It all begins and ends with Flynn. Why else would Trump try to get Comey to stop the investigation into Flynn. If you say Comey lied about that whats the motivation?
Trump brought this on himself.
Alan
Not having perfect insight into the motivations of Trump in trying to get Comey to stop the investigation into Flynn is extraordinarily week evidence to back up the specific claim; "It all begins and ends with Flynn."
I'm beginning to think Flagpole and his predictions are going to be another bust. No way Trump won't finish his first term, which is what HE has claimed for about 1 1/2 years now. Seacrest OUT!!!!