Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

He's taken the opportunity to give up even more intel to reduce his sentence and it must be juicy. How dumb are you?

Wait for it wrote:

He's taken the opportunity to give up even more intel to reduce his sentence and it must be juicy. How dumb are you?

Well, that depends on the scale, doesn't it?

Compared to the average squirrel I would not do very well.

But among retarded earthworms I think I might be considered above average

It all begins and ends with Flynn. Why else would Trump try to get Comey to stop the investigation into Flynn. If you say Comey lied about that whats the motivation?

Trump brought this on himself.

Alan

Runningart2004 wrote:

It all begins and ends with Flynn. Why else would Trump try to get Comey to stop the investigation into Flynn. If you say Comey lied about that whats the motivation?

Trump brought this on himself.

Alan

Not having perfect insight into the motivations of Trump in trying to get Comey to stop the investigation into Flynn is extraordinarily week evidence to back up the specific claim; "It all begins and ends with Flynn."

PIO! wrote:

Runningart2004 wrote:

It all begins and ends with Flynn. Why else would Trump try to get Comey to stop the investigation into Flynn. If you say Comey lied about that whats the motivation?

Trump brought this on himself.

Alan

Not having perfect insight into the motivations of Trump in trying to get Comey to stop the investigation into Flynn is extraordinarily week evidence to back up the specific claim; "It all begins and ends with Flynn."

0/10, fake PIO!. Week evidence, indeed.

week wrote:

PIO! wrote:

Not having perfect insight into the motivations of Trump in trying to get Comey to stop the investigation into Flynn is extraordinarily week evidence to back up the specific claim; "It all begins and ends with Flynn."

0/10, fake PIO!. Week evidence, indeed.

The logical thinking capability is absent in this ^ one.

NO MORE beautiful solid wall. Trump now plans a cheaper see through fence so he knows when bad hombres are approaching.

....It will be beautiful and, at the same time, give our Country the security that our citizens deserve. It will go up fast and save us BILLIONS of dollars a month once completed!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 19, 2018

Good morning! How are all you LRC stable geniuses doing this fine am?

https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2018/07/12/trump-speaks-after-nato-summit-stable-genius-newday-vpx.cnn

Runningart2004 wrote:

It all begins and ends with Flynn. Why else would Trump try to get Comey to stop the investigation into Flynn. If you say Comey lied about that whats the motivation?

Trump brought this on himself.

Alan

No I disagree. Flynn is a nobody. Trump tried to get Comey to stop investigating Flynn because he thought that's what presidents were allowed to do. It wasn't because Flynn knows something special, but rather because our president is, well, a moron.

Wrong. Obama was corrupt, you're just too biased to see it. You don't look for bad when your flavor of the day won.

Monkeys typing wrote:

LL. wrote:

No, I think you are once again wrong...big surprise---and you're a liberal!

It's Liberal Dribble and has been around forever, it's a saying that you should be familiar with. "Drivel" doesn't apply here. You're welcome brother and I took you for someone who would be just a tad smarter. Oh well;)

https://www.pinterest.com/cbirkholtz623/liberal-dribble/https://liberaldribble.wordpress.com

Bueller? Bueller? Bueller? Flagpole? Flagpole? Flagpole?

You were proven wrong on this one Flagpole and you've hidden in the bunker ever since. Yes, Liberal Dribble IS a saying and it's been around for a long time.

Not Alan wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

You are incorrect about Obama. His undergrad degree was in Political Science. He then became a lawyer...both degrees from Ivy League schools. He then was a practicing lawyer with an interest in politics, eventually teaching law classes at the University of Chicago. He then had elected positions at both the state and federal level. His elected positions taught him everything he would need to know about being a governor and/or a president.

The right education.

The right work experience.

The right intellect.

The right morals.

One of the most prepared to ever hold the office.

Wrong. Obama was corrupt, you're just too biased to see it. You don't look for bad when your flavor of the day won.

Obama WAS one of the most inexperienced Presidents. He even said so himself. It’s not debatable.

tHow long did he serve in Congress before he started campaigning for POTUS?

This is coming from someone who would have voted for him a third time.

Monkeys typing wrote:You were proven wrong on this one Flagpole and you've hidden in the bunker ever since. Yes, Liberal Dribble IS a saying and it's been around for a long time.

Sure it's a saying. Created and propagated by idiots who didn't originally know the correct word, which is drivel.

Unless you mean drool (which might be appropriate here, given the context), the closest legitimate meaning is basketball-related, and that's a (lengthy) stretch to apply in this discussion.

Not Alan wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

You are incorrect about Obama. His undergrad degree was in Political Science. He then became a lawyer...both degrees from Ivy League schools. He then was a practicing lawyer with an interest in politics, eventually teaching law classes at the University of Chicago. He then had elected positions at both the state and federal level. His elected positions taught him everything he would need to know about being a governor and/or a president.

The right education.

The right work experience.

The right intellect.

The right morals.

One of the most prepared to ever hold the office.

Wrong. Obama was corrupt, you're just too biased to see it. You don't look for bad when your flavor of the day won.

Yeah, who can forget the Obama Foundation, and Obama University, and all those times his companies went bankrupt, and all those lawsuits by people he stiffed when he didn't feel like paying?

Anglo Canuck in French Belgium wrote:

Monkeys typing wrote:Yes, Liberal Dribble IS a saying and it's been around for a long time.

Sure it's a saying. Created and propagated by idiots who didn't originally know the correct word, which is drivel.

They're just ignorant.

Same thing when they type "special council" and they're twitted--even gently!--and shown the correct spelling ("counsel"):

"Oh, no! No, I really meant 'council'! See, because . . ." and then some convoluted and entirely unconvincing "explanation" follows.

They simply cannot admit themselves to have been wrong. And the same thing goes for their 2016 vote for Trump: Some of them, at least, realize what a mistake it was--but rather than simply acknowledging that they erred, they double down on their unthinking vote and announce that they will vote for DJT in 2020 as well. Just because.

Trumpists are hardly the only ones of whom this is true, but even a (supposed) know-it-all like Flagpole will occasionally admit that he made a mistake. These folks, never. I guess it's a violation of their own-the-libs ethos.

Not Alan wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

You are incorrect about Obama. His undergrad degree was in Political Science. He then became a lawyer...both degrees from Ivy League schools. He then was a practicing lawyer with an interest in politics, eventually teaching law classes at the University of Chicago. He then had elected positions at both the state and federal level. His elected positions taught him everything he would need to know about being a governor and/or a president.

The right education.

The right work experience.

The right intellect.

The right morals.

One of the most prepared to ever hold the office.

Wrong. Obama was corrupt, you're just too biased to see it. You don't look for bad when your flavor of the day won.

1) My comments about Obama had nothing to do with whether he was corrupt or not (though I say not).

2) If you believe he was corrupt, go hire and lawyer and have at him. Good luck with that.

Runningart2004 wrote:

It all begins and ends with Flynn. Why else would Trump try to get Comey to stop the investigation into Flynn. If you say Comey lied about that whats the motivation?

Trump brought this on himself.

Alan

I agree that there is a lot wrapped around Flynn.

The CIA, under Obama, knew Flynn was talking to Russians.

Sally Yates, the Acting AG at the time assigned by Trump but previously working under Obama as Deputy AG, warned Trump about hiring Flynn as National Security Adviser. But he did it anyway.

Yates was subsequently fired by Trump and replaced by Sessions for speaking out against Trump's travel ban.

Flynn officially was fired by Trump for lying to Pence about his pre-inauguration talks with Russians.

Notice he was not fired for lying to Trump (because, come on, Trump knew and directed Flynn to do that)

This happened while the FBI was charging Flynn with lying to them about this.

Trump asked Comey, head of FBI, to leave Flynn alone.

Then he fired Comey for not dropping the charges on Flynn (smells like obstruction)

Sessions recused himself from any Russian investigations because of his link with rump's campaign.

Deputy AG Rod Rosenstein then appointed Mueller to investigate Russian interference and anything tied to the campaign.

In December 2017, Flynn eventually plead guilty to lying.

A full year later, Mueller suggest no jail time for Flynn because of his complete cooperation.

Yesterday, they pushed back the sentencing because Flynn's lawyer was being smug and acting as if Flynn really wasn't guilty.

Flynn did some shady stuff for Trump and has given a lot of information to Mueller.

Trump can be brought down entirely by the Flynn chain of events.

But if that is not enough they have fraud activities with Cohen.

And there were surely shady transactions with Manafort.

He may have perjured himself in his written responses to Muller and will surely lie under oath given the chance.

And there is an emoluments case going on against him right now.

And how many of his staff had to step down for ethics violations? (like Pruitt)

Monkeys typing wrote:

Monkeys typing wrote:

Bueller? Bueller? Bueller? Flagpole? Flagpole? Flagpole?

You were proven wrong on this one Flagpole and you've hidden in the bunker ever since. Yes, Liberal Dribble IS a saying and it's been around for a long time.

Pffft. No bunker for me. I have no problem admitting that I didn't know some idiot somewhere uses a word incorrectly. You should not promote using that word incorrectly like that. The word is "drivel". Seems the wrong phrase came about out of ignorance.

You are right that I "occasionally" admit when I made a mistake, because I only make them occasionally. To be clear, I ALWAYS admit when I was wrong when it is so...ALWAYS and without exception.