Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Fat hurts wrote:

audi not delivering... wrote:

they are now allowing you to put a $1000 deposit on their all electric SUV which will supposedly be delivered in 9 months but what person in their right mind buys a completely new model car without having the opportunity to test drive that model of car before buying???

I don't want a tesla but at least they let you test drive an example of what you will be getting... thinking about the Jaguar all electric but I'll bet they offer the same situation as audi....

Hundreds of thousands of buyers put down $1000 to secure a place in line to buy a Tesla Model 3. At that time, none were available in the Tesla stores. So a ton of people did reserve a car without ever having seen one in person.

But now the other car companies are trying the same thing with their new EV's. Some have been quite successful. Porsche just announced that they were doubling their initial run on the Taycan because the got so many pre-orders. The car is not due to be out until the end of next year.

Racket wrote:

confident in stupid wrote:

It just illustrates how confident he is in the stupidity of his supporters and the knowledge that all he has is his base so he doesn't have to waste time trying to appeal to anyone but the stupid. He doesn't have to explain not living up to past promises, he doesn't have to explain the harm it will cause to Americans, all he has to do is repeat the catch phrases that his mindless supporters are only able to hear. The important thing is that stupid people are frightened people because when you don't understand simple things, everything is scary. Tell them the border is scary, and that's all they need to hear. I mean, who wants people with "lots of problems" coming into the country. Lots of problems are scary. So scary.

Oh, and drugs. Do Trumpers even know what drug is killing the most people and where it comes from? It's not being carted across the Mexican border. If an entire ocean can't keep out fentanyl, why in the world would spending billions on a wall with Mexico somehow keep it out? And is US the only country with drugs since it shares a border with Mexico? Is that what they believe? So, since the UK is an island an doesn't share a border with Mexico, no drugs there? It's all so stupid and requires an almost complete absence of thought.

You're definitely not wrong, but this is has been true pretty much since 1776 when America was founded ("OH BUT ACTUALLY I'LL HAVE YOU KNOW AMERICA WAS TECHNICALLY FOUNDED ON XX/XX/XXX") and I think it's better to talk about the solution because the problem at this point is somewhat obvious.

Here's a problem with not obvious solution : how do we prevent Donald Trump 2.0 in 4, 8, 16, ... years?

Flagpole wrote:

Racket wrote:

You're definitely not wrong, but this is has been true pretty much since 1776 when America was founded ("OH BUT ACTUALLY I'LL HAVE YOU KNOW AMERICA WAS TECHNICALLY FOUNDED ON XX/XX/XXX") and I think it's better to talk about the solution because the problem at this point is somewhat obvious.

Here's a problem with not obvious solution : how do we prevent Donald Trump 2.0 in 4, 8, 16, ... years?

We need to be on the lookout for a Donald Trump 2.0, but it isn't likely in the near term (I consider 16 years still the near term). Here's why:

1) Trump had a perfect storm that got him elected...a not-likable Democrat candidate in a change election, a brash thought-to-be billionaire who said he wouldn't take money from any big donors, an electorate ready for a populist candidate, and the illegal help of Russia and perhaps Israel and other countries too.

2) Trump 1.0 is going to end up paying greatly for his crimes, his lies, and his populist authoritarian tendencies (let's be clear here, "populist" is mostly used as a derogatory term, and populism typically has a very short life cycle).

3) Now, a Trump 2.0 might try to raise his or her ugly head 30+ years from now...time between Nixon and Trump was about 45 years, so we might find that level of criminality again after at least 30 years. Right now the Republicans have the top two MOST CRIMINAL presidents in Trump (1) and Nixon (2), and unless the Republican Party greatly changes, those mouth-breathers will be the ones to put in the next huge criminal.

Mueller is coming.

The clown is done.

Flagpole wrote:

Racket wrote:

You're definitely not wrong, but this is has been true pretty much since 1776 when America was founded ("OH BUT ACTUALLY I'LL HAVE YOU KNOW AMERICA WAS TECHNICALLY FOUNDED ON XX/XX/XXX") and I think it's better to talk about the solution because the problem at this point is somewhat obvious.

Here's a problem with not obvious solution : how do we prevent Donald Trump 2.0 in 4, 8, 16, ... years?

We need to be on the lookout for a Donald Trump 2.0, but it isn't likely in the near term (I consider 16 years still the near term). Here's why:

1) Trump had a perfect storm that got him elected...a not-likable Democrat candidate in a change election, a brash thought-to-be billionaire who said he wouldn't take money from any big donors, an electorate ready for a populist candidate, and the illegal help of Russia and perhaps Israel and other countries too.

2) Trump 1.0 is going to end up paying greatly for his crimes, his lies, and his populist authoritarian tendencies (let's be clear here, "populist" is mostly used as a derogatory term, and populism typically has a very short life cycle).

3) Now, a Trump 2.0 might try to raise his or her ugly head 30+ years from now...time between Nixon and Trump was about 45 years, so we might find that level of criminality again after at least 30 years. Right now the Republicans have the top two MOST CRIMINAL presidents in Trump (1) and Nixon (2), and unless the Republican Party greatly changes, those mouth-breathers will be the ones to put in the next huge criminal.

Mueller is coming.

The clown is done.

Racket wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

We need to be on the lookout for a Donald Trump 2.0, but it isn't likely in the near term (I consider 16 years still the near term). Here's why:

1) Trump had a perfect storm that got him elected...a not-likable Democrat candidate in a change election, a brash thought-to-be billionaire who said he wouldn't take money from any big donors, an electorate ready for a populist candidate, and the illegal help of Russia and perhaps Israel and other countries too.

2) Trump 1.0 is going to end up paying greatly for his crimes, his lies, and his populist authoritarian tendencies (let's be clear here, "populist" is mostly used as a derogatory term, and populism typically has a very short life cycle).

3) Now, a Trump 2.0 might try to raise his or her ugly head 30+ years from now...time between Nixon and Trump was about 45 years, so we might find that level of criminality again after at least 30 years. Right now the Republicans have the top two MOST CRIMINAL presidents in Trump (1) and Nixon (2), and unless the Republican Party greatly changes, those mouth-breathers will be the ones to put in the next huge criminal.

Mueller is coming.

The clown is done.

Hmmmm

Immigration on the rise, anti-globalist/establishment and nationalist sentiment at an all time high in Europe, bear market in Europe and *checks current favored Democrat to face Trump in 2020; oh, it's Joe Biden, an old white establishment Democrat that no one will really be excited about *... Yep, Trump or Trump 2.0 doesn't stand a chance! This is the tip of the iceberg brother, and I'd watch out for what's happening in Europe in regards to Macron (who for now still holds a good grip on his government), Germany, and the UK where Teresa May might be facing a vote of no confidence for her under-perfomance on the runner up in Most Retarded Vote In 2016 award.

Here's a better reason : If you voted for that clown in 2016, why would you not vote for him in 2020 or someone like him in the future? His approval rating is up, and no one cares if he colluded with Russia. By "no one cares" I mean the average working person or would be susceptible to voting for Trump or Trump 2.0. My point is these people exist and will always exist in large enough numbers to throw the election to Trump or someone like him. So how do you convince them to not? The problem is, what I just typed has been hashed and rehashed so many goddamn times and there still isn't really a clear answer. Your best bet is a bear market in the US (which is probably inbound for 2019) so rich Republicans who held their nose last time at least stay home

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

We need to be on the lookout for a Donald Trump 2.0, but it isn't likely in the near term (I consider 16 years still the near term). Here's why:

1) Trump had a perfect storm that got him elected...a not-likable Democrat candidate in a change election, a brash thought-to-be billionaire who said he wouldn't take money from any big donors, an electorate ready for a populist candidate, and the illegal help of Russia and perhaps Israel and other countries too.

2) Trump 1.0 is going to end up paying greatly for his crimes, his lies, and his populist authoritarian tendencies (let's be clear here, "populist" is mostly used as a derogatory term, and populism typically has a very short life cycle).

3) Now, a Trump 2.0 might try to raise his or her ugly head 30+ years from now...time between Nixon and Trump was about 45 years, so we might find that level of criminality again after at least 30 years. Right now the Republicans have the top two MOST CRIMINAL presidents in Trump (1) and Nixon (2), and unless the Republican Party greatly changes, those mouth-breathers will be the ones to put in the next huge criminal.

Mueller is coming.

The clown is done.

1. All true- Trump IS a billionaire not "thought to be".

2. Your TDS is showing

3. You can keep hoping for a Trump indictment which will NEVER happen. Therefore, I conclude that you are a silly, TDS infected, mouth breathing clown.

Thanks for providing us another Clownpolian Classic and the the inevitable Flagpolian Flop. You will never get that greatest "I told you so".

I will.

Mueller never

Clownpole forever

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

You are really a simpleton, wanting everything and anything to show that Trump was legitimately elected. Google wasn't the only way Russia intervened, wasn't the only way Trump and his campaign cheated, and either you know that and are just trying spin, or you really don't know that (which wouldn't surprise me).

Trump and his campaign cheated. He will pay the price. He's a criminal. You show that you are a fool by continuing to support him in any way.

You continue to double down on delusion. Don Quixote has nothing on you.

You have so many Flagpolian Flops coming your way that it will take a full page to list them all.

When Mueller wraps up this witch hunt, you will get nothing that you desperately desired for except for my unending "I told you so's."

When this happens, I expect you disappear for several weeks like you did after Nov 2016.

Mueller never

Clownpole forever

Flagpole wrote:

Racket wrote:

Hmmmm

Immigration on the rise, anti-globalist/establishment and nationalist sentiment at an all time high in Europe, bear market in Europe and *checks current favored Democrat to face Trump in 2020; oh, it's Joe Biden, an old white establishment Democrat that no one will really be excited about *... Yep, Trump or Trump 2.0 doesn't stand a chance! This is the tip of the iceberg brother, and I'd watch out for what's happening in Europe in regards to Macron (who for now still holds a good grip on his government), Germany, and the UK where Teresa May might be facing a vote of no confidence for her under-perfomance on the runner up in Most Retarded Vote In 2016 award.

Here's a better reason : If you voted for that clown in 2016, why would you not vote for him in 2020 or someone like him in the future? His approval rating is up, and no one cares if he colluded with Russia. By "no one cares" I mean the average working person or would be susceptible to voting for Trump or Trump 2.0. My point is these people exist and will always exist in large enough numbers to throw the election to Trump or someone like him. So how do you convince them to not? The problem is, what I just typed has been hashed and rehashed so many goddamn times and there still isn't really a clear answer. Your best bet is a bear market in the US (which is probably inbound for 2019) so rich Republicans who held their nose last time at least stay home

1) Americans will not be able to vote for Trump in 2020.

2) Trump has lost people who voted for him in 2016 already, and he won't be gaining more and will continue to lose voters. Voters of his die. Liberal voters become of age. Some disgruntled voters who voted for him before will not do so again.

3) Just as the midterms were a rebuke of Trump, 2020 will be also so that Pence or whomever else runs for the Republicans will lose. Normally that wouldn't necessarily be the case, but he is just too criminal, and the whole Republican Party will suffer.

4) I see the stuff going on in Europe, but we aren't Europe.

5) Oh...we also have another part of the perfect storm, and that is Jill Stein running for the Green Party when she was a dinner guest of Putin's along with Flynn. Will be interesting to see if she was a willing participant in the conspiracy. I actually don't think so, but it will be good to know that for sure she wasn't.